Cannes Film Festival 2013

Season premiere review: 'Bored to Death' - 'The Blonde in the Woods': You're in the frame

What did everybody think of the HBO private eye comedy's return?

<p>Jonathan Ames (Jason Schwartzman) shows off at his "Bored to Death" book signing.</p>

Jonathan Ames (Jason Schwartzman) shows off at his "Bored to Death" book signing.

Credit: HBO

As I wrote about at the start of "Bored to Deathseason 2, I think I've come to terms that the parts of the show I enjoy (George and/or Ray on their own, the three guys on a job together) and the parts I don't (anything to do with Jonathan by himself, and also some parts of Jonathan interacting with the other two) aren't going to change, that Danson and Galifianakis are just funny enough to overcome my dislike of the Jonathan Ames character and/or the way Schwartzman plays him, and that it's therefore not something I'll write about much.(*)

(*) If at all. I wound up not writing about season 2 again after that initial post, and we'll see if HBO winds up ordering a fourth season. For all the publicity about how Danson would get to do both "CSI" and this, it was easy to say, given that "Bored to Death" season 3 was already in the can. I have no idea whether CBS will let him do a fourth season, whether HBO would bother with a fourth without him, whether its banishment to Mondays (due to an overload of original programming) suggests HBO doesn't have future plans for it, etc.

For those of you who are still sticking with it, how did you feel about the season premiere? Are you glad to see Jonathan becoming more accomplished in both his professional lives? Did the level of violence (even if it was off-screen) seem off for the show? And how about Ray Hueston, part-time dad?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Chris

    Alan, did you catch that the knife thrower's name was Throwdini?

    October 10, 2011 at 9:50PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall I did not, no. If an intentional NewsRadio nod (as opposed to it being an obviously quirky name for a knife thrower), then a nice touch.

      October 10, 2011 at 9:55PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Chris Regrettably, it appears that while the knife-thrower took his name from Newsradio, he was simply playing himself within the show. #Newsradio4Life

      October 10, 2011 at 10:22PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    lztouchthedream

    Zach Galifiniakis with a baby is just never not funny. The whole sequence with him trying to get in the door with the stroller was the funniest thing in the epiosde.

    October 10, 2011 at 10:42PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Truck

    I remember being excited about this show before it premiered (what a cast!), but caught a random promo interview with the real Jonathan Ames that just sucked away all that good will (along with all the life in the room). I wasn't surprised at all when the show turned out pretty dull and directionless. I gave up in the second season, but now that you point out that the supporting cast is still good I'll have to give it another try. Every time I've watched it I've been too annoyed to go on.

    October 10, 2011 at 11:23PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    fbihop

    I was not a fan of this premiere. I don't mind Jonathan by himself, but don't think that Ray is much fun to watch unless he's interacting with Jonathan or George -- or hopefully both.

    In fact, there were no scenes with Ray and either of the other two. Maybe because of Galifianakis' other obligations, but it seemed weird to have a premiere where one of the three main characters was split off into his own, unfunny plot.

    October 11, 2011 at 12:38AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ian

    This grew into a really enjoyable show last season for me. It's slight but delightful. But keeping the guys separated for the majority hurt the premiere a bit. Still enjoyed it though.

    October 11, 2011 at 1:08AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Paul I hear what you're saying. With it being a 2-part episode, I think it's safe to say that they'll be reuniting before too long- and that seperation was by design.

      October 11, 2011 at 10:05AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Rob I can see the possibilities with the baby coming along on cases, it could work or maybe not so much.

      October 11, 2011 at 11:11AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Adam

    The show has upped the Noir style and cinematic feel and I think it works well. That aspect of the show has always been half-baked as Jonathan has been a half-baked detective. It's also funnier. "He was in Menscha" was a damned good line. I'm glad this show is back.

    October 11, 2011 at 7:28PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Adam

    they've upped the noir style and cinematic feel, and it's funnier. "He was in Menscha" is a damned good line. I'm glad this show is back.

    October 11, 2011 at 7:33PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    salamander

    is it just me, or was the season 3 opener a little weak? like i'm a fan of the show, but this was definitely not a memorable episode, in my opinion. perhaps its because very little weed was smoked in this one...

    October 11, 2011 at 8:26PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web