Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Awake' - 'The Little Guy': Conspiracy theories

The second episode keeps the family stories interesting, but stumbles elsewhere

<p>Laura Allen in "Awake."</p>

Laura Allen in "Awake."

Credit: NBC

A quick review of tonight's "Awake" coming up just as soon as I give you a bag of sugar and a spoon...

With "Awake," my question for a very long time was, "Okay, that's a hell of a pilot, but can they do this every week?" And "The Little Guy" doesn't conclusively answer that question one way or the other.

On the positive side, I thought it did very well in continuing to show how Britten's new situation is impacting — and often improving — his personal life. When Rex complains about how he does the laundry in the green world, he can simply wait until he's back in the red world and watch Hannah do it. And Hannah in turn tells him what Rex is up to with the motorcycle, giving Britten the chance to both freak Rex out with the knowledge and be the total cool dad about it. And it remains interesting to see the struggles this situation creates with his family, as well. Hannah is really struggling with Rex's loss, but Mike isn't, because to him, Rex is only a few hours away(*), so they can't entirely find common emotional ground. Similarly, when Hannah finds out about the motorcycle, she's happy, because it's a good memory she can now have about her dead son, where to Mike it's an instance of the very much alive son lying and sneaking around and doing things he's not supposed to be doing.

(*) A question that occurred to me watching this one: so far, the structure seems to be that Britten spends a full day in the red world, lays down on the bed with Hannah and wakes up alone in the green world, lather, rinse, repeat. But what happens if he takes a nap, or gets knocked unconscious, or has to pull an all-nighter in one world because of something happening in a case?

The rest of the episode (which was, like the pilot, written by Kyle Killen, with director Jeffrey Reiner trying to maintain the visual style set up last week by David Slade) was on shakier ground. Though it ultimately turned out to be intentional that the red world case wasn't as interesting as the one in green world — it's there, apparently, to put Mike on the trail of the evil conspiracy responsible for the car accident — it still meant a bunch of scenes of Britten and Vega going in circles and accomplishing little, and Vega's not a rich enough character yet for me to just want to watch them do nothing together.

As for the actual conspiracy scene, with Laura Innes' Captain Harper and an unnamed mastermind played by Hey, It's That Guy! actor Mark Harelik, I know it was supposed to make me all excited about puzzling over exactly what it means. (Was the fact that it took place in the red world — and was not something Britten was present for — supposed to tell us that this is the "real" world and Rex is dead?) But I honestly, truly don't care. It may be that Killen has an absolutely brilliant plan for what's going on, why the Britten family was attacked, why Mike is suddenly shifting from one reality to the other, etc. The problem is, there's such a long trail of shows like this — including "The X-Files," which this scene felt very reminiscent of (and where "Awake" producer Howard Gordon spent a long time) that have failed utterly to provide satisfying payoffs to this kind of mythology-driven storyline that "Awake" enters the game guilty until proven innocent. I'm not interested in why Britten's family was attacked (and why he's being spared), nor which reality is real or any of the rest of it. I just want to watch this guy go through his days (and then go through them again with a different color filter). The other stuff may prove interesting down the road, but I actually groaned when I saw Harper having an ominous meeting on a park bench with a shady man in a nice suit. (At least they had the restraint to not give Harelik a cigarette.)

As I said in my initial review, your mileage may vary wildly on this. You may be watching "Awake" primarily for the mythology and be glad there was such a tantalizing scene at the end of the second episode. Or you may be like me and feel like you've been burned so often before that you don't want to invest in the bigger mystery. Or you may fall somewhere in between.

So let's have at it. Almost everyone seemed to love the pilot episode. What did everybody else think of the second installment?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • 1
  • 2
Next 96 Comments
  • Default-avatar

    Dick Bones

    Another practical question: Does he repeat the same day? And if so, shouldn't he be playing the stock market?

    March 9, 2012 at 12:10AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Dick - Nope. Life is moving forward on parallel tracks. Otherwise, this would be "Day Break."

      -Daniel

      March 9, 2012 at 12:16AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      toonsterwu Day Break ... I actually had some hope for that show. Started off okay, but that was a show that felt like it didn't have more than 13 episodes of story.

      March 9, 2012 at 12:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Greg I thought he would live a day in one universe, then wake up in the other universe and live that same day there. Otherwise, he would be missing a day in one universe every time he was living in the other.

      March 9, 2012 at 3:58AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Dick Bones OK, but does the calendar show the same day in both universes? Does this mean he'll live to be twice as old with half the effects of aging? And shouldn't he be doing simple experiments to determine which one might be reality? Maybe future shows will address this type of thing, at the urging of the "nice" shrink.

      Intriguing premise and execution so far. Not sure how much to trust the writers will deliver in the long run.

      March 9, 2012 at 8:56AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Steve Britten answers why he isn't questioning which "reality" is real in the pilot. When one of the shrinks asks him why he isn't willing to return to reality and get better, Britten answers that he would rather live two parallel lives with both his wife and son instead of giving one of them up by choosing a reality. Britten has no desire to figure out which "reality" is real, so no experiments or anything to figure that out.

      March 9, 2012 at 10:47AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Kshithij

    I agree, I didn't find the conspiracy scene enticing at all, but I have to say, I loved the rest of the episode. The acting on this show is fantastic and the character development and exploration is great.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:13AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Other Scott

    I really like the episode. The cool colour world case was actually pretty neat and would have been a satisfying storyline in a straight procedural, and it's nice to see a case that goes nowhere in the other world, something you don't see very often on TV. The family stuff was well done as well.

    The colours were much more distinct this episode, I'm pretty sure BD Wong had his walls painted because I remember them being green in the pilot, which threw me off a bit.

    The last scene felt like I was back watching The Event again, with a combination of Laura Innes and the references to things that we aren't clear on right now. While that's not a compliment, I can take 2 minutes of that an episode (rather than the 44 that The Event dedicated to it) if the remainder is going to be as good as this show is right now. I don't particularly care about the background mythology, but I can see where it might be needed to keep the show from becoming too dull. As long is it is done well, I'll be fine with it.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      RP +1 on how the last scene reminded me of "The Event." That's actually what made me groan... I kept expecting something really vague and alien-y to come out of Laura Innes mouth. It intrigued me a bit, but I really hope the mythology doesn't consume future episodes... I don't think I'm ready for that yet.

      March 9, 2012 at 1:11AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      LeeZy I didn't watch the Event, and no offense to Laura Innes, but I got horrible flashbacks to the show, mainly because I couldn't stand the absurd commercials I was subjected to.

      March 9, 2012 at 3:13AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Roland

    I understand the sentiment that you don't want to get burned by another show that promises some great and awe-inspiring reveal in the mythology, but the fact is that if they gave you the explanation for the dual worlds in episode one, this show would be much less interesting. The "why" is part of the suspense and the reason I would think you'd be looking forward to tuning in every week.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • I agree. I like how the show is interesting enough for the casual viewer to enjoy it in one shot, but I equally appreciate the mythology that rewards viewers who follow the show weekly. I just hope that it doesn't get so heavy-handed that I'm scrambling for a pad and pen to keep track.

      March 9, 2012 at 12:22AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Cody

    Ugh. I completely agree. I thought Awake would be different. It says something that I simply enjoy watching him in the different realities and seeing how they connect. That last scene was such a turn-off. It wasn't smart writing. It was the typical, ominous conspiracy crap from shows like Lost, X-Files, and Fringe.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:17AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Moneluv

    Hmmmm, what if HE is the one that died in the accident and everyone ELSE is still alive?! Long shot, I know...I'm just having fun watching. :)

    March 9, 2012 at 12:18AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Kevin

    I like how the show is interesting enough for the casual viewer to enjoy it in one shot, but I equally appreciate the mythology that rewards viewers who follow the show weekly. The continuity is nice and I hope that it doesn't get so heavy-handed that I'm scrambling for a pad and pen to keep track.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:19AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JLPatt

    Not a fan of this one. You could tell their budget was much lower as the visual pop of the pilot certainly wasn't here. But besides that I just don't find the police stuff at all interesting, or the bland characters for that matter. And what's up with those silly little scene transition effects they brought in? No thanks. Didn't care for "Event" lady either.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:29AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      toonsterwu The "Event" lady? Guess she's not the "ER" lady anymore, or I'm a bit older than I think.

      March 9, 2012 at 12:31AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JLPatt LOL, don't worry. I never watched "ER."

      March 9, 2012 at 12:40AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bob Hey, I still think of her as Lowell's ex-wife on "Wings."

      March 26, 2012 at 6:21PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    toonsterwu

    I want the serialization aspects ... but this felt ... too soon. I guess they were thinking that they had to have a catch early on to get people to continue, but I think they could've at least waited another episode before throwing that out there.

    The problem I see with this show so far is that the endgame almost has to be ridiculous (in a totally stupid way,a too scientific way, or a "duh, we told you in week 1 that the dude's psyche was messed up" way) to answer why this occurs to Britten, or they go the Lost way and play on the characters, which will annoy some (I guess, there's a third way, which I call the Journeyman way ... give some answers, but play it as it is).

    That said, I enjoyed this episode enough. I enjoyed the fact that they tried to do a bit of everything (developing the characters that Minnette and Allen play, having the conspiracy, etceteras). I guess I like seeing shows try to be aggressive early in their tenure, although again, think they could've waited a week on the conspiracy.

    March 9, 2012 at 12:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Matt

    This is by far the best television show ever based on a Heart song:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41P8UxneDJE&ob=av2e

    March 9, 2012 at 12:49AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      carnie Sigh...if only that 'Barracuda' pilot ever succeeded.

      March 9, 2012 at 4:58PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ray And here I thought it was based on a They Might Be Giants song:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL64Gq-URf4

      March 13, 2012 at 2:03PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    CVAL

    Another game for Milos!

    March 9, 2012 at 1:04AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      C-Man He was also Matthew Broderick's statutory-raping budding in "Election."

      March 9, 2012 at 2:12AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Adam

    I'll give them a week or 2 to add some context to the park meeting. Had it been a phone conversation where one was red, one was green then I think it would have moved forward on the same track without moving to a different one - which that scene felt like.

    March 9, 2012 at 1:13AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Ken Raining Laura Innes was wearing a green shirt, though.

      March 11, 2012 at 9:30PM EST
  • Capthammer_talkback_profile

    Captain Hammer

    Something that bugged me: if one of these realities is just Britten's subconscious, as Killen has said, does it really make any sense that there would be scenes without him present? That struck me as kind of off.

    As for the conspiracy twist at the end, I completely agree. It just felt really out of place for me. And I'm still not entirely crazy about the procedural elements of the show. But the character drama is enough to keep me watching, for now at least.

    March 9, 2012 at 1:22AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Fartius-Expulso I imagine that he is legitimately experience two separate, but real, universes.

      Some scientists believe that the notion of a multiverse is rather plausible. I think that's what this show is, somehow this guy is switching between two actual universes.

      March 9, 2012 at 1:28AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      toonsterwu If they really are going down the multi-verse path (and there are some holes to that idea, but it's certainly possible, and some of the holes can be corrected by their own "guidelines" for multi-verses), I tend to think they are better off just playing it as is for as long as possible and leaving that reveal for another season (if it gets that far).

      I tend to think the reveal of a multi-verse may drive off some folks, whereas the character focused stories on a man willing to sacrifice his sanity to keep his family in some form has a lot more texture to it in terms of character development.

      March 9, 2012 at 1:42AM EST
    • Capthammer_talkback_profile

      Captain Hammer @Fartius - The problem with that is Killen has basically confirmed that, in his mind, one of these realities really is Britten's subconscious. So the multi-universe thing is out of the question.

      March 9, 2012 at 1:55AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      toonsterwu hmm ... hadn't realized Killen had been so explicit about things until now. reading an interview, he seems to suggest that there are clues along the way to tell which one is which.

      March 9, 2012 at 3:39AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Arrow If there is a "real" universe, than it has to be the red one. Not only because of the conspiracy scene but because there is no way for Britten to know his son is building a motorcycle in the green universe.

      Still, the scenes happening without Britten in both realities don't make much sense to me. I think I would prefer a multi-verse explanation at this point.

      March 9, 2012 at 12:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ted Schmoesby why does the presence of scenes without him bother so many people? if nothing happened in whichever reality is "in his mind" without him being aware or involved, he could just solve the accompanying cases instantly. if you dream about being in Los Angeles, do you assume that only the parts of LA that you see in your dream exist there at all or do you assume that the entire city as you know it is still existing around you? I can see why some of you would be thrown off by it, but it makes perfect sense

      March 9, 2012 at 3:40PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Arrow @Ted Schmoesby: Imagine the red universe exist only in his head. If gets to the scene of a murder, it could be that he imagines a dead body first, than imagine how things could have played out, so everything is really happening in the same order as we see them.

      On the other hand, if the conspiracy scene isn't real, how can that scene happen without him knowing about it? For that plot to work, he would need to imagine that conspiracy first, than maybe have some flashbacks explaining everything.

      It's sad but I think this could end up being a big problem for the show, maybe even a fatal one. Even if the mythology of the show isn't that important, it still has to make sense.

      March 9, 2012 at 4:09PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ted Schmoesby @awake, in that scenario, the conspiracy itself could be explained as a subconcious defense mechanism his mind developed from knowing the particpants in some other way or something similar to that. again, I just don't see it as a big deal that events unfold in a subconscious realm of any sort that don't have the principal figure in or aware of them

      March 9, 2012 at 7:07PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Dezbot If he was in fact drunk when the accident occurred, and the two universes is his way of dealing with that, the conspiracy makes even more sense (takes the blame off him for the death of his wife or son). That would make the green world the real world (which still has logic problems, but I'll go with it because I like the show).

      March 13, 2012 at 11:08AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    bitchstolemyremote

    I can imagine that that ending is going to be deeply divisive between the mythology viewers (why is this happening and how and who is responsible) vs the character - for lack of a better word - viewers (how will Michael continue to develop his relationship with wife and son). Our full take here: http://wp.me/p1VQBq-z2

    I'm somewhere in the middle, but I would definitely prefer less of the procedural elements. While it's understandable that they need some structure to the show to maintain casual viewers, if the cases will be this dry, it's going to be a bit of a slog to get through.

    March 9, 2012 at 2:10AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    TVDude

    This is reminiscent of a bunch of other good shows (Life, Castle, ) that do everything right procedurally and charectar-wise - but stumble with this 'overarching plot device' that is completely uninteresting because it is so tremendously cliched and tired and uninspired

    March 9, 2012 at 2:14AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    TVDude

    Ultimately, it's not that I dislike mythologies - but I'd rather they build slowly into this one with as much care as they're taking with the characters and the tone.. It sucks when the ultimate payoff the premise of an excellent show is badly done

    March 9, 2012 at 2:23AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tammy

    Considering that this show's concept is basically the inverse of Lone Star, I wish that show had lasted longer. I think the contrasts would be interesting.

    March 9, 2012 at 2:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Kendra

    The appeal of this show to me is found in the two worlds he navigates. I am a fan of procedurals so I'm fine with the fact this is the structure they're using to showcase those two worlds.

    I already decided after last week that I'm in it for the journey. I don't reall care about the explanation behind the two worlds. The same applies this week with the mythology. Maybe I'll change my mind later but it's not something I'm going to focus on or be upset by.

    I was worried a bit after I read reviews that the show changes a bit after the pilot so I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it. It wasn't as good as the pilot but that pilot was a uniquely good piece of television. A dropoff should be expected.

    March 9, 2012 at 2:44AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jake

    Kill Moves!

    March 9, 2012 at 2:51AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Emperor Graucius Seon Varillian IV

    Maybe both worlds are a fiction in his mind because he is in a coma. In the series finale he wakes up, turns out he was never even married?

    March 9, 2012 at 3:39AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Obese-Barber You theorize that both worlds are delusion. Intrigued.

      March 9, 2012 at 3:40AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      I-Oppose-Theocracy-I-Also-Oppose-Iceberg-Lettuce-Romaine-Is-Better A supreme twist. Agreed. Are there hints to suggest it, or just blind theorizing?

      March 9, 2012 at 3:42AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      KarenX If we're just playing Let's Pretend, I like to imagine a world where he's the one who died and his wife and son are still alive, and one of them drops a hint to him about it. Except that his wife would have said something to him already. But I still like to pretend that.

      March 9, 2012 at 5:19AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Farts-Of-A-Gaseous-Rhino-ewwwwww karenix..........it is...a WAKING DREAM????

      You declare a theory?

      March 9, 2012 at 5:36AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    Kill Moves!

    Will the actor be able to play anything more than homeless man?

    March 9, 2012 at 6:25AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    I was actually bored by the procedural element of the show. Fringe did a similar episode a couple of weeks ago where the doctor implanted "his children" with a genetic mutation which allowed them to be linked telepathicly and when they found out a group of them killed him.

    I am looking for mythology in this show. I liked the character of the son and the wife/mother were deepened and I enjoyed spending time with them. I liked the scene at the end because it shows me that there is something to look forward too.

    right now I am watching

    Alcatraz
    Grimm
    Fringe
    Once Upon a Time

    All five of these shows have universes which are split in 2. 3 of them are procedurals which can be hit or miss so I am looking for something more.

    The most inventive, fun, genre crossing and complex show I am watching write now avidly is Lost Girl and it deals with only one world and has fun with its procedural elements and always makes the world or the main characters its focal point so. I am hoping Awake will give me a more concrete world to walk in.

    March 9, 2012 at 6:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Brian

    "(Was the fact that it took place in the red world — and was not something Britten was present for — supposed to tell us that this is the "real" world and Rex is dead?)"

    On the other hand, the "green world" also had a scene w/o Britten being present, when Rex & his friend were fixing the motorcycle and the girl came to visit Rex.

    March 9, 2012 at 8:23AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall True, and we also saw Hannah out on her own without Mike in red world. So I guess the significance of that isn't that big.

      March 9, 2012 at 9:59AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Narrim

    The conspiracy plot at the end was just bad. It feels like a network mandate or something, that the show can't just be about this guy living two different lives. It needs a hook. It felt both very slapped on and far too soon. I would have been satisfied with Dr. Kerry Weaver keeping a close watch on Britten for a while with scenes like her looking at the computer. The reveal needed more build up than one scene. We needed to feel like she was watching out for Britten or making sure he wasn't crazy or trying to trust Britten again (since he's obviously not in as good a position in the red world) before we get that she's a villain maybe three to five episodes from now, that there is more to his accident.

    The rest of the episode was fantastic, but that final scene just made me groan for a time before every show required this kind of plot.

    March 9, 2012 at 8:55AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dougs

    Maybe the final scene was in a completely separate reality from the red or green, as Innes says something about "taking out his whole family." Whole family?

    March 9, 2012 at 9:13AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      A. VIEWER I had the same thought when I heard that line. Is the real world neither red nor green but, I dunno, blue?

      March 9, 2012 at 3:27PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      mountaineer I wondered the same exact thing..took out his whole family comment confused me. Any thoughts Alan?

      March 10, 2012 at 9:23AM EST
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall Or Harper could just mean that they tried to take out his whole family, and succeeded in killing (from her perspective in the red world) Rex.

      March 10, 2012 at 9:31AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bob Also, consider this: The conspirators were worried about Britten starting to remember details of the accident because of his comments about a "little guy." But in the red world, the phrase "little guy" came from a witness to the homeless man's murder (and Harper knew this). It was in the green world that Britten had a "hunch" about a "little guy." So it's not so clear in which world the conspiracy scene took place.

      March 26, 2012 at 6:33PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Darren

    This episode was kinda boring. Also it irked me that they had that eye opening/rorschach thing everytime he switched realities. The colours were more pronounced in this episode, so it didn't feel necessary and was a lot less subtle than the plane sounds on Lost.

    Also I found the cases hard to follow. And the last scene felt like it was from a different show. And not a show that taps into what I like most about Awake, which is how people deal with grief.

    March 9, 2012 at 9:16AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Steve

    "(At least they had the restraint to not give Harelik a cigarette.)"

    With Innes eating an orange, I was half-expecting him to take out and bite into a green apple.

    I agree that the introduction of scenes not involving Britten opens up a whole new can of worms, and I'm curious to see where it goes, more than anything.

    March 9, 2012 at 9:51AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    HoosOnFirst

    Why don't the two psychiatrists meet and hash this out? Everyone else but the wife and son exist in both worlds.

    March 9, 2012 at 10:00AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Freakazoid_talkback_profile

      mmcb105 Yeah but they wouldn't be aware of the other world, so why would they bother meeting.

      March 9, 2012 at 10:41AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      apearlma Actually, Britten could force things here. He asks each psych something that only they'd know. Find that psych in the other world and tell them that. Obviously, something would go very badly, but it seems to be an episode that ought to likely happen soon at some point - probably involving B.D. Wong's alternate version dying horribly.

      March 17, 2012 at 11:55AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Paul

    Not quite as good as the pilot, but I was fully engaged and enjoying it. Until the last two minutes. I hated the twist. Felt forced, out of nowhere, and totally at odds with the rest of the show. It was so unnecessary. Awake was working fine without it. And doesn't it have enough issues to work out without adding that nonsense?

    March 9, 2012 at 10:02AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ryan

    Not gonna lie here, Alan, I think your career as a TV critic has left you jaded about this potential sci-fi storyline. To say that they are guilty until proven innocent because of other shows' lack of success wit this type of plot seems extremely silly.
    It was about 60 seconds worth of screen time at the end of the show so I fail to see any point in getting worked up over something that maybe might come apart well down the line.
    The writers thus far seem to know what they are doing with this show, so I am more than content to sit back and let them steer this show where they will. If it ends up coming apart because of a sci-fi storyline that doesn't fit, I will worry about it then. I'm happy to enjoy it until that day comes, though. Definitely the best new network show of the year.

    March 9, 2012 at 10:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • 1
  • 2
Next 96 Comments

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web