Cannes Film Festival 2013

WonderCon 2009: 'Up' is Pixar's 'Gran Torino'

Substitute Ed Asner for Clint Eastwood and you get Pixar capitalizing on Geriatric Chic

<p>'Up'</p>

'Up'

Credit: Pixar

Shame on me for doubting anything with the Pixar brand-name attached, but early material from "Up" had me interested, but hardly giddy. 

After seeing 17 minutes from the film as part of Pixar's WonderCon presentation on Saturday (Feb. 28), I'm back on board. 

[Find out why after the bump...]

The five extended clips were funny, instantly human and heartwarming, colorful and fresh. They featured the "Up" money shot of the house soaring through the air carried by a flotilla of helium balloons, but also a different side of the story, one involving the flora and fauna of some obscure South American jungle, including a giant bird and a pack of talking dogs. The clips were all set to a strong Michael Giacchino score and accompanied by the sort of dense sound design that would make Pixar a juggernaut in those Oscar categories except that Oscar voters sometimes don't understand sound editing and sound mixing.

What really got me jazzed, something that hasn't been made clear in the Super Bowl trailer, is that "Up" could (should?) actually be retitled "Pixar's Gran Torino." 

Now are you ready to buy a ticket on May 29?

"Up" is the story of a grouchy old widower living in a rundown house in a neighborhood that has changed over the years. He's uncomfortable with the new world around him, particularly the friendly, obsequious Asian kid who insinuates himself into the old man's life. I'm not giving anything away if I strongly imply that the chubby Asian kid is going to teach the crotchety septuagenerian  how to appreciate life again, or at least see his purpose anew. 

Alas, Clint Eastwood isn't voicing the main character in "Up," but if you're looking for substitutes for an animated comedy, you can certainly do worse than Ed Asner. Newcomer Jordan Nagai is supplying vocals for the kid, Russell, and his comic timing and high-pitched tones seem to have the requisite cuteness and comic timing.

One should never, as I've said, doubt Pixar's ability to turn even unlikely subject matter into hits. "Ratatouille" had a title that kids couldn't pronounce and a hero most of their parents would want exterminated and it was big. "Cars" didn't offer a single relatable character or humorous situation, but I'm told children love that movie. 

A month or two again, "Up" might have seemed like a tough sell. In an industry that can only sell youth (or only attempts to sell youth), would there be any way to market a movie about a grumpy old git and hit floating house? Then "Gran Torino" made more than $135 domestic. 

Obvious put into production many a moon before anybody knew "Gran Torino" existed, "Up" will be able to feed into that wave of Geriatric Chic, but the clips presented at WonderCon give every indication that Pixar has covered its bets. What looks on the surface like a bickering two-hander takes a variety of twists along the way, including the aforementioned talking dogs, who are bound to be kiddie-favorites. 

"If you walk into the theater knowing exactly what you're going to get, it's not nearly as much fun as when you go 'Whoa!'" producer Jonas Rivera told the WonderCon faithful.

In addition, "Up" will have the novelty factor of being the first Pixar movie projected in 3D. For me, that isn't much of an incentive, but Rivera explained that "we're treating the screen more like a window looking in," comparing it to a diorama approach, giving the visuals a new depth of field, rather than things popping off off the screen at viewers.

"Up" opens on May 29.

 

Can't get enough of The Fien Print? Sign up now for HitFix Blog Alerts and receive daily updates.

Don't miss out. Click here to add The Fien Print to your  iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience today.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

 

Dan-feinberg-sm
Daniel Fienberg
Executive Editor
A long-time member of the TCA Board and a longer-time blogger of "American Idol," Dan Fienberg writes about TV, except for when he writes about movies or sometimes writes about the Red Sox. But never music. He would sound stupid talking about music.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Djl-headshot-sketch-squared_talkback_profile

    djloehr

    I've come to the point where I trust Pixar implicitly, so I didn't have the same early doubts about this one.

    But I take a little issue with your dismissal of "Cars." Comedy is subjective, so I won't argue that, but that it "didn't offer a single relatable character" at all?

    One of the reasons I--grown adult male with two sons--enjoy the movie is because it takes a chance that other Pixar films haven't. It starts out with an unsympathetic hero. Only "Toy Story" comes close with Woody's jealousy, but even there, he starts out sympathetic and his shift in character is understandable. But Lightning McQueen is a jerk, plain and simple. I think a lot of critics reacted to that element without considering how or why that might be useful to the story.

    What's more, he gets a lesson in tough love. He's forced to slow down, to stop and smell the motor oil. He genuinely grows and changes over the course of the story, which isn't always the case with Pixar heros. Most of them are recognizably the same lovable selves that started the films. Small lessons are learned, they're better than they were, but this is the only Pixar film where the hero is truly transformed.

    It doesn't hurt that my boys love the movie and have watched it regularly since it hit DVD, but I thought that the first time I saw it. As did my wife, who took our older son to see it in the theatre with grim determination. She came out stunned, amazed that she could love a film about racecars.

    Don't get me wrong, I love all of the Pixar films, and we own them all. But I think "Cars" might have the most sophisticated character development and evolution of all of them.

    March 2, 2009 at 3:33PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Djl-headshot-sketch-squared_talkback_profile

    djloehr

    Sorry for the block of text. It would be nice for the software to preserve paragraph breaks in comments...

    March 2, 2009 at 3:34PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Gerberdaisyjpg_talkback_profile

    chutneylix

    I have to agree with the author, Cars is my least favorite Pixar movie by a long mile. Like all Pixar films, the base story is simple which has been done a million times before. But unlike their other movies, I couldn't see truth in its characters.

    March 2, 2009 at 4:29PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jessica

    But Cars has Paul Newman. Impossible not to believe in character development when it's voiced by Paul Newman.

    March 2, 2009 at 5:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Roy

    "Karate Kid" is a story of a grouchy old Asian widower living in a rundown house in a neighborhood that has changed over the years. He's uncomfortable with the new world around him, particularly the friendly, obsequious Italian kid who insinuates himself into the old man's life.

    October 12, 2009 at 3:19PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web