Film Festival

Review: Syfy's 'Stargate Universe'

A great premise and a strong cast are wasted in a mostly leaden new 'Stargate' series


Sloppy execution cripples what ought to have been an extremely promising possibility for franchise reinvention in "Stargate Universe." The new Syfy series, premiering on Friday (Oct. 2), finds masterminds Brad Wright and Robert C. Cooper determined to deliver the grittiest, darkest, most realistic "Stargate" to date, a worthy ambition except for when the result is also this dull and lugubrious. 

Full disclosure: Except for passing seconds here and there, the last "Stargate" I watched with any seriousness had James Spader, Kurt Russell and the chick from "The Crying Game." It was a movie I kinda dug, but I never really required an expansion for that work. But with MGM and Syfy so enthusiastic about "Stargate Universe" and so insistent that this was a "Stargate" that was intended to welcome fresh eyes, I decided to give it a shot. After all, a similar experiment served me well on "Torchwood: Children of Earth," which stands as one of my favorite TV experiences of the year, despite no interest at in "Torchwood" mythology. 

And "Stargate Universe" is loaded with actors I respect, including Robert Carlyle, Louis Ferreira, Ming-Na and Lou Diamond Phillips. What? You don't respect Lou? After "Stand and Deliver," "La Bamba," "Wolf Lake" and his week in the jungle with Spencer, the man deserves your admiration and he certainly served three television hours of my time. 

There's a very real chance that "Stargate Universe" will play totally differently for fans of the franchise and also that a certain subset of science fiction fans will embrace its bleak perspective. I can only share my side...

After the break...

In the third hour of "Stargate Universe," Ferreira utters a line that I think was meant as the series mantra: "These are the wrong people in the wrong place."

The series focuses on a motley group of soldiers, scientists, politicians and civilians who are foced to go through a Stargate when a not-so-hidden base comes under attack. 

Don't know what a Stargate is? Don't know anything about any of this stuff? Fortunately, "Stargate Universe" offers David Blue's Eli, a dorky gamer who unlocks a hidden puzzle in a role-playing game, only to discover that the puzzle was inserted in the game by Dr. Nicholas Rush (Carlyle), looking for somebody capable of solving the ninth whatever on the Stargate. Eli is there for all of the uninitiated viewers, even sitting through an orientation video. Thanks, Eli!

Anyway, these civilians burst through the Stargate and find themselves on the Destiny, an ancient vessel thousands of light years from Earth and on a quest to who-knows-where. Not only is the Destiny basically lost (as far as they're concerned), but it's also short on supplies and its life support systems are failing. 

Creators Cooper and Wright make a botch of things structurally right from the beginning, which features the dirty, frightened people popping through the Stargate, sometimes violently, into the Destiny. The point of the series, at least as I could figure it, is in the mystery of each and every one of these characters. They have names and job titles, but the experience on the Destiny is meant as their proving ground, it's the thing that determines the leaders and the followers, the heroes and the villains. 

It's "Lost" in space, only the "Stargate Universe" writers aren't clever enough to unspool character mysteries in the way "Lost" was able to. Almost immediately after the characters are on the ground disoriented, we flash back and their path to the Destiny is badly over-explained and the characters are expositionally introduced. 

You know what I wanted? I wanted to see the characters on the Destiny trying to figure out where they are and what they're doing there and who they are. Instead, that's mostly saved for the second hour and the characters are explained before they're mysteries and then we're expected to let them go back to being mysteries. There are new mysteries introduced, but the whole storytelling mechanism is amateurish.

I guess I understand why the flashbacks were necessary. The attack that forces their departure is the only action scene in the first three hours, the only moment you could foreground as being "fun" or "exciting," as opposed to "brooding" and "tense." Pushing it up in the story at least captures viewers' attention, though pushing it later would have prevented tedium from setting in.

Oh and tedium most certainly sets in. The "SGU" premiere is two hours of dirty, unrecognizable people bitching about being lost and confused and uncomfortable. In space. It subscribes to a very popular sci fi trope that says that there's no reason why space ships should be these shiny, bright, pristine vessels. They'd more plausibly be grungy and cramped and the perfect setting for all manner of intrigue. 

The best cinematic representation of this is the first hour of "Alien," where the characters operate only in poorly lit spaces complaining about how they want to go home and wondering if they're going to get the bonus payouts they deserve. Is it exhilarating? No, but with Ridley Scott's direction and a tight script, the characters are clearly delineated and the environment is suffocating. Until all hell breaks loose.

The speed with which all hell is breaking loose on "Stargate Universe" is mighty slow. The premiere builds to an act of heroism, which seems like it ought to come from an unexpected source, but the script does such a poor job of positioning the players that it isn't nearly as powerful as it ought to be.

That means that it's the end of the third hour where we begin to learn what the Stargate can do and where it can sent our characters. We're led to believe that through some process of frequent leaping, the characters will eventually find the supplies they need to survive and maybe they'll get the false hope that they're getting closer to getting home. Instead, the characters spend the second episode on a desert planet sampling sand and having flashbacks. 

And for some viewers, this will be enough. Actually, for some viewers, this will be nirvana. There are plenty of fans of minimalist science fiction, who will be able to pretend that the lack of plot is a sign of near existential ennui. I happen to think you can weave a survival narrative in with a little more drama without resorting to blasting spaceships and strange alien visitors, but that's a happy medium "Stargate Universe" has yet to find.

With only limited time to develop a huge ensemble, the performances in "Stargate Universe," something which ought to be a draw, are a mixed bag. Phillips and Ming-Na have barely been utilized at all. And most of the supporting performances are just SyFy supporting standard (i.e. a little wooden and sporting Canadian accents), though Brian J. Smith at least has enough to do in the first three hours that I could recognize him going forward.

Blue comes in from a totally different show. He's playing his character's nerdiness and uncertainty broadly enough that he would be a comic foil if he didn't have to keep explaining his jokes to the people around him. Without him, "Stargate Universe" would be unbearably dour, so even if I wouldn't say he's giving a great comedic performance, he's a welcome relief whenever he's around.

As for Carlyle, he's the anchor of a better series entirely. He's interesting, commanding and passionate despite a character who motivations have yet to really be explained. 

[Carlyle is really laying the foundation for his role as Groundskeeper Willie in the live-action "Simpsons" movie I'm casting in my head. I'm going a bit indie, so I've got Dylan Baker as Seymour Skinner, Frances McDormand as Edna Krabappel, Alan Dale as SuperNintendo Chalmers and Elle Fanning as Lisa. Offers are out to John Carroll Lynch for Homer and Patricia Clarkson as Marge, while Jason Segel is expected to make a cameo as Otto. But that's a totally different post that just intruded. Apologies.]

Just because I wasn't enthralled by the first two episodes of "Stargate Universe" doesn't mean that the premise isn't one that remains laden with promise. I just hope this isn't the wrong show in the wrong place (with the wrong people behind the scenes).

 

The two-hour premiere of "Stargate Universe" airs on Friday, Oct. 2 at 8 p.m. on Syfy.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Ray

    It seems that as far as scientist and technology go, its a step backward from Stargate Atlantis Scientist and Stargate SG-1's group. It also seems as they are trying to make this more like a Battlestar Galactica. But the most awful thing about the premiere was the ratio of actual tv show to commercials. It seemed as if their was a 4 minute sequence then 5 minutes in commercials. I may someday watch this on DVD, but if the ratio's stay the same, no way. Greed is destroying TV. So far, I don't anticipate watching the next show, but who knows..

    October 2, 2009 at 11:50PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    honk_mahfah

    I didn't time it or anything, but I doubt there was a significantly greater amount of commercials than there would normally be during two hours of tv programming. The problem, I think, is that the commercial breaks were often astonishingly poorly placed; it felt almost as if the episode had not been edited with commercial breaks in mind. Either way, it seems fairly idiotic to me to complain about commercials. Seriously, how do you think a series gets made? With prayers and wishes? No, sir, it gets made with money, and that money has to come from somewhere. Complaining about the commercials littering up your dorky sci-fi show (which I thought was fairly enjoyable, actually) is about as sensible as complaining about the lack of sunlight on a submarine.

    October 3, 2009 at 1:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    TV Obsessed

    I'm a huge fan of the Stargate franchise having watched all the SG-1 episodes multiple times and every SGA episode. I wanted to like SGU, but it tried too hard to be dark like BSG instead of focusing on story or characters. The 2-hour series premiere was completely unnecessary and could have been cut to an hour thirty or an hour. Full review of the episode.

    http://th3tvobsessed.blogspot.com/2009/10/review-stargate-universe-season-1.html

    October 3, 2009 at 1:41AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    honk_mahfah

    Right, 'cause BSG certainly never focused on story or character.

    I didn't think SGU was anything to crow about, but the character work seemed okay to me. They seem like somewhat real people, and have room to be developed. I found those qualities to be thoroughly lacking in what I watched of the two previous Stargate series.

    October 3, 2009 at 2:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Matthew

    Well I'm a veteran of the original movie, SG-1 and Atlantis, a fan of Battlestar Galactica, and I loved every minute of the Universe pilot. Star Trek killed itself going over the same old ground and I would have been very dismayed if Wright & Cooper had done a Berman & Braga and brought out another series along the lines of SG-1 and Atlantis. Yes, Universe more than tips its hat in the direction of BSG, but when it is a show worthy of this level of flattery, as BSG is, then in my book it is no bad thing. If you think the ability of this production team will suddenly lose its ability to write for characters that make you care about them, then I think you'll be in for a shock. It may take longer for some, but I already have an emotional interest in the fortunes of more than a few of the characters of 'Universe' - particularly Eli, Chloe and Everett (I liked these guys almost instantly). I'm also transfixed by Rush, who is already living up to the promise of being a character you will love and hate in equal measure. Robert Carlyle is one amazing actor and we 'Gaters' should consider ourselves lucky he's on board. Give it time, folks, this is going to get rather damn good.

    October 3, 2009 at 5:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    James C. Harwood

    Daniel Fienberg: I agree with your review completely. A few remarks I must add. I have been a fan since the Stargate movie. Stargate SG1 was a good TV series, up to a point, and then I believe it went on too far. About that time came the saving spin-off Stargate Atlantis, which also was a good TV series, up to a point, and then it went too far. I was hoping that during a happy break between interstellar enemies, the rest of Earth's population would find out about the stargates. I was hoping they would figure out how to start building their own stargates, even larger sizes to set up one massive port on Earth. I was hoping that the writers would follow in the footsteps of Robert A. Heinlein and content of his Tunnel In The Sky novel, to send colonists to other worlds. From that point there might have been no limit to the kinds of stories that could be told. I don't like the new series Stargate Universe, mainly because of the endless childish bickering, which goes so far that it becomes unrealistic. A few minutes at the start would have been acceptable, but 2 hours of it and more promised is wrong. It did have a few good moments, so I don't hate it, but I will look for something better to do on Friday nights. It looks like ABC might be doing better with science fiction than SyFy, with the final season of the excellent series Lost when it starts, the excellent new series Flash Forward, and I have high hopes for the return of V next month.

    October 3, 2009 at 8:16AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      reeree You may be right,up to a point. What they should've done
      was, put the two together(SG1 and SGA) to make a series.
      It would've been much better than what they have now.Star
      Gate Universe is BORING!!! I never thought I would fall
      asleep,but I did. No action, no nothing, a total waste. It's time for StarTrek to make a move now.

      November 1, 2009 at 3:02PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Diane Charmley

    The acting was so bad at times, I have to say it was almost boring and I can't really see how they can develop these characters. I'm not going to be spending my precious Friday nights watching. What a sad follow up to a wonderful Star Gate series I grew to love.

    October 4, 2009 at 10:48AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jmb

    This new series started out really crappy. The acting was weak and every characters story is so sporadic. I nearly fell asleep towards the end of the show. You don't even need an eight ball to predict when it will end. SOON.

    October 6, 2009 at 11:20AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Andrew

    I have to admit, Stargate Universe didn’t get off to a good start and I have to agree with your initial review. It did grow though and I really enjoyed it. Perhaps because it was a pretty big change from previous installments in the franchise of because it lost viewership because of the awkward start I don’t know but unfortunately the show didn’t recover when it came to the ratings and now SyFy has cut the show. At least there giving fans an ending and not just letting the series hang.
    I guess I can’t be to upset though. SyFy has a lot of great programming out and some of its upcoming shows look very promising as well. As an employee/subscriber of DISH Network I probably should have gotten to this sooner but I just upgraded to high definition equipment. I can’t believe how much better the horror and SciFi genre’s look now. And with DISH offering HD free for life it’s a great time to make the jump. It has made me look forward to the upcoming programming SyFy has even more.

    March 19, 2011 at 9:27AM EST Reply to Comment
Daniel Fienberg

About This Blog

At the dawn of the 21st Century, Daniel Fienberg came out to Los Angeles for grad school. He hasn't left. "The Fien Print" is a blog about television -- reviews, interviews, analysis -- but it's also about movies and the business of Hollywood. It probably won't be a blog about the Red Sox, though it might seem like that at times.

Get Instant Alerts on The Fien Print

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook