Cannes Film Festival 2013

Analysis: Betty White helps SAG Award TV voters out-silly the Golden Globes

Even 'Hot in Cleveland' fans may be slightly confused

<p>'Glee' star Chris Colfer</p>

'Glee' star Chris Colfer

Credit: FOX
Is Betty White the new Piper Perabo?
 
After the inevitable silliness of Tuesday's Golden Globe TV nominations -- Piper Perabo! Scott Caan! Jennifer Love Hewitt -- I settled into Thursday morning's Screen Actors Guild Award nominations expecting to see a little sanity restored. Instead, the SAG voters managed to do what I never would have thought possible: On several levels, they out-crazied the Golden Globes.
 
Congratulations, I guess?
 
There are a couple different levels of crazy at work if you look over the SAG Award nominations. Those thoughts are after the break...
 
The first and most obvious: "Hot in Cleveland" nominated for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series!
 
In general, I have no interest in maligning "Hot in Cleveland." It's not aimed at me. I get that. I also respect that Betty White, Valerie Bertinelli, Jane Leeves and Wendie Malick are utter professionals at what they do. "Hot in Cleveland" is probably 2010's best comedy from 1985. 
 
It's just that when I personally think of the best comedy series ensembles on TV from the past year, I think of "Community," "Parks & Recreation," "Cougar Town," "The League," "Party Down," "Better Off Ted," "The Big Bang Theory," "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" and a couple other shows first. The Showtime comedies that usually grab slots categories of this sort are all questionable as ensembles. Each one of them is a single-actor-driven show, albeit with terrific supporting actors around them. I'd still put "Weeds" in this category instead of "Hot in Cleveland." 
 
In general, SAG Awards voters continue not to understand the concept of an "ensemble," even though you'd think a body of actors would. It's not that there aren't fine supporting actors on "Dexter" and "The Closer," but those two shows are VERY much "Michael C. Hall and whoever he happens to be sharing a scene with" and "Kyra Sedgwick and whoever she happens to be sharing a scene with." "The Good Wife," "Mad Men" and "Boardwalk Empire" all have very obvious lead performances, but I'd argue that they're all truer ensembles than "Dexter" and "The Closer." I'd say the same for "Breaking Bad," "Lost," "Rubicon," "Terriers," "Parenthood," "Fringe," "Chuck," "Friday Night Lights," "Treme" and "Sons of Anarchy," none of which found a place in the Ensemble Drama category. So when SAG voters ignore "Community" and "Parks and Recreation," two of the truest ensemble comedies in many a moon, it's not surprising. That doesn't mean it's not slightly disappointing. 
 
As for Betty White's nomination? What can you say? SAG Award voters love Betty White. Emmy voters love Betty White. Everybody loves Betty White. You can almost sense Golden Globe voters waking up this morning, seeing Betty White's nomination and going, "Why didn't we think of that?"
 
The part that's interesting is that on the individual acting side, where SAG Awards voters don't split out lead and supporting performances for some reason, White is one of six nominated comedy actors who are usually considered "supporting" actors by other awards-giving bodies. If that doesn't seem odd to you, note that all 10 of the acting performances on the drama side are traditional "lead" performances.
 
That means that Ed O'Neill and Ty Burrell made the cut from "Modern Family" -- squeezing out Eric Stonestreet and Jesse Tyler Ferguson -- but Jim Parsons from "Big Bang Theory" was left out. It produces the oddness of Chris Colfer -- magnificent on "Glee," but giving a primarily dramatic performance in a primarily supporting role -- going up against Alec Baldwin and Steve Carell. They're not exactly doing the same thing at the same volume for the same amount of screentime.
 
You don't need to belittle Betty White or Jane Lynch or Sofia Vegara to look at the Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series field and wonder how, in fairly one-note (or two-note) supporting roles, those three earned inclusion over the shunned Showtime trio of Laura Linney, Mary-Louise Parker and Toni Collette. The category isn't Outstanding Comedic Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series. It isn't required that Toni Collette make you laugh. All that's required is that you look at the performance and go, "Goodness that's some fine acting."
 
Or if you're a true aficionado of marvelous supporting performances -- a totally legitimate pursuit -- excluding Aaron Paul of "Breaking Bad" from the drama category is hard to figure. 
 
I guess SAG Award voters just want credit for not nominating Piper Perabo?
 
But as much as I made fun of Golden Globe voters for nominating Jennifer Love Hewitt for "The Client List," I feel better about the Globes Movie/Miniseries nominations than I do about the HBO-centric SAG Awards nominations in those categories.
 
John Goodman over Michael Sheen, David Strathairn and a host of others? No thanks. If you're getting desperate enough to nominate Goodman -- perfectly fine, but truly in a negligible supporting role -- why not look at HBO's "The Pacific" and tip your hat to one or two members of that vast ensemble?
 
Susan Sarandon over over Hope Davis and a host of others? No thanks. I know she's Susan Sarandon, which means she's inherently awesome, but her "You Don't Know Jack" performance made Goodman's look exhaustive.
 
Sigh.
 
A few other thoughts from the SAG Awards roster:
 
*** The stunt category is strange, with "Burn Notice," "CSI: NY," "Dexter," "Southland" and "True Blood." I'm wondering where "Chuck" and "Human Target" and "Leverage" and a handful of other action-driven favorites are.
 
*** Going back to the strangeness of all of those supporting performances in the comedic acting fields, last year, all 10 comedic SAG Awards nominations were for lead performances. What kind of odds would you have given that Larry David, Tony Shalhoub and Charlie Sheen would all drop out of the Comedy Actor field and there wouldn't have been room for reigning Emmy winner Jim Parsons?
 
*** While it seems strange to nominate "The Office" for any overall awards for the calendar year that show had, this is one of those places I don't object. No matter how erratic the writing on the show has become, that doesn't take away from a very good comedic ensemble that still ekes out laughs from misguided material. For my money, "The Office" still remains one of the five best comic ensembles on TV.
 
*** Perfectly pleased to see Glenn Close recover "The Piper Perabo Slot" she lost at the Golden Globes. Mariska Hargitay usurping Katey Sagal is a bit more disappointing, but everybody loves Mariska. [Note: I understand that Close could have taken the Sagal slot and Hargitay the Perabo slot.] My own preference would have been to see Kelly MacDonald get a nod for "Boardwalk Empire." Oh well.
 
*** Sad that Michael K. Williams goes all of those years of being shunned as part of the "Wire" cast -- the finest ensemble cast in television history -- then he appears on a show that actually *does* get a series nomination and his name gets left off the initial "Boardwalk Empire" ensemble list. As I noted in the comments, I assume that'll get corrected.
 
*** Again, no nostalgia for "24," "Lost" and "Law & Order."
 
Anyway, I've already written entirely too much about the SAG Awards nominations. Any thoughts on your end?
Dan-feinberg-sm
Daniel Fienberg
Executive Editor
A long-time member of the TCA Board and a longer-time blogger of "American Idol," Dan Fienberg writes about TV, except for when he writes about movies or sometimes writes about the Red Sox. But never music. He would sound stupid talking about music.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Chew_talkback_profile

    Shitegeist

    Repeat post from elsewhere: The list of actors in the Boardwalk Empire ensemble nomination doesn't include Michael K Williams. Is this an accidental oversight or a miscarriage of justice?

    December 16, 2010 at 1:16PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Shitgeist - I'm gonna say "accidental oversight." There are other randomly missing actors for other shows. Like Chris Noth from "The Good Wife." I would assume the lists were provisional and will be closer to correct when the show finally rolls around...

      -Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 1:19PM EST
    • Chew_talkback_profile

      Shitegeist Thanks Dan, I hope you're right.

      December 16, 2010 at 1:35PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jane But Dan and correct me if I'm wrong, isn't Chris Noth still being crediting as a "Special Guest Star" every episode of The Good Wife? So maybe he wasn't even eligible. I mean Guest Stars aren't part of the ensemble, I don't care how often they "guest" or how big of a part they play, you know?

      December 16, 2010 at 2:35PM EST
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Jane - I have no idea what the SAG logic is. Julia Stiles and Jonny Lee Miller, both "Special Guest Stars" on "Dexter" are listed for that show...

      Who knows?!? All I know is that they love Betty White, SAG voters do...

      -Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 2:37PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Dante

    Is Chris Colfer magnificent on Glee? I like Glee, but I don't agree with that statement. I wouldn't say any of the actors on Glee are untalented, but the type of acting they're doing is deliberately cheesy, and thus hard to admire.

    I would almost say Glee would be better for best stunt ensemble in a weird way. I was more moved by Brittany and Mike Chang's dancing on Special Education than any of the actual acting they've done.

    December 16, 2010 at 1:24PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Dante - Hmmm... I'm not sure I've loved the way they've used Kurt this season, but I definitely wouldn't call his performance cheesy. I'd say that since they mostly stopped making him just a campy one-joke character, he's consistently been the best actor on a *really* inconsistent show...

      -Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 1:26PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    fbihop

    Aaron Paul was the best actor in a supporting role in any TV show that I watched this year.

    December 16, 2010 at 1:25PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan FBIHop - I think I could make the argument that he was the best actor in *any* role that I saw on TV last year -- though I could make an equally enthusiastic argument for Bryan Cranston and Jon Hamm.

      Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 1:28PM EST
  • Pic_talkback_profile

    forg

    I'm just sad Jim Parsons failed to make the cut. But Ed O Neill finally getting some love is just awesome!

    I'm okay with the Hot in Cleveland nominations, the sitcom is mediocre but very strong cast

    Surprised Laura Linney didn't make the cut

    December 16, 2010 at 1:28PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Forg - Also surprised about Linney, obviously... And although the "Hot in Cleveland" cast is just fine, how many better comedy ensembles can you think of? I listed 9 up there without hesitation...

      -Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 1:51PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    YingYANG

    I'm confused at your logic. You are confused that Chris Colfer got nominated for a mostly dramatic role, but then you say that Laura Linney and Mary Louise Parker deserved nominations, even though their performances aren't terribly funny. Also, I'd argue that Chris Colfer has had enough screen time this season to be considered a lead.

    December 16, 2010 at 2:30PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan YingYang - Not exactly. I argued that Colfer didn't deserve a nomination. Which I didn't. I wasn't at all confused by Colfer being nominated. All I said was that it's an odd circumstance in which a dramatic supporting performance in a comedy is going head-to-head with a straight-forward comedic male lead and how the SAG structure sometimes forces that kind of apples-to-oranges comparison. That's all.

      I also find Mary Louise Parker extremely funny on Weeds...

      -Daniel

      December 16, 2010 at 2:35PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JC

    I've often heard TV actors say in interviews that people on TV actually watch very little TV themselves. So I'm left to wonder how many of the nominees these SAG members have actually watched. Are they voting for performances they've actually seen, or voting based on what they read and/or hear from others?

    December 16, 2010 at 3:26PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Q

    What is that need to belittle Piper Perabo? She didn't steal anybody' spot.

    December 16, 2010 at 4:00PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Uglyguy-small_12

    Eldritch

    I'm feeling like the Grinch, but does anyone remember who won or was even nominated last year? or the year before? And if no one (other than the professional reviewers) remembers, what difference does it make? Do I have to go back and "unenjoy" a show I previously liked now because its actors weren't nominated by some self appointed oligarchy which makes bad nominations?

    December 16, 2010 at 4:06PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Joe Yes. Yes, you absolutely do.

      December 17, 2010 at 6:36AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Wylie76

    Write a comment...

    December 17, 2010 at 10:22PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Wylie76 I saw John Goodman's name and was happy for a brief moment, thinking that he had been nominated for Treme in which he was brilliant but of course not. God forbid a David Simon show should ever get nominated in the acting categories.

      December 17, 2010 at 10:25PM EST
    • A_talkback_profile

      belinda Me too! I was puzzled why Fienberg was so dissatisfied with the nomination (because if anything else, that would be a nomination for a David Simon show!) and then I realized it wasn't for Treme.

      December 17, 2010 at 10:30PM EST
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan I'd have *celebrated* a John Goodman nomination for "Treme"! I'd have done a little happy dance. Instead? It was for an entirely uninteresting -- not bad, just uninteresting -- performance in a TV movie that was 100 percent Al Pacino and little else... Oh well.

      -Daniel

      December 17, 2010 at 10:40PM EST
  • A_talkback_profile

    belinda

    I suppose in a way Perabo is equal to Hot in Cleveland in terms of the HUH? factor. Must stop assuming that actors and the HFPA actually, you know, watch television instead of regarding the award show as a popularity contest.

    December 17, 2010 at 10:26PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web