TV Review: 'Mental'
Something's off about FOX's new summer medical drama and there's a good reason...
Annabella Sciorra and Chris Vance of FOX's 'Mental'
There's a great story to FOX's "Mental," specifically the story of how the show made it on the air at all.
No, that isn't a derisive, "Geez, how did this dreck get on TV!" comment. It's actually completely in earnest. "Mental" was a rejected TNT pilot that became an international co-production shot at the Fox Telecolombia production facilities in Bogota. When TV networks talk about finding new business models, "Mental" is one example of a viable alternative pipeline. Because its bottom-line cost to FOX is negligible and the network is using the show as scripted filler in the summer months, it hardly even matters if "Mental" is successful, though if it does well, you can be assured we'll be seeing much more of this.
"Mental," which FOX is premiering on Tuesday (May 26) night, is one possible glimpse into TV's future.
But if you don't know the details behind its production or if, for very justifiable reasons, you don't care about the details behind its production, "Mental" becomes a good deal less interesting in a hurry. It's a subgeneric medical drama with dull characters, unengaging performances and dismal production values.
[A review of "Mental," not its production process, after the break.]
At its heart, "Mental" is a pretty straight-forward Vocational Irony Narrative. "Prison Break" veteran Chris Vance plays Dr. Jack Gallagher, the new Director of Psychiatric Services for a "Los Angeles" hospital. But Jack, with his unorthodox methods and upside-down version of the world may be just as crazy as his patients, which may be what makes him so good at his job.
Actually, Jack isn't really all that crazy. His wacky style is only outside-of-the-norm if you compare him to the other doctors at the hospital, who are all more busy with bureaucracy and professional advancement than practicing medicine.
Because Jack is a fairly upbeat character, and because Vance is allowed to speak with his native British accent, he isn't exactly Dr. House, nor would you have to necessarily say that Annabella Sciorra's Nora Skoff, the hospital administrator, is his Cuddy (though she is). The other supporting roles are limited and co-star Nicholas Gonzalez, Marisa Ramirez, Derek Webster and Jacqueline McKenzie are mostly restricted by playing variations on rolling their eyes at the audacity of Dr. Gallagher.
Series creators Deborah Joy Levine and Dan Levine haven't mastered the art of showing viewers, rather than telling them, so the first two episodes spend a lot of time on characters explaining symptoms and diagnoses and courses of treatment, just in case viewers might otherwise lump in every patient as "nuts" and every solution as "drugs and therapy." "House" does the same thing, but with more panache, or at least with more movement, which suggests the problem is one of direction as much as dialogue. The excessively expositional nature of the writing is deadly when the patient-of-the-week is generic (like Silas Weir Mitchell's struggling artist in the premiere) and crippling when there's actually an original patient (Nicholle Tom's hysterical pregnancy in the second episode).
And the characters relate to each other in this same over-declarative fashion, which is how we know that Sciorra's character had cancer or that Ramirez's character is a lesbian or that McKenzie's character is married to a jazz musician. The only new character to this environment is Vance's, yet they all relate to each other as strangers, which is just about the worst writing sin in a workplace drama. You either write in a way that establishes pre-existing dynamics, or you have the characters saying how they relate to each other in the dialogue. the Levines are stuck in the latter mode.
With a show this flatly rendered, there's no room for visual flourishes of any kind, so the semi-inspiration that might have stood out as the show's best gimmick comes across as a rarely used, poorly delivered affectation instead. I'm referring to the visualization of the patients' points-of-view, the manifestations of their disorders. So a character afraid of the water is seen adrift in an ocean of towering waves. Or when a delusional paranoid patient comes in, we see the snake-creatures he imagines everybody else to be. It isn't such a bad idea at all, but the execution is dreadful.
Viewers who don't know the backstory of how "Mental" came to be produced won't instantly look at the show and yell, "That's not LA, it's Bogota!"
Instead, there's a sense of lingering unease that comes from watching "Mental." It's partially that the hospital set is darker, older and less TV-condusive than what viewers have come to expect from "House" or "Scrubs" or "E.R." or "Grey's Anatomy." The scripts give no indication that the doctors are working in anything less than a state-of-the-art facility, but maybe they're stuck in a ghetto hospital and they can't admit it to themselves (the dialogue gives the script a location that's at odds with its physical geography). Viewers will notice the cheapness of the sets and the video quality, but they'll only infer the difference in light between Colombia and Los Angeles (part of the reason shows filmed in LA substitute poorly for New York and why shows show in Vancouver substitute poorly for nearly everywhere, because light quality is unique to physical locations). Some viewers will also notice that in crowd or group or outside city scenes, all of the extras are very obviously Latino, but they're South American in appearance, not Mexican or Caribbean, and that none of those extras ever have dialogue.
No matter how many of the creative handicaps you notice and how many you just perceive in the back of your mind, "Mental" doesn't feel like a network TV show and it doesn't feel up to the standards of a TNT, USA or FX basic cable show either. It's a telenovela version of an American medical show that just happens to feature English-speaking actors and that doesn't have the guilty pleasure qualities of a telenovela. Business-wise, "Mental" may be a sign of hope for the industry, but quality-wise, it's just another summer dump.
Can't get enough of The Fien Print? Sign up now for HitFix Blog Alerts and receive daily updates.
News From Our Partners
-
Family Film Guide: Do Your Kids Love 'The Phantom Menace'?
My Night at a Midnight Showing of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace in 3D
'Breaking Dawn Part 2' Trailer Will Debut In Front Of 'The Hunger Games'
-
'Breaking Dawn - Part 2' Trailer To Debut Before 'Hunger Games'
'The Vow': The Reviews Are In!
Sarah Jessica Parker: Replacing Demi Moore In 'Lovelace' 'Daunting'
-
Suge Knight Charged With Marijuana Possession
Nicki Minaj Track "Marilyn Monroe" Leaked
Madonna 2012 World Tour Announced
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - TWoP 10: Ways We'd Like to See House End
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Thursday, February 9, 2012
-
'My Strange Addiction' Exclusive: Man Loves Car
Vanessa Hudgens Lived In A Homeless Shelter For Two Weeks
Cassandra Scrimgeour: 2 Broke Girls: The Good, the Bad and the Hope of Love
-
Brandi Glanville Claims She Hooked Up With Gerard Butler
Charlie Sheen Talks Ladies – Onscreen & Off
Jonah Hill ‘Overwhelmed’ By ‘Moneyball’ Supporting Actor Nomination
-
Critics Consensus: Journey 2 Isn't Quite Worth the Trip
Total Recall: Luis Guzman's Best Movies
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part I
-
Podmass: Week of Feb. 2-8
For Our Consideration: The Grammys are worth watching (seriously)
Interview: Karl Pilkington
About This Blog
At the dawn of the 21st Century, Daniel Fienberg came out to Los Angeles for grad school. He hasn't left. "The Fien Print" is a blog about television -- reviews, interviews, analysis -- but it's also about movies and the business of Hollywood. It probably won't be a blog about the Red Sox, though it might seem like that at times.
Get Instant Alerts on The Fien Print
Latest Posts
-
Did Symone Black survive? And what drama did Group Day bring?Thursday, Feb 9, 2012
-
The auditions are over and now Randy, Steven and J-Lo get seriousWednesday, Feb 8, 2012
-
The mentors perform and the judges spin their chairs for more contestantsMonday, Feb 6, 2012
-
Dan and Alan talk Super Bowl commercials, 'Smash,' 'The River' and moreMonday, Feb 6, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupJmichealH Where do I go to find out more about how the show managed to get made - it sounded more interesting than the show itself.
May 26, 2009 at 12:33PM EST Reply to Commenttina2026 The show started off pretty slow and dull. However, I think it has potential if the writers get more creative. I saw the preview for next week and it looks interesting.
May 26, 2009 at 9:06PM EST Reply to Commentgabisaenz "Some viewers will also notice that in crowd or group or outside city scenes, all of the extras are very obviously Latino, but they're South American in appearance, not Mexican or Caribbean, and that none of those extras ever have dialogue."
May 29, 2009 at 4:07PM EST Reply to CommentSo South Americans aren't latinos? and there's no Caribbean in South America? how stupid is this writer?
dan gabisaenz - The Caribbean nations are not considered South America. So "No" on that part. And of course South Americans are Latinos. That being said, South American Latinos, specifically those from Ecuador or Colombia, because of their different racial and cultural makeup, look different from Mexicans and from Puerto Ricans in the same way that somebody Irish or German might look different from somebody Polish or Italian, even though they're all "European." The extras in the background in Mental are all Colombian, because that's where the show was filmed, and they look Colombian. If a movie was supposed to be set in England, but was filmed in Germany and all of the background extras were notably Germanic in appearance, you'd notice. Well, maybe *you* wouldn't notice. Why is this complicated for you? -Daniel
May 29, 2009 at 6:01PM EST Reply to CommentLuPatty Your review on the show is pretty harsh. The show is very good actually, more fun than some shows that were given a second season. You just can't judge a show for its first episode. Obviously the writing needs polishing, but it will get better. The story about Jack's background is interesting and Chris Vance does a great job playing him.
June 15, 2009 at 11:43PM EST Reply to CommentAbout your Latino comment... Ugh, as a Mexican, I have to say... Never mind.
Paul Judging by the comments, I have read here, I think most commentators have actually missed the very serious point of the show, especially the Season finally.
August 21, 2009 at 12:50PM EST Reply to CommentIt was a punch in the face for “BIG PHARM†and the money that it is all about in the real world.
Jack really got his point across when he punched that ##$%@# in the mouth. It represented how he felt about the way not only psychiatric medicine but also the way the entire medical field is ran today. It is all about the money, who cares about the wellbeing of the patient. It is all about business and how much money we can get out of the patient, how much is he or she worth.
“BIG PHARMâ€, say’s you either allow us to do clinical trails and experiment on your patients so we can figure out how to make more money or we cut all of your funding and close the place down and everyone is out of a job!
Jennifer First the show is good, you have judged this show compared to other medical series, House is great with that said it didnt start off a hit. Second Scrubs, please not going there. What is funny is you compare the sets and make such stupid comments to say the sets used on House,Scrubs,or ER are more real. In what world? Hospitals are not what you see on tv, given that ER came closer then any other show you see on tv, still hopsitals dont have designers come in a decorate. I know from experience they are nasty, blood on the floor, dull curtains, ungly paintings so please when mocking a new show at least stay close to the facts. As for the way Mental represents that money is held higher then patitent care, all you have to do is ask someone who has went to the hosptial lately without insurance. IF you have a private insurance you are admitted for something as simple as a kidney infection, if you have no insurnace or goverment insurance they send you home. Now before you disagree, I was admited last year for a kidney infection that I got a few weeks after my back surgery. This year again same infection, I was sent home. The only difference was the year before I was on a private insurance and now on goverment insurance. So thank you for making a show that is honest when it comes to money, and to those doctors who care more about getting a head then about taking care of their patients
September 26, 2009 at 8:14PM EST Reply to Comment