Cannes Film Festival 2013

Why Britney Spears is not a good fit for 'The X Factor'

Singer on verge of inking deal for Simon Cowell's talent show

<p>Britney Spears: Can she do it?</p>

Britney Spears: Can she do it?

Credit: AP Photo

Are you a fan of Music News?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

As Britney Spears' signing on a judge on the U.S. edition of “The X Factor” appears to be moving closer and closer to reality, we have serious doubts that the pop singer could add anything of merit to the program.

Instead, her main draw will be to curiosity seekers who tune in to see if she can form a sentence unaided by others. And guess what? The people who view to see a potential  train wreck count just as much in the ratings as those who honestly watch to see the talent competition. And at this point, show founder Simon Cowell, who has not delivered the ratings he bragged his program would, needs a big name to bring in eyeballs. And he’s apparently willing to pay $15 million to Spears to do just that.

Here’s why we have doubts about Spears as a viable draw: While she remains a ubiquitous fixture in the gossip pages as we see pictures of her and her two sons or her and her fiancee out and about, any actual speaking that we’ve heard from Spears in the past few years has been as carefully controlled as a politician’s and about as revealing.

For example, any television interviews for “Femme Fatale” were taped beforehand, so any embarrassing gaffes could be edited out, and her replies consisted of about as much depth as a shallow rain puddle. She answered her questions for Rolling Stone via email so there was no give or take.

Seldom were her answers any longer than two sentences and they were about on a third-grader’s conversational level (In her defense, she wasn’t being asked anything that would necessarily require greater detail or introspection so it's unclear if she's capable of deeper thoughts). After reviewing several of them today, the most interesting thing I discovered about Spears is that she likes vanilla-scented candles.

The 30-year old remains, according to a judge, unable to run her own financial and personal affairs, so any major decisions have to be made in conjunction with her conservator, her father. Earlier this month, Spears went to court to ask that her finance, Jason Trawick, be appointed co-conservator. Her father has been conservator since 2008 after some especially troubling events showed that Spears was not mentally competent to oversee her legal, personal and business decisions.

Spears has toured since the conservatorship has been in place and while her outings tend to consist of her walking about, dancing stiffly, and lipsyncing, there have been no shudder-inducing outbursts or truly cringe-worthy moments that marked much of 2007 for her.

Instead, Spears seems to operate on some kind of auto-pilot now. In interviews, she answers questions, but never seems fully engaged. In concert, she is competent, but not compelling.

While people will tune in to “X Factor” to see if she brings the crazy and answers in complete non-sequiturs that make absolutely no sense, a la Paula Abdul her first few seasons on “American Idol” or Steven Tyler on “Idol” now, that’s not going to happen. Her handlers will never allow that to, for one thing, and, other than her weird, white-trash clad, gum-smacking interview with Matt Lauer a few years ago, she hasn’t really displayed those kind of mindblowing WTH moments in such a setting.

Instead, I predict she’ll be a non-entity...like Jennifer Lopez on “Idol,” but even more so, in terms of giving contestants very mild advice, like “You need to bring more emotion to the song,” or giving them such heartfelt encouragement as “I really felt it when you sang that... “  In other words, dullsville. Lopez's blandness worked for her in that it softened out her hard edges and let people see her as human and compassionate.  In some ways, Spears' climb is a tougher one: she needs to show fans that she is capable of deep, instructive thought and insight that she has garnered from spending more than half her life in show business. I'd advise her to start most of her feedback with "One thing I learned years ago..." or  "I once made the same mistake of not... "

The Voice” made fans realize that artists can give constructive advice and can have opinions without being mean or crazy, but the competition among that show's four mentors also helps bring out the daggers and the fun.  It’s, quite frankly, hard to imagine Spears being able to survive in that kind of fast-paced environment, so “The X Factor” is definitely a safer spot for her, but "The Voice" has raised the bar on what fans expect from artists on these shows.

I hope for her sake she doesn’t have any crazy moments, as she does seem to be back on an even keel and that’s a very good thing. However, a calm life and demeanor, sadly, never make for great TV.

How do you think she will fare? 

Follow Melinda Newman on Twitter @HitFixMelinda

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Jason Regan

    I think you're missing a major point which is how is someone who lipsynchs her live vocals competent to judge a singing contest? Her guest performance in the UK show was an embarrassment.

    April 11, 2012 at 6:25PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      melinda That is an excellent point, but it doesn't stop other acts/judges who likely lipsync in concert, such as Nicole S (or maybe it did stop her) or J Lo...

      April 11, 2012 at 6:39PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jason Regan You're quite correct, which sort of undermines the hypocrisy of the judging setup, Cheryl Cole of course being the prime example over here. I think it's more pronounced in the US though as you have a much larger talent pool and the contestants are of a notably higher quality.

      April 11, 2012 at 7:08PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    taynement

    I agree with you. TERRIBLE idea. Artists still in the limelight have a hard time being honest because they have an image to protect. New Britney is spaced out and just not equipped to be a judge. Thought Simon was smarter.

    April 11, 2012 at 7:11PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    2dhighest

    this is a very negative article. it's such a haters' world nowadays. give britney a chance. we all have our ups and downs and we're so lucky that we dont have it photographed or captured in anyway like britney's experience. she is a survivor and to be still around, relevant and all that, it just shows that she has the xfactor that nobody can explain. i respect britney as an artist and human being. kudos to her for being brave in embarking in this challenging career move.

    April 12, 2012 at 10:30AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      SG I agree with you, Melinda's article was negative and included inaccurate information. She's trying to get into TMZ territory, so go work for that rag.

      April 12, 2012 at 2:01PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    James

    ou're quite correct, which sort of undermines the hypocrisy of the judging setup, Cheryl Cole of course being the prime example over here.

    April 12, 2012 at 3:32PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mild one

    I think Britney is epitome of 'X factor' maybe even a reason why that term exists. she's probably best fit for that show, hope her crazy persona will occasionally came out

    April 13, 2012 at 4:00AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Gerry Dunn

    Not a fan particularly of Brittany. . . however, you certainly a jerk. In fairness, you do not show any major "deep thought" or introspect either.

    Just about 75% of Entertainers are "competent" not compelling!

    April 1, 2013 at 1:26PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Music News

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web