Cannes Film Festival 2013

Bruce Willis says he expects to shoot 'Die Hard 5' in 2011

No director and no writer yet, but that doesn't seem to concern Bruno

<p>Bruce Willis may have made an underwhelming 'Die Hard 4,' but that doesn't mean he's not willing to try and disappoint fans of the original film once again with a 'Die Hard 5,' and thank god for that.</p>

Bruce Willis may have made an underwhelming 'Die Hard 4,' but that doesn't mean he's not willing to try and disappoint fans of the original film once again with a 'Die Hard 5,' and thank god for that.

Credit: 20th Century Fox

I can honestly say that if I were sitting across from Bruce Willis in an interview these days, the last thing that would cross my mind would be asking him if he's going to be making another "Die Hard" film.

That's why there's an MTV, I suppose.

Maybe I misread the general reaction to the last film in the "Die Hard" series.  Maybe there are people out there saying to themselves right now, "I wonder what happened to John McClane after he fought that jet airplane bare-handed and saved the universe from the Internet," but if so, I've never met one of them.  Maybe there are hardcore fans who are already angrily logging in to HitFix so they can respond, "Mr. McWeeny, you are simply not cool enough to appreciate a PG-13 'Die Hard' movie, so go FORK yourself."  Maybe.

Personally, I like to imagine an alternate reality where the producers of the original "Die Hard" realize that the charm of the film hinges largely on the idea of John McClane being a very average guy who finds himself in one-time-only circumstances much larger than him, and who survives just barely, and as a result, they decided to never make a sequel because they know it would just be stupid to do so.  I like to imagine that reality, and when I look at my own DVD collection, that is indeed the reality it reflects. 

There are no "Die Hard" sequels in this dojo.

In that peksy "real world," though, there were indeed three sequels of varying quality, none of which I'd call good movies, and now Bruce Willis says that he plans to make another film in the series next year.  He even wants to bring back Len Wiseman, who directed "Live Free Or Die Hard," to helm the film that Willis hopes will take the series international.

"It's got to go worldwide," he told MTV during his interview. "That would be my contribution to it."

I guess I'm baffled why this one's happening.  Did "Live Free Or Die Hard" really do that well?  I was under the impression that the general reaction to it was indifference, but maybe I'm projecting my own take onto everyone.  Whatever the case, if this does start to come together, we probably won't hear anything more concrete until it's closer to shooting next year.

In the meantime, I'm seeing Bruce Willis's new film "Cop Out" this week, and I'll have a review for you before it opens.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    nick_r

    I like all the first 3 Die Hard movies (my ranking goes 1, 3, 2 and it goes without saying that the original is the best by leaps and bounds), but I thought the fourth was truly awful. Forget being a good Die Hard movie; it failed at being even an average late-2000s action flick. If you can say anything good about it, it's that it makes Lethal Weapon 4 and Indiana Jones 4 look like a pair of Oscar winners by comparison. If Willis wants to do more of these, I can only assume it's for the money. And that's a shame, because he's proven that he's capable of doing great, subtle work in other, better kinds of movies. He doesn't have Nic Cage's financial woes, so why not commit the rest of his career to doing small films for scale, rather than aspiring to emulate Harrison Ford's latter years?

    February 22, 2010 at 6:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    alphabet

    agree, more Die-Hard is not needed, and that John McClane is much more interesting as an average guy.

    But given context of the die-hard universe, where he's saved the world a handful of times, realistically (i know, how relevant is a word like that here, but whatever), he wouldn't be such an average guy anymore - he's been changed through experience into JohnMothaFuckinDieHardMcClane.

    Somebody (Maybe even you, Drew!) said that in reality, Oliver Stone would likely have made a film about Jack Bauer by now.

    So they can never recapture the charm of that first movie, but would it even feel genuine if they tried? John McClane just isn't that guy anymore.

    Admittedly, this is perhaps the best argument for No More Die Hard.

    February 22, 2010 at 6:56PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Dkaye2_talkback_profile

    HubertHawkins09

    "Die Hard With a Vengence" was the best of the sequels, while "Live Free... " the worst by far. However, I did like Willis shooting the fire extinguisher that explodes and blows the bad guy out the window. But whatever happened to great hero introductions? I really liked "Vengence," but McClane had a terrible introduction. And in "Live Free" he shows up in a parking lot outside his daughter's school? (if memory serves)

    February 22, 2010 at 7:28PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jim_M

    Drew: Notice the disturbing trend:

    Live Free or Die Hard: $383,531,464
    Die Hard With A Vengeance: $366,101,666
    Die Hard 2: $240,031,094
    Die Hard: $140,767,956

    February 22, 2010 at 8:22PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Those numbers are very misleading, though. First of all, even though the first made very, very good money for 1988, its real appreciation didn't break until home video/cable. So it's haul doesn't really reflect it's overall quality/appeal.

      Second of all, you're listing worldwide grosses, not domestic, and none of them are adjusted for inflation, which is pretty relevant considering the last installment came out 20 years after the first. The worldwide theatrical market was just not what it is now in 1988, so that's a factor. But if you look even closer, the second, third and fourth entries in the series were outgrossed in the (now-expanding) worldwide market - #'s 3 and 4 by a HUGE margin. Why? The rest of the world loves branded American action movies, even when Americans don't really care.

      It's a statistic, but I don't think the lesson is that the worse the movies have gotten, the more people have gone to see them because they think they're really good. In fact, the LFoDH barely made back its production budget stateside and made less worldwide than DHwaV. Which I think is tantamount to Drew's point - a fifth film could make money, but no one really cares, by and large, whether or not it happens.

      February 23, 2010 at 1:18AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    There are only two Die Hard movies, both directed by John MicTiernan. The first 90 minutes of 'With A Vengeance' are tremendous, probably the last great pre-CG action movie, its only when the cargo ship blows up and the action moves to the Canadian border that it becomes sadly lacking.

    Die Hard 2 and Live Free or Die Hard do not exist.

    February 22, 2010 at 9:08PM EST Reply to Comment


  • I think you are projecting your own opinion on it.

    A lot of us love the last Die Hard. Went with like 20 people opening night and we all really dug it. I was pleasantly surprised. Loved the non stop action and thought it was great. Would love to see another one. Also love the 2nd one. Think it is underrated. Gene Siskel actually put it on his ten best list the year it came out.

    Not crazy about the third one. Felt all over the place and didn't think there was enough action.

    The first is still one of the greatest moves ever.

    February 22, 2010 at 10:31PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    David

    I know about 15 people who really enjoyed the last Die Hard Including Me and no one that didn't enjoy it!

    February 22, 2010 at 11:23PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    j2talk

    die hard 4.. gets bonus points for casting Kevin Smith....the lack of swearing doesn't affect enjoyment of the f'ing movie.It does however loose points for the jump the shark airplane sequence....I would however, be standing in line for the the NEXT installment of the series...

    February 22, 2010 at 11:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Cody B

    This is pleasantly surprising news. i was hopin that they would continue the series but i didnt think they were up for another. I love ALL the die hard movies. You people seriously need to move on. of course they wont be as good as the original bu the sequels have gotten pretty damn close. just enjoy them for the extremely fun action movies they are. Yippe Kay-Yay Mother Fucker!!!!

    February 22, 2010 at 11:44PM EST Reply to Comment


  • Im with you, Drew. No more sequels, please! The first is the perfect action movie, and everything since then is complete arse. The 4th I saw at the movies, and felt offended to the core with almost every decision in there. Please just leave it be!

    February 22, 2010 at 11:52PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    TheRestofHumanity

    I, on the other hand, found DH4 unwatchable, as did everyone I know.

    February 23, 2010 at 7:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Fastbak

    I agree Drew. Even Michael Scott in an episode "The Office" knew that what made the first DIE HARD great was that John McClane was just an average guy and that the latest one wasn't as good because he's like a superhero.

    February 23, 2010 at 12:24PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Uglyhomer_talkback_profile

    TallBoy66

    To me, there's only 2 Die Hard movies: Die Hard and Die Hard with a Vengeance. Both have Gruebers in them so it works in a "thematic" way, well as thematic as movies called Die Hard can be. The interplay between Samuel L. Jackson and Willis in Vengeance is too good to completely write off.

    February 23, 2010 at 10:48PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web