Will Neil Gaiman's 'Sandman' finally find a home on TV?

And why does 'Supernatural' seem like a perfect training ground for the adaptation?

Will Neil Gaiman's 'Sandman' finally find a home on TV?

Death and Dream meet in the park for a chat in an important early moment in Neil Gaiman's epic 'Sandman' series

Credit: DC Comics/Vertigo

Now this is finally starting to sound like something I can get behind.

I haven't been particularly vocal about my affection for the show "Supernatural" up till now, because I've never really watched the show on the right schedule to chime in.  I caught up to it fairly late.  I think they were probably three seasons into production before I decided to give the first few episodes a try.  Enough people told me how much the show improved and how good it got that I stuck with it.  And honestly, it wasn't bad to start... just familiar. A cleverly-made "monster of the week" show about a pair of brothers on the road fighting things that go bump in the night, "Supernatural" didn't seem special at first.

Eventually, though, that's the exact word I'd use for the series.  Under the supervision of Eric Kripke and a truly great writing staff (yay, Ben Edlund!), the show turned into a wry, self-aware, hilarious and often actually scary show with a great mythology.  The cast is a big part of the show's appeal, but it's the way the show gradually found its voice and its focus and really stuck to what they were building that won me over.

So when I read that Eric Kripke might be the guy to develop "Sandman" for television, and that part of what has to happen before it moves forward is Neil Gaiman signing off or coming onboard, then I start to think, "Maybe this time, they'll actually do it."

Way back in the early days of Ain't It Cool, I wrote an impassioned plea against the direction Warner Bros. was heading in development on a "Sandman" film for producer Jon Peters.  It was basically a toxic rant about a draft by William Farmer for Peters, and it was such a bizarre, horrifying misfire that I went a little over the top.  In the years since, I've spoken to many filmmakers who would love to take a shot at the material, and they've all acknowledged the same fear... that they would screw it up and displease Neil Gaiman.  No one wants to be that person, or at least none of the people I spoke with want to be that person.  And that's great.

Today, when Borys Kit and James Hibberd broke the story today, I glanced at it and thought Kripke already had the gig, but now it looks like they're actually still meeting with people to try and find the right fit, with Kripke merely the guy at the top of the potential list for the moment.  What I really respect about "Supernatural" is how good they got at the art of building a season, something that I think is essential in serialized storytelling.  With "Sandman," you've got amazing potential season arcs lurking in there, and I don't think it's as easy as just saying, "One graphic novel, one season."  A really smart showrunner is going to feel free to take the material and completely explode it before putting it back together in the shape of a TV show.  And they're going to know that they don't have to reinvent anything... they've got this outstanding source to draw on, and the gig is more about curating.  Finding the best way to translate what makes the comic great to the screen.

Whatever happens, I hope Warner Bros. moves cautiously here and really finds the right match.  In those hands, "Sandman" could be the next great TV obsession, and a wealth of material for years to come.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

Become a fan of HitFix on Facebook.

You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Ogammi definitely should be tv vs film, hopefully walking dead will be a success and that will get the ball rolling for sandman on tv, as well as preacher, 100 bullets, y the last man, fables, etc

    September 2, 2010 at 6:59AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Chrissy Yikes. First Locke and Key and now this. I am definitely feeling negatively towards more and more beloved comics being turned into TV/movies. It was fun for a while - superhero stories, Hellboy; those are great as cinema. But why can't some of these stories live their lives on the page? It makes me feel like, somehow, the comic book/graphic novel medium isn't good enough, that every story told there has to move into the physical realm if it's any good. Every time they do something like this, isn't there some screenwriter with an original idea going home depressed? I love Supernatural and, by extension, Kripke, but I can't think of a comic series I would less like to see on the big (or little) screen than Sandman.

    September 2, 2010 at 8:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JoeK I've said it before this is perfect for HBO prestige format episodic. If done with care and proper resources could be huge.

    September 2, 2010 at 9:17AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mardia I love the Sandman comics, but am I the only one who thinks Kripke is one of the worst possible choices

    September 2, 2010 at 12:54PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      mardia ack, posted too early. Anyway, I think Kripke is one of the worst choices possible for this. Yeah, he's got experience with Supernatural, but the Sandman comics have a LOT of great female characters, and on Supernatural, all the female characters end up either evil, dead, or evil AND dead. And count me in as one of the people who actually think Supernatural is a really overrated show.

      I'd love to see Sandman done right, but there's no way Kripke will manage that.

      September 2, 2010 at 12:55PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Brendan I don't know man, I don't know if a TV show will be able to have the scope (Ancient civilizations, alternate dimensions, Hell) and the sense of sprawl that Gaiman was able to creat with Sandman. To me, it isn't really Sandman if you don't have the overarching theme about the nature of stories and dreams, and to achieve that, the makers need to feel free to move backwards through time, to make episodes where Dream's role is minimal, to have the kind of huge cast and ambition to create sights that truly boggle the mind. I don't know how you take that work and boil it down to 22 episodes a year with a manageable budget.

    Death might make a good TV show.

    I don't know. Good luck, I guess. Don't tarnish the greatest comic book series ever.

    September 2, 2010 at 1:08PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Bradley Valentine "curating" would be a great word for this show with the pool of material there.

    September 3, 2010 at 3:01AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mest Neil Gaiman is underwriting Scientology. The Scientologists list Neil Gaiman in the Cornerstone Newsletter along with Mary Gaiman, as contributing $35,000.00 in 2009. Being listed in the Cornerstone Newsletter means you are in good-standing with the cult.

    In 2010, Mary Gaiman was awarded the "Gold Humanitarian Award" for her contribution of $500,000.00 to Scientology. This is significant because Mary Gaiman continues to be Neil Gaiman’s business partner in The Blank Corporation, which is now Neil Gaiman's Scientology front and how he pays the cult.

    Gaiman is also the "Vitamin Heir" of Scientology. The Gaiman family owns G&G Vitamins which reaps 6 million a year from selling The Purification Rundown Vitamins.

    Gaiman's two sisters, Claire Edwards and Lizzie Calciole are not just high-ranking Scientologists, they are the head of RECRUITING and the head of Wealden House, the Scientology stronghold in East Grinstead. These two cannot associate with Neil unless he is in good standing.


    September 5, 2010 at 6:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Toshi_icon_talkback_profile

      drew Ultimately... so what? So what if he is? It doesn't negate one single line from one single page of one single issue of "Sandman."

      People who chase other people around the Internet over their religious choices, no matter how much you disagree with them or dislike them, are intolerant creeps.

      Knock it off.

      September 5, 2010 at 9:20PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Mest jr. Drew, you are an ignorant fool. Scientology isn't a religion, it's a dangerous CULT that destroys people's lives and Gaiman is funding it. You must be a Sea Org member typing away in a basement somewhere. Sad for you.

    November 11, 2010 at 1:51AM EST Reply to Comment
Drew McWeeny

About This Blog

Los Angeles has changed since 1990, and Drew McWeeny, all-around Chauncey Gardner of movie fandom, has seen it all as an industry insider and screenwriter who wrote for 12 years as "Moriarty" for Ain't It Cool News.

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook