Cannes Film Festival 2013

Watch: Third 'Tron: Legacy' trailer reveals more details of the Disney sequel

Will this be the first worthwhile live action 3D movie?


Disney released a third trailer today which incorporates a lot of the footage we have already seen in the Daft Punk "video" montage and some other clips that already been floating around. But there were other details that caught my eye. I'll explain.
 
Part of the reason that 3D animated films (including "Avatar") have been more successful than live action 3D films is that the animators modeling the characters and landscapes are thinking in 3D space, the software they use forces them to, and the fact that the films are finally being shown in 3D is more of a logical afterthought of the process than an end to the means.

Traditional live action filmmakers however, have over one hundred years of tradition and teaching that tells them to think of the screen as a "canvas", AKA, a flat plane. They compose their visual information in those terms and may be inadvertently trapping themselves in that plane, as opposed to thinking of their new canvas as a cube instead of a rectangle.
 
If you'll notice, almost every shot in this trailer has lines that lead the eye into the distance or set up barriers that give a sense of depth. Even watching it in 2D, it's apparent that they are thinking in 3D. Fitting and perhaps ironic that such a CGI centric movie like 'Tron: Legacy' may become the example of how to shoot live action in 3D.
 
What do you think? Is Joseph Kosinski the guy to do it?
 
Tron: Legacy opens in theaters December 17th
 

Get Instant Alerts - Motion Captured
By subscribing to this e-alert, you agree to HitFix Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and to occasionally receive promotional emails from HitFix.

Follow Drew McWeeny and Motion Captured on

RSS Facebook Twitter
 
Alex-dorn-sm

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup


  • The more I see the more I want to see. I love everything about this.

    November 9, 2010 at 2:28PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Dkaye2_talkback_profile

    HubertHawkins09

    I'm in. Trailer was terrific. However, Bridge's digitally de-aged face still stands out like a sore thumb. Perhaps it will look better in the film.

    November 9, 2010 at 4:04PM EST Reply to Comment
    • I agree. As a glimpse, the effect works amazingly well. Seeing the face project emotion or recite dialogue, not so much. Still, this movie looks front-loaded with so much visual style that I can forgive a slight dip in the uncanny valley.

      November 9, 2010 at 6:16PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JoeK

    I've been on board since the first, great, understated trailer but they are dangerously close to a tipping point (with the internet crowd at least) in my opinion. Average people that don't mainline movie news are maybe tangentially aware and I'm sure the TV will kick in soon to remedy that but I hope this gets a chance by the time it actually arrives. Personally the first trailer and the fabulous one-sheet and the musical cues have been enough for me. At this point every new element I see is like erosion.

    November 9, 2010 at 6:37PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

    Mulderism

    If anything I'd say the trailers are giving us too much. I can already piece together most of the story from the first trailer.

    I'm definitely there for the first midnight showing.

    I'm fine with Clu. It looks CGI for sure but maybe this will be fixed up a bit when it's released. My only complaint is the costumes. I wish they had paid more homage to the original costumes with their glowing circuitry. The TR2N costumes just look like motorcycle suits with glowing strips. Aren't these supposed to be programs? Hopefully this will be addressed.

    And finally, I hope TRON is in the movie somewhere. Maybe that's a surprise being kept under wraps.

    November 9, 2010 at 10:21PM EST Reply to Comment


  • When he says 'where are you now??' it looks good. When he says 'we're always on the same team' it looks horrible. They have GOT to get that mouth/speaking fixed.

    November 10, 2010 at 1:22AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jason Regan

    I'm really liking what I see, apart from the 'younger 'Bridges who looks like he's been to Joan Rivers' surgeon. There's something very artificial about tit which may work in the virtual world but really doesn't in the flashback section. It's a bit like some of the digital doubles in Superman Returns that were unnecessary and stuck out like a sore thumb, undermining other amazing effects work.

    November 10, 2010 at 11:08AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Jason Regan Excuse my typing above! ..artificial about it....

      November 10, 2010 at 7:30PM EST


  • As a general rule, special effects tend to look better on the big screen than on tv/video - I always thought it had something to do with the film to video conversion, but it might have to do with scale too. Things we are noticing in the trailer may just wash over us in the theater?

    November 11, 2010 at 11:01AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web