Watch: Gay-baiting crazies and floundering franchises all part of the 10 Worst Films Of 2011
Some well-liked voices hit sour notes this year
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Just as 2011 delivered some delirious highs, there were also some moments of jaw-dropping wrong-headedness, movies that aimed high and failed completely, and ineptitude on a level that is almost infuriating. If we're passionate enough to pick the ten films that did everything right, you can bet we're passionate enough to pick the ten that got it all wrong.
I considered titles like "Jack and Jill," but the Happy Madison stuff is such a uniform sort of terrible that I find it hard to work up the energy to truly hate them. I may think the "Twilight" films are terrible, but "Breaking Dawn" is so well-made that even if I don't like the text, I can respect the wrapping paper they've put it in.
No, to make this list, a film had to really spectacularly fumble it all, and if you throw in some truly nasty subtext, you've got a winning combination. I dislike every single one of these films in an active and engaged way, and I have no interest in ever sitting through any of them again. The great part about the end of the year is that you can put awful movies like this in your rearview mirror and move on.
But not without one more kick to the ribs...
10 / RED RIDING HOOD
A lunk-headed fairy tale told through the filter of "Twilight," and shot with a hilarious solemnity by Catherine Hardwicke. The film deserves another kick on its way out the door for being an especially pointless example of the way the term "unrated director's cut" is abused when marketing movies on home video. Featuring a mystery that would have been laughed off "Scooby Doo," the film in set in some cranked up fantasy land where hot dudes fight over bug-eyed pretty girls who spend most of their time running in slow-motion through Enya videos.
9 / THE RESIDENT
While I'm happy that Hammer is making horror films again, they have to aim higher than this. Hillary Swank finally makes a film in which her last name seems like a direct shout-out to the skeevy men's magazine, a dirty, mopey little horror film about a young doctor trying to escape a bad relationship. Sadly, she does so by moving into a building where her landlord, played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan like he's starring in a really beefy update of "Flowers For Algernon," has rigged her apartment so he can do pervy things. Not campy or crazy enough to be bad movie fun, it's just ugly and dull and a waste of a good cast, including a visibly embarrassed Christopher Lee.
8 / THE EAGLE
It's hard to believe anyone in Hollywood thought we needed two movies inspired by the story of the lost Ninth Legion of Rome, but at least Neil Marshall's "Centurion" featured a shirtless Fassbender in midieval Superhero mode. This is an uneasy buddy movie between Channing Tatum, hilariously miscast, and Jamie Bell, who seems well aware of just how bad the movie is but unable to do anything to stop it. Kevin Macdonald also made this year's very good "Life In A Day," as well as "The Last King Of Scotland" and "Touching The Void," so I'm sure he'll survive this stumble, but it's safe to say that whatever his strengths are as a filmmaker, period-era action films are not among them.
7 / PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDES
As strong an example of what happens when you end up on the wrong side of the fine line between crass commercialism and naked contempt for an audience as you'll find this year. Rob Marshall managed to suck whatever fun remained in the idea of watching Johnny Depp wobble about doing his Captain Jack shtick, and Penelope Cruz is visually appealing but utterly wasted in her role as his not-even-slightly-believable love interest. Since this worst film in the series made a billion dollars worldwide, we can expect them to keep getting worse in the future. That's not a promise… it's a threat.
6 / MAGIC TRIP
I think it was about thirty minutes into Alex Gibney's flabby, phony documentary about the Merry Pranksters bus tour and Ken Kesey and the '60s that I realized I am 100% finished with pretending to care about hippie culture. It's fifty years now of navel-gazing self-congratulatory self-mythologizing nonsense, and it has to stop. Boomers have to get over something that happened to them a half-century ago, and there is no need for anyone to ever cut another crappy montage of half-naked flower children painting each other and smoking joints cut to a Canned Heat tune. This is empty cliche after empty cliche, and proof that Gibney is just cranking out docs as product these days instead of digging deep on subjects that really merit the attention.
5 / RED STATE
Before including this film on the list, I went back to see it again, removed from the grotesque circus that surrounded its Sundance premiere, and I was surprised to realize it is even worse than I thought on first viewing. Shapeless, cynical, and sloppy, "Red State" is Kevin Smith's idea of what a horror movie about fundamentalism looks like, and it's a post-Waco undercooked mess, a movie that tackles some very big subjects without a single thing of interest to say about them. Even the great Michael Parks, saddled with endless speeches full of hollow rhetoric, can't make this material work, and if there's anything good to say about the movie, it is that Smith swears he's almost done making them.
4 / THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE 2 (FULL SEQUENCE)
This film reveals Tom Six as one of the most calculated and empty provocateurs working today. His first film managed to capture a surprising mainstream audience simply because it restrained itself, focusing more on mood than on graphic mayhem. The second film reaches for some meta-textual significance and commentary on horror film audiences, but it is so cartoonishly gross, so unrelentingly unrelenting, that is becomes a numbing exercise. It is a total failure as a horror film, not remotely scary, and not all the post-modern reflexive deconstruction in the world can justify the parade of moronic degradation the film delivers.
3 / GREEN LANTERN
"in Brightest Day, In Blackest Night, Ryan Reynolds career is not alright, With this and the "Change-Up" both a blight, it's crazy they couldn't get 'Green Lantern' right!" The scary thing is that the marketing for the film understood the movie more than the actual movie did, and for a little while, it looked like Warner had pulled off a "Star Wars" with superheroes. Instead, the movie plays like someone really wanted to find a way to deliver all the thrills and charms of "Superman III" or "Batman Forever." Garish, with a terrible villain and an incomprehensible climax, there's no excuse for anyone making a superhero movie this bad at this point.
2 / APOLLO 18
Even as I try to figure out where to start describing the staggering ineptitude involved in every aspect of this found-footage horror film, I just keep coming back to the idea that this is a monster movie in which the monster is eventually revealed to be a pile of moon rocks with legs. Even so, I find myself unreasonably excited to realize that the Blu-ray version that was sent to me for review contains the endings that they originally shot that were considered "not good enough to use." Keep in mind, it now ends with moon rocks with legs. Thrilling, isn't it?
1 / FRANCIS FORD COPPOLA'S TWIXT
A movie that was almost breathtaking in the way it torched not just the artistic legacy of one of the greatest commercial filmmakers of the '70s, but the reputation of Edgar Allen Poe for no good reason. I admire and respect that Coppola has become more experimental at this stage in his career, but this manages to be a worse horror film than "Apollo 18," "Red State," or "The Resident." That is almost as depressing as watching the ruined beauty of Val Kilmer clown his way through the lead role, his once flawless comic-timing now buried. The live performances promised at Comic-Con never came to pass, which is a shame, because it's not often you can buy a ticket to watch someone destroy their good name live and in person. The horror… the horror… indeed.
i'm still working on my final wrap-up piece for 2011, so look for that the day after Christmas. In the meantime, I'm taking the boys to see "Tintin" in 3D later today, and then it's time for family and friends and all sorts of fun. I hope you guys have a great holiday, and if you're one of the filmmakers who made the list above, I sincerely hope 2012 is a better year for you.
News From Our Partners
-
'The Office' Series Finale Review: "Finale"
'Anger Management' Review: "Charlie and the Break-Up Coach"
'Hannibal' Review: "Fromage"
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
Supernatural Season 8 Finale Review: It's Raining Angels
-
Who Won 'American Idol' 2013?
'The Office' Finale: Michael Scott's Surprise Appearance
And Your New 'American Idol' Is ...
-
'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II': The Oscar-Winning Movie is Getting a Sequel
'The Bling Ring' Cannes Premiere: Emma Watson Steals the Show (PHOTOS)
Why Brad Bird Turned Down 'Star Wars: Episode VII'; Talks 'Incredibles' Sequel
-
Mariah Carey Medleys, Jennifer Lopez Lives It Up With Pitbull on 'American Idol' Finale [Videos]
Candice Glover Wins 'American Idol' Season 12
Beyonce Gets Emotional Onstage in Belgium [Video]
-
'Pacific Rim' Trailer Surfaces: Watch Now!
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
-
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition
Video Interviews with Katie Aselton & Lake Bell of Black Rock
-
Crosstalk: A fan and a newbie catch up on the first season of The Venture Bros.
AVQ&A: What are your favorite and least favorite cultural baits and switches?
Podmass: The Dice Man infiltrates podcasting, Casey Wilson chokes up on The JV Club, and Kumail vs. Maron
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupLaruse
December 24, 2011 at 5:00PM EST Reply to CommentI thought you said you weren't going to be talking about Kevin Smith anymore? You just can't resist. This is hilarious.
drew Had to be honest at the end of the year, and his film really is that bad.
December 24, 2011 at 5:05PM ESTOther than that, though, I've been happy to leave him alone all year. He hasn't stopped talking about the review, though. It's amazing how much it seems to have bothered him.
If one paragraph eleven months later is "hilarious" or means I "can't resist," I guess guilty as charged. Let's see if poor put-upon Mr. Smith can survive another 100 words or so.
So you know he hasn't stopped talking about it. Again, not ignoring him.
December 24, 2011 at 5:28PM ESTDrew, he isn't mad that you didn't write a positive review the film so much as the WAY you wrote it. Making yourself out to be a "better filmmaker" because you "made a horror film" and, in YOUR opinion, it was "better than his" was a really poor choice.
Eating sour grapes isn't as bad as reading them. Sorry, you still have a hard-on for a guy who's had movies that have debuted outside of Showtime.
drew That's not what I wrote, Adam. Go back and read it. Anyone who thinks I said "I am a better filmmaker" did not read that review. And that includes him.
December 24, 2011 at 5:31PM ESTPaint it any way you want. I wrote one review in January and a paragraph here and nothing in between. Hardly a jihad.
I DID read it back then (and commented- more on that later). Perhaps I exaggerated a bit but here's what you wrote-
December 24, 2011 at 6:01PM EST"Ahem. I think I did. Make a film, that is. I wouldn't call mine better, per se. Humbly submitted, I will be happy to tell you every single thing I think is wrong with my "Masters Of Horror" episode "Pro-Life," directed by John Carpenter, and it's not a small list. But I will also tell you that we deal with very similar material, we did it in 2006, we did it for 1/4 of the money Smith spent, we had Ron Perlman who was amazing in the film, and I didn't spend a year of my life bent in half like a carnival freak blowing myself in public in the lead-up to the release of the episode. So that removes that old qualifier that filmmakers love to throw at critics, because I know that it's hard to pull off material like this."
Sounds a little self-congratulatory to me. It's not a straight out "I did it better" but it's not exactly...not, either. You basically say, "I did a movie that tackled the same sort of issues for less money and I didn't have to whore my self around to do it." You see, what you did was about as close to passive-agressive as you can get (super sweet the way you covered your ass with the "things that went wrong" part- absolves you of any comparisons between your movie and his).
Now I'm not saying his movie is better than yours or vice versa. What I AM saying is that (in my opinion, which I know means jack shit to anyone) YOUR film carrier should have never been a part the review. But honestly, that wasn't even my major problem with your review then. Here's that quote I talked about-
" "We've heard a few sight-unseen pre-emptive bids. THIS MOVIE HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN SOLD. After the screening, THEN we'll pick the distributor."
I don't see how this is a lie. Perhaps they did get a few sight -unseen pre-emptive bids. The movie WASN'T sold. And after the screening they DID pick a distributor- HIM. All statements were true. YOU inferred what you wanted. What he said didn't match up with what was in your mind and you think somehow he's pulling a fast one? I don't think so.
It saddens me how (few, if no) internet bloggers understand what Smith was doing. He did do a little bait and switch with your EXPECTATIONS (but still not a lie based on what he said) but he wanted to get his point across. The system is FUCKED. Don't think so? Look at all the films from 2010 and all the money that went into making them. Was all that REALLY worth it? When a James L Brooks rom-com costs $120 million- the system is fucked.
This was Smith's Fuck You to all that. He's showing that you don't need a shit ton of money or spend five times the budget of a film on P&A. He's showing that he doesn't need studios or (God forbid) the press (be it print, online or otherwise). He doesn't need YOU and you're pissed. Understandable- we all want to feel needed.
No, what he's doing is not revolutionary but the fact that it's being done- the fact that someone who can stand up and be heard is stepping up in front of executives and saying, "You're broken. Maybe we should try something else for a change," is a great thing. The internet especially should be behind the ideals Smith is spouting off. Films that are made as art- not, "Let's see how much scratch we can earn in three days with our craptastic, rushed, post-3D mess of a film." It's only though change that we can learn. But when that change doesn't include you- it hurts."
I'm not giving excuses for his actions and I'm not Super Fanboy coming to the rescue of my favorite film maker (Smith isn't by a long shot, BTW). I'm just a guy who wants critics to be held to a higher level of excellence than I thought you displayed in your initial review. Hate the movie- I'm totally cool with that. But hate a movie because you hate a MOVIE not because you hate an individual who was involved with the movie. You got (what you think was) bamboozled and told your kind (press) didn't matter to him any more and you got upset and took it out in your review. Personally, I don't like to read that in reviews. Just my two cents.
By the by- I do agree with most of your bottom 10 movies of 2011.
drew Smith framed the conversation from the start, Adam.
December 24, 2011 at 9:08PM ESTSmith is the one who spent a year saying, "You can't criticize a filmmaker if you've never made a film." That's a lazy, lazy way out for filmmakers, claiming that no critic could POSSIBLY know how hard it is to make a movie.
My entire point is that I do know. I know that it's hard to make even a severely compromised film, which is how I'd describe "Pro-Life." That's not a dodge... it's my opinion. I think the finished film is a mess, and it's because of a million things -- budget, schedule, casting compromises -- but a mess nonetheless.
And sorry, but your defense of the Sundance thing is empty. Smith could have handled that a dozen different ways and still had his moment to rail about old models no longer working. Instead, he convinced buyers to fill that room so they could bid on a movie that was never for sale. Those same buyers could have seen something else, something they could have actually bought, instead of sitting there being scolded by Smith.
When he showed "Clerks" for the first time, what if some filmmaker who was already established had held a screening at the exact same time and drawn all the attention, keeping buyers from being there for that one screening of "Clerks"? And what if it had simply faded into obscurity after that?
I do hate "Red State" as a movie. That's why it is on the list this year. I also hated the entire Sundance experience, which is why I included that in the original review.
I'm not remotely confused about the two. And I still couldn't care less what Smith thinks of the press. Your complaints are totally unfounded.
I. S. Shut Up About My Product Unless You've Made One Yourself is among the stupidest things that someone can say. I hope you've learned that this kind of attitude does not deserve a respectful response.
December 24, 2011 at 11:02PM ESTJoe Absolutely agree with I. S. Anyone who hides behind the "well why don't you make a better one" response is acting childish. I haven't seen "Red State" so I have no idea as to its quality but Smith's response to the criticism tells me all I need to know about his integrity.
December 26, 2011 at 4:38AM ESTBen Kabak dont worry Drew. Smith is a hack. Anyone who sat thru 15 min of Red State feels your pain.
December 28, 2011 at 11:56AM ESTlevrock
December 24, 2011 at 5:06PM EST Reply to CommentI haven't seen "Magic Trip", but I agree with the sentiment in your review 100%. Maybe 99%. Scorsese got his start editing "Woodstock". Great. Point for you there, Boomers.
drew It's on Netflix Instant now, and I highly recommend you avoid it completely.
December 24, 2011 at 5:48PM ESTBradley Valentine Thanks for the heads up. I have this in my Netflix Instant queue and I’ll delete it immediately. I’ve liked books like Electric Kool Aid Acid test and a few things Kesey did. But you absolutely nailed that hippie thing, Drew. To be fair, one of those disgruntled hippies did turn me on to a lot of good artists and good work. But it came at a high price and a lot of ranting.
December 30, 2011 at 4:17AM ESTwhiterok
December 24, 2011 at 5:14PM EST Reply to CommentNow THAT's a seriously aggressive point of view. This is fun though, I could go for another 10. Thanks in part to your recommendations throughout the year, I've done pretty well with my viewing selections. Much appreciated.
Cash Bailey
December 24, 2011 at 5:31PM EST Reply to CommentDon;t worry, Drew. Smith will just start another podcast and call it 'Drew McWeeny is such as Meanie'. It'll be three hours long.
Also, RED STATE blew. I totally believe Smith when he said he wrote it in three days. It could have used a few more drafts.
Stormshadow4life
December 24, 2011 at 5:46PM EST Reply to CommentIt pleases me that I've managed to avoid all of these films....however, I'm sure I will be seeing Pirates 4 at some point when it's on cable.
UGABugKiller
December 24, 2011 at 6:03PM EST Reply to CommentI love pre-marijuana Kevin Smith. His films were honest. They were real. They were raw.
Marijuana Kevin Smith is bloated, lazy, and maybe the most filmmaker around.
And I blame Harvey Weinstein. Harvey totally screwed Smith and his last good film, Zack and Miri Make a Porno over by scheduling its release for Halloween Weekend. The one weekend in the year where you're guaranteed to get the absolute worst receipts.
So, what does Smith do with about yet another critically praised film that underperformed at the box office?
He decides to say "Fuck it," and goes and smokes his weight in weed.
And now we, his audience, who loved films and SModcast when it FIRST started, when it was topical and had a coherent point, are screwed, because now Kevin Smith, his films, and his SModcast, are a incomprehensible mess to those of us who don't want to see or hear a stoner's meandering ramblings.
I don't have anything against people who smoke weed, but for those who always tell me that weed doesn't ruin people's lives, I offer you Kevin Smith and Dave Chappelle. Two guys who allow their need to smoke weed overcome their artistic ability.
I hope to God Kevin Smith doesn't make his hockey film, and that someone else writes it and directs it under Smith's banner. I'd love to see the next great hockey movie, and I know I won't get that from a stoned Kevin Smith.
UGABugKiller should be: "... and maybe the most DISAPPOINTING filmmaker around."
December 24, 2011 at 6:05PM EST
While I personally liked "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" it was by no means critically acclaimed. It got mixed reviews.
December 24, 2011 at 9:09PM ESTdrew I liked "Zack and Miri" as well. Gave it a nice review when it opened. In fact, if you go back and look, I've been historically very kind to Smith's work.
December 25, 2011 at 1:33AM ESTBut try telling that to his Army Of Dunces. Once you've disliked any of his films or actions, you are an Enemy. And it's not just the message board morons, either. I recall a lovely e-mail I got from Malcolm Spellman years ago when I reviewed "Small-Town Gay Bar" and liked it, and yet the night of "Red State," Spellman tore into me on Twitter, complete with the "You're just jealous you're not making movies!" nonsense.
It's sad, more than anything.
XeRocks81 It's Malcolm INGRAM, one of Smith's closest friends for years.
December 25, 2011 at 3:13AM ESTdrew Okay. Malcolm Ingram. Whatever the case, it was one of those moments where you realize that the force of the cult of personality outweighs rational response completely.
December 25, 2011 at 6:00AM ESTAll previous good things are forgotten. Attack. Attack. Attack.
Boreflower
December 24, 2011 at 9:18PM EST Reply to CommentDrew... Drew! Did you know that a technical error (or something) caused Bellflower to be on the Best list INSTEAD of the Worst list!? Just thought I should clue you in so you can correct it.
drew Oh, I see what you did there. Heeeee-larious.
December 24, 2011 at 11:19PM ESTI. S.
December 24, 2011 at 10:45PM EST Reply to CommentFilmmakers who don't want their movies reviewed (if the reviews might be bad) are like politicians who don't want people voting. When they attack the reviewer, most of the time, they're doing it wrong. Sure, there are sociopathic reviewers out there, but by definition these are people who don't have really big followings. Life's too short to watch crap, so for a consumer, a trustworthy reviewer is a valuable thing. Please, sit through that godawful stuff, so that I never have to.
By the way, a worst list is not all negative. I might check out Twixt as a "so bad it's good" experience. Watching great filmmakers go wrong can be interesting, but I'll keep my expectations low.
loogenhausen
December 24, 2011 at 10:45PM EST Reply to CommentDrew, stop arguing with these idiots and enjoy your Christmas Eve!
coolhandjennie
December 24, 2011 at 11:19PM EST Reply to CommentThis is too funny. I am literally in the middle of watching Red State; I paused it halfway through to go pick my grandmother up for Christmas Eve dinner with the intention of finishing it later tonight. As I was watching I thought - and I'm not exaggerating - "I don't remember seeing Drew's review of this, I'll have to look it up." Now I REALLY can't wait to read the review! I'm a little afraid to finish the movie though, because I really thought it was going to turn itself into a Kevin Smith movie at some point.....
Monty Jack
December 24, 2011 at 11:42PM EST Reply to CommentNo Sucker Punch? That movie was WRETCHED.
drew I'll say this much in the defense of "Sucker Punch"... it misses its target wildly, but it was aiming for something big and bold, and the ambition alone (plus Snyder's still-undeniable eye for an image) keeps it from being anything I could call the worst of a given year.
December 25, 2011 at 1:35AM ESTMonty Jack No matter how pretty the images, a film filled to the brim with loathsome misogyny thinly disguised as some sort of "feminist", Go Girl! empowerment statement was something I just could not stomach. It was actually worse than a TRANSFORMERS SEQUEL, which is saying a lot.
December 25, 2011 at 2:46PM ESTJohnCarterofMarsh I totally agree with Drew here. Sucker Punch was a mess of a movie but as a show reel of video game cut scenes it was impressive. Neither can I buy into the misogyny allegation. I thought the same too, before seeing the film, but afterwards I'm more convinced than ever of Snyder's possible latent homosexuality (and that's not meant to be derogatory, speaking as a blatant homosexual myself). Those weren't living breathing sexually attractive female archetypes. They were garish laughable cartoons. They were @ss-kicking drag queens.
December 26, 2011 at 12:36AM ESTThat Werewolf Guy
December 25, 2011 at 5:30AM EST Reply to CommentI don't know, it seems to me like you tend to judge movies on what they COULD have been and not what they are. I was disappointed by POTC 4 and GREEN LANTERN as well, especially because they could have been awesome, but I would put them more in the "mediocre and forgettable" category, instead of the "Oh noes, I saw over 200 movies this year, but those are the most awful ones" list. I didn't hold a grudge on them at all, but just shrugged them off. There was some REALLY awful stuff, like JACK & JILL or SUCKER PUNCH (nice visuals and an interesting concept are no excuse for insulting the intelligence of your audience), that deserved a spot on this list much more.
Also I'm really looking forward to finally see RED STATE. Face it, if a film that gets so completely different reactions among audiences and critics (obvious fanboy- and haterism aside), it must have done something right!
SB
December 25, 2011 at 10:59AM EST Reply to CommentIt never fails to amuse me, how commenters never understand the difference between "statement of opinion" and "claim of objective fact." Or that the former is not subject to "logical" argument.
Spence
December 25, 2011 at 1:56PM EST Reply to CommentGreat list, Drew, I see your points on both this list and your "best of" list, even if I don't consistantly agree with you. I enjoyed Pirates 4 for what it was, but I ended up hating Transformers 3. I guess people can tolerate different types of Hollywood bullshit, but can't abide by others.
Oh, and Red State. Not a good movie by any stretch of the imagination, but it is slightly interesting to see a director do something that is so totally different to their usual type/genre/style. Might be worth it just for that. And Michael Parks.
BigAl6ft6
December 28, 2011 at 9:51PM EST Reply to Commentwhile I don't agree with some of the choices on here, it was an entertaining watch which is really what "worst of" lists are about. Nicely gutso reading of the list, too. I got asked to do one this year but I passed because I didn't think I put in enough hours, nor did I want to at all, watching the real contenders like "Jack & Jill" and/or "New Years Eve". etc.