Cannes Film Festival 2013

Watch: Guy Ritchie on the luxuries of a big-budget London for 'Sherlock Holmes 2'

A casual chat with the filmmaker about world-building


Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

It's not often that I double-dip with interviews for one movie, but that's exactly what happened this past week with Guy Ritchie for his new film, "Sherlock Holmes - A Game Of Shadows."

Earlier in the week, I ran our podcast interview, which was about twenty solid minutes with the director talking about a number of different aspects of making the film, including working with Robert Downey Jr., a demanding collaborator by all accounts, and how they handled Moriarty.  But one of the things we didn't have a chance to talk about it is actually one of the things that interests me most in the film.

I think it's safe to say I've been preoccupied with London most of my life.  I fell in love with English pop culture young, and one of the great pleasures of my professional life has been the way I've been able to repeatedly visit London and tour various corners of it, including some of the soundstages and studios where many of my favorite films were made.

I'm particularly fascinated by historical depictions of London at various points in its history.  The Dan Simmons novel "Drood" is one of the best pieces I've read in recent memory about London as it made the transition from a classic Victorian city into a modern industrial monolith.  The dirty and the grime and the cost of human lives is what makes that such a memorable depiction, and it's not often that filmmakers dealing in period films spend their time and money on the building of that environment.  WIth Ritchie, I get the distinct feeling that part of what he enjoys about the "Sherlock" films is the chance to explore the city's history on film, and so that's what we spent most of this interview discussing.

I'm not sure what the future holds for Ritchie.  I like the notion of him doing a "Man From U.N.C.L.E." film, and it seems like he's getting more comfortable with these big-canvass movies like this.  I'm curious to see if this film does well enough for them to keep making "Sherlock" films, and if so, how they'll handle the series moving forward.  These two were set at a very particular time in the relationship between Holmes and Watson, and it feels like they've got a real challenge if they return for more films.

"Sherlock Holmes - A Game Of Shadows" is in theaters now.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Bradley Valentine

    Another Rock n Rolla would make me hip and happy.

    December 18, 2011 at 10:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    SoberFilmCritic

    We've seriously been lacking good, entertaining blockbusters in recent months. The most popular flick we have to show for the fall up to this point is The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1, which is a really sad statement. While Hollywood has been complaining about record lows for attendance this year at the box office, they continuously put out crappy movie after crappy movie. Well, what can I say? If you put out a product that undeniably sucks, your returns will suck. That being said, Hollywood needs to man up, take some creative risks, and actually try to make good original movies. With Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, they came close; they made a good sequel at least. With Guy Ritchie's follow up to the 2009 film Sherlock Holmes, Hollywood finally brings something worthwhile to theaters again. For more of my thoughts on Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, check out my review on Sobriety Test Movie Reviews at http://bit.ly/rtT3YQ

    December 19, 2011 at 12:59AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web