Toronto: 'Let Me In' is exceptional, with two brilliant young leads at their best
A case where a second shot at material yields even richer rewards
Chloe Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee co-star in 'Let Me In,' an American version of an acclaimed recent Swedish film
There is no one who feels more protective of "Let The Right One In" than I do.
The joke, of course, is that I imagine most fans of the film feel that way. When I saw the movie at Fantastic Fest in September of '08, that was already nine full months after it started its life on the festival circuit, and if you go back and look at the reviews that came out of festival after festival, including Tribeca in April and Seattle in May, people were buzzing about this special, beautiful, hushed little gem of a vampire movie. It got a theatrical release of sorts here in October of that year, but it never broke out of the "well-reviewed subtitled movie that no one sees" boneyard. Whatever fan base it has, it has earned honestly through word of mouth and reviews, and everyone I've ever spoken with about the film seems to love it in that protective way that film fans sometimes adopt for delicate movies you don't want anyone to abuse.
I think a lot of that has to do with the enormous empathy that the film generates for Oskar (Kare Hedebrant) and Eli (Lina Leandersson), kids who were cast after an open search turned them up, non-professionals who gave these amazing, non-affected performances. I know that when I saw the film originally, I felt so bad for these kids that it excused everything they do in it. I thought they did work that was magic. Once in a lifetime.
There is good reason to be skeptical of "Let Me In," which was adapted by writer/director Matt Reeves from John Ajvide Lindqvist's novel and from Lindqvist's own adaptation of the book which was used for the Swedish film, "Lat Den Ratte Komma In." I was skeptical all the way up to the moment the screening actually began, and I got pulled in by the quiet precision of this film by Matt Reeves. I believe this is every bit as valid a take on Lindqvist's novel as the film by Tomas Alfredson was. That may offend some purists, but Matt Reeves approached this material with a keen eye and a sharp wit. He basically stripped it all the way down, cutting out most of our glimpses of the community around these children, reducing parents to out of focus background figures, stranding Owen (Kodi Smit-McPhee) and Abby (Chloe Moretz) in a universe where they must make impossible moral choices on their own.
Working with Greig Fraser, the cinematographer whose last film "Bright Star" was a great example of control over atmosphere, sculpting with light and shadow, Matt Reeves turns Los Alamos, New Mexico into a ghost town, a place cut off by a perpetual chill, and he sets Owen adrift in it. I didn't care for last year's "The Road," and I didn't connect at all to the performance there by Kodi Smit-McPhee. And now, I think I have to blame that on John Hillcoat, the director of "The Road," and not on the kid because he's amazing in "Let Me In." Amazing. And for the second time this year, I find myself singing the praises of Chloe Moretz, a remarkable, intuitive actress who is able to project this presence way beyond her years, and yet it never seems like an act, and it also doesn't seem to have dented the innocence that is still so close to the surface for her as well. They both do sophisticated work in this film, and the dance between Owen and Abby is everything. That's the whole film. It either works or the movie is pointless, and what Matt Reeves captured between these two is raw and real and amazing.
Equally impressive in the film are Richard Jenkins and Elias Koteas. Jenkins plays a caregiver to Abby, a man who seems at first glance to be her father, but whose actual relationship to her is much more unsettling. Jenkins is one of the greats, a character who knocks it out of the park, time after time, film after film. In this film, those sad sad eyes of his are perfectly used, reflecting a lifetime of devotion and damage. Koteas is another one of those guys who just plain does great work consistently, and he plays the cop trying to piece together what's happening in Los Alamos, following Abby's trail, threatening this delicate cat-and-mouse between the kids. These two are really the only significant adult roles in the film, and they both do such great work that it's obvious no one was sitting around on set thinking about this as a "remake." It's just an impeccably crafted version of this story, and Matt Reeves should be very, very proud of what he's done here.
It's one thing to have a command of camera craft. It's a totally different skill set to be able to get great work out of young actors, or actors of any age, frankly. But Reeves has both those skill sets, and he's obviously made this film out of some deep-seeded compulsion. It's odd to call the second adaptation of someone else's book "personal," but that's exactly how this feels. Matt Reeves is completely in touch with the banal horror of adolescence, and he makes it almost too painful to watch at times. It's very real, and yet stylized to a degree. Michael Giacchino's score is spare, haunting, atonal in a sort of early 60's Jerry Goldsmith way, and it really works on you as you watch. It's great stuff from one of the best film composers working.
Don't think it's all going to be sad-eyed kids and mopey vampires with feelings, though, because Reeves was careful to remember that this is still a horror film as well. This is horrifying. Abby does terrible, terrible things, and when she does them, she's a horrifying thing, an animal, mad for blood. Owen doesn't just meet cute with her and then make his decisions. He is dragged into this, even as part of his brain knows how wrong the situation really is. Still, when you are on your own, feeling abandoned and abused, anyone who can give you any power is probably going to seem like your savior. When the violence comes, Reeves doesn't shy away from it, nor does he fetishize it. He wants it all to hurt, and it does.
I'm sure some people will be unwilling to invite this film in, but for those who take the shot, there are such rewards waiting for them. "Let Me In" may be, technically speaking, a remake, but even so, it's a commanding experience, and one of the strongest films of 2010.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
Become a fan of HitFix on Facebook.
You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.
News From Our Partners
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
Supernatural Season 8 Finale Review: It's Raining Angels
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
-
Crosstalk: A fan and a newbie catch up on the first season of The Venture Bros.
AVQ&A: What are your favorite and least favorite cultural baits and switches?
Podmass: The Dice Man infiltrates podcasting, Casey Wilson chokes up on The JV Club, and Kumail vs. Maron
-
'The Office' Series Finale Review: "Finale"
'Anger Management' Review: "Charlie and the Break-Up Coach"
'Hannibal' Review: "Fromage"
-
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition
Video Interviews with Katie Aselton & Lake Bell of Black Rock
-
'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II': The Oscar-Winning Movie is Getting a Sequel
'The Bling Ring' Cannes Premiere: Emma Watson Steals the Show (PHOTOS)
Why Brad Bird Turned Down 'Star Wars: Episode VII'; Talks 'Incredibles' Sequel
-
Who Won 'American Idol' 2013?
'The Office' Finale: Michael Scott's Surprise Appearance
And Your New 'American Idol' Is ...
-
'Pacific Rim' Trailer Surfaces: Watch Now!
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
September 11, 2010 at 11:43PM EST Reply to CommentI'm a huge fan of Let The Right One In, but I'm greatly looking forward to seeing Let Me In. Top-notch review as ever, Drew. Very excited for this one.
Snarf
September 12, 2010 at 8:02AM EST Reply to CommentGreat review. Can't wait to see this on October 1st.
Stormshadow4life
September 12, 2010 at 10:54AM EST Reply to CommentI really enjoyed Let The Right One In (although, I still haven't seen the theatrical subtitled version....so I might even like it more if I see the "correct" version). Anyway, I was pretty annoyed when they announced this remake, but decided to keep an open mind. Now I'm completely excited to see it on opening day (which happens to be my birthday)!
On a side note, did you only see The Road once? If so, I'd be curious to see your opinion of it on a second viewing. I found the movie to be profoundly powerful. And thought Viggo and Kodi were excellent.
Kujo Wow, you were able to watch "The Road" twice? I commend you. No way in hell I could watch that film again. One of the most depressing films I've ever seen. That being said, I didn't hate it.
September 12, 2010 at 5:33PM ESTStormshadow4life No, I only watched it once...I was just wondering if Drew watched it a second time.
September 13, 2010 at 9:12AM ESTShteev
September 12, 2010 at 2:38PM EST Reply to Comment"It's one thing to have a command of camera craft. It's a totally different skill set to be able to get great work out of young actors, or actors of any age, frankly."
From your lips to M. Night's ears.
chris
September 12, 2010 at 2:45PM EST Reply to Commentjust like scott pilgrim right drew?
pass.
alphabet
September 12, 2010 at 3:37PM EST Reply to CommentSo then Batman3... Kodi Smit-McPhee as Robin?
Ryan
September 12, 2010 at 5:28PM EST Reply to CommentAwesome review. This is the kind of review i'm talking about. You treat the films differently and review them for what they are as a singular film that share the same story of a great novel. More proof that this isn't the shot for shot remake people are claiming it to be. Let Me In takes a different adaptation to the story and turns it into a thought provoking depth filled story that is all its own. The camera work and the original scenes reeves created set this film above a high line.
Kujo
September 12, 2010 at 5:31PM EST Reply to CommentI thought Kodi Smit-McPhee was the standout of "The Road". His character was annoying at times to say the least, but the acting talent was on display.
Gotta admit, my eyes rolled when I heard about the remake, as they do with pretty much every Hollywood remake. I said to myself, I'll watch the movie strictly out of curiosity, but my expectations will be low, as Hollywood pretty much butchers every remake, and they shouldn't be made in the first place.
This is the second extremely positive review I've read.
It's great to know that this film "appears" to be as good (this will be greatly debated) as the original.
Really looking forward to seeing this now.
John W
September 12, 2010 at 6:33PM EST Reply to CommentI feel relieved. I can't wait to see it.
Could Moretz be the second coming of Portman?
hector
September 12, 2010 at 7:15PM EST Reply to CommentI was extremely skeptical when I heard about this remake (still am, really), but you've convinced me to check it out. Great review.
September 12, 2010 at 9:26PM EST Reply to CommentSigh.
Alright, so if Abbey's caretaker is a former boy who she groomed to be a killer for her, and is now doing the same with Owen.
While the original, only some people thought that. While others who read the book or even thought it odd an adult would hang around with an eternal child, and that the love between Eli and Oskar was one that transcended sex and traditional boy/girl archetypes. For one that was born out of two children that have known nothing but bad in their lives finally finding good, and bringing out the best in each other. LIKE THE BOOK.
Well this is indeed a REMAKE that did miss the point, innit? I mean in Let Me In Abbey is a vampire girl(who when she attacks is laughably Hollywood) who is taking boys every lifetime to take care of her and then tosses them away when they no longer serve purpose/something better comes along. On top of which when Jenkins says maybe I want to be caught and the car scene screaming that as well, it was a down right, "that makes me feel angry" trope, that was just bad. Glad you liked it though. Though for someone who feels very protective of the film, and is blown away with a movie that ruined the story of both...well, I don't know. Read the book and watch the original movie again?
mick I totally agree with you, though I think it's debatable whether or not Abby is consciously grooming Owen, or if that is just a byproduct of her lingering need to have closeness and still being partly a child.
September 28, 2010 at 4:20PM ESTThe two parts of the remake that demonstrated that this was a glossy money-grubbing remake were the moment where Owen finds the photobooth photos, and the total disregard for the ambiguity of Abby/Eli's gender (questioning gender roles makes American audiences squeamish).
AGGGGGGGGGGGG
September 13, 2010 at 7:32AM EST Reply to CommentARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG.
WHAT THE HOLY HELL IS THIS FILM?!
john someone
October 3, 2010 at 5:40AM EST Reply to Commentmatt reeves has not been faithful to the book's plot and starting from that, everything else is wrong,that´s why for me will always be nothing more than an example of ambition for money from lazy people who did not want to read those "pesky subtitles" from the original version,and their only defense will always be the propaganda machine paid for the movie studios
just like this supposed film critic ...