Today's Latest Headlines
-
TV
'Rubicon' - 'The Truth Will Out': Along came poly -
MOVIES
Telluride: Natalie Portman triumphs in Darren Aronofsky's riveting 'Black Swan' -
MOVIES
Box Office: George Clooney tops Danny Trejo as 'The American' wins the weekend -
TV
Take Me to the Pilots '10: ABC's 'Detroit 187' -
TV
'Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam' becomes 2010's top cable movie -
MOVIES
Telluride: Danny Boyle's '127 Hours' is a visceral and uplifting experience -
MUSIC
Kanye West has written a song for Taylor Swift and says his ego is 'overdone' -
TV
Comedian Robert Schimmel dies in tragic car accident
Review: Angelina Jolie in 'Salt' delivers impossible thrills
Published on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 9:30 PM Drew McWeeny
Liev Schreiber, Chiwetel Ejiofor, and Angelina Jolie are the key players in the crazy action/thriller 'Salt,' in theaters this weekend.
Credit: Sony Pictures
"Salt" is a very silly movie, and by the end of its brisk and breathless running time (and I mean that literally), it makes the "Bourne" movies look like documentaries.
I'm not entirely sure that's a bad thing.
Angelina Jolie is, in my opinion, a casting problem in anything at this point, and it's simply a side effect of her megafame. She projects such a powerful, fully-formed persona that it is difficult to accept her vanishing into a role. She's a talented actress, she works hard in her films, and I feel like no one could ask more of her than she already gives for her movies... but that hesitation on my part remains. You watch her onscreen, and it's Angelina Jolie, no matter what.
Part of it is the way she looks, sure. She's a cartoon, a comic-book artist's idea of the dangerous bad girl. Because she is so visually extreme, I don't buy her as, say, a spy or someone who is meant to be anonymous or adaptable. I still think the notion of the "little grey man" is the most potent notion of who a spy should be, someone you wouldn't look at twice. No matter if she's wearing long blonde hair or a dyed Morticia Addams do, Jolie stands out in any crowd.
But part of it is that there is some part of her as a performer that feels unbending, like she can't submerge her own personality enough anymore to convince as someone else. That actually serves "Salt" to some degree, because the character she plays, Evelyn Salt, is living several different roles at once, with a central core that remains unchanged no matter what situation she's in. That's a gift in the film's opening moments, where we see her in North Korea. She's been captured, and she's being tortured in an effort to convince her to confess that she's working as a spy. She keeps denying it, over and over, her cries becoming more pathetic as the main title is revealed and we cut forward in time to her release. She's being traded for a North Korean who ended up in the hands of America, at the insistence of her boyfriend Mike (August Diehl), who has no idea what she does for a living.
Two years later, Salt is back at work in the US as part of a CIA cover corporation, hoping to move over to a desk job, getting ready to celebrate her wedding anniversary to Mike, and at the end of a long day, she's about to walk out of the office with her boss, Ted (Liev Schreiber), when a defector walks in and needs to be debriefed. What starts as an inconvenience turns Salt's entire life upside down when the defector, a mysterious Russian named Orlov (Daniel Olbrychski), accuses her of being a sleeper agent, planted in the United States as a child to eventually fulfill some part in bringing down the country completely.
Desperate to find her husband and prove she isn't the sleeper agent, Salt goes on the run... and that's pretty much the entire rest of the movie. Salt runs, things are revealed, lots of people die, and a sequel is set up with almost naked contempt for the audience. And as the film accelerates, it gets more and more absurd until it reaches a climax in a White House-bound set piece that is impossible on almost every level and deranged in conception. Philip Noyce is one of those action filmmakers who's been doing it for so long that it almost feels second-nature now. He's got a clean action style, and there are some really exciting sequences in the movie. Noyce seems to me to be one of those directors who doesn't really care about coherence in his screenplays. He's set-piece driven, and he has gotten great at building an individual sequence. Stuart Baird and John Gilroy share credit on this one as editors, and it's an interesting collision. I think of Gilroy's work on films like "Michael Clayton" or "Narc," and I think of movies that have fractured timelines and a fluid sense of mise en scene. Baird is a guy who studios turn to as a closer on big action movies. Both of their skill sets are on display in this one, and the film has a relentless pulse that is well-punctuated by a few key flashes of memory to pin down the truth of Evelyn Salt's identity.
Liev Schreiber remains one of my favorite character actors working, a guy who can play completely unctuous or incredibly likable, all a matter of degrees, and he calls on a pretty full range of what he's able to do in this film. Chiwetel Ejiofer is another of the best guys working right now, and he's basically playing Tommy Lee Jones in "The Fugitive" in this one, the guy who is pursuing but who starts to believe he may be on the wrong trail. They're pretty much the whole show aside from Jolie, and Noyce got lucky with the combination of the two. They're so good that they almost convince you as you watch that the film adds up or has some emotional heft to it.
In the end, though, it's a Teflon "Bourne" rip-off, an excuse to let Angelina run and punch and grunt and shoot and ride motorcycles and jump some more and all of it to very little end. It's odd that Tom Cruise left this film to go make "Knight and Day" instead. There's no real difference between the two aside from tone. They are both wildly implausible and not interested in being plausible, they both feature nearly robotic superhero leads who are somehow supposed to be "real" simply because they don't wear capes, and both films feature busy, mechanical plots that seem unimportant except as an excuse to string together big moments. "Salt" will most likely not disappoint the eager audiences that see it opening weekend, but I can't honestly say I care one way or another if they ever make another one.
Salt may need to keep running, but I don't think I need to keep watching.
"Salt" opens in theaters everywhere this Friday.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
Become a fan of HitFix on Facebook
You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.
- Next Post Comic-Con Exclusive: New 'Drive Angry' images
- Previous Post First wave of Fantastic Fest 2010 programming announced
movie Reviews
Star Trek View Reviews
The Twilight Saga View Reviews
Batman View Reviews
Iron Man View Reviews
The Hobbit View Reviews
Inception View Reviews
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World View Reviews
Avatar View Reviews
Follow Motion/Captured
About Motion/Captured
- Los Angeles has changed since 1990, and Drew McWeeny, all-around Chauncey Gardner of movie fandom, has seen it all as an industry insider and screenwriter who wrote for 12 years as "Moriarty" for Ain't It Cool News.
Latest Posts
-
The studio offers up a look at the film that almost wasFriday, Sep 3, 2010
-
Robert Rodriguez and his conspirators keep the 'Grindhouse' franchise afloatFriday, Sep 3, 2010
-
Film's brash, frank voice distinguishes it from romantic comedy packThursday, Sep 2, 2010
-
Does the studio prefer James McAvoy for the part?Thursday, Sep 2, 2010
- Up
- Page Down



Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupTimmy C Drew, that last line is Ebert-worthy. I love your writing and glad to see you sinking your teeth into pretty much every assignment.
July 20, 2010 at 8:51PM EST Reply to Commenttigger500 Great review. I sorta feel the same way about Angelina as you. I think about her early character work like in Playing By Heart where you just new that she wasn't going to be doing those kinds for much longer.
July 20, 2010 at 10:13PM EST Reply to Comment
Oh, I suppose Schwarznegger, Stallone, Willis, Cruise, et al. submerge their personae/personalities in their action films and the characters they play are all different? And of course, their films are all original, too.
July 20, 2010 at 11:24PM EST Reply to CommentDCRunner Good one. I guess it's because those are men. Different standards for Angelina I guess. It looks exciting and interesting to me. Why would I want to watch a spy thriller where the person was so ordinary that they didn't even hold your attention? This is supposed to be a m-o-v-i-e, not a documentary - and really how believeable are the Bournes and their action scenes - which I greatly enjoyed.
July 21, 2010 at 1:13AM ESTI'll be there OW.
I was planning on skipping this entirely, but your review will get me into the theater for an early bird special. Thanks?
July 20, 2010 at 11:37PM EST Reply to Commentjacky Why is this marked as a positive review on Rotten Tomatoes?
July 21, 2010 at 12:25AM EST Reply to CommentJules It's not really a negative review, the writer isn't enthusiastic about the film (or dumb action movies in general it seems) but still thinks:
July 21, 2010 at 3:39AM ESTthere are some really exciting sequences in the movie
and
"Salt" will most likely not disappoint the eager audiences that see it opening weekend
jacky Yeah, but that last paragraph he basically says it's a bad movie. How the plot is garbage and just "an excuse to string together big moments." And the last line sums his feelings up:
July 21, 2010 at 10:32AM EST"Salt may need to keep running, but I don't think I need to keep watching."
Maybe it's just me, but I thought he personally didn't like the movie and it sounds like a negative review. The only thing positive about it is that he recommended it to people who are already going to see it... I wonder if Rotten Tomatoes doesn't want Angelina Jolie's film to have too bad of a "Rotten" rating...
Chrissy It sounds to me like a film that does what it sets out to do, but isn't really something Drew personally is that excited about. That isn't necessarily negative - I'm not really into Westerns, but I can acknowledge that one is decent. It would have to be amazing for me to really want to watch it, though, and this is clearly not an amazing movie (but not a bad one, either).
July 21, 2010 at 1:21PM ESTThat's how I read it, anyway. No idea how Rotten Tomatos works these things out.
"...as the film accelerates, it gets more and more absurd until it reaches a climax in a White House-bound set piece that is impossible on almost every level and deranged in conception."
July 21, 2010 at 4:27AM EST Reply to CommentWell, that's me sold on it. I shall be picking up my ticket for opening weekend...
rico Gonna be interesting to see. Read Wimmers original script, which started out fine, but then it just put impossible action sequence on impossible action sequence and Salt turned into one of these indestructible über-heroes, which got kinda boring.
July 21, 2010 at 4:52AM EST Reply to Commentthruppence I thought Jolie's work in Changeling was a good change-up - not a cartoon bad girl, but a victimized depression-era mother who stands her ground to find her son. Different target audience, though.
July 21, 2010 at 10:07AM EST Reply to Commentthe truth Excellent review thanks! However, I disagree with one point - Angelina Jolie cannot act. Never could never will. Though she makes a great ham! Back to your review, great writing style and these lines perfectly summed up the movie imo - wildly implausible and not interested in being plausible, they both feature nearly robotic superhero leads who are somehow supposed to be "real" simply because they don't wear capes, and both films feature busy, mechanical plots that seem unimportant except as an excuse to string together big moments.
July 21, 2010 at 1:18PM EST Reply to Comment