Review: Jude Law and Forest Whitaker's 'Repo Men' comes close to its lofty goals
Jude Law, Forest Whitaker, and Liev Schreiber have great chemistry in offbeat effort
Forest Whitaker, Jude Law, and Liev Schreiber star in the SF/thriller 'Repo Men,' opening in theaters everywhere this weekend.
The best science-fiction, like the best horror, manages to be about more than one thing, using the outrageous to illustrate the universal. "Repo Men" doesn't quite hit all of its targets, but it hits enough of them to count as a welcome and even exciting new SF vision. Jude Law and Forest Whitaker have surprisingly rich chemistry in the film, and despite one major storytelling stumble, it's soulful enough to linger.
Law stars as Remy, a repo man working for The Union, the company that makes the artificial organs that have revolutionized health care in the future. The organs are obscenely overpriced, and patients are cornered into buying, sometimes going black market. It's a genuinely interesting industry to imagine and explore, and Miguel Sapotchnik's taken as many cues from the reality of modern New York and Tokyo as from the futurescapes of "Brazil" or "Blade Runner" in bringing his vision to the screen. Eric Garcia and Garrett Lerner, working from Garcia's novel, have played fast and free with structure on the film, and as a result, it feels like you end up watching two or three different movies.
The first movie's probably the most fun, with Remy and Jake (Forest Whitaker) working the job. It's matter-of-fact, observational, all character and chemistry. Law etches Remy as a charismatic cad, a guy who can't admit to himself how much he enjoys the hunt. He's good at it, and a part of him enjoys the pain he causes someone else. He's a thug, born and raised, and his job is his excuse to keep that up, to indulge it with approval. That's the bond he shares with Jake, since he's the exact same way. And as long as that's the movie, it's just plain dark bloody fun. Liev Schreiber plays Frank, their boss at The Union, and he's an absolutely ruthless salesman, well-oiled and unburdened by any vestige of humanity. He's sensational in the part. It's one of those roles that exists like a gift to an actor, a supporting role that gets a high percentage of the good lines in the movie.
The second movie, which I think is good but not as much fun, is what happens when Remy is hurt badly on the job, requiring him to get one of the artificial organs put into himself. Suddenly, he's one of the damned souls in the system, owned by the company he works for. That makes sense, and there's real possibility in the idea that he can't pay and he ends up hunted by his best friend. The action's pretty great, staged with energy and wit.
Then there's a third movie in there, about a guy in crisis whose wife just plain can't handle it. And when she leaves, he turns to someone else in crisis and builds something new with her, something that might even be healing for both of them. I want to like that story. One of my favorite scenes in the whole film is the way this particular storyline builds to its final emotional crescendo. It's a great SF movie moment, and that is enough to forgive the film's nearly unforgiveable conclusion, a narrative move that devalues almost the entire film before it. If most of the film makes me think of the tone and style of "Robocop" (a compliment), the film's big finish is all "Total Recall" (not a compliment), and it's not a fresh enough payoff to justify undoing any investment the audience might have in these characters. I'm not sure if it's from the book or if it was created by the screenwriters or if it's Sapochnik's inventions, but it is the film's one major misstep, one that risks ruining the film for people.
Technically, the film's impressive on all fronts. It's a commercially-designed functional future that Sapochnik's designed here, and the effects give everything a real-world polish that perfectly supports the production design, which all informs the performances. As a world, it works. The score and the song soundtrack are both strong and memorable. And even so, even loving the eye for detail that the director exhibits, I'm not quite sold on "Repo Men" as a whole picture, and that bothers me a little bit. It's a recommendation with caveats. It's good but. If you're fine with almost, you'll get what you're looking for in "Repo Men," and considering how ambitious the film is, "almost" is praise, and not entirely faint.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.
News From Our Partners
-
'Breaking Dawn - Part 2' Trailer To Debut Before 'Hunger Games'
'The Vow': The Reviews Are In!
Sarah Jessica Parker: Replacing Demi Moore In 'Lovelace' 'Daunting'
-
Brandi Glanville Claims She Hooked Up With Gerard Butler
Charlie Sheen Talks Ladies – Onscreen & Off
Jonah Hill ‘Overwhelmed’ By ‘Moneyball’ Supporting Actor Nomination
-
FIRST LOOK: Meet Rachel's Dads!
Barbara Walters Vs. JFK Alleged Mistress On 'The View'
William Lucas Walker: Prop 8: The Color Of Pee-Pee
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Friday, February 10, 2012
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - TWoP 10: Ways We'd Like to See House End
-
'The Boys,' 'Mortal Instruments' Dropped By Studios
Oscar Short Film Nominees 2012: What Are They About?
Best Song Oscar Shuffle: Academy May Revamp Nomination Process
-
Interview: Woody Harrelson
Podmass: Week of Feb. 2-8
For Our Consideration: The Grammys are worth watching (seriously)
-
Suge Knight Charged With Marijuana Possession
Nicki Minaj Track "Marilyn Monroe" Leaked
Madonna 2012 World Tour Announced
-
Weekly Ketchup: Naomi Watts to play Princess Di
Critics Consensus: Journey 2 Isn't Quite Worth the Trip
Total Recall: Luis Guzman's Best Movies
About This Blog
Los Angeles has changed since 1990, and Drew McWeeny, all-around Chauncey Gardner of movie fandom, has seen it all as an industry insider and screenwriter who wrote for 12 years as "Moriarty" for Ain't It Cool News.
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
A long day at ILM features familiar images everywhereFriday, Feb 10, 2012
-
We sit down to discuss bad behavior and a great performanceFriday, Feb 10, 2012
-
Exciting filmmaking can't quite shock the script to lifeFriday, Feb 10, 2012
-
A screening of 'This Means War' raises a question about how much is too muchFriday, Feb 10, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupDanger Mouse Should also mention that the movie is very bloody and violent, almost cartoonishly so. Overall I enjoyed it though. Drew, did you see this movie here in Austin? I was at the Tuesday night screening at the Galaxy; I don't know if there was another one later in the week.
March 19, 2010 at 1:20AM EST Reply to Commentwhiterok Damn. And I started your review thinking this one would actually be worth seeing. Oh well.
March 19, 2010 at 2:06AM EST Reply to CommentJohn I disagree about the conclusion. It’s a very smart ending. The script is quite subtle with interesting twists for once - the plot is not as simple as one might at first think. As for favorite scene, I agree with http://www.pandalous.com/topic/repo_men that it's the mass reaping scene.
March 19, 2010 at 3:50AM EST Reply to Commentblah blah blacksheep The "third movie" you talked about seemed a bit over-weighty and got in the way at times. I really wished they would have just cut back on the whole "I miss my wife and kid" stuff. Sure, it provides emotion, but we're talking about a guy who hacks body-parts out of still-living people ...it's a little hard to feel sorry for him. Other than that, I felt it was a little too blaise in how it treated people who "owed". A future where you can just hack a part out of someone w/o concern for them dying afterwards? I think they could have handled that with a bit more seriousness. Then again, this isn't the kind of movie you take human rights activists to go see.
March 19, 2010 at 12:27PM EST Reply to Comment
Wait wait wait? What's wrong with the Total Recall ending?
March 19, 2010 at 5:30PM EST Reply to Commentevan @drew:
March 19, 2010 at 9:53PM EST Reply to Comment"...not a fresh enough payoff to justify undoing any investment the audience might have in these characters. I'm not sure if it's from the book or if it was created by the screenwriters...but it is the film's one major misstep, one that risks ruining the film for people"
-- this captures my response to SHUTTER ISLAND, and I don't want to waste the experience of seeing one more movie this year that's going to leave me feeling the same way.
I wonder how you didn't come out of that film with the same impression.
Rachel REPO MEN!!!!!
March 20, 2010 at 5:28PM EST Reply to CommentSo looking forward to this!
Check it the interview I found!
http://bit.ly/91CADA