Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: Robert Downey Jr. and Mickey Rourke go head-to-head in star-studded 'Iron Man 2'

With the element of surprise gone, how do you convince the audience they care about Iron Man?

Has Marvel Studios been able to build a better 'Iron Man' for their second time out?

Credit: Marvel Studios

Let's call this one the victory lap.

"Iron Man" was no guaranteed hit before the weekend it opened.  There were people predicting failure for that film even after it opened, even after it started to turn into a word-of-mouth-must-see, not just a box-office success but a genuinely loved pop culture moment.  The first movie's got its weak points, but it also has a ridiculous energy to it, and I unabashedly loved it when I reviewed it for Ain't It Cool.

"Iron Man 2" is, in every possible way, issue two of a comic book.  It doesn't have to spend time setting up the origin of the character, and it doesn't feel the need to resolve every single story thread introduced in this one film.  There's a sense that everyone's settling into this series and thinking big.  It is just as confident as the first film, and incredibly aggressive in the way it handles story and characterization.  The pre-title sequence picks up mere seconds after the ending of the first film, and introduces Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), an embittered Russian with family ties that make Tony Stark a perfect target for his rage.  By the time the main title appears onscreen, everything's already in motion, and then we're right into the Stark Expo, where Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) takes the stage.

Do you remember on shows like "Happy Days" when the fan favorite character like Fonzie would make their first entrance and the audience would go nuts for so long that the actor would have to stop and wait for a moment and acknowledge all the applause?  Well, that's the first ten minutes or so of this film after that opening title, as we're dropped into the daily life of Tony Stark, Public Superhero.  He's at odds with the US Government, who want the suit, and he's at odds with Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell), another weapons manufacturer who hates that Stark is everything Hammer wants to be.  He's at odds with Pepper Potts (Gwenyth Paltrow), who is desperately trying to hold his company together even as his attention is being pulled in a thousand different directions.  And he's at odds with his own body, which is failing him as the chest implant that powers him and that powers the suit slowly fails, poisoning him even as it keeps him alive.  This is not a movie in which there's only single threat to Tony Stark or to the world, but in which he faces almost constant threats, and in which he's never given a moment to relax.

Jon Favreau has gotten even better at building his action sequences, and he stages a few showstoppers this time.  Once Ivan Vanko finally builds his prototype Whiplash suit and debuts it during a Monaco street race, the stakes start to escalate for Tony quickly.  It's a relentlessly paced film, and the action scenes aren't just one style over and over.  I actually think one of the best in the film takes place between Iron Man and Col. James Rhodes (Don Cheadle), who shows up at Tony's birthday party only to find him drunk and dangerous, using the suit to show off.  Rhodey has no choice but to suit up himself and stop Tony, and what starts as an intervention with armor turns into a brutal encounter in which long-simmering resentments suddenly blow up.  It's a perfect example of the way this film manages to keep even the most outsized action scenes focused on character, with plenty of small, quirky flourishes.

The first "Iron Man" ended with a post-credits scene involving the introduction of Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and a quick mention of "The Avengers," and since then, there has been a lot of speculation and conversation about Marvel's game plan of eventually building one giant movie featuring Iron Man, Captain America, the Hulk, and Thor.  The building blocks have never been more apparent than they are here, with Fury playing an actual role in the film and not just dropped into the post-credits sting.  His organization SHIELD also plays a greatly increased role this time, and there are clues dropped to the role that Tony's father Howard (played briefly by John Slattery, famed for his work in "Mad Men") had in founding SHIELD decades earlier.  Both Captain America and Thor are overtly referenced in this film, and my guess is that we're going to see these references work directly into the films that Marvel has in the works for next summer.  It's a fascinating gamble, and I talked to people after the film who were just annoyed by the whole thing, but I think it's like watching part of a big, crazy mini-series.  I don't feel cheated at all by these clues.  "Iron Man 2" works as a complete film without any of these "Avengers"-oriented moments, but they add to the overall texture of the piece in some really rewarding ways.  One of the questions fans have had about the film is what role Natalie Rushman aka The Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) would play in the film, and how she'd play into the larger continuity.  I think it's a very smart, simple use of the character, and I'll wager we see her show up in several other movies in the Marvel universe in the next few years.

Besides... Scar-Jo in IMAX?  Pretty much a Christmas gift.  Ka-pow.

Don Cheadle's work here demonstrates a much better chemistry with Robert Downey Jr. than Terrence Howard did as Rhodes in the original, so I'm guessing this will be a casting switch that fans barely notice.  Maybe it's because Rhodes has a better part this time, but everyone in the film registers with strong work.  Sam Rockwell plays Justin Hammer as the funhouse mirror image of Tony Stark, and he plays more scenes with Mickey Rourke as Vanko than anyone else.  The two of them give off a real air of danger, and they make an imposing threat to hang the film on.  Even Clark Gregg, returning as Agent Coulson from the first film, has a few choice moments, which is good since we're going to see him in "Thor" next year.  Paltrow and Downey come off as the Nick and Nora Charles of the Marvel universe with their lightning fast volleys of frustration shot through with affection, and there's an actual arc to their relationship here, etched in subtle but effective exchanges. 

Films like this often come down to moments... are there moments in this movie I want to see again immediately?  Yes.  In fact, I'm leaving town this morning to do exactly that... see it again.  And I'm taking my wife with me, because the first film sort of blew her mind.  She didn't realize she (Robertdowneyjr) liked Iron Man so much as (Robertdowneyjr) a character, and it was so much fun (Robertodowneyjr) for her to watch.  Ahem.  I get it.  That's what they're selling.  That's the show.  Him in the suit and him out of the suit is equally compelling to me in this film.  I like Stark.  I get him.  He's tapdancing.  He's living a certain version of himself in public.  There's a POV sequence here (including a great cameo) that gives you an idea of what it's like in the helmet... only it's not the Iron Man helmet... it's the Tony Stark helmet.  And more than that, it's the Robert Downey Jr. helmet.  It's him that you're taking the ride with.  And he doesn't get to hide behind a Bruce Wayne persona.  When Tony Stark makes a public ass of himself, he does property damage because of his suit, and everyone knows it's him.  They're nowhere near "Demon In A Bottle" here, but they certainly make Tony stupid and human and genuine as well as heroic and comic book cool.

ILM's work is more impressive this time out, precisely because it's hard to tell where the real suit stops and the CG suit begins, and Matthew Libatique's cinematography is richer, more vibrant.  I have the same complaint about the score this time that I had about the first film... I still don't think there's an "Iron Man" theme that works.  It's sound and fury and almost entirely forgettable.  Still, if my one big complaint about the film is that I don't care for the score, that's a pretty good sign.  I thought even without the shock of the new on its side, "Iron Man 2" works as a blast of pure confidence and charisma, absolutely effective, and I expect audiences are going to devour the film when it reaches theaters May 7th.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Ajax

    Nice review. They have assembled a good cast and I am glad to hear nobody is wasted. I can't wait to see it.

    It is John Slattery though, not Kevin Slattery playing the father.

    April 27, 2010 at 8:47AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Indy9506_talkback_profile

    CDC9506

    Nice review, Drew. I appreciate your efforts to keep it more about your impressions of the film (and what elements worked and which weren't quite as successful) rather than a detailed blow-by-blow of the film.

    I'm curious, however, as to whether or not the screening you attended included the rumored post-credits scene (although I'm not asking for a spoiler-laced description; I'd like to be surprised in the theater). Apparently, the print Harry Knowles watched did not have the scene in question.

    Thanks!
    Chris

    April 27, 2010 at 10:16AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      blue_flames Maybe they're pulling the same trick they did on the 1st one? (No post credit scene on the press screening)

      April 27, 2010 at 1:11PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      whalemenace there is an after credit sequence:

      SPOILER:::







      some guys find mjolnir(thor's hammer) in the desert

      April 28, 2010 at 1:25AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    John W

    I can't wait to see it. I think Marvel is reaping the benefits of casting actors who can act in their movies.

    I can't wait for Thor and Captain America.

    April 27, 2010 at 10:23AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dan

    good review, however i really liked the score for ironman both in the theatres and at home, its quite clear to me his theme, its when he tries the suit for the first time and just escapes crashing to the earth, i really liked the sound for the first film and thought it was mixed really well, remember the presentation when obidia is accepting an award sounds fantastic and something that really drew me in at the theatre, slightly off topic but i think the sound mix on ironman is superb.

    April 27, 2010 at 10:58AM EST Reply to Comment


  • Hey Drew, great review, as always, and while I don't want to be THAT guy, but it is John Slattery, not Kevin.

    April 27, 2010 at 12:12PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Warren Peace

    I dunno Drew, I couldn't help but feel an undercurrent of dissapointment reading this. Didn't seem that you were particularly blown away... you end the review speculating about what the film will mean to audiences, not you. None of it seems like a rave. After all, when someone takes a victory lap, they're resting on their laurels, not competing.

    April 27, 2010 at 3:02PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      stormshadow4life I didn't read the review (I'd like to see the movie without knowing anything).....but if what Warren Peace (clever name) is true, I'd like to hear your response.

      April 28, 2010 at 11:17AM EST


  • Saw it in Austin last night. Drew is spot on. It's a damn fun movie, and I left the theater wanting to see more from every single character.

    April 28, 2010 at 4:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    silaband

    Please check out my Fan Made IRON MAN 2 Trailer featuring my new song EMOTIONS on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q6fDcklE64
    Let me know what you think :-)

    -SILA

    April 28, 2010 at 6:09PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    I. S.

    Right - it's competent, light-touch entertainment that gives you your money's worth. Fun to watch just for the performances - Rourke, Rockwell, even ScarJo and Shandling, who are not trying too hard but are perfectly cast. It's smart to focus on the characters for the sake of viewers who can't buy into the unrealistic action (nothing can possibly move or absorb damage like the suit does). Theroux also does a good job making the tedious meta-franchise hooks feel like an organic part of the story. But yeah, the music is completely forgettable.

    April 29, 2010 at 3:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    coolhandjennie

    Sooooooo happy to hear it!!! Iron Man was like love at first sight for me, so as much as I've been looking forward to round 2, of course there's the fear of sequel mediocrity that far too frequently breaks my heart. Sounds like I'll be seeing this one 5 or 6 times at the theater, too. =) Thanks for passing on the good word!!!!

    May 1, 2010 at 1:21AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    MC D-Lyte

    Iron Man 2: Full Throttle was so awesome! It was like the all time best sequel Charlies Angels: Full Throttle but like at least two times better than that. How is that even possible right? Charlies Angels was so awesome. Well Iron Man 2 is even more awesomer. http://j.mp/d54uWH

    May 2, 2010 at 7:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • 3043359090_065080dc5e_talkback_profile

    dyikini

    Didn't enjoy 2 as much as 1. I think the chronology and pacing of the film was off. Too much happened in such a tiny amount of time- Particularly in the final 3rd. Everything comes together (and when I say Everything, I mean ALOT - the physical requirements that Stark, Hammer, Ivan and the Stark Expo have to go through in order to be where they're at come act 3 is as ridiculous as the universe being created in 7 days...)
    The action was a let down too. The action in the first was much, much more involving, dynamic and entertaining - even though it was on a smaller scale - actions scenes are few and far between also. The final showdown is shorter than that involving Iron Monger... silly mistake. At no point did anyone seem like they're in real danger, even the thousands of people attending the stark expo. Still like it, but quite flawed I thought.

    May 4, 2010 at 10:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    c

    I love Iron Man!! Robert Downey Jr. is charming and endearing and made me love this movie! Normally I'm not a comic book fan, usually I go for more dramatic stuff like the movie Cycle (you can check it out at www.myspace.com/cyclethemovie), but because of Downey I'm a convert and loving it!! But Scarlette Jo has got to go I just find her annoying.

    May 17, 2010 at 6:09PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web