Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: Leonardo Di Caprio's 'Inception' bends brains, breaks hearts

An amazing cast rises to the challenge of their demanding director

<p>Leonardo DiCaprio stars as Dom Cobb, the head of a dream-invading team of thieves in Christopher Nolan's new film 'Inception'</p>

Leonardo DiCaprio stars as Dom Cobb, the head of a dream-invading team of thieves in Christopher Nolan's new film 'Inception'

Credit: Warner Bros./Legendary

I'm going to do this without spoiling the movie for you, because I think this is one of those films you should experience as free of fore-knowledge as possible.

Christopher Nolan has been making the same basic film since the beginning of his career, and one of the things that makes his filmography compelling is the way he circles the central idea in his work.

"Inception," like his earlier work, deals with a broken man, determined to fix his mistakes but only making things worse in the process.  That could easily describe "Memento" or "The Prestige" or "The Dark Knight" or even his one remake, "Insomnia."  Yet even with him returning to this idea, worrying at it, exploring different ways it can play out, he doesn't feel like he's stuck or marking time.  I'd argue the opposite is true:  by refining this idea over time and over different films and in different ways, Nolan is becoming merciless in his ability to engage both intellectually and emotionally.  As a result, "Inception" flattened me, and even now, more than a week after my first viewing of it, I find myself turning over images and ideas from the film almost constantly.

Shrouded in secrecy during production, the film isn't really built as a narrative shell game with mind-blowing twists and turns so much as it is a logical and orderly descent into a trippy but airtight exploration of the way we frequently chase illusory versions of the people in our lives while ignoring the real flesh-and-blood imperfections that we don't want to acknowledge.  Taken as a simple exploration of a marriage that has imploded, "Inception" is harrowing and brutal, and all the SF trappings layered in on top of that only serve to make that stark emotional truth palatable in some way.

The film intentionally dislocates you in time and space with the opening fifteen minutes or so, laying groundwork for the ride you're about to take, and I'm impressed by the way the film avoids any easy structure.  Nolan wants to tell you a very particular story, in a very particular way, and there's little about it that's familiar in terms of Hollywood structure and storytelling.  Right from the start, Dom Cobb (Leonard DiCaprio) is a haunted man, but Nolan makes you work your way gradually towards understanding what it is that damaged Cobb so deeply.

I'll give you a hint:  this would be a fascinating double-feature with "Shutter Island."

As trippy as the film can be at times, and the last forty-five minutes or so of the film is just one long reality-bending set-piece, the movie really is a very direct piece of storytelling.  Dom Cobb is the head of a team of specialists who steal ideas out of the subconscious of sleeping targets.  They are approached by someone who they tried to steal from with a unique proposition.  He wants them to invade the dreams of a business competitor, but instead of stealing an idea, he wants them to plant one.   Dom has his reasons for thinking that's a bad idea, but he agrees to the job, hoping that it will finally wipe clean a legal record that has kept him on the run and away from his family for years.

It's interesting to look back at the ad campaign they've run for this film after finally seeing it, because I think they've been very accurate to the content of the film, selling the big images, making sure you understand just how visually compelling it is, but the result is that there's a sort of "Matrix" action movie vibe about the campaign, and despite some wild visual moments in the film, I wouldn't describe this as an action film at all.  There are action beats in it, but all of them are ultimately in service of the emotional journey that Dom takes in the film, and as a result, the stakes seem so much higher than they would if it was just another movie where people were chasing around some empty Macguffin.  Everything in this film... cities folding in on themselves, buildings filling with sudden floods of water, gravity that stops working, reality fraying at the edges... ties back in to whatever happened between Dom and his wife Moll (Marion Cotillard) years ago.

Cotillard spends the entire film as a ghost, an echo, a memory that manages to keep opening fresh wounds in Dom's heart and his mind, and it's agonizing work to watch.  All of the film's mysteries hinge on Cotillard's character, and I'm amazed how uncomfortable she made me in the film.  There's no make-up on her, no special effects to make her frightening.  It's the emotional content of the sequences she's in that left me deeply unsettled, and in a way, my one hesitation about the film is just how raw and difficult it is.  It's not a "summer movie" by the conventional definition, and Nolan never lets you off the hook.  He never tells you that it's all a dream, all something you can shake off.  He wants it to hurt.  He wants this one to ricochet around inside of you.  He wants it to scar.  Remember the image at the start of "The Prestige," with all the top hats on the ground?  Well, in this film, it's that tiny gray gunmetal dreidel that sums up the film's most chilling ideas in a single image, and it's just as powerful in hindsight as those hats were. 

The entire cast does great work.  Ellen Page plays a new recruit to the team, and Dom's scenes with her serve as a primer for the audience, teaching them the rules of how this dream invasion works.  Joseph Gordon Levitt is Arthur, Dom's right-hand man, and they're a great on-screen team, with energies that are nicely complimentary. Tom Hardy damn near steals the movie as a very crafty member of the team, and he's the one person in the entire film that seems to be having fun as a character and as an actor.  His character, Eames, relishes his abilities inside the dream, and takes full advantage of it.  Michael Caine makes a brief appearance, and he's fine, but he isn't terribly consequential.  Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe, Tom Berenger, and Dileep Rao all lend strong support to the film, playing key roles in the "heist," and everyone seems to understand exactly what it is that Nolan's doing, adding just the right grace notes to each role, each sequence.

Wally Pfister is easily one of the most impressive cinematographers working today, and his collaborations with Nolan have allowed him to push his craft right to the bleeding edge.  Here in particular, he creates some truly original imagery, and yet it never feels like spectacle is the point.  It's fair to compare this to Aronofsky's "The Fountain," another film that uses SF trappings to explore elemental notions of love and sorrow and loss and pain, and I think Nolan may manage to lure people in with the promise of the surreal James Bondian adventure in a way that Aronofsky couldn't.  It's just as difficult an experience, and I found the last few shots of "Inception" to be positively devastating.  Nolan isn't interested in offering you up easy comfort at the end of this experience, and he doesn't care about making you feel good.

I'm going to revisit the film with a spoiler-heavy review on opening weekend, something I don't do frequently, but with a film like this, it's going to be exciting to dig into both the text and the subtext, and I hope you'll join me then for what I suspect will be a spirited, heated conversation about what the movie says and how and why.  Until then, suffice it to say that "Inception" is an exhilarating cinematic experience that suggests there is still room, even in the blockbuster world, for big ideas and dangerous emotions, and that may be the single most thrilling thing about it.

"Inception" opens July 16.  We'll definitely have much more to say about it then.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

Become a fan of HitFix on Facebook.

You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    theonetruecams

    Great review. Can't wait for the film to hit so we can get a discussion going. I get chills every time I see the trailer (which was the highlight of having to sit through Eclipse with my wife last Tues at Midnight in IMAX).

    July 5, 2010 at 6:17PM EST Reply to Comment


  • Is it as good as Memento, Thats the question...Besides I think decaprio is a little overrated. I just think he doesn't emote like a good actor should.

    July 5, 2010 at 6:20PM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew I think "Memento" fans in particular will enjoy this one. And Leo's really, really good in it.

      July 5, 2010 at 6:27PM EST


  • As someone who adores The Fountain but generally thinks Chris Nolan isn't the Director many people think he is yet (I emphasise yet! He is getting there and is one to watch, but he's not there yet based on what I've seen from him), this review has me very excited. Edge, daring, emotional film-making that doesn't pander? Count me in!

    July 5, 2010 at 6:53PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Jack_talkback_profile

      Letodan If Nolan is not there "yet", I think most director in Hollywood just will never "get" there. With Memento, The Prestige, the two Batman movies and now Inception... I wonder what it takes to "be" there.

      July 6, 2010 at 8:05AM EST


  • Christopher Nolan is the new James Cameron. I can't wait to see this.

    July 5, 2010 at 6:54PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Please don't compare Christopher Nolan to James Cameron. Please. Nolan has so much more talent.

      July 5, 2010 at 8:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      I. S. So much more talent... for self-promotion, not filmmaking.

      July 5, 2010 at 8:57PM EST
    • Meaning, he makes high quality blockbuster films. Dissing Cameron has become ridiculously reactionary. He's a genius and an incredible talent even if you think Avatar is shallow or Titanic is two-dimensional.

      July 5, 2010 at 9:15PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JohnDoe I agree. He makes brilliant sci-fi psychological thrillers just as Cameron makes brilliant sci-fi action films. Also, shame on the guy that slams Cameron. Cameron is a technical genius that brought us The Terminator, and T2: Judgment Day, Aliens, The Abyss, etc. Yeah, his dialogue is wonky and two dimensional, but he sure does a good job keeping me entertained.

      July 6, 2010 at 7:10AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Erik

    This shit is gonna break records! There's no doubt in my mind about that! I have no idea why this film wasn't shot for 3D. That would looks SO COOL!

    July 5, 2010 at 7:16PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Tim Because Nolan has gone on record as disliking 3D. He also is a devotee of shooting on film and all 3D cameras are digital capture methods. Nolan and Pfister are both vehemently against digital capture.

      July 5, 2010 at 7:23PM EST
    • Are there any scenes shot in IMAX ala TDK? I think I want to see this in IMAX.

      July 5, 2010 at 9:17PM EST
    • @Quentin - No IMAX, but "significant portions" were shot in VistaVision and Panavision System 65 (70mm).

      July 5, 2010 at 9:33PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Chris Erik - Inception wasn't shot in 3D because it was filmed before this 3D craze hit. It's just that it's releasing during the craze.

      Tim - Nolan doesn't dislike 3D. I don't know where you read that or if that was taken out of context. He said this movie almost had a 3D release as well. He saw some tests that looked great but he didn't have enough time to do the whole film properly with the current release.

      July 5, 2010 at 10:52PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tim He never outright said he dislikes 3D but he has gone on the record of "not being a big fan" and has outlined reasons for why he won't shoot in native 3D.

      Most, but not all, of the movement towards 3D right now is due to studios and theater owners wanting to charge inflated prices. Obviously since the studios pay for his movies Nolan will have to go with the trends, to a certain extent, but from multiple interviews it's clear he prefers "2D".

      http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/06/14/christopher-nolan-not-a-fan-of-3d-will-probably-make-a-3d-film-anyway/

      July 5, 2010 at 11:34PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Fan

    I want to see this so bad!

    July 5, 2010 at 8:16PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    briguyx

    While I'm looking forward to the film and the review certainly gets you primed for it, I can't help thinking that this is a movie that affects the reviewer more than it will me due to his marriage. Every so often, something hits close to home for Drew due to his family life more than it would the average viewer...

    July 5, 2010 at 9:09PM EST Reply to Comment


  • Did we really need to have the thing spoiled by drawing a direct comparison with the twist ending to "Shutter Island"? The only reason I read this thing was because you promised not to spoil anything in the opening paragraph.

    Goddamnit, I swear to God, if the twist-- or a major revelation-- in the flick is what you just nakedly referred to it being, I'm never reading another M/C article again.

    Not cool.

    July 5, 2010 at 9:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • You know, now that I've had a minute to calm down and reread that, I'm stepping back a bit. Drew, I love your stuff--been reading for years-- but I don't want this movie spoiled. Please tell us you didn't just do that.

      July 5, 2010 at 9:39PM EST
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew They're not the same, and as I said in the review, "Inception" is NOT built on a twist. But there are thematic similiarities, certainly. That's all.

      July 5, 2010 at 10:35PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Gerald Posey Like Scott, I'm concerned that you just gave away an important part of the story. It doesn't matter if the revelation is a "twist." Let's hope that I simply read too much into your comment.

      July 6, 2010 at 1:06PM EST
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew It's a thematic similiarity. You're reading way too much into what I said. The characters are driven in similar ways from the very start of the films, haunted by similar loss.

      That's all. I didn't give away a "reveal" or a "twist."

      July 6, 2010 at 2:22PM EST
  • Luke_vader_talkback_profile

    DAGOBAH

    I am unbelievably excited about this film.

    The amount of times I've watched the trailer and yet still have no idea what it's about is incredible.

    It's interesting that Leo has had two roles which so similar back to back. And Cotillard's character appearing as a ghost/memory sound remarkably like Michelle William's character in SHUTTER ISLAND, and the fact that Leo was the distraught husband in both films...

    Actually, reading this a lot of what you said in this review could play as an advance review for SHUTTER ISLAND...

    July 6, 2010 at 1:13AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Max

    "Shutter Island"????

    I fucking hate that movie because it's just a fancied up version of a really old story. If I get to the end of this and find out his character has been in the fucking looney bin the whole flick and it was all in his imagination, I'm going to be seriously pissed. I'm tired of that crap. It's lazy.

    July 6, 2010 at 8:04AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bebe I seriously agree. The whole shutter island movie all I was thinking was "PLEASE DO NOT GO THAT ROUTE" and they did. Really dissapointing.

      July 6, 2010 at 7:52PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    John W

    I wasn't planning on seeing this in the theaters but now I probably will.

    July 6, 2010 at 2:59PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    carrie

    aïe! i dislike Shutter Island reference !and i had need 3 times for finishing "memento"

    July 7, 2010 at 11:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    bob

    did you not give away the ending of the movie by saying it is all a dream in your reveiw? I dont know the ending, but it seems you may have said it...

    July 7, 2010 at 7:23PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Elane

    Inception on Facebook... they're giving out free tickets to screenings and other goodies:

    http://bit.ly/saitofb and http://bit.ly/inceptn

    July 8, 2010 at 1:56PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Annie8bit_talkback_profile

    Stormshadow4life

    Still waiting for your 2nd (Spoiler Heavy Review)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    July 18, 2010 at 7:48PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    pinoy cineaste

    with this film, christopher nolan kicks james cameron's ass!

    watch the oscars pile up on this one

    July 19, 2010 at 4:41AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    steveinaustin

    Drew,

    In your review you said, "I'm going to revisit the film with a spoiler-heavy review on opening weekend".

    Still waiting for the review! I can't wait to read it!

    I hope you are still doing it, and that you are not going to be a weenie and too lazy to do it.

    July 19, 2010 at 11:21AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Alex Ditto. I'm waiting for this too Drew.

      July 20, 2010 at 3:27AM EST
    • Yes! I too am waiting for the spoiler-heavy review!

      July 20, 2010 at 11:41PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    The Deacon

    There haven't been a lot of negative reviews for this movie, but many of the ones I've read since seeing it claim that the movie fails to make an emotional connection, which I found really surprising. Every time the two crouching children turned up in a frame, my heart went right up in my throat. The anticipation of Mol's arrival in nearly every dreamscape made me incredibly uneasy, even without knowing her full story.

    I wonder if being married and having children made it easier for me to make that emotional connection? I would be curious to see how many negative reviews came from writers who don't have children, and who might find Dicaprio's understated performance as distant, or Nolan's minimal portrayal of the children as insufficient to produce an emotional investment.

    July 19, 2010 at 11:36AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      JDR22 Interesting point about being married with children.

      I have a one-year-old, and ever since he was born, I find myself more susceptible to emotions in movies (my experience with "The Orphanage" was my first devastating movie experience as a new parent).

      In my opinion, you don't need to have children to make the emotional connection, but it is certainly enhanced because of it. Inception deals in universal themes: lost loved ones, separation from family. These emotions affect people with and without children.

      I don't understand the criticism that Inception fails to make an emotional connection, but I can only speak for myself. It didn't devastate me, but it certainly made me care.

      To me, Nolan wasn't going for the kind of catharsis found in a film like Shutter Island, but is using the emotional core to explore ideas. I'm still grappling with those ideas, but I LOVE that this film has inspired so much thought in me.

      Now, I really need to see it again, because once is not nearly enough.

      July 21, 2010 at 12:37PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    RIAN

    Write a comment...

    July 21, 2010 at 4:03AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    OJ (not that one)

    The movie won't open here before next week, but I'll be mighty pissed if that Shutter Island remark is the spoiler I think it is.

    July 21, 2010 at 11:06AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JDR22

    I loved Inception, but I wasn't as emotionally devastated as you. I felt the emotional core was perfect, but it never "wrecked" me. It pulled me in, made me care, gave everything weight. Which is how it should be. I agree with every other aspect of your review. Great write-up, Drew.

    I'm looking forward to your spoiler-heavy review.

    July 21, 2010 at 12:21PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      emilio Looks like the spoilered review will be only a promise. Sad, it would have been quite good!

      July 23, 2010 at 3:34PM EST


  • I watched it on blu-ray twice today. I needed the extra watches after my pitiful single viewing in the theater. Not only would this make a great double feature with Shutter Island, it would make a great triple feature with eXistenZ.

    January 16, 2011 at 12:31AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web