The M/C Review: Cameron's 'Avatar' delivers, transports, delights
James Cameron's the king of a whole new world now
In many ways, my anticipation for James Cameron's "Avatar" started in 1977, when I emerged from the darkness after my first viewing of the original "Star Wars."
I was seven years old, and my brain had just been rewired by what I saw on that screen. I didn't know how George Lucas discovered those alien planets and managed to get movie cameras to visit them, but I knew for a fact that I had left Earth and visited new places, met real aliens, and had a fantastic adventure. And the experience transformed me immediately into a cinema junkie in general, but specifically, it awakened a deeply-seeded love in me for the idea of world-building on film.
In the 32 years since then, I've read a lot of science-fiction and fantasy, both high-minded and pulp, and I've seen pretty much everything in those genres on film. I've watched the gradual refinement and evolution of special effects on film, and I've watched many filmmakers, including George Lucas, try to nail the same sort of giddy feeling of travel to a new world, and I've seen most of them fall short.
Yesterday morning, I got a hit of the real stuff for the first time in a long time.
I haven't seen as persuasive and passionate a trip into a fantasy world since Peter Jackson's triumphant "Lord Of The Rings" trilogy, with the most significant difference being that James Cameron is offering us a personal vision of a brand-new place, and in doing so, he's absolutely given birth to a brand new world, one in which he is the undisputed king.
It's sort of amazing to me to realize that for many of the kids who are going to be as chemically altered by what they see onscreen as I was at the age of seven, James Cameron is a brand new filmmaker. After all, his last narrative feature was "Titanic," and that was 12 years ago. For many members of the audience, "Avatar" will be the first of his films that they see in a theater. I think you're going to see a huge fallout effect as a result of this film, too, as kids realize that anything you can dream, you can portray onscreen now. When Cameron pulled the plug on "Avatar" during the original development of it, claiming the technology didn't exist to fully bring his vision for the film to life, he was right. But effects have caught up now, and as a result, this trip to Pandora isn't cobbled together from real-world locations and set dressing. Instead, Pandora is its own place, as real as any imagined land could possibly be, rich in detail and gorgeously imagined.
The big question, of course, has to be whether there's anything more to the film than dazzling production design, and the answer is an emphatic yes. This is spectacle with soul, a film as unafraid to reference My Lei or the Trail of Tears as it is Edgar Rice Burroughs or Hayao Miyazaki. And trust me... when Miyazaki sees the flying sequences in this film, you're going to hear him bellow "OMFG" all the way from Japan. The comparisons that have been made between this film and earlier movies like "The New World", "Pocahontas," "Dances With Wolves," and "A Man Called Horse" are all apt, and they're definitely bouncing around in the movie's DNA. I've also seen the comparison to "Dune" made several times as well, and I can see why. If I were Andrew Stanton preparing to make "John Carter Of Mars" I'd be alternately exhilarated by the potential onscreen and annoyed by how much Cameron was dipping his toe in my water. Honestly, though, "John Carter" is much closer to "Dances With Wolves," since I'm not sure I remember Kevin Costner ever possessing the body of an Indian in his film. If all you do as you watch "Avatar" is play "spot the precursor," you're missing the subtext that makes this one of the most of-the-moment films of the year.
Cameron could just as easily have named this film "Pandora" and told the story of a human being interacting with the Na'vi directly, and the narrative could have largely played out in the same way, but he didn't. Instead, he's created a story that comments on the very nature of entertainment and escapism and the way the evolution of technology is changing the way we relate to it.
When I first moved to California back in 1990, I made a special detour on my cross-country drive just so I could meet Jeron Lanier, one of the fathers of virtual reality. What was cutting-edge then has become routine today, and the concept of a digital avatar that we control exploring entire worlds that do not exist is now commonplace, especially to the generation that has grown up as gamers. This year alone, I've probably spent 80 hours or more lost in the alternative realities of "Fallout 3," "Assassin's Creed II," "Uncharted 2," and "InFamous," just to name a few, and when I think back on those hours, they are memories as tangible as any real-world ones. That ability to step outside my own body, slip into another skin, and do things I will never do as myself is the exact reason I invest time and mental real estate to gaming in the first place. It's a powerful experience, and only getting more powerful with each passing year.
To be fair, though, cinema's been doing it a lot longer, and one of the reasons I've always been such a crackhead for international cinema is because I want to know what it's like to be a poor child growing up in 1950's India or a Japanese businessman facing his own mortality or an Argentine woman demanding answers about the Disappeared. Those experiences, conveyed through cinema, enrich us and expand us, and so year after year, movie after movie, I sign up and take the ride, and my understanding of myself and other people grows as a result. These other people are my onscreen avatars, and when a film is particularly great, I feel like I've shared something real with them.
In the onscreen world of "Avatar," Jake Sully (Sam Worthington in the role that finally pays off his potential) is not the only person to use an Avatar. There are, of course, the literal Avatars, combinations of human and Na'vi DNA that can be run by remote mental uplink, and in addition to Jake, we also meet Grace (Sigourney Weaver), the head of the program, as well as Norm (Joel David Moore), another new recruit, both in human and Avatar form. Beyond that, though, one of the main pieces of tech gear in the movie is the EVA suit, which serve as a physical extension of the Marines who wear them, and you could argue that the EVA suits are just different forms of avatars. Jake is, of course, the audience's avatar in the movie, and when you watch the film in the jaw-dropping 3D that Cameron helped perfect, it is completely immersive, to the point where I stopped thinking about it at all. This is the first time that's ever happened with a 3D film for me. It stopped being a gimmick or even a device and just became part of the fabric of the picture. I can't tell you anything about individual 3D moments because the entire experience just felt like I was looking through a window into this new world. Cameron uses 3D to make each of us into Jake Sully, and when he boots up and finds himself in this amazing dreamscape, we are right there with him.
It shouldn't surprise anyone who knows Cameron's work to hear that the action set pieces are huge, visceral, and exquisitely staged. It also shouldn't surprise anyone who knows his work to hear that some of his dialogue lands with a thud. I think that's true of each of his movies in a few places, and "Avatar" has its tin-eared moments. The thing is, the film works like a steamroller, constantly pushing forward, and if something trips you up momentarily, there are sights and sounds coming immediately after that dazzle anew. Running over two and a half hours, the film throws one remarkable sequence after another at you, and what ultimately won me all the way over is the persuasive, overwhelming creation of Pandora, its ecosystem, and the creatures who inhabit it. Cameron has gotten career best work out of production designer Rick Carter here, and the density of the creation left me feeling a little drunk when I walked out of the screening. Because the film deals with a world where everything exists in harmony, interconnected in a planetary neural network, the design is not just gravy on top of the story, but is actually the substance of the film. You have to believe that this is a place that all makes sense, and the way Cameron has drawn inspiration from pulp iconography, underwater iconography, and films as diverse as "Baraka" and his own earlier work is surprisingly effective. It never feels cobbled together. Instead, it is easy to believe that James Cameron believes in Pandora completely, and that to him, it is as real a place as his Malibu estate.
Special credit has to be given to Zoe Saldana, fresh off her work in "Star Trek," for giving the best performance capture performance since Andy Serkis played Gollum and King Kong. While I think all actors would potentially enjoy the experience of working in this new way, I don't think all actors automatically understand the different skill set that they need to utilize to fully bring one of these characters to life. Saldana imbues Neytiri, the female warrior who brings Jake Sully into the Na'vi tribe, with dignity and strength and humor and heart. Everything she feels plays out in her body language, the small non-verbal details, and when the film does finally break your heart, it's due in no small part to her spectacular work. Worthington demonstrates a real evolution over the course of the film, gradually turning from a coarse, thick-headed Marine into a man with a real moral center, dictated by himself and not by the orders he's given. Weaver, who was Oscar-nominated for her work in Cameron's "Aliens," is almost at home in her Avatar skin as Saldana is, and she's pretty great in live-action, too.
On the human side, Giovanni Ribisi feels like the character who probably ended up on the editing room floor the most, thinly defined at best, while Stephen Lang is unleashed to play the genuinely despicable face of voracious consumption, human progress at the cost of the greater good, and he seems to relish every single moment of screentime. Quaritch is a memorable bad guy, cut from the Cameron mold just as well as Saldan's Neytiri fits the heroic woman archetype that Cameron helped create. Michelle Rodriguez is basically just playing a variation on herself, but she registers strongly in the film's third act, and ends up being very sympathetic.
The last 40 minutes or so of this movie contains some of the saddest imagery of the year as well as some of the most exciting. It's that mix of emotion and excitement that is one of Cameron's trademarks, and there is no doubt who the architect of the movie truly is. Honestly... that's what makes me happiest about this film. In an age where so many of our aging lions falter and fail when they try to return to their earlier glories, James Cameron has actually aimed higher than ever before and accomplished most of what he set out to do. He would have done better to find a fresh collaborator for his score, since James Horner continues to cannibalize his own earlier work, including both "Aliens" and "Titanic," but in almost every other way, Cameron has inspired the people around him to do work that impresses on every level. WETA Digital may not be the only house who worked on the movie, but they did the lion's share of the work, and if you're impressed by what you see, there's no doubt it's because of their efforts.
I plan to see this film at least two more times before it opens, and I have no doubt we'll be discussing it more here on the blog in the weeks and months ahead. For now, just believe that one of our most gifted action filmmakers has once again crafted a singular experience, one that MUST be experienced on the best possible screen. "Avatar" is not a case of empty hype with no payoff. If anything, the hype has failed because it never once suggested the emotional richness of what Cameron was creating, and it's that component which makes all of the action stick. I cared deeply about these remarkable creatures and their remarkable planet, and by the end of the film, the real-world metaphors were forgotten because I was caught up in the immediacy of what I was watching. Yes, there is obviously something Cameron wants to say about our world, but what I'll take away from "Avatar" are all the things I want to say about his world.
"Avatar" opens on December 18th everywhere. Do not miss it.
[Editor's note: For a preview of James Cameron's "Avatar" check out these six new clips here.]
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
News From Our Partners
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
-
Listen to Selena Gomez's 'Come & Get It' Remixes
Katy Perry vs. Rita Ora vs. Beyonce vs. Kesha vs. Demi Lovato – Who Wore It Best?
Chris Brown Launches New 'Channel' Website, Gets More Personal Than Ever
-
'Pacific Rim' Trailer Surfaces: Watch Now!
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
-
Ilana Rapp: Actor Richard Harmon From Bates Motel and Continuum Talks about SpongeBob Squarepants and Yoga
'The Last Classic TV Comedy'?
'Biggest Loser' Host: 'I've Never Seen Jillian Eat A Cupcake'
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
Supernatural Season 8 Finale Review: It's Raining Angels
Watch an Extended Trailer for CBS's Under the Dome (VIDEO)
-
'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II': The Oscar-Winning Movie is Getting a Sequel
'The Bling Ring' Cannes Premiere: Emma Watson Steals the Show (PHOTOS)
Why Brad Bird Turned Down 'Star Wars: Episode VII'; Talks 'Incredibles' Sequel
-
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition
Video Interviews with Katie Aselton & Lake Bell of Black Rock
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day One: Sofia Coppola offers the first misfire of the festival
Hear This: A song with a long title succinctly encapsulates ’90s power-pop
Watch This: Laura Palmer lives—however briefly—in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupwarblecroaker
December 12, 2009 at 1:10AM EST Reply to Commenthe he he, i gleefully enjoy your enjoyment. doesn't get any better than creating a new world never seen before and doing it well.
Ryan
December 12, 2009 at 1:25AM EST Reply to CommentOh how I love the great feedback this movie is getting. Glad to see the jaded and cynical haters put back in their hole.
Keep rocking Cameron!
Thomas
December 12, 2009 at 2:43AM EST Reply to CommentHi Drew, just two comments here: The reason Quaritch works, one note as he is, is because Lang plays him as a tragic figure who's unaware of his own tragedy: A guy living in paradise who is not able to connect or understand. And isn't the scene where he blows off the door and goes after the refugess sans oxygen just amazing?
Also, I'm impressed that it's just the other way round: It's the old guard that keeps challenging what film can be - for better or worse: Cameron, Michael Mann, Zemeckis, DePalma, Romero. I'ts not that all of their inventiveness is necessarily great, but at least they're trying, pushing forward, redefining who we are, what world we live in through the eyes and possibilities of cinema.
Danger Mouse
December 12, 2009 at 3:20AM EST Reply to CommentI saw this movie at an early screening as well, and the one thing that bugged me the most, strangely enough, was the score. I know people have been saying that James Horner repeats some of his work from ALIENS, but if you listen carefully you can also hear GLORY and WILLOW of all things. That really took me out of the movie at times. Everything else I though I sincerely enjoyed. It' just unfortunate that our screening was at a subpar theater so I'm definitely going to check this out when it comes out in a better theater and for sure in IMAX.
Dirkblack
December 12, 2009 at 6:59AM EST Reply to CommentMy wife and i are off to see this on the 18th, at the Imax in London in 3D, This will be the first time i have experienced both.....Should be quite a day.
stormshadow4life
December 12, 2009 at 10:56AM EST Reply to CommentCan't wait. We're going to see it in IMAX 3D next weekend
flash2000
December 12, 2009 at 11:19AM EST Reply to CommentThey like this
Justin Jump
December 12, 2009 at 3:27PM EST Reply to CommentHey THOMAS. Don't forget the fucking movie isn't OUT YET. Please clearly label a post with a spoiler warning. You inconsiderate douche.
Richard
December 12, 2009 at 10:00PM EST Reply to CommentThis review reads like an oscar acceptance speech. "I want to thank the production designer..."
"Also, my girl Zoe. Great job honey. This is for you."
Davor Vukasovic
December 13, 2009 at 12:04PM EST Reply to CommentHeard the soundtrack and i totally agree,hopefully i
will agree with the rest of the review too
bubbatwo420
December 13, 2009 at 2:11PM EST Reply to CommentReally great review, I think the anticipation for Avatar is through the roof right now and it's about time an event film like this took it's place on the pedestal of masterpieces we all love. I'll be seeing this twice in 12 hours in 3D IMAX opening night and will probably go 6-7 times more. The full blown experience in the 3D IMAX theatres can never be replicated and i'm thankful for that. It means we'll remember it even more.
Justin Jump
December 13, 2009 at 2:37PM EST Reply to CommentI've been listening to the soundtrack recently, and honestly, I think it's pretty great. It may use some familiar cues, but dammit, I LIKED those cues the first time around. So it works for me. I would have loved to hear what someone like Howard Shore would have done with it, but Horner came through just fine, in my opinion.
Scott Rudicil
December 13, 2009 at 9:39PM EST Reply to CommentI actually think the musical score by Horner is one of the best scores to come from Hollywood in a good long while. Sure, it's got some familiar cues in there, but they work fantastically. And it's also got a boatload of brand new stuff that is rivetingly excellent. To my knowledge, I've very rarely seen comments from Moriarty/McWeeny on movie music stuff before, so I'm not sure how his opinion of other musical scores in film stacks up against mine. But who in the world of film music would he have taken over Horner at this point? Classically scored film music is a dying breed, and there simply aren't many composers out there who are capable of outputting something so tremendous as a vintage Horner or John Williams or Jerry Goldsmith score. I think this soundtrack is pretty fantastic, and I can only hope the movie is nearly as good.
warblecroaker
December 14, 2009 at 10:13AM EST Reply to CommentIt's also nice to hear that the film will chemically alter you without even having to add any chemicals.
Nicole
December 14, 2009 at 11:33AM EST Reply to CommentMy husband and I have tickets for an IMAX 3D showing and are really excited to see it. Now all we have to do is make it through the workweek...
Larry Rocha
December 14, 2009 at 5:13PM EST Reply to CommentHey Drew,
Quick question, as a fellow bespectacled fellow how do you wear the 3D glasses?
Thanks,
Larry
drew Depends on the glasses, Larry. The ones at BNAT were almost impossible to wear with my glasses, but the ones at the Digital IMAX screens are really comfortable and fit right over my face well enough that I forgot they were on.
December 16, 2009 at 7:41PM ESTnick_r
December 14, 2009 at 7:07PM EST Reply to CommentI wonder if we'll ever reach the point where the quality of special effects is a non-issue, for good or ill. I say this because it seems like every time a movie like Avatar comes out, every critic on earth is waiting with bated breath to say that "the effects are great but the story's just so-so" -- almost like the quality of the visuals gives them an automatic excuse to assume that the writing is subpar. I wish we could have a critical dialogue about Avatar that's entirely separate from special effects, but it feels like that won't be possible, and that's unfortunate. I look forward to the day when effects work is so taken for granted that calling attention to it would be as irrelevant as calling attention to how smoothly the film was loaded.
David
December 16, 2009 at 3:33PM EST Reply to CommentWhen you hear words like "transported", "chemically altered", or "just like Star Wars" from a net reviewer your warning bells should be going off (add orgasm to that list too).
It is amazing to me that Drew and many of the smart posters on here can be so easily duped by some pretty effects. Recycled mecha from Matrix Revolutions and an updated gunship from Aliens is all Cameron needed to do to get you all in a tizzy? “World building†you say? Let me ask then, what is the point of building a world when you don’t have a story or interesting characters to inhabit it?
The true test if a movie deserves to be called great is how good its story and characters are. In both respects Avatar fails. Just like Peter Jackson's King Kong and Spielberg's War of The Worlds. Both had pretty pictures. Both sucked.
Yes yes my opinion...sure. But when you buy the blue ray disk in six months and realize how shitty Avatar is I will be happy to say I told you so.
Sam An ordinary story can be greatly improved if its told well enough.
December 16, 2009 at 6:47PM ESTSure Avatar's story and characters aren't "great" on paper, but it's in combination with the unprecedented visual craft of this film (and other aspects of story telling Cameron does very well) that they are enriched.
Saying people were duped into liking this movie because of the visuals is like saying people were duped into liking Chicago because of the music.
drew You won't be saying "I told you so to me," David, so spare me the tirade. Was my entire review about how pretty the effects were? No? You mean I liked it precisely because of James Cameron as a STORYTELLER and the STORY that he is TELLING? Well, imagine that.
December 16, 2009 at 7:39PM ESTWade You know, David...just because you didn't like it, and don't like other movies, yes it's your opinion. But to imply that those who don't agree with you are fooled into liking something that they shouldn't? Shame on you. I thought King King was so-so. I was a HUGE fan or WotW, the George Pal version, and grew up with my Dad's copy of the original Orson Welles recording, and I have to say - Spielberg's version scared the S%#T out of me, in the theater. Not horror, but terror. Adn Avatar? Maybe not my fav of the year, but DAMN that man pushes the envelope.
December 19, 2009 at 5:11PM ESTAs far as "recycled mecha" - where did the W brothers get it from? It was already recycled. JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING IN HOLLYWOOD IS anymore. No, the story wasn't fresh, but if you didn't enjoy it, weren't immersed in it, then hey, not for you. I WAS and I'm glad I went. I will say, though...I worry how it may translate to the small screen, as you remark.
Wade One more thing, David. I keep turning to WotW on cable when it's on, and can't turn it off. It just keeps drawing me in. So, I suppose since it "sucks" as you say, my opinion is not valid?
December 19, 2009 at 5:15PM ESTYou go on doing what you do, Drew (and you'll always be Moriarty to me). Thanks for your input.
apred
December 22, 2009 at 5:09PM EST Reply to CommentI finally saw Avatar in 3-D which is certainly the way to see the movie. It is the most immersive and least intrusive 3-D film that I have ever seen. Also, I found the film enchanting on many levels. The story, while certainly not unique, kept me interested and the performances were top notch. While I do not believe that it reinvents cinema, I can see it inspiring young people the way Star Wars did thirty years ago. In fact let's not forget that Star Wars was a pastiche of older story ideas stirred together by a master storyteller just as James Cameron has done here. Also, the commentary in the film both harkens back to a past that many Americans I believe would prefer to forget and it is a cautious warning that these will be issues in the future. If we ever do explore and begin to colonize other planets, how we deal with any natives that we meet will say alot about where we have come as a species. Overall, it was an extremely satisfying and and enjoyable film and one that I am still thinking about days later unlike so much of the disposable entertainment today.
December 24, 2009 at 11:19PM EST Reply to CommentAvatar has set the gold standard for visual science fiction story telling http://paullevinson.blogspot.com/2009/12/avatar-in-science-ficion-perspective.html