'A Serbian Film' shocks and supercharges SXSW midnight programming
Shocking, profane, deeply disturbing, but amazingly made and truly significant
If I even tried to describe what's happening in this image in vague, general terms, you would be so offended you would stop reading my blog. Suffice it to say, 'A Serbian Film' likes its metaphors big and bold.
If you were anywhere within earshot of me during SXSW, then you already have some idea of just how enthusiastic I was about a screening that happened early in the festival, a screening that may turn out to be one of my few chances to see this audacious debut on the bigscreen.
However, it's precisely because the film hit me so hard that I found myself unable to quite put it all into words during the festival. It's taken me until now to get my head around it completely so I could somehow write a review that wouldn't just be ranting and raving. So what is "A Serbian Film"? Hmmmm...
"This is a new genre, Milos!"
-- Vukmir Vukmir, "A Serbian Film"
On one level, "A Serbian Film" is the movie that Brian De Palma and Dario Argento teamed up to make in 1987, and it works as a dark, inhuman thriller in which a family man's tainted past catches up with him and threatens the happy life he's built for himself. It is the story of one generation's crimes becoming a younger generation's punishments. But even before any of that, it is a hysterical cry for help, a cultural declaration of surrender that I found emotionally devastating.
Here's what I believe. Anyone who is writing seriously about the current culture of cinema should be required to review "A Serbian Film." I think it's a significant litmus test. It is a challenge, no doubt about it. When Tim League introduced the film and said it actually disturbed him when I watched it, I took that as fun but empty hype. Tim League has seen more onscreen depravity than would seem possible in the span of one human lifetime, so for him to preface a film with a warning that this even tested his threshold seemed too William Castle for me to believe.
I should have listened.
I should have believed.
"That's it, Milos! That's the cinema!"
-- Vukmir Vukmir, "A Serbian Film"
The film introduces one of its dozen themes in the opening scene, where Milos (Srdjan Todorovic) and his wife (Jelena Gavrilovic) return home to find their nine-year-old son watching a hardcore porn film. Even worse, it's a film that stars Milos. He's retired, supposedly, but he's running low on his reserves of cash, and he's starting to think about a return to the business. When he's approached by Lejla (Katarina Zutic), an actress he worked with in the glory days, she's got a mysterious offer he has a hard time turning down. She knows someone who wants to make a piece of political pornography, and they want Milos to star in it. She plays to his vanity first, then plays to his insecurity, finally hooking him. He agrees to meet the director of the film, Vukmir Vukmir, and that meeting is the start of a chain reaction avalanche, like a rollercoaster with a track that only goes down.
Vukmir Vukmir is this movie's Satan, the ruiner, constantly seducing Milos down the road to a self-made Hell. It's a great role, and (Sergej Trifunovic) tears it up. He's gleeful because he genuinely believe in his artistic mission. He's doing something significant. He's saving Serbia with depravity. The way Vukmir shoots the film, there's no script, no warning ahead of time about what he's going to ask Milos to do. Vukmir is invisible, speaking to him by earpiece, and everything plays out for real. Whatever Milos does, it's real. And it's disturbing to see the way Milos is lured down the rabbit hole, the way his moral compass is reset to a new north each day. The pace and energy of the filmmaking is very precise, controlled, with a scary command of film language. It's fitting. You can't make a film about a brilliant but disturbed filmmaker and make it truly effective unless you make a slick and truly depraved movie. You can't make a genuinely shocking film about pornography without showing images that are, by definition, pornographic.
And therein lies the rub.
"At least your dick liked it... and he never lies."
-- Vukmir Vukmir, "A Serbian Film"
This is that rare film in that it never flinches. Once the film starts, it never once shies away from the ideas or the imagery that it introduces. As a result, you find yourself in moments in the film where you start to worry that you're about to see something so awful that you'll be changed by it, and then after they show you what you were afraid of, they show you something worse. Most films that flirt with darkness do exactly that: they flirt. They tease. They are never quite as horrifying as you think they'll be. The screenplay that Aleksandar Radivojevic and Srdjan Spasojevic wrote together is a catalog of the darkest corners of the human heart, and they're young enough that they've got the same sort of crazy pent-up film nerd energy that early Tarantino had. That kind of command of language. Spasojevic is the director of the film, and I'm not making a cursory comparison when I mention De Palma or Argento or early Carpenter. The film is shot is gorgeous 2.35:1 scope, using the Red camera, and if I didn't know that, I might think I was looking at old '70s stock 35mm. It's that lush and visually impressive. It is an incredibly angry film, and there are some dark laughs so dark that they just sort of take your breath away. It's a tricky structure, because for the first hour, it's all build-up. It's the seduction, as Vukmir Vukmir shoots the first three or four days in his film, culminating in a moment that Milos finds repulsive, degrading, over a line he didn't even realize he needed to define.
Then Vukmir Vukmir levels with Milos. He lays bare his whole philosophy. He explains who he really is, what he's really shooting. He still doesn't lay out specifics, but he defines the borders of the game, and the borders are non-existent. He goes so far that something happens onscreen, graphically, in your face, without any cutting away or relief of tension or horror that I guarantee... no matter what rough or dangerous films you've ever seen before, you will see something you have not seen. You will see it and you will hear it. And it is goddamn awful.
And from that point, you might think, "That's it. Whatever else they show me, that's the line. They went further than anyone ever, and there's nothing else they can do that's going to go further."
And you would be wrong.
"Victim sells."
-- Vukmir Vukmir, "A Serbian Film"
In the second hour, time is no longer linear. Milos wakes up in bed, smeared in blood and filth, and he's lost three days. There are only a few clues to follow, but each one is going to lead him to remember a little more of what he's done and what's been done to him. And while the image I described above is a nightmarish image for any audience, a generally unimaginable horror, what happens in the second hour is personal to Milos. He's taken on a ride into his own life, where all the simmering tensions between him and his wife and their son and his brother all spill over and drown him. Vukmir Vukmir directs Milos through three of the worst days possible. The film just punches and punches and punches.
Talking to Tim League and Rodney Perkins of Fantastic Fest after the screening, it was obvious that they really wrestled with whether or not to program the movie. They made the right choice. This summer, Mitch Davis is going to be showing the film at FanTasia in Montreal, and I would argue that it is one of the most important dates on the festival calendar for North American critics. If you haven't seen the film, get to Montreal and see it because I don't know when or if it will play here again. I seriously challenge every working critic who reads this to see the film, and to only see it theatrically. Do not watch a screener. Do not watch it in a setting you control. You have to be willing to lock yourself in a room with this movie and a crowd of total strangers. That's part of what is so terrifying about it. You know you're not supposed to say or do or think any of what Vukmir Vukmir does or puts Milos through, but you also know that other people do think this way, and those people could be sitting around you reacting to what they're watching in a much more disturbing way. It's scary because you realize that this is the way these filmmakers are saying it feels to be Serbian. Pardon my language, but in Serbia, you are f**ked from birth, you are f**ked until you die, and then, no doubt, you will be f**ked some more. That's the simple truth of this movie, and until you live it, you don't realize just how jet black a view of life that really is.
It's about victimization and humliation, and how it's an industry that certain regions of the world export for the consumption of other regions of the world. In Serbia, they don't see themselves contributing or leading or competing. They see only one role for themselves and their countrymen... as victims to be sold to people sitting in comfort somewhere, watching the suffering so they can feel better about their own lives. The film asks if you can truly have a pornographic industry without creating a victim economy, which is a HUGE thing for a film like this to tackle. The pornographic is everywhere, they argue. It's inconveniently convenient at this point. From the opening scene to the final images, there is blatant sexual imagery in almost every single frame of the film, in every corner of the culture it presents. Even as they're driving Milos to an unnamed destination, drugged and crazy and ready to kill him, they drive by billboards that he can see from the floorboards of the back seat, and on the billboards, half-naked women beckon and bend. They cast the film with truly stunning Eastern Bloc beauties in every single female role. It's alarming how beautiful the cast is, and that's no accident. It's the cartoon of what the West imagines when we think of women in the former Soviet states.
"Welcome to a warm family home."
-- Vukmir Vukmir, "A Serbian Film"
The lead performance by Todorovic is intense and incredible, an Old Testament Job for the porn age, and he really is the thing that makes it all work. He has to be fearless as a performer. We hear that in connection to things like Reese Witherspoon movies here, but allow me to laugh. There is very little in American cinema that actors are asked to do that is genuinely terrifying. This guy has a substantial career in Serbia. I mean, come on... this is the star of "Strawberries In The Supermarket," "The Red Colored Grey Truck," and the entire "We Are Not Angels" series including "We Are Not Angels 3: Rock & Roll Strike Back," for god's sake. He was described to me by the filmmakers as "the Serbian Kevin Bacon." I'm trying to imagine Kevin Bacon doing what Todorovic does here. It's not working.
Here's how much "A Serbian Film" affected me. We saw it at midnight on the Sunday night of SXSW this year, at the Alamo South Lamar location, and it was a rowdy, energetic screening. Before the film screened, Tim League asked several of us up onstage to do "Extreme Tequila Shots." That means you snort the line of salt, you drink the shot of tequila, and you squeeze the lime right onto your eyeball. I was involved. There is photographic proof of this bouncing around Facebook now. It hurt like I can't even describe. That feeling is what the film did to every single person in that room. Outside afterwards, it was like comparing notes on a crime that had been committed right in front of us. One person, Scott Weinberg, couldn't make the screening, but as he heard everyone talking about it, he realized he needed to see it that night to review it. He managed to procure the festival's official screener of the film, and needed a place to see it. An Austin friend, Luke Mullen, who saw the screening with me, offered to let Scott and I watch the film on a portable DVD player in his truck so we wouldn't wake anyone. I sat through it a second time, making notes about specific things, and even screening it like that, I was totally absorbed in it. The power of what they've made is just amazing. Love it or hate it, you cannot deny that it's an experience, and a reminder of just how dangerous film can be in the right hands.
On the first Motion/Captured podcast this week, you'll be able to hear me interview Tim League, owner of the Alamo Drafthouse and programmer of Fantastic Fest, along with the writer and the director of "A Serbian Film" as well as Simon Rumley and Amanda Fuller, whose "Red White And Blue" I'll also be reviewing this week. It's a pretty great roundtable, and was probably the high point of the festival for me.
First, though, some DVD reviews tonight. Be back with those soon.
SCREENED @ SXSW 2010
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.
News From Our Partners
-
Brandi Glanville Claims She Hooked Up With Gerard Butler
Charlie Sheen Talks Ladies – Onscreen & Off
Jonah Hill ‘Overwhelmed’ By ‘Moneyball’ Supporting Actor Nomination
-
Gateways To Geekery: There’s more to Russ Meyer’s films than breasts, though those are pretty important
Interview: Men In Black 3 director Barry Sonnenfeld on creating character and managing 3-D
The Walkthrough: 30 Rock showrunner Robert Carlock walks us through some recent series highlights
-
Russell Crowe, Elvis Costello, Sing Elvis Presley And Johnny Cash In London
Zero Dark Thirty: Kathryn Bigelow, Mark Boal, Given Secret Access By CIA For bin Laden Film
'Transformers 3' Extra Receives $18.5 Million Settlement For Injury
-
Pamela Newton: My 'Downton Abbey' Fantasy Life
Remy M. Maisel: It Turns Out, We Can Indeed Haz Super PAC: Part I
WATCH: Reporter Fakes Sandstorm On Live TV
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: Best Lines of the Season 3 Finale
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
-
'Dark Knight Rises' TV Spots: A Lighter Side Of Batman
Emma Stone Nabs First 'MTV Trailblazer Award'
Charlize Theron Gives Dirty Details About Michael Fassbender
-
Total Recall: Will Smith's Best Movies
Cannes 2012: Critics Scorecard
24 Frames: The Films of Wes Anderson
-
The Dandy Warhols Celebrate 18 Years Together
Lady Gaga Turns Yellow For The Simpsons
Dance Music Vocalist Susana Releasing New Album
About This Blog
Los Angeles has changed since 1990, and Drew McWeeny, all-around Chauncey Gardner of movie fandom, has seen it all as an industry insider and screenwriter who wrote for 12 years as "Moriarty" for Ain't It Cool News.
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
Our review of the best film at this year's Cannes Film FestivalWednesday, May 23, 2012
-
Long-rumored Kerouac adaptation mostly gets it rightWednesday, May 23, 2012
-
His second film with Andrew Dominik is dark, cynical, and fairly greatTuesday, May 22, 2012
-
We take a little time with one of Hollywood's living legendsTuesday, May 22, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupTom Cole
April 6, 2010 at 12:07AM EST Reply to CommentIt sounds interesting, but I disagree that every reviewer should be required to see it, much less review it. By your own admission, the film delves into actual pornography. I haven't seen the film (although I probably will against my better instincts) but I did read some spoilers to know if I have the stomach for it (I probably don't).
Every human, critics included, should have a line they draw for themselves, and I wouldn't blame any film critic for drawing the line at a film that is clearly head and shoulders more transgressive than ALMOST ANYTHING out there, and will probably only exist as a cult film from here on out, no matter how poignant the story and theme, or how amazingly shot and directed it was.
Now, should a critic rail against the movie without seeing it, as I recall one critic you pointed to did with Antichrist, well - that's horseshit and they should be skewered for it. But if a critic chooses to excuse him/herself from the conversation because they're aware that this movie isn't for them, I think they should be allowed.
As you said in an AICN talkback regarding your buddy's film Maskhead: "Scott has an appetite for this dark, seedy end of the genre that I don't as a filmmaker. I'm actually sort of afraid to see 'Mask Head.'" Now I realize you meant this from the perspective of a writerfilmmaker rather than a viewer, and that you probably did end up seeing Maskhead, but surely you can understand why some critics will end up skipping this one.
I'll wrap up this screed by saying that I do believe critics should seek out films that challenge, subvert, and disturb. They should certainly have to experience the pushing of the envelope in order to stay up on the evolution of cinema. But this film - I definitely wouldn't think less of any critic who sits it out. But that's just where I draw my line.
JoeK Well said.
April 6, 2010 at 9:33AM ESTLooking forward to an opportunity to see this.
drew
April 6, 2010 at 12:37AM EST Reply to CommentVery true, Tom. Obviously, some critics will sit it out, and I won't think less of them for it. But I'm daring them to see it with an open mind and meet it as art, not as hype about "that was so nasty!", which is all some people could manage after watching it. I think the film has a lot to say about where we are now as a global culture, and the fact it'll have trouble playing in most places makes it something critics will have to work to see.
Justin Jump
April 6, 2010 at 2:38AM EST Reply to CommentI cannot wait to see this movie. The trailer floored me.
John W
April 6, 2010 at 11:21AM EST Reply to CommentI'm actually scared to see the movie now...
Toulon
April 8, 2010 at 10:15PM EST Reply to CommentCan't wait... gotta see this now.
Btw, Drew, if you go "Arrrrrrrrrr" after squeezing the lime in your eye, it's called a Pirate Shot!
JDR22
April 9, 2010 at 7:39PM EST Reply to CommentI'm sorry, but I've heard about some of the things in the film (even the so-called "tame" stuff). I don't care how artful the rest of the film is, nothing justifies depicting these acts on film.
Nothing.
It makes me question the judgment of every critic who is defending the film.
Drew, I read your blog frequently, and have a lot of respect for you. However, I just can't understand how you can defend this movie. I'm not saying this to be a snob, or a religious nut (believe me, I'm not); I just can't see justifying this deplorable content for any reason.
I feel sick just thinking about it.
drew You say that as someone who has grown up in a Western country, and no matter what the circumstances of your life, they don't compare to the life that has been endured by people in certain other regions of the world. You don't ever need to see the film, but to say that they don't have the right to express their worldview in metaphorical or literal terms doesn't sit right with me at all.
April 9, 2010 at 9:30PM ESTArt is not meant to comfort us. At least, not exclusively. And, yes, the film is ENTIRELY justified in my opinion.
JDR22 @Drew,
April 10, 2010 at 1:33PM ESTInteresting that I can't reply to your comment...
I never said they didn't have the right to express their worldview; and don't dismiss my opinion because I live in the Western world.
Many in the West have endured rape, murder, incest, etc. Should they express their "worldview" by creating a film explicitly depicting those experiences? What do we gain from it? Understanding? That can be achieved without resorting to explicit means (although I don't feel you can ever fully understand without being in that situation).
It's one thing to express your worldview through art; it's another to do it using immoral and deplorable content. What's next: public torture and murder broadcast to the world? That's also a way to express your worldview. Where does it end? I know, I know: "But no one was killed while making the movie." It doesn't make it right.
I'm not one for censorship, but there is a line. The problem is that once you say you can't cross a line, you're labeled a censor/nazi/close-minded idiot. To me, some content in 'A Serbian Film' crosses a line (and that's only the little bit I've heard about). Nothing anyone can say will make me smash my moral compass. Some things are just wrong.
I respect you, Drew, but we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
drew JDR22...
April 10, 2010 at 5:26PM ESTI respect you as well, sir. I don't think you personally have to cross the line if it makes you uncomfortable. I would never consider anyone to be less of a film fan or less of a person just because they chose not to ingest a certain work of art.
But it is art. Art is one of the ways we process and share our human experience, the good and the bad. Noe's "Irreversible" is a shattering, ugly, painful experience, but it is also one that contains enormous soul and beauty. Just because it's built around a distressingly violent sexual crime, many people refuse to watch it, and I understand.
I find art that pushes the extreme to be of enormous value. Not everyone agrees. It is a conversation that will not end with this one film, and I certainly wouldn't call you a censor or a Nazi or a close-minded idiot just because you don't want to see it.
And there is a HUGE, HUGE difference between art that portrays something and simply recording an inhuman act of violence. That's a specious argument, at best. It's not a sliding scale. One is drama. One is document.
The things depicted in "A Serbian Film" are wrong. No doubt. Showing something is not glamourizing it, and watching something does not mean my moral compass has been smashed.
JDR22 @Drew,
April 12, 2010 at 12:02PM ESTYou make some valid points, and I admit that my "public torture" argument was a bit specious.
I think it comes down to where you personally draw the line. Perhaps I would feel differently had I gone into the film not knowing what would happen, and then having to sort it out. As it is, knowing ahead of time what the film contains, I feel it's a line I can't cross. In effect, I would have to smash my moral compass to bring myself to experience it. That's not to say that you (or anyone else) has done the same by watching it. It's a choice we each need to make as film fans.
At any rate, at least it's inspiring important conversations about film. That's always a good thing.
Keep up the good work, Drew, I look forward to your future write-ups. :-)
April 10, 2010 at 6:58PM EST Reply to CommentWill this be screened at Fantastic Fest.. I don't think I'll be able to fly to Canada when It will be screened again...
April 12, 2010 at 12:26AM EST Reply to CommentThis is definitely something got me that I wrestle with as a film fan and a soon-to-be filmmaker. Someone said something about a moral compass... Well, after hearing about the content that IS in this film, I really don't know if I could ever stomach sitting through it, or if I could ever fairly watch it as art. It's a really hard thing for me to measure, because I recognize that there is incredible beauty an soul in the ugly... BUT, does that mean that I should see it because those ugly things are things that I just can't bring myself to even imagine... ever?... I honestly don't know.
Horror Society
October 21, 2010 at 9:20PM EST Reply to CommentA Serbian Film will be playing at our upcoming film festival at Portage Theater in Chicago on Saturday, October 23rd. http://www.horrorsociety.com/festivals/
October 21, 2010 at 9:40PM EST Reply to CommentThis film was amazingly executed. I didn't find it entirely shocking. Though not as blatant, I feel that a lot of Takashi Miike's work has been more disturbing in many ways. It's a great film, and if you don't like movies with challenging material, don't watch it. But I really didn't find it to be that bad, personally.