The directors of 'Jesus Camp' return with a look at the abortion debate

The directors of 'Jesus Camp' return with a look at the abortion debate

<p>The corner that is the center of a debate over abortion in the new documentary '12th &amp;&nbsp;Delaware,' part of this year's Sundance Film Festival.</p>

The corner that is the center of a debate over abortion in the new documentary '12th & Delaware,' part of this year's Sundance Film Festival.

Credit: Sundance Film Festival

We live in a country where genuine debate seems to be dead, and has instead been replaced by polemic, polar opposites that scream at each other.  Most documentaries these days are produced to advance an agenda by one side or another, and as a result, sitting in a theater frequently feels just like watching this biased news channel or that one.  Not that I think bias is necessarily a bad thing, or even something that can be avoided, as long as it's open and not disguised.  A film like "Outrage," for example, is profoundly biased, but it still makes its points in a clear-eyed, well-argued way.

What's truly difficult is to make a film about something as hot-button divisive as abortion and still somehow give both sides of the debate equal time and equal weight.  Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, the filmmakers behind the terrifying "Jesus Camp," found the perfect way into the conversation in their new film "12th & Delaware."  Even the title of the film serves as a microcosm, since I'd imagine there are thousands of 12th and Delawares in America.  In this case, Ewing and Grady went to Fort Pierce, Florida, where they found a remarkable situation that sums up exactly where we are with this dialogue right now.  Their approach to the film was to give both sides of the situation half the film to present the case with no editorializing at all, and in doing so, I think they've made a powerful film that is infuriating and heartbreaking.

I'd never heard of a crisis pregnancy center, but if asked, I'd guess that's another name for an abortion clinic or a family planning clinic, and I'm not alone in that misperception.  That's the point.  In Fort Pierce, there's a clinic called A Woman's World, and it's exactly what you think of as an abortion clinic.  They bring doctors in hidden under sheets.  They have protesters outside from the moment they open to the moment they close every single day, and yet they continue their work, refusing to be shamed or terrorized.

Across the street, there's another business called the Pregnancy Care Center, and here's where confusion becomes a valuable tool.  The Pregnancy Care Center is a CPC, a pro-life organization whose job is to try and talk pregnant women out of getting an abortion.  To that end, they're willing to use graphic video, doctored statistics, and the empty promise of aid that will never come.  Even the location they chose is designed to create confusion in young women at a particularly vulnerable moment in their lives.  Almost every single girl we see go into the Pregnancy Care Center believes that they're going to be able to get an abortion there, and even when questioned directly, the staff puts off telling the truth as long as they can.  It is truly reprehensible behavior, and what makes me angry about it is the mistruth.  If they would simply be honest about their agenda, then I'm all for a difference of opinions.  But when you have to resort to these sorts of grotesque, abusive tactics to "win," then you're not winning anything.  Most of the girls who walk into the Pregnancy Care Center end up going across the street as soon as they realize how they've been misled, and the emotional toll on them is much more severe because of the preamble.  When they are given a brochure that tells them that 80% of all women who have an abortion develop breast cancer or that an abortion will mean they can never have children later, it's little wonder they are traumatized.

There's a particularly chilling sequence in the film where one of the pro-life protesters who spends his days walking the sidewalk outside A Women's World decides he's going to tail the car that brings the doctors to the clinic.  They have to park in a secret off-site location and try to be careful about protecting their identities, but we watch as this muscle-bound lunatic follows the car to a mall parking lot, where he takes note of the license plates of the car, determined to use that information to track down the doctor's name.  He makes it very clear that he's willing to do anything to stop the doctor from his work, and considering how they practically canonize the guy who killed Dr. George Tiller, "anything" seems scary.

It would be easy for Grady and Ewing to make these people look bad, but they seem perfectly capable of doing it themselves.  The more Grady and Ewing let them speak for themselves, the more they make themselves look like the exact opposite of the Christians they claim to be.  For a philosophy that's supposed to be built on love and tolerance, these people are all about fear and hatred, and their behavior is destructive.  I don't think it matters if you're pro-life (a term I hate) or pro-choice... wrong is wrong.  At the end of the film, there's a sequence in which a group of protesters, careful to never break the court order about how close they can get to A Women's World's front door, manage to convince a woman who already has six children to change her mind about aborting number seven, using the promise of financial aid and long-term support.  When they finally get her into the Pregnancy Care Center, we hear what that financial aid really consists of:  her choice of any stuffed animal on the shelf.  If you can't see how crazy and despicable that is, then you're not thinking about the human toll of this issue, and no matter what, this is not an abstract.  These are real lives that are affected, and a film like "12th & Delaware" really drives that point home.

HBO Documentaries produced that film, and I'm sure you'll see it turn up on the network sometime this year.  It's a must-see for anyone interested in the issue, and a genuinely important piece of reportage.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Tom Cole

    I don't know. I haven't seen this movie, so I can only comment based on this review. For the record, I am pro-choice and lean left. But this movie seems incredibly biased. So you dedicate equal time to both sides, but if one side is comprised almost entirely of loons, then aren't pro-lifers in general being painted with the crazy brush in this film? There are level-headed Lifers out there, and if those folks aren't given a significant amount of time (which they may well be, in which case disregard this comment), then I would say this movie doesn't represent a debate on abortion. It seems this film is designed rather to show the hypocrisy of the fringe folks on the far right of this issue. Which I'm all for, but that doesn't make it unbiased or agenda-free.

    February 1, 2010 at 10:25AM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew It's not about pro-lifers in general. It's about people who run these CPCs, and the tactics they use. They are allowed to explain themselves, and they are filmed going about their daily business. That's fair. No one forced them to do the things they do on-camera, and no one had to manufacture the disgusting nature of the lies they feed these women.

      February 1, 2010 at 3:53PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tom Cole I hear ya, and I agree. I believe that the filmmakers were fair to their subjects and didn't manipulate any material. I guess my problem is claiming the movie represents an unbiased look at the "abortion debate". That term alone is very general while the filmmakers are focusing on a specific sub-set of that debate that includes a fringe minority. If a conservative made a similar film about the environment, where the liberal side represented included only eco-terrorists, and then claimed the film was a debate on deforestation or something, that would be equally disingenuous. Now I don't believe the filmmakers in this case are even claiming this doc is debating abortion, just as I don't think they would claim that Jesus Camp is designed to showcase the pros and cons of Christianity. I would say both films are objective portraits of extremism, and they let the audience decide if that's dangerous, which probably most folks with half a brain would.

      February 3, 2010 at 10:27AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ajax

    Wow, I will have to check this one out. The current issue (Jan 2010) of GQ magazine has a great article on the death of Dr. Tiller in it. Well worth a read.

    Did you get to CaneToads Conquest at Sundance? Cane Toads was one of the most charming and odd documentaries I have seen.

    February 1, 2010 at 10:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Fr. Tom Euteneuer

    Hey Drew, You got sucked in and you didn't even know it. When a movie reviewer says such irresponsible things as "most of the girls who walk into the PCC end up going across the street as soon as they realize how they've been misled," I know he is living in the realm of fantasy, not objective journalism or dispassionate movie reviews. FYI--an average of 1200 women have gone into that PCC every year for the past decade and received the generous help they have needed in times of crisis. You drank Heidi and Rachel's Koolaid to think that the place exists to scare women out of abortions. Please spare us. You believe what you want to believe. Were you part of the Sundance panel of judges who thought Cane Toads were more interesting than the lives of the women and babies helped by the PCC?

    February 7, 2010 at 1:34PM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew You believe what you want to believe as well, sir. That's the miracle of living in a free society. If you find the behavior of the people in the film defensible, then we disagree. Vehemently.

      February 7, 2010 at 5:11PM EST

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Around the Web

News From Our Partners