Spielberg and Bay may still make 'Transformers' 4 and 5 back-to-back with Jason Statham

All I know is I want to see Jason Statham punch a robot

<p>I don't want to hear any complaints when Paramount serves up more than this, because you asked for more of it to the tune of a billion dollars worldwide this summer.</p>

I don't want to hear any complaints when Paramount serves up more than this, because you asked for more of it to the tune of a billion dollars worldwide this summer.

Credit: Paramount Pictures

When I was in Russia this summer for the international press day for "Transformers 3," there was a good deal of conversation about how this was the end of the franchise for Michael Bay and for Shia LaBeouf.

Turns out, that talk may have been a bit premature.

The last story I published, about the "Micronauts" deal, was based in part on information revealed in the Hasbro Q3 earnings call that happened this morning.  During the call, another surprising bit of information was revealed, and now it looks like Paramount, Hasbro, Steven Spielberg, and Michael Bay are all in discussions to continue the franchise.

Duh.

When you make a part three in a series and it makes a billion dollars worldwide, you don't stop making those films.  Not if you're a Hollywood studio.  And so the conversations are underway now, and it looks like Bay is still in the mix despite some of the conversations he had in Moscow about having finally finished with the giant f'ing robots.

I can't say I'm surprised by the idea that they're considering making "Transformers 4" and "Transformers 5" back to back.  It's the same reason Disney is still talking about doing "Pirates Of The Caribbean 5" and "Pirates Of The Caribbean 6" back to back.  It's simply easier on a logistical level for the studio to pay for one giant shoot that they can then break into two movies with two separate post-production schedules.  It's also easier to schedule, because even if it's a long shoot, once it's done, you've got it all in the can, and the cast can go do other things.

I hope they keep Rosie Huntington-Whitely, especially if they really do cast Jason Statham in the lead this time.  I also hope that they just hire Statham to play Sam Witwicky and don't explain the difference in any way.

Right now, Ehren Kruger, who had sole screenplay credit on the third film, is said to be developing the dual sequels, but there's no start date at the moment, nor have they negotiated deals to bring everyone back.  I'm sure we'll here more in the near future as Paramount gets their ducks in a row to keep the giant robots fighting for at least two more movies.

Optimusprime2_primary

Everything: Transformers

Latest news, photos, reviews, interviews, videos and more.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    jcpdiesel21

    Jason, just say NO! The Fast and Furious sequels are more up your alley.

    October 17, 2011 at 10:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      T Imagine The Stath fighting alongside Optimus, taking out Decepticons "Shadow of Colossus" style. I'd pay 20 bucks to see that film.

      October 17, 2011 at 11:37PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      U What exactly would Jason Statham be able to do a giant ass robot? He should stick to fighting people his own size... and species.

      October 17, 2011 at 11:49PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Nic I totaly agree keep SHIA

      January 20, 2012 at 6:13PM EST
  • Batboy_talkback_profile

    Rev. Slappy

    I totally understand why studios do the shooting two sequels at a time thing. But has it ever really worked? And Lord of the Rings doesn't count since it was three books to begin with.

    October 17, 2011 at 11:03PM EST Reply to Comment
    • A_monty_talkback_profile

      Monterey Jack It sort of worked with Back To The Future and Superman (despite the removal of Richard Donner on the second one). Other than that, though, shooting two sequels back-to-back is always a terrible idea.

      October 17, 2011 at 11:37PM EST
    • Batboy_talkback_profile

      Rev. Slappy While I like BTTF 3 quite a bit, I really don't like Part 2 at all. It's loud and screechy and charmless. And the Pirates and Matrix back to back sequels were pretty much disasters.

      October 18, 2011 at 1:05AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Jack Flack

    Jason Statham transforms into garbage actor every time he's on film. Just replace Bay already and get on with it...

    October 17, 2011 at 11:54PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Hemlin

    I can imagine a domestic scene with Statham as Spike. After about 30 seconds of enduring the parents overbearing schtick, he leaps from the table, puts them both in a choke hold and then clamly resumes his breakfast.

    October 18, 2011 at 1:19AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    daniel

    I have huge respect for your point-of-view Drew - normaly - but I just don't get your approval of Huntington-Whitely in the third Transformers. To me, the qualities she brought across mostly where whinyness and needyness. I just couldn't help thinking that Megan Fox's character would have kicked that robots ass somehow - at least she would have tried - and she would definitely never have told sam 'please do what the evil smarmy guy is saying, Sam!'
    I also have to say that I'm much more with those critics of the movie who said 'a little better than Transformers 2 dudn't mean its really any GOOD at all!' Me it left pretty cold, which is also down to the fact that I just didn't care as much for the characters as I still did with #2. And Huntington-Whitely is pretty symptomatic of that lack of involvement for me.

    October 18, 2011 at 3:50AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Freakazoid_talkback_profile

      mmcb105 I think you underestimate the other qualities she brings to the role, such as extreme hotness. Which may or may not be what Drew is referring to.

      October 18, 2011 at 11:37AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      adam And for whatever it's worth aren't she/Statham a couple "in real life" (as opposed to "reel life" I suppose)? I did not see the most recent Transformers movie so I cannot in good conscience comment upon her acting ability although the reviews I read of the movie suggested that she will not have to be up early the day that nominations for the Academy Awards are announced

      October 19, 2011 at 10:59AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    Statham joining Bay and Transformers makes perfect sense. Complete garbage all round.

    October 18, 2011 at 5:16AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Processed Media Amen, brother.

      October 20, 2011 at 5:14PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    dustin

    "I also hope that they just hire Statham to play Sam Witwicky and don't explain the difference in any way."

    I might break break my Bay-embargo if they did that.

    October 18, 2011 at 8:35AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Nic No if they reblay shia it would completly fuck up the whole series you can just replace an actor (besides rosie replacing megan that actually kinda worked) especially replacing shia with stathom yeah that makes sense replacing a 20 year old with 40 yr makes sense NOT!!

      January 20, 2012 at 6:12PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    daveyf

    Fighting robots got me bald and 19 years older all of a sudden. Maybe the robot put him in a time-prison!

    Stupid fucking idea.

    October 18, 2011 at 11:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • S602160292_2076173_4167_talkback_profile

    studioplant

    "I also hope that they just hire Statham to play Sam Witwicky and don't explain the difference in any way." Well played sir, you just made me laugh out loud.

    October 18, 2011 at 4:26PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      hanzele me to :)

      October 20, 2011 at 10:46AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    train

    keep Shia, jason go do fast and furious

    November 9, 2011 at 12:08PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    train

    keep Shia jason say no go do fast and furious

    November 9, 2011 at 12:09PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jessica c

    They need to keep Shia as the lead because he is freaking amazing in these movies. Don't change something that is already great.

    March 17, 2012 at 11:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jordan

    They should keep everybody they make a great cast

    April 17, 2012 at 1:15AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Around the Web

News From Our Partners