Cannes Film Festival 2013

Ridley Scott goes 'Red Riding' for Sony

You can see the original at AFI Fest in Hollywood this month

<p>Quick! Someone replace this man before an audience accidentally sees the 'Red Riding' trilogy starring a bunch of icky English actors!</p>

Quick! Someone replace this man before an audience accidentally sees the 'Red Riding' trilogy starring a bunch of icky English actors!

Credit: IFC Films/Channel 4

Earlier today, the full line-up for the AFI Fest in Hollywood was announced, and one of the things I'm most looking forward to seeing is the "Red Riding" trilogy.  The movies were originally produced by Channel 4 for the UK, but IFC Films picked them up for theatrical release.  They just played Telluride, and the buzz I've heard on them has been incredibly strong.

So, of course, they're going to be remade.

The remake's got a hell of a pedigree.  Steve Zallian is going to be writing the film, and Ridley Scott is set to direct.  Can't really complain about a eam like that.  I assume that Zallian's going to be using the four novels by David Peace that inspired the trilogy of films as his source. 

I'm just a little confused as to why they feel like they have to do it.  Is there something wrong with Julian Jarrold, James Marsh, or Anand Tucker as filmmakers?  Do we really have that little faith that American audiences can handle watching a drama starring people with English accents?

I've been excited to see these films for the last few months, and it looks like I'm going to see all three in one day next week.  But even as I watch them, I'm going to have it in the back of my head now that these are just speed bumps on the way to the Hollywood version.  I think that's what gets my dander up at this point... the idea that Hollywood is the last word on something.  It's no good until Hollywood's had their way with it, right?  Sure, I thought "Let The Right One In" was one of last year's very best films, and a fantastic example of how you adapt a film from a novel, but it doesn't count.  Nope.  Not until we get "Let Me In" with Chloe Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee next year.  They'll show those dumb Swedes what they did wrong.  Obviously, someone needs to remake "Red Riding" because the original stars nobodies like Paddy Considine and Eddie Marsan.  I mean, Considine's just one of the best actors working in any language anywhere in the world right now... but who cares?  Maybe they can get Keanu!

Sounds condescending and arrogant, doesn't it?

Business as usual these days, it seems.

Here's the official Channel 4 description of the original production:

The crime trilogy boasts an all-star cast including; Mark Addy (The Full Monty), Sean Bean (The Lord of the Rings), Jim Carter (Cranford), Warren Clarke (Dalziel & Pascoe), Paddy Considine (Dead Man’s Shoes), Rebecca Hall (Vicky Cristina Barcelona), Sean Harris (24 Hour Party People), John Henshaw (Early Doors), Gerard Kearns (Shameless), Eddie Marsan (Vera Drake), David Morrissey (The Deal), Daniel Mays (White Girl), Peter Mullan (Boy A), Maxine Peake (Shameless), Saskia Reeves (The Fixer) and Lesley Sharp (Afterlife).

The three x 120 minute films, airing as part of C4’s winter 2009 schedule, are set in Yorkshire in the 1970s and 80s. Produced by Michael Winterbottom and Andrew Eaton’s production company, Revolution Films, each film in the trilogy was directed by a separate big name director: Julian Jarrold (Brideshead Revisited), James Marsh (Man on Wire) and Anand Tucker (And When Did You Last See Your Father?).

1974, Yorkshire - a time of paranoia, mistrust and institutionalised police corruption. Rookie journalist Eddie Dunford (Andrew Garfield) is determined to search for the truth in an increasingly complex maze of lies and deceit that characterises a police investigation into a series of child abductions.

In the second episode, directed by Marsh and set in 1980, The “Ripper” has tyrannised Yorkshire for six long years, and with the local police failing to make any progress, the Home Office sends in Manchester officer Peter Hunter (Considine) to review the investigation. Having previously made enemies in the Yorkshire force while investigating a shooting incident in 1974, Hunter finds himself increasingly isolated when his version of events challenges their official line on the “Ripper”.

In the final instalment, directed by Tucker and set in 1983, another young girl has disappeared and Detective Chief Superintendent Maurice Jobson (Morrissey) recognises some alarming similarities to the abductions in 1974, forcing him to come to terms with the fact that he may have helped convict the wrong man. When local solicitor John Piggott (Addy) is persuaded to fight this miscarriage of justice he finds himself slowly uncovering a catalogue of cover ups.

Sounds sort of awesome to me.  If you live in Los Angeles, I highly, highly, highly recommend you check out the website for AFI Fest this year and catch these on the bigscreen.

Don't wait for the remake.  Please.  Don't prove the suits right once again.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup


  • So wait, is this going to be a US-set remake? Do they realise that the story is, in part, based on a real case - the Yorkshire Ripper murders?
    Actually, the original Red Riding films (which were made for British television) are uneven, as you'd expect from the nature of them, but pretty damn good even if they do have the unmistakeable air of 'Life on Mars' about them.
    Hollywood needs to quit remaking classy UK tv. No good will ever come of it State of Play.
    I'm expecting an announcement of Seth Rogan as Malcolm Tucker in In The Loop any day now...

    October 15, 2009 at 2:33AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Leon Russell

    Miles Pieri is right, the television version of the Red Riding trilogy is very uneven, but more than that incredibly dense and confusing. By all accounts David Peaces' original novels are pretty masterful though, and it will be very interesting to see what Ridley Scott brings to a film version.

    October 15, 2009 at 4:27AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Donnie Darko

    Yeah, the Red Riding films are very good (Part One is by far the best IMO) but they are definitely dense and confusing and, to be fair to American viewers, almost inaudible at times. I struggled with the dialogue and I'm English, and watched them on my own at home on a widescreen tv.

    October 15, 2009 at 5:09AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Jesus_talkback_profile

    warrenpeace

    I agree with the comments below about the Red Riding trilogy being dense and confusing, and they also changed quite a bit from the books from what I remember (i.e. four books into three films, missing bits and shifting bits around etc.). However, I don't think there should be a remake of it, especially if it's going to be set in America. Like Miles Pieri said the books are sort of based on something that actually happened in Yorkshire so the story needs to be set there.

    If they really really really have to remake it then they should at least get some of the original actors back such as Paddy Considine, Sean Bean etc.

    October 15, 2009 at 6:58AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ED209

    I, for one, am tremendously excitied to be seeing all three installments on Sunday at the Chicago International Film Fest.

    Maybe it's unreasonable to expect, but I'm hoping for an experience akin to reading James Ellroy's L.A. Quartet.

    October 15, 2009 at 10:56AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    adamkesher

    I love Ridley Scott, I do. But this is completely wrongheaded and insulting.

    Yorkshire is the DNA of the story of Red Riding. The setting is everything. You can't Americanize Red Riding. If you change the setting, it's not Red Riding, period. There's just no point is transposing this story to the states. This idea is destined to fail artistically. The setting can not be altered without completely tearing this story apart and changing pretty much every detail of the story. Seriously, what is the fucking point?

    Like Drew said, don't let the suits be right. Don't let the dumbed down bullshit that they'll turn this in to be what comes to be the more commonly known Red Riding. It's the latest outrage in studios insulting your intelligence.

    October 15, 2009 at 11:34AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web