Review: Martin Scorsese's 'Hugo' is a rapturous lesson in the value of art
The year's smartest kid's film may be the best 3D movie ever
- Critic's Rating A+
- Readers' Rating A-
Asa Butterfield takes Chloe Grace Moretz to see her very first movie in a magical moment from the magical new Martin Scorsese film 'Hugo'
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
As always, Martin Scorsese says it better than I ever could.
Little by little, I've started to feel like Film Nerd 2.0 is one of the most significant things I've done since I've started writing about film online in 1995, and it's part of a bigger plan I have. I eventually plan to get involved in creating and implementing some very real educational reform involving media education that runs K-12, so that kids are given a media literacy on par with any print literacy that is taught. I think we have a responsibility, given the omnipresence of media in the lives of modern children, to not only encourage them with choices about what to watch, but also to teach them how to watch. Without context, how do you expect them to navigate the ocean of choice available to them at all times these days?
Martin Scorsese has spoken at length in the press about wanting to make a movie that his 12-year-old daughter could see, and how much he loved 3D in the '50s, and how this movie serves as, in some ways, autobiography because of his own childhood spent trapped by asthma in a private world, cut off from other kids. All of that is true, but the moment you start putting labels like "kid's film" on a movie like "Hugo," you are being reductive in your thinking, and that's missing the point entirely. In its own way, this is "Film Nerd 2.0: The Movie," and perhaps the most head-over-heels-in-love movie about movies since "Cinema Paradiso."
Based on a novel by Brian Selznick, "Hugo" tells the story of a young man whose father died, abandoning him to the cruelties of a romanticized version of 1930s Paris. Hugo Cabret (Asa Butterfield) was raised by his father (seen briefly in flashback and played by Jude Law) to be a clockmaker, just as his father was, and the two of them shared a private language defined by this world of clockwork and machines. Hugo's father brought home one item in particular that he found collecting dust in storage at a museum, and together, they worked to restore this automaton, this mysterious mechanical man, to working order. When his father died, the project was still unfinished, and since then, Hugo's been hiding, working on it, doing whatever he has to do to stay free and solve this mystery.
Early on, it's obvious that the film is less about the mechanical man and more about the way broken people sometimes need other people to fix them, how we can all play some part in the lives of others, sometimes without meaning to. Hugo's search for answers leads him to meet an angry, sad old man named Georges played by Ben Kingsley, who runs a toy shop in the train station in the heart of Paris, which is where Hugo lives in the walls, keeping the clocks running. Hugo has to stay watchful, constantly hiding from the Station Inspector (Sacha Baron Cohen), who would love nothing more than to send Hugo to an orphanage. Hugo observes the daily life of the train station, the various people playing out all the various stories around him, never participating, trying to make sense of this world he watches.
It's in the second half of the film that "Hugo" goes from good to great, and it also reveals itself as one of the most intensely personal films Scorsese has ever made, as central to an understanding of him as an artist as any of his early classics like "Mean Streets" or "Raging Bull." Without giving away the film's secrets, I'll just say that the movie eventually makes an argument for, of all things, film preservation, but in ways I didn't expect. Yes, it argues that you have to take care of films in a physical sense, making sure they are available and able to be seen. But it also argues for preservation in other ways, such as making sure people see these movies that we take care of. After all, what's the point in making sure there are prints of something if there's nobody watching the films anymore? It is the job of everyone who loves movies to try to pass that love along, and to share older films with zeal. You have to show people why you love what you love. And then Scorsese even goes beyond that to make the case for homage as another form of film preservation. You won't have to work very hard to see the references to "L'Arivee d'un Train en agree de La Ciotat" or Harold Lloyd's "Safety First," since he underlines the nods by showing the actual clips elsewhere in his film, and he wants you to connect the dots. He's explaining that artists build on the work of other artists, and he's showing you the way movies bounce around inside of an artist before they emerge in some new combination of ideas, some new context for an image. Only by doing all three of those things do we truly keep films alive, part of the ongoing conversation that is cinema.
And as much as I love the movie stuff, it's really the idea of how people fix other people that speaks to me, and the movie is overt in the way it introduces all of its main characters as broken in some way, in need of just the right piece or part to fix them, and Hugo emerges as a lovely catalyst, acted with a great sense of wide-eyed sorrow by Butterfield. I love the supporting cast in the film, the adults that surround Hugo as he moves through this story in search of the piece that will fix him. Christopher Lee makes a strong impression in his brief role, Ray Winstone is suitably awful as the drunken uncle who claims Hugo when his father dies, and Jude Law is lovely in his brief time as the father who taught Hugo how to fix things. Emily Mortimer, Frances de la Tour, Richard Griffiths, and Sacha Baron Cohen fill in the lives of these people around the train station with lots of great, well-observed little touches as well, and the entire thing has a languid, sweet charm.
It is Ben Kinglsey and Helen McCrory who just tear me up, though, whose work as Papa Georges and Mama Jeanne is so wonderful, so richly played, so heart-wrenchingly human. Kingsley has rarely been better than he is here, and when I realized that McCrory isn't actually a woman in her 80s, I was shocked. I didn't recognize her from her role as Draco Malfoy's mother, and she plays her age make-up in a natural, honest way that no one in "J. Edgar" ever managed. Their storyline and the way the secret is teased out and finally revealed is devastating, and I really can't wait to see the film again if only to watch that final third, when we really learn who they are, what they shared, and what they have lost.
I love that Selznick's story is based in biographical truth, and John Logan's screenplay adaptation is incredible, built just right, a wondrous piece of clockwork in its own right. Howard Shore's score adds the final touch to a hypnotic piece of work that I think stands right alongside Scorsese's finest, although it is such a new voice for the filmmaker that some longtime fans may be thrown. People who think of Scorsese only in terms of crime films sell him short, and they are the ones who will miss out on this thrilling, beautiful movie that believes we each have a place and a purpose, and true peace only comes from finding it.
"Hugo" opens in theaters today.
News From Our Partners
-
'Pacific Rim' Trailer Surfaces: Watch Now!
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
-
'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II': The Oscar-Winning Movie is Getting a Sequel
'The Bling Ring' Cannes Premiere: Emma Watson Steals the Show (PHOTOS)
Why Brad Bird Turned Down 'Star Wars: Episode VII'; Talks 'Incredibles' Sequel
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
Supernatural Season 8 Finale Review: It's Raining Angels
-
Mariah Carey Medleys, Jennifer Lopez Lives It Up With Pitbull on 'American Idol' Finale [Videos]
Candice Glover Wins 'American Idol' Season 12
Beyonce Gets Emotional Onstage in Belgium [Video]
-
Who Won 'American Idol' 2013?
'The Office' Finale: Michael Scott's Surprise Appearance
And Your New 'American Idol' Is ...
-
Crosstalk: A fan and a newbie catch up on the first season of The Venture Bros.
AVQ&A: What are your favorite and least favorite cultural baits and switches?
Podmass: The Dice Man infiltrates podcasting, Casey Wilson chokes up on The JV Club, and Kumail vs. Maron
-
'The Office' Series Finale Review: "Finale"
'Anger Management' Review: "Charlie and the Break-Up Coach"
'Hannibal' Review: "Fromage"
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupforg
November 23, 2011 at 2:26AM EST Reply to CommentYour review made me feel more excited to see this film! Too bad why does it have to go up against Muppets and Arthur Christmas (plus week 2 of Breaking Dawn and Happy Feet 2?) I hope it will find a solid audience and maybe grow through word of mouth
Jack P
November 23, 2011 at 2:59AM EST Reply to CommentCouldn't agree with you more!
In "A Personal Journey Through American Movies," I remember how Martin Scorcese defined one type of director as "The Smuggler." This particular filmmaker fended off banality and included various sensibilities, off-beat themes, even radical political views within otherwise conventional storylines.
That definition perfectly sums up what Scorcese achieved with "HUGO." Against the whimsical trappings of what seemed like yet another teal-and-orange, Oliver Twist-esque children's tale - he somehow managed to smuggle in a tremendously moving ode to the importance of film preservation and keeping art at the forefront our lives.
But more to the point: tonight was the first time I experienced tears of joy while wearing 3D glasses.
I'm sure I could write much more, but (to risk sounding corny) Drew always says it better than I ever could. So just take his word for it :)
CinemaPsycho
November 23, 2011 at 3:30AM EST Reply to CommentWish I could see it, but it's not opening anywhere near me. Thanks, Paramount.
Jason Regan
November 23, 2011 at 7:16AM EST Reply to CommentLovely review. Actually my favourite Scorsese movie is the Age of Innocence, so I'm looking forward to another period piece from him. Incidently Helen McCrory is superb in everything she does.
Stormshadow4life
November 23, 2011 at 9:44AM EST Reply to CommentI didn't see it in your review. Do you recommend seeing it in 3D or 2D? Really, I'm kind of burned out on 3D, but if you think it's worth it....
Stormshadow4life Just noticed the header "The year's smartest kid's film may be the best 3D movie ever". I guess that answers my question. Is this a kid's film, or a family film?
November 23, 2011 at 10:41AM EST
It's also one of the few films that was actually shot in 3D (and is not a conversion). And I'm seeing a lot of critics saying it's the best 3D movie since Avatar, and perhaps better. So it would seem that this would be the one film you should actually see in 3D above all others.
November 23, 2011 at 10:59AM ESTSean Houlihan
November 23, 2011 at 12:28PM EST Reply to CommentHi Drew. I just wanted to thank you for not revealing the actual identity of Georges. In fact, I'm excited for the movie, and have read a bunch of reviews and yours is the first review that does not reveal Georges identity.
Having read the original novel, I know his identity. But it's funny how many professional critics can't seem to talk about the film without revealing who Georges is. I know the reveal is a huge revelation, and makes you really analyze what Scorsese is doing here as a filmmaker, but I have to commend you for writing a very long analysis and not letting the cat out of the bag. Well done!
XeRocks81 On the Daily Show with Jon Stewart last week Scorsese himself talked about it though, I didn't think it was some great secret.
November 23, 2011 at 1:55PM ESTSean Houlihan Perhaps it is not a secret for cinephiles and history buffs. But, for my own part, as someone who was unfamiliar with the story, when I read the novel, I was genuinely surprised at who Georges was. I think the casual viewer will be surprised as well. Therefore, I would be thankful as a casual filmgoer to come across a review like Drew's, that made it a point not to spoil the reveal for me.
November 23, 2011 at 7:03PM ESTI. S.
November 23, 2011 at 12:37PM EST Reply to CommentScorsese has made plenty of great, unique films that are not about crime. Just that chunk of his CV, alone, is streets ahead of the life work of most other filmmakers. I'm glad to hear this one turned out well - shooting in 3D is no walk in the park.
Joe
November 23, 2011 at 1:28PM EST Reply to CommentI'm calling it now. HUGO is going to sweep the Oscars next year. Pic, Director, Screenplay, Supp Actor (Sir Ben), Art Direction, Cinematography, Costumes, Score and Make-up
Monty Jack Marty already has his Best Picture and Director trophies. The most Hugo can expect is a smattering of technical nominations.
November 24, 2011 at 12:16AM ESTBeth
November 23, 2011 at 3:12PM EST Reply to CommentGreat review. I wasn't sure if I was going to see this and I have been sold. One thing - the Harold Lloyd film was actually called "Safety Last!"
Trevor Whitecliff
November 23, 2011 at 4:02PM EST Reply to CommentI was confused by the tv trailers, but it makes more sense after reading this. I think I'd like to see something about people fixing other people. Don't know if I've ever known anyone like that, other than my dad. Just seems like some are more interested in destroying instead of fixing, whether they mean to or not. If I have the chance, I'll check it out. Need some positive stuff.
As a side note, that's why I really like Dean Koontz books. His characters are almost always broken, but through building relationships with others they're able to repair their lives, their worldview and generally seem to move on to some highly realized portion of their lives. Thats after defeating the mad scientist, the invading alien species or get a handle on how to control their ability to travel to other dimensions, of course.
As always, good stuff, Drew.
Dave I
November 23, 2011 at 4:48PM EST Reply to Comment"I eventually plan to get involved in creating and implementing some very real educational reform involving media education that runs K-12, so that kids are given a media literacy on par with any print literacy that is taught."
That sounds really cool. I hate to be negative about it all, however I doubt that would ever happen and given the state of education, it should not. Schools cannot even "afford" to let kids have gym class, art, or music. Without getting too up-in-arms, there are so many problems with public schools that need to be addressed before teaching media education. Sure, media can be very powerful. That said, I want my kids to have the opportunity to learn to draw, play music, and have their allotment of <1 hour a day (more like 20 to 30 minutes after time to dress, putz around, shower, and redress) to run around and be kids before implementing an education of media. Any skeptic will ask "what's the educational value of watching movies." Sure there are answers, however it better be a very compelling one, and it also better either be an answer that will prioritize it over the rest of what's been cut, or come after education reform has reinstated and cemented beneficial programs and found ways to fund Media Appreciation on top of everything else. Not to mention lots of families will not hold that in such high regard. Considering our national problem with obesity and the fact most go home and watch media of some sort on top of whatever they do at school, you kind of have to admit naysayers will have a pretty good point.
-Cheers
Stormshadow4life
November 23, 2011 at 5:51PM EST Reply to CommentJust got back from this. I actually really liked it. After seeing Harry Potter in 3D, I said enough! But this movie's 3D is really quite beautiful, enough so that I'll regret watching it on a standard BluRay when it comes home. I loved the idea of people having their purpose and of fixing each other. I do feel that move could have maybe been 15 or so minutes shorter, but overall, it was quite excellent.
VicDiGital
November 24, 2011 at 1:59AM EST Reply to CommentJust got back from seeing it, and I have to be honest, I was left unmoved. My feelings about this are similar to Drew's feelings about "The Artist". For me, the emotional peaks and valleys of "Hugo" were almost a straight line all the way through. I should have felt anguish and desperation for these characters to achieve their goals, but there wasn't any part of this film where I felt like the stakes were as powerful as they should have been.
The film was stunningly beautiful, and absolutely must be seen in 3D. Best 3D cinematography I've ever seen. I especially loved the 3D-ification of the classic films. Not for a moment was a bored with this film.
That said, it just left me flat. On paper, the theme of broken things/people needing to be fixed sounds wonderful, but I didn't feel it to the depths it clearly wanted to be felt. The others I was seeing it with felt the same way. We all liked the film, but weren't moved by it.
One big problem was that so much emphasis was put on the automaton. As Drew says in his review, its importance is gradually lessened over the last half of the film, but by then the damage is done. It's so much the focus of the film, and the sense of mystery is drilled into us so fully that it needed something more direct than what it turned out to be. The mystery is implied to be a direct connection between the automaton and Hugo's father, and it doesn't play out that way. The actual mystery is interesting enough, but it's so different from what the movie was pushing. It especially felt deceptive when they kept on showing meaningful closeups of the automaton implying that MAYBE it might come to life on its own and that there might be more of a mystery to it than there was. But there never was. It was just one of the bits of machinery in the grand clockwork of life. That's a really neat thematic device, but not when the whole first part of the film was implying a much different sort of mystery.
I really really wanted to be transported by this movie, but... I wasn't.
VicDiGital Part of my disconnect was that I never felt Hugo was in any real danger. He was like Anakin in "Phantom Menace". Yes, Hugo was an orphan, but he was in control of his situation to a great extent (not at all like David Copperfield, for instance). He had the run of a cool world, he was working on a robot in his spare time (also eerily exactly like Anakin), and his "job" was also pretty interesting. The only real threat was being dragged off to an orphanage, and when that actually became a real issue in the film, it lasted all of a minute until he freed himself. The scene where he's hanging from the clock hand was silly because he didn't need to be hanging. The ledge was six inches below his feet and he could have been standing on that the whole time like he does at the end of that sequence. Not trying to be nitpicky, but the two scenes with the most inherent tension were both undercut before there was any chance to be anxious for the characters.
November 24, 2011 at 12:14PM ESTroy_batty
November 24, 2011 at 4:07AM EST Reply to CommentI love Scorsese as much as the next guy, I firmly believe he is one of the very few "great ones" still working in cinema nowadays, and in my opinion, he's got at least 3 masterpieces on his resumé (Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and Goodfellas).
And certainly his love for films as media nad his efforts in educating on and pushin for film preservation are as equally important as his body of work. And yes, that part of his persona is there in plain sight on this his latest offer.
But HUGO is weakly built nad paced, and, worst of all, is boring. Very uninvolving and boring.
The parts where he gets to recreate Melies' studio suffers from the same overall lack of subtlety of the film as a whole, but at least made me feel something warm, something close to emotion in what it is, otherwise, a pretty inert, lifeless movie.
I was looking forward to this (I went to see it at one of those kind of preview shows on Tuesday's late night) and I really hoped I would love it, I wanted to love it. But the movie did not let me.
As some critic from NY1 put it today, it is too adult for children, and not adult enough for adults.
In the end, I am afraid both will get equally bored.
I couldn't have said it better...
November 24, 2011 at 4:21AM ESTpete
November 24, 2011 at 10:00AM EST Reply to CommentHow much is Chloe Moritz in this movie?
pete
November 24, 2011 at 10:01AM EST Reply to CommentHow much of a roll Chloe Moritz is this movie?
Stormshadow4life a pretty decent amount. she probably has the second most screen time
November 24, 2011 at 11:45AM ESTcoolhandjennie
December 15, 2011 at 7:31PM EST Reply to CommentI have to say, I'm in the "disappointed" camp. As beautiful as it was, it lacked a certain amount of visual & storytelling style throughout the first three-quarters of the film that really left me cold. I wasn't engaged by the story at all until the end, and it just didn't feel like a Scorsese film to me. I didn't think it was BAD, and I absolutely loved the latter part of the story; I just wish it was more cohesive.
Asa Butterfield is remarkable though. His utterly transparent vulnerability is a thing of beauty & wonder. You can literally see every emotion flicker across his face and through those unbelievable eyes.
I've always had an I'll-get-to-it-someday attitude about delving into that world of old film and if nothing else, Hugo has inspired me to get cracking, so I'm grateful to Marty for that.
Tuula
February 23, 2012 at 3:00PM EST Reply to CommentIt was dull, badly written and really annoyingly teal and orange. Why is everything teal and orange?
Tuula
February 23, 2012 at 3:03PM EST Reply to CommentDull, badly written and incredibly teal and orange. Why is everything teal and orange?