Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close' mines 9/11 and autism for emotional weight

Sandra Bullock and Tom Hanks make great parents, but is it a great movie?

  • Critic's Rating B+
  • Readers' Rating C
<p>Thomas Horn and Tom Hanks make a powerful father-son combo in the emotionally wrenching 'Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close'</p>

Thomas Horn and Tom Hanks make a powerful father-son combo in the emotionally wrenching 'Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close'

Credit: Warner Bros.

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

I wish I were more resistant to Stephen Daldry's movies.

He's given to the sort of grand gestures that can drive me nuts in some filmmakers who don't earn those moments, who work at the depth of a car commercial, but put to service of some fairly well-groomed material.  And I'm a guy who really liked "Everything Is Illuminated," the first film that was adapted from the work of Jonathan Safran Foer.  I think this guy writes lovely little books that filmmakers can get crazy about, gorgeous little challenges.  Here, he's crafted a narrative that depends completely on finding the right kid.  You've got to believe this kid and his relationship with his parents, and the parents have to work quickly, and you have to be ready to be sucker punched by this one, because it's going to work you, and in more ways than many people will expect.

I think any advertising for this makes it fairly clear that the main hook is "Boy loses his father, WHO HAPPENS TO BE TOM HANKS, in 9/11, and then struggles."  That's clear.  And to be fair, that sort of is the whole movie.  A boy struggles to deal with the loss of his totally awesome father in a very famous tragedy.  "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close."  Here's a U2 song.  I see this movie coming, and it makes me nervous.  It looks to me like it will be shameless.  And if you listen to some other critics, the movie is shameless.  It is that worst case scenario.

But I don't think so.

Thomas Horn is a first-time actor, a "Jeopardy" contestant that the producers saw and liked.  He plays Oskar Schell, the little boy who is our way into the story.  This, as much as anything else this year, is an exercise in voice, a film about the way someone sees the world.  I think it's interesting that both this and "The Girl WIth The Dragon Tattoo" are produced by Scott Rudin, and both feature lead characters who gradually indicate certain things about themselves, certain markers that might suggest they land somewhere on the Asperger's Index.  These are autistic narrators, then, giving us a glimpse inside the panic and the confusion and the different way of processing things.  

Lisbeth Salander is a superhero by virtue of the fact that she's super-smart with a computer and seemingly unstoppable in close-quarters physical confrontation.  She's a machine, a Terminator for the anti-psychotics age.  And Oskar Shell is the opposite, an autistic angel, a healing spirit, incomplete on his own but able to repair other in small ways from encounter to encounter.  He does a a world of good simply through the process of looking for answers that may not even exist.  He has to do things his own way, and he has to arrive at his answers in whatever process gets him there.  The film is about that journey for him, that effort to make sense of nonsensical violence.  Both films offer these new archetypes, and I think it's fascinating that we've reached this point now in the mainstreaming of this seemingly-increasing population.  We've started saying that they're fair game for comedy in things like "Big Bang Theory" and that they can be treated in this sort of mythologized way.  None of these things are "about" autism in any direct way, but that's what makes it notable.

Likewise, does the film have to take place on 9/11?  I think it makes very fair use of the morning and the way it felt, and I say that knowing full well that the way I felt on that morning is not the way you felt, or the way anybody else felt.  It was very personal, even though it was something that happened to all of us, symbolically speaking.  And for New Yorkers, it is something that no one outside of New York can experience or understand the same way.  I had a strong reaction that morning, but I wasn't in harm's way.  I couldn't smell the smoke on the air.  I don't have tangible physical memories of it.  Daldry's film is not being well-received by New York critics at all, and I wonder if that's part of it.  I feel like the film uses the moment because it is a lightning bolt we all shared, and it's important that the entire community that Oskar interacts with all have some investment in his healing.  That's the point of the film, I think, the sense that the only way we can recover from something shattering is through other people, and through new experience.  Only life can repair a broken life, and ultimately, that's the thing this movie wants to dramatize.

I think it's really lovely, and yes, part of the trick of the film is the casting of his dad and his mom, and I think both Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock do very strong work, warm and open and able to really support Horn in his work.  What I found most compelling is the way the film doesn't really apologize for the shrill nature of the characters at the start of the film.  It's a movie that does not invite you in up front.  Oskar is played shrill and his mother is played shrill and the world itself is shrill.  But over the course of the film, Daldry gradually steers it all towards the calm, towards something more centered, and the film's voice shifts.  And as it shifts, it finally does invite you in, and as a result, that last act connects with a blunt force, a real emotional wallop.

I've watched the new Louis CK special "Live At The Beacon Theater" a few times now, and there's one run of material in particular that just devastates me.  It's about the lengths that parents will go to in an effort to protect their children, and when I think about the way "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" pulls everything together in the last twenty minutes, it cuts right past anything that is calculated or obvious about the film.  That's why I find I can't resist Daldry as a filmmaker.  Even when I know what strings he's pulling, and even when he's totally blatant about pulling them, he has the ability to zero in on the one thing that makes it impossible to shield myself emotionally, and in this film, his wrap-up more than redeems any missteps the film makes earlier.  Great work by Jeffrey Wright, Viola Davis, the lovely Max Von Sydow, and a whole slew of character actors in small roles give this film the tapestry feeling that Daldry's reaching for, and in the end, it all comes down to Horn for me, this kid trying to wrestle a broken and bewildering world into some shape that makes sense.  If it hits you the way it hit me, it's a hard one to shake.

"Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close" opens in limited release on Christmas Day, then goes wider on January 20, 2012.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    hamish

    Drew you pull back from evaluating Thomas Horn's performance. I've only seen the trailer but I fear they didn't quite get this casting right?

    December 22, 2011 at 6:49AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      hm I thought there wasn't enough to judge that on the trailer...my son has Asperger's, but each person is different, so even if the character is not "textbook" it wouldn't mean he isn't being played appropriately. Honestly what I'm wondering through the trailer is why on earth is this boy wandering around NYC by himself? Guess we'll have to watch and see.

      December 22, 2011 at 9:45AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Nick I think it is fairly obvious what he felt of Horn. The movie hinges on his performance. If the kid was miscast, the movie would unravel.

      December 22, 2011 at 1:08PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    LisaB

    So at what point in the movie does Oskar figure out that his father was killed by fundamentalist Islamic supremacists?

    Right, that's what I thought.

    December 22, 2011 at 2:36PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      LisaB Sorry, fat-fingered the "send." Anyway, continuing -

      I haven't seen the movie, but a quick check of the book's plot synopsis on WIKIPEDIA strongly suggests the film is about the young man's quest to figure out WHY his father died, and while it seems concerned with things from the trailer: the elderly, locker keys, music, etc. I don't see much referenced as to the social or political reasons why the boy's father died.

      The answer to why the father died, the only answer, to me, really, is that hatred and prejudice prevailed on 9/11 over love and mutual understanding. When hate prevails, the result is always tragedy.

      To me, especially given the nature of the story, you can't, as a writer, introduce the 9/11 part of the story without at least making some effort to acknowledge the root cause, because to me the rest of the story would ring hollow without it.

      Because I suspect from the trailer this is a "hey, people are people" kind of story, where Oskar meets a colorful cast of characters who treat him differently and finds "his way" in the world, his "voice" etc.

      Doesn't it do his father a disservice if we simply state the character "went away because something mysterious happened that we don't want to talk about?"

      Bottom line to me is that it spits in the face of people with autism/Aspergers/whatever has been discussed here to suggest that they're too stupid/simple to handle the realities of 9/11 and need a more metaphoric answer. And I bet the film doesn't even so much as gloss over the matter.

      Am I right?

      December 22, 2011 at 2:51PM EST
    • Freakazoid_talkback_profile

      mmcb105 Thats an awful lot of words for somebody who admits to not having read the book or seen the movie.

      December 22, 2011 at 6:10PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      CinemaPsycho He finds out the same time the rest of us did - as soon as he turns on the TV news channels. So basically, somewhere around Sept. 12.

      December 23, 2011 at 3:04AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    jake

    No, you're not right. The film/book addresses these things, the kid knows how his father died, it is more just about how he copes with losing his father to early

    December 22, 2011 at 3:59PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Pic_talkback_profile

    forg

    Currently reading this book. Liking it so far, can't wait to see it on the big screen

    December 23, 2011 at 9:19PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jon Weisman

    You write: "It's about the lengths that parents will go to in an effort to protect their children, and when I think about the way "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" pulls everything together in the last twenty minutes, it cuts right past anything that is calculated or obvious about the film."

    The movie actually does the opposite - a blind spot in the film that would be stunning if not for all the other blind spots it has. Louis C.K. would be utterly mystified by the mother in this movie.

    December 24, 2011 at 2:44AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Truth

    I used to like Hanks. Then he became another rich Hollywad mouthpiece instead of a good actor. So, like millions of others, I'll save the coin from this flick.

    December 25, 2011 at 6:21PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Crovax

    A movie exploiting 9/11 with a pacifist, vegan as the main character. Totally not a liberal propaganda movie.

    December 26, 2011 at 10:22PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Crovax

    A movie exploiting 9/11 with a pacifist, vegan as the main character. Totally not a liberal propaganda piece.

    December 26, 2011 at 10:24PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web