Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Dark Shadows' benefits from Burton and Depp in a playful mood

This one's just plain silly and better for it

  • Critic's Rating C+
  • Readers' Rating C
<p>Terrible things have happened in this room.  Terrible, terrible things.</p>

Terrible things have happened in this room.  Terrible, terrible things.

Credit: Warner Bros

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

I have a weird relationship with Tim Burton's movies.

Fitting, I guess, since he's such a particular filmmaker.  And this is going to be one of those reviews where you read it and you look at the letter grade and you say, "Are you sure those match?"

When "Alice In Wonderland" came out a few years ago, I found myself getting actively angry at almost everything about the film.  I hated the script.  I hated the way they bent Lewis Carroll's work.  I hated the performance choices.  Nothing about it worked for me, and beyond that, it irritated me.  That film, of course, made well over a billion dollars around the world.

When "Mars Attacks!" came out, I thought it was wildly flawed, but also entertaining and ridiculous and packed with details that made me sort of fall for it, flaws and all.  If I had to give "Mars Attacks!" a letter grade, it might not be a good one, but I own the film and I've seen it many times since that initial screening.

Often, I've noticed that when I really enjoy something that Tim Burton does, it makes other people mental and vice versa.  Knowing this, I am probably not the best barometer for most people on Burton's work.  All I can do is be honest and admit that, yes, "Dark Shadows" is one of those films where I see a lot of problems with it, and they pretty much don't matter to me because of what I enjoyed about it.  I think the overall effort is endearingly ridiculous, and here's a way to gauge your own expectations for the film:  how do you feel about "Death Becomes Her"?

While the ad campaign has focused on the film's sense of humor, the movie is not a pure comedy.  The opening of the film, establishing the history of the Collins family and Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp) in particular, is played fairly straight, with a heightened, stylized version of the world a pretty fair match for the outsized way that Depp attacks his role.  I am not a fan of every single "quirky" Depp performance, and I've certainly disliked a number of his films with Burton, but here, I think he finds the right tone for Barnabas.  He's playing a sort of overheated soap opera hero, a former rogue laid low by a curse, tortured for 200 years, and uncertain how to fit into a new world when he finds himself in the '70s suddenly.

The film certainly plays the fish-out-of-water side of Barnabas and his dislocation for laughs, but the film plays a lot of different tones from moment to moment.  The film feels like they've taken a couple of years worth of storylines from the series and shoehorned them all into a two hour span, and while that may sound frantic, I like the way the film manages to suggest the rhythms and wackadoo invention that is part of the source material.  I think the truth is fairly evident at this point that Burton is less interesting in story than mood and incident.  The script by Seth Grahame-Smith and John August is busy to the point of being a blur at times, but honestly, not much happens.  Sounds strange, but the film sets up a number of things that either don't pay off completely or they pay off suddenly in an abrupt fashion or they just plain get abandoned.  The main throughline has to do with the relationship between Barnabas and Angelique Bouchard (Eva Green), the witch who cursed him to become a vampire when he spurned her advances, and any time the two of them are onscreen together, I had a great time.

But as an example of how the film misses its mark, look at the relationship between Barnabas and Victoria Winters (Bella Heathcoate), a nanny hired to take care of David Collins (Gulliver McGrath), the damaged, withdrawn son of Roger Collins (Jonny Lee Miller).  The film makes it very clear early on that Victoria has secrets, and she looks exactly like Josette, the woman who Barnabas loved 200 years earlier, the same one that Angelique killed when she cursed Barnabas.  Instead of creating a tension between the way Barnabas reacts to both Angelique and Victoria, it seems like they forget Victoria every time she's not onscreen.  Even worse, they can't seem to quite figure out if she's the reincarnation of Josette or if she's being guided by the ghost of David's mother or quite what the rules are.  And as shortchanged as Josette's story is, it feels like they really didn't know what to do with Roger Collins at all.  Miller's an interesting actor who has nothing to do, and just as they start to try to make him interesting, the film just shoves him out the door.  Gone.

The thing is, even acknowledging the ways that the film fails, I still found myself enjoying a good deal of it.  I think Michelle Pfeiffer has a real handle on what sort of film Burton was trying to make, and she and Depp have some nice moments together.  Chloe Grace Moretz is practically in her own movie, and while her nearly-feral teenage angst may seem amped up to a bizarre degree, as with any good soap opera, she's got her secrets that explain everything.  Jackie Earle Haley shows up to drop a little Renfield on the proceedings as Willie Loomis, one of the last servants working at the Collins estate, while Helena Bonham Carter seems to beam in from deep space to play the aggressively wiggy Dr. Julia Hoffman, a psychiatrist who has been working with David since his mother's death.

When the film does finally bring together for a climactic showdown at the Collins estate, that's when I couldn't help but think of "Death Becomes Her."  Burton and his cast go completely bonkers, quite literally bouncing off the walls.  And in the end, maybe it's just the crazy energy between Green and Depp that I find myself drawn to, because they really are nuts together.  There's a "love" scene of sorts in the middle of the film that gets loopy, and Green prowls through the film, deranged and degenerate, sexually carnivorous and completely without a moral compass.  It feels like the gravity of just how big her performance is pulled the entire film out of whack.  While that may mean there are things that just don't work, I can't deny that Green and Depp and Moretz and Pfeiffer make it feel like it's working from moment to moment.

So… like I said.  The letter grade isn't great, but I did enjoy myself.  I prefer this to anything Burton's made since "Sleepy Hollow," and I think I'd put it side by side with the equally-flawed "Sweeney Todd."  Maybe we won't ever get another film from Burton as complete and satisfying as "Ed Wood" or "Pee-Wee's Big Adventure," but I've come to a sort of peace with the idea that the bits and pieces I do enjoy can be enough sometimes.

"Dark Shadows" opens everywhere on Friday.

Drew-mcweeny-sm
Drew McWeeny
Film Editor
A respected critic and commentator for fifteen years, Drew McWeeny helped create the online film community as "Moriarty" at Ain't It Cool News, and now proudly leads two budding Film Nerds in their ongoing movie education.
Trending Now on HitFix Boards
Topic Started By Latest Post Replies
sandylewis90
8 days ago
2
sandylewis90
27 days ago
1
Discuss In Theaters and Coming Soon on HitFix Message Boards »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Latauro

    I saw this last night, and it's safe to say I enjoyed it significantly less than you did. And even less today when I wrote up my notes and reflected on what I felt was a pretty impenetrable mess.

    But having heard your case against the statement made by the ending of Fatal Attraction, I have to ask if the same thing bothered you here? Although the tone of the two films is significantly different, they do have very similar structures in terms of the love triangle/vengeful woman. Am I drawing too long a bow?

    May 9, 2012 at 3:54AM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew If there was anything... even one character beat... where it felt like they were aiming for something real and human and honest, then I could compare it to "Fatal Attraction." Blatantly ridiculous goes a long way to excusing things, as does the freaky and the supernatural. Angelica is not the same as Alex in intent or execution.

      May 9, 2012 at 4:25AM EST
    • Cyberman_tenthplanet4_talkback_profile

      Latauro I know it's a stretch, but I think it's still emblematic of the way Hollywood thinks of the spurned female lover. I'm not sure blatantly ridiculous does excuse things, but the gleeful silliness with which they all approach one another does soften the blow a bit.

      Not a drum I'm beating heavily, just a vague connection I'm throwing out there.

      May 9, 2012 at 4:41AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    walt kovacs

    so if it was made by anyone but burton...would you like it?

    if the answer is no...throw away your computer, you are as worthless a hack as a reviewer, as smith is as a screenwriter

    May 9, 2012 at 3:56AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      CinemaPsycho If it was made by anyone but Burton... it wouldn't be the same movie.

      May 10, 2012 at 2:12AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    walt kovacs

    if this were done by anyone but burton...would you still like it?

    seth grahame smith is a hack

    as a reviewer, you are too

    May 9, 2012 at 3:57AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      PSB At least Drew can use proper grammar.

      May 9, 2012 at 8:42AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    walt kovacs

    sorry for the almost same response...didnt see that my post went through

    doesnt change my feelings...this was a very lazily made film

    and if you really watched the trailers, you would have seen that the opening was always portrayed as straight...its when it gets to the 70s that it all falls apart, with fish out of water gags and bad site gags

    tell me, how did you like the masturbation joke about moretz?

    May 9, 2012 at 4:02AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    tommy five-tone

    I honestly don't know how anyone can give this tepid, sluggish, pointless nonsense anything within spitting distance of a pass. Pretty much every cast member seemed sedated (including the uninspired Depp), with the exception of the occasionally amusing Moretz and the energetic but terribly unfocused Green. And while I don't know about the script as written by August and Grahame-Smith, I will say that what made it to the screen was far from compelling in terms of characterisation and story. With the exception of Sweeney Tood (which I'm inclined to revisit to see if it still stands up), Burton's recent output has revealed him to be a one-trick pony, one that should be put down. Still, we'll always have Ed Wood.

    May 9, 2012 at 4:12AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    walt kovacs

    one more thing. they only used two and a half story lines. the first, the barnabas return and falls in love with vicky. the second, angelique tries to destroy barnabas. the half...the doc tries to cure barnabas (with a twist) the script is a mess, because smith isnt very good and didnt bother watching more than a few epis of the original series

    next time, why dont you ask someone who is familiar with the show...

    May 9, 2012 at 4:13AM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew I'm familiar with the show.

      I think the show is ridiculous and a drag.

      I get the appeal. I do not share the enthusiasm.

      When you challenged me above, it's a pointless statement. First, it implies that I've given Tim Burton's work as a whole a pass. No. Nope. Not even close. Feel free to go back and find the reviews yourself. I have not been kind in a while.

      I liked the tone here. I liked the energy. I liked the cast. I thought the film's script was a mess... as I said. But even so, what I enjoyed, I enjoyed, and I think the hack move would be playing my reaction as the simple binary "Yes/No" that so much of the Internet seems to think is the only way to react to any film.

      You disagree? Great. You can't be civil about it again? You're gone. Tone it down, tough guy.

      May 9, 2012 at 4:21AM EST
    • Phlogo_talkback_profile

      Playhouse Wow, Walt Kovacs, chill. You must chill. I have hidden your keys. Chill.

      May 9, 2012 at 4:26AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Fastbak I think if you any soap opera on the big screen and put three years worth of it's plots in two hours it's going to be silly regardless of tone. Soap operas have the benefit of stretching out improbable storylines for weeks or months at a time so when they get to the payoff, instead of it being ridiculous, they become inevitable.

      May 9, 2012 at 9:20AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      walt kovacs the show was so rediculous that it influences writers of horror fiction, until the present day

      but of course, you know that

      and i have been going through the aicn archives to find a single film where you found just as much wrong and still enjoyed it....no luck yet

      May 10, 2012 at 5:34AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    tommy five-tone

    And when I say Sweeney Tood, I of course mean Swenney Todd.

    Oh God damn it!

    May 9, 2012 at 4:14AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    briguyx

    I'm pretty sure Victoria was seeing visions of Josette throughout the film, which would make sense if she's Josette reincarnated or a descendant. That the ghost of David's mother shows up only goes to show the everything but the kitchen sink nature of the ending.

    While I did enjoy the film, I did think it was pretty talky early on. I did enjoy the fish out of water material and would have liked to have seen more of it. But Depp's performance and the wacky humor was enough for me to like it, although it certainly isn't great. I bet people that were fans of the show will like it less than people coming to the movie cold!

    May 9, 2012 at 4:58AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Momo

    I'm okay with silly. That's pretty much what I expected from this movie. That and Eva Green. And I'll be honest, she probably accounts for about 90% of my desire to see it.

    May 9, 2012 at 7:48AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Annie8bit_talkback_profile

    Stormshadow4life

    No interest in seeing this one theatrically. I lost most of my faith in Burton after Alice, and movie tickets are too expensive.

    May 9, 2012 at 8:31AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Sean

    Tim Burton reminds me a lot of Ridley Scott, in that there's a real hit or miss quality to their movies.

    But just like Scott, I'll see pretty much anything Burton directs because there is such a unique style and artistry to his films.

    Most filmmakers don't have their own voice, their aesthetics are just homogenized bits of other peoples movies, but if you watch five minutes of a Tim Burton movie you can recognize he directed it just from the visuals.

    That's pretty cool.

    May 9, 2012 at 9:33AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JJ1

    You guys are ROUGH, haha. Tim Burton has nevvvvvvvver had great scripts; even good ones. My favorite Burton film is 'Sleepy Hollow'. But I sure didn't love it for it's script. With Burton, it's all about a macabre/silly tone, performance, and unique visuals. Is the script for this SO bad that it pales in all other Burton films? I recently re-watched Edward Scissorhand (a film I ADORED as a child and is revered as a sort of Burton Classic, if not Classic, in genreral). I found myself completely bored. I couldn't believe it. I really think that Burton has not gotten worse over time (I even mildly enjoyed Alice), I think that the collective we have just gotten used to Burton's antics/style. I'll be fascinated to see just how horrid the script supposedly is when I see the movie this weekend.

    May 9, 2012 at 9:42AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      anonymous really Ed Wood had a terrible script. Thats silly and makes no sense.

      May 9, 2012 at 11:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JJ1 OK, I take back "nevvvvvvvver" haha. Ed Wood is an exception. But on the whole, I do feel like the scripts have been the weakest aspect of nearly all of Burton's films.

      May 9, 2012 at 3:16PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    MrBobert

    Spoilers....

    I thought it was always Josette's ghost that was guiding Victoria, acting out her death and pretty much goading her to jump so that her reincarnation could be complete (with a little help from Barnabus' undead bite). We don't really get any prior glimpse of the kid's mama till the bloated finale. That's my 2 cents.

    May 9, 2012 at 2:02PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      MrBobert Might as well offer a few more cents...

      Saw DARK SHADOWS last night. So I guess, um, Spoilers....

      People really seemed to be into it. I liked it. Definitely the kind of dark humor that harkens back to Burton's BEETLEJUICE days.

      What I liked was the fact that the filmmakers weren't afraid to allow Barnabus Collins to be a straight up creature of the night, meaning -- he kills innocent people for blood but still maintains the status of protagonist we empathize with. Totally had the Lovable but Deadly Monster motif of Burton's best work, and really the only way I think you can approach classic Movie Monsters humorously. If you defang them, they cease having that intangible thing that inexplicably draws us in.

      It kinda lost me in the bloated finale, though. Everything leading up to it was funny and entertaining. I also really dug that 70s soundtrack.

      Oh, and Eva Green was distractingly RAVISHING!

      May 9, 2012 at 2:25PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    camphenn

    You say that you "prefer this to anything Burton's made since "Sleepy Hollow," "...I get the sense you didn't care very much for "Big Fish" then. I mean, if this is only worth a C+ and you liked it more...I'm just surprised. I liked it very much of course, but I liked it even more when watching it with my stepdaughter. Maybe in a few years when your boys are a little older, you'll have a second viewing and see it differently. That's the beauty of reading your blogs about your adventures in viewing with your sons. Not only do we see the movies through their eyes for the first time, but we experience how you see those same movies in a different light.

    May 9, 2012 at 6:13PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    benfranz

    Personally I'm holding out hope that Frankenweenie startles and delights, because the preview just kills me. It capture the ennui of losing your best four legged friend perfectly.

    May 9, 2012 at 7:59PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Evan

    I'm still considering seeing the movie, but I'm wondering how does being in IMAX benefit it. Is it worth it?

    May 9, 2012 at 8:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Thumb_talkback_profile

    TimB

    I still don't know how I feel about Burton. He's so hit-and-miss for me personally that I've never been able to get a good grasp on him.

    I will always give him kudos for "Big Fish," though. That is one of those "just can't explain it" movies, for me. That movie cuts me deep. Every single time Crudup says that last line and Pearl Jam's "Man of the Hour" kicks in, I fuckin' lose it.

    May 9, 2012 at 8:30PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Gamera1_talkback_profile

    KlarkKent

    I didn't hat Alice the way you did, but every time Depp was on screen, he dragged down the entire film. The fact that his Mad Hatter got raves was beyond ridiculous on account of it being an awful design coupled with one of his worst performances. It was "crazy Nic Cage" bad. This looks like it's more in the Mars Attacks/Beetlejuice mode which I usually enjoy from Burton and yes, I would also say I haven't truly enjoyed one of his films in which he's been the director since Sleepy Hollow.

    May 9, 2012 at 8:58PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gamera1_talkback_profile

      KlarkKent OK, I forgot about Big Fish. I did enjoy that one.

      May 9, 2012 at 8:59PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    EndlessEight

    One thing to like about Alice (perhaps the only thing): Danny Elfman's score, his best work in quite a while.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce0dZbPOepE

    May 10, 2012 at 2:02AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Logo Lou

    I know I'm late to this party, but I never find enough places to say it... I LOVE Death Becomes Her!

    May 11, 2012 at 6:05PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Yodachilliresize_bigger_talkback_profile

    BigAl6ft6

    Might letter grade it lower than you (whatever 2 outta 5 translates to) and honestly it's all over the place in it's plots that it kinda irritated me (you can be a soap opera but putting series worth of the soap-opera twists into a two hour movie gets numbing) and coming off how elegantly Avengers handled multiple characters this looked downright terrible in comparison.

    But I do agree with some parts being fun, basically any time Eva Green did absolutely anything I thought she rocked. The broken porcelain doll effect when she started cracking was amazing. And while I thought some (okay, most) of Depp's vampire-outta-time bits were clunkers there is some gold here and there. Like when he admits to killing those "nice harry young people". Tee hee.

    May 12, 2012 at 4:37AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web