Paramount/Sony merger: the death of the studio system?
Are the studios following newspapers and broadcast networks into obsolescence?
Pure sweet Transformery Bayhem in a moment from Paramount's megablockbuster 'Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen'
It's a dramatic headline. I'll grant you that.
After all, right now, it's just speculation, and from only one source. But the publication of the rumor that Paramount and Sony might be considering a merger was all it took to send Hollywood's behind-the-scenes rumor mill spinning today. My phone rang at least five times with people ready to declare the deal "DONE!" and with people telling me that the story is further along than just speculation. When pressed, no one could actually pin down enough fact for me to say this is anything but a rumor, but even the rumor is worth considering.
What would it mean if Paramount and Sony really did merge?
Honestly? I think it's the beginning of the end if that happens. And not just for those two studios, but for what we know right now as the studio system.
I said as much today on Twitter, and several people outright dismissed that possibility, but anyone who thinks that the studios are in any way permanent is wrong. All you have to do is look at what's happening with newspapers and the broadcast networks right now.
And, yes, I think broadcast networks are on the way out. You don't think NBC handing over an hour of prime time every night to a talk show is a white flag begging for surrender? Because it is. Every year, they lose ground to alternative broadcasting, including internet. The market of viewers is, I think, actually expanding, but it's going in the strangest of directions, and the studios and the networks and the newspapers all represent the same thing... established pay models that feel like they no longer make sense from the consumer side. Or at least, not the same sense they once made. The audience has changed. Their needs have changed. The way they consume media has changed. The way they want to consume their media will change, and you need to be ahead of it, not behind it. This summer is a wheezing phlegmy wet cry for help, for the most part. Even the best summer movies out there, like "Star Trek" in my opinion or "Pelham" in some opinions, are familiar fare in some way. Pixar's "Up" is a lovely original vision... from the Pixar brand, as sturdy and unopposed at this point as any brand name can be. Safety is the name of the game and what is safe is an increasingly difficult thing to define.
[more after the jump]
"If we do a new 'Terminator' movie and we hire that guy who played Batman, that'll make a bajillion dollars, right? That's sort of impossible to fuck up. Right?"
Welcome to 2009. I salute Warner Bros. for nursing "The Hangover" into exactly the sort of hit they really truly believed it was. When they saw the film, they got excited, because they knew there was a chance to sell the movie the right way and then deliver exactly the movie they would promise. That $31 million movie deserves to be the biggest money earner, cost-to-return, of the summer, because it took a chance. It did its own thing. With a cast that was no guarantee. And an R-rating that really means rated R. And they did it. Home run.
So when I read in Forbes, and then I read echoed across Twitter and the blogosphere and other news sites, that Paramount "might" merge with Sony, my first reaction is, "I really hope that's not true." And I'm happy to tell you why.
It's bad for the creative community. Right now, Paramount and Sony both are buyers. And they're both making movies... right?
Well... sort of. There's a slowdown in production everywhere right now. Paramount's got some big stuff on their slate for the near future, and in a little over a week, they're opening "Transformers Part Deux," which is going to make more money than the banks did in bailouts. And I'm seeing it soon, the right way, and I'm freakin' excited. I look forward to the experience, and seeing it with a group of friends.
But that's this summer. That's this year. Next year, the year after... things are thin right now, and that's because money's seriously tight. Hollywood exists to some degree on momentum... money always rolling forward... one thing making another happen... and when that momentum is interrupted, things slow waaaaaay down.
Now. Take one of those buyers out of the market altogether. You're down to... what? Seven or eight major buyers? With a few new people in and out from time to time. MGM. Lionsgate. Sony. Time/Warner, Viacom, Fox, Disney, Universal. Summit, maybe. I'm sure I'm not thinking of a few off the top of my head, but... really... the idea of taking even one of them out of the marketplace should make people nervous. But one as large as Paramount?
Because if they're saying "merger," I assume they mean "sale." And that means someone's corporate identity is going to fold into someone else's. Paramount will become a home video label under the Sony banner, and little else. That's a seismic shift. That's like Europe just not being there. It changes the landscape. Something that big's going to have gravity. There's going to be more damage done to the business. Things that are tenuous now that depend on Paramount in some way, or Viacom, or financing between the two, will just fall apart in the aftermath. I'm guessing that a lot of people in the creative community would feel a sudden and immediate pinch if this happened, as deals just vanish. Some things would survive the merger, of course, considered active assets. But other things would get crushed, and that could have a ripple effect in the business. Things like this do. Competition at other places would change.
Now... having said that...
Just because it's not good for the studios doesn't mean it has to be bad for the movies.
This could be that moment. That "Easy Rider" moment. I saw "Public Enemies" tonight, and while I won't say what I thought of the film itself, the cinematography is fascinating, clearing shot on HD. Mann has adapted that aesthetic completely now. Some people are going to hate the way it looks, but I found it sort of immediate and arresting. And those tools... the same tools that Michael "Heat" Mann is using to shoot his Depression-era gangster drama... those tools are within the reach of the no-budget filmmaker these days. And distribution is as simple as having an internet connection.
Look. I reviewed a documentary I loved at SXSW this year called "American Prince." And the other day, we got an e-mail here at HitFix from Tommy Pallotta, the director of that film:
Hi,
Drew McWeeny reviewed my movie AMERICAN PRINCE and I am trying to get ahold of him.
I wanted to update him and let him know I have since released the film via bittorrent
If you could please forward this to him I would appreciate it
Best
Tommy Pallotta
Interesting. So there we go... a film I reviewed at a film festival that you might never get to see otherwise has been released online now by the filmmaker for free. So no one can complain if you watch it and, in fact, I strongly encourage you to download that movie as that director requests, because it's a pretty tremendous piece of entertainment. Steven Prince is one of a kind. Do I think one film released on BitTorrent is a revolution? Do I think it's interesting? Absolutely.
Things could easily shift away from the old model to such a degree that none of the studios we know right now survive. Instead, there will be companies that own the film libraries of the entities formerly known as, so to speak. I think guys who make the $200 million movies will still be doing that, but there will only be about five of those a year, and everyone else will be making movies that cost waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay less. The days of the romantic comedy that costs $100 million and change are over. You wanna spend that kind of money, it better be something that every schoolkid in America is already ready to tattoo on some intimate part of their body. The proverbial sure thing.
See how circular that thinking is? That's why I'm so sure this is a bad, bad thing to even consider. The more you back the studios into the corner, the more people are going to abandon the cynical product that gets produced out of desperation in favor of something... anything... that feels alive.
Let's hope this is all just idle chat that got a whole lot of attention, and little more.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
News From Our Partners
-
Box Office: 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Misses $100M Domestic Mark on Opening Weekend
Beyonce Pregnant Again? Sources Confirm 'Epic' Star Is Carrying Baby No. 2
'Hangover 3' Red Band Trailer: Take a Walk Down a NSFW Memory Lane (VIDEO)
-
WATCH: SNL Spoofs San Francisco's Bacon Bacon Controversy
Mike Hogan: The Wedding From Hell
WATCH: 'SNL' Takes On IRS Scandal
-
Box Office Guru Wrapup: Star Trek Softer Than Expected at #1
Weekly Ketchup: Will Smith to Star in Wild Bunch Remake?
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
-
'Mad Men' Review: "The Crash"
'Game of Thrones' Review: "Second Sons"
'Star Wars Episode 7′ — Jonathan Rhys Meyers to Join the Cast?
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Season Finales of Rectify and Hawaii Five-0 and the Series Premieres of The Goodwin Games and Motive
Hey TV.com, Should I Watch The Goodwin Games?
FTW vs. WTF: The TV Week in Review (May 19)
-
Inventory: “Illusion, Michael. A trick is something a whore does for money”: 20 inept magicians in pop culture
For Our Consideration: The crowd-funding conundrum: The line between bringing fans closer and taking advantage
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Four: The Coen brothers return to the festival with a folk-rock flashback
-
Nicki Minaj Gives Lil Wayne a Lap Dance During 'High School' at 2013 Billboard Music Awards [Video]
David Guetta, Akon + Ne-Yo 'Play Hard' at 2013 Billboard Music Awards [Video]
Prince Closes 2013 Billboard Music Awards With Rare Performance Medley
-
'Anchorman 2' Trailer Had Us At 'Hello': Watch Now!
Fiery 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Scene Hurt The Most: Ouch!
How Far Will 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Boldly Go At Box Office?
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
The director's next film promises to be packed with talentSunday, May 19, 2013
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupJoeK
June 16, 2009 at 8:37AM EST Reply to CommentI wouldn't seek to diminish anything you've said here but your proximity to things should still give you a keen sense just how much these people still toss insane amounts of money around with abandon - even in times like these. In other words, this is the kind of talk floated by people that have no intention of meaningfully changing how they do things because they are addicted to the rarefied air they have already created for themselves and will do anything to make sure they can keep it. No one at the top will suffer a minute with this sort of thing but everyone else will for all the reasons you stated and more. What a craven and selfish move to consider taking a huge legacy out to pasture instead of forging a leadership role when well positioned to do so.
O Goncho
June 16, 2009 at 8:45AM EST Reply to CommentI wake up from a deeply pleasant sleep and THIS is the news you have for me? Blimey, Drew, go easy on me. My spongy unrefined brain oil can't even begin to process something so seismic at least until I've had some toast.