Cannes Film Festival 2013

'Max Payne' director John Moore set for Russian-located 'Die Hard 5'

If Bruce Willis approved this choice, imagine who he turned down

<p>For a New York street cop, John McClane sure does find himself in some weird situations, and now it looks like he's heading to Russia for 'Die Hard 5'</p>

For a New York street cop, John McClane sure does find himself in some weird situations, and now it looks like he's heading to Russia for 'Die Hard 5'

Credit: 20th Century Fox

John Moore is entirely competent.

Having said that, I am not sure why 20th Century Fox loves him the way they do.  They've given him more chances to fail than I can comprehend, and he has risen to the occasion over and over.  "The Omen" and "Flight Of The Phoenix" are both remakes that make the originals look brilliant by comparison, but they are masterworks compared to his strange and nearly incoherent "Max Payne."

All told, he's made four films for the studio so far, and to me, he seems a great example of what happens when you take a commercial director and throw him into feature films without him having to prove he has real narrative skills first.  Yes, film is a visual art.  Yes, the ability to make a pretty image is important, and in advertising, there is no skill more highly regarded.  But in feature filmmaking, when you're supposed to be telling stories, there has to be more than just a pretty picture.  Moore went right from directing Dreamcast commercials to making "Behind Enemy Lines," and it feels like each of his films gets worse, not better.

He might be the perfect filmmaker for the Fox system, though.  He's a guy who seems to have lucked into his position, and he knows that he's not getting hired anywhere else right now.  My guess is he's one of the most malleable filmmakers that Fox works with, happy to execute exactly what the studio tells him to execute, and that's perfect for the way that studio works.

Then again, I can't imagine getting worked up over any choice for the director's chair on "Die Hard 5," because I can't imagine anyone being remotely passionate about "Die Hard 5."  Of all the pointless franchises out there, this one baffles me the most.  John McClane was a normal cop who got caught in one exceptional circumstance in the first "Die Hard."  It was a fluke, and the entire appeal of that film is seeing a normal guy have to somehow survive and take down this entire team of professional killers and thieves.  His normalcy is the reason his heroism matters.  In each film since then, credibility has been stretched to the breaking point, and the last movie was like a blue-collar Bond film, preposterous and silly.  The new movie shoots in Russia, which makes me wonder how they're going to justify that.  Unless McClane joined the CIA or some arm of the military, I'm not sure how you explain him having international adventures now.

Then again, the last paragraph of Mike Fleming's piece at Deadline about this sort of says it all.  "The most recent instalment, 'Live Free Or Die Hard,' grossed $384 million worldwide."  As long as people keep going to see these, lured in by the return of Bruce Willis, I'm sure Fox will happily keep making them.

And with the hiring of Moore, it looks like the terrorists win after all.
 

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Zimb

    It better be called "Old Habits Die Hard". They can't make a better title than that.

    August 31, 2011 at 8:38PM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_monty_talkback_profile

    Monterey Jack

    I actually think Moore's remake of Flight Of The Phoenix is a really good movie, even if his shot-for-shot retread of The Omen was deeply unnecesary.

    As for DH5, as long as they bring back the R rating, I'm all for it. Live Free...was a pleasant surprise, a LOT better than the inert, sloppy With A Vengeance. I hope that they bring back MEW...

    August 31, 2011 at 8:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Ben Kabak A good movie? Wow

      September 1, 2011 at 1:56PM EST
  • 3043359090_065080dc5e_talkback_profile

    dyikini

    Unlike almost anywhere else it would seem that your success at a job interview has nothing to do with the quality of your previous work...

    What a joke.

    August 31, 2011 at 11:19PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    DougMac

    will Bonnie Bedilia get time off from Parenthood to reprise her role as Holly?

    August 31, 2011 at 11:58PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Cash Bailey

    After hearing Kevin Smith's stories about Willis all I can say to John Moore is... God luck.

    September 1, 2011 at 5:12AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Cash Bailey

    After hearing Kevin Smith's stories about Willis all I can say to John Moore is... Good luck.

    September 1, 2011 at 5:12AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    The original Omen is a brilliant film anyway, no matter how good it looks next to the disastrous remake. Beautiful scope cinematography, lush and terrifying Goldsmith score, Peck, Remick, Troughton, Warner and an absolutely terrifying sense of foreboding. If only we had horror movies like it now.

    September 1, 2011 at 7:00AM EST Reply to Comment


  • I'm giving up. Die Hard 4 made me fucking sad and I dont have the energy to give a shit. This isn't a sequel to the original die hard - my favourite movie - it's a watered down, misdirected, pale imitation. Fuck this, fuck it, fuck it, fuck it, fuck it.

    September 1, 2011 at 9:20AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Trevor Whitecliff It was so beyond the basic concept of the original that its mind blowing. Who knew that McClain could fly a helicopter?

      September 1, 2011 at 4:22PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    ai

    DHINO

    September 1, 2011 at 3:56PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Trevor Whitecliff

    They should trap McClain on an asteroid hurtling through space as he tries to flee a group of oil rig drillers, one of which wants to hump his daughter, Lucy. Wait... Did they alreade make that?

    September 1, 2011 at 4:19PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    DanLast

    I think anybody who takes these films too seriously is doomed to disappointment. Calling McClane normal in even the first film is going a wee bit far. Endless franchises such as this and Rambo end up being about how far they can be pushed or 'amped up'. I enjoy seeing a movie where a man punches off someones head or fires a car at a helicopter. Not for depth. Just for fun.

    September 6, 2011 at 2:52AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web