Cannes Film Festival 2013

Guy Ritchie signs to direct 'Lobo' for Warner Bros.

Crazy DC Comics character poses unique challenges and potential rewards

<p>Lobo, one of the weirdest characters in the DC Universe, may be headed to the bigscreen in a film by Guy Ritchie</p>

Lobo, one of the weirdest characters in the DC Universe, may be headed to the bigscreen in a film by Guy Ritchie

Credit: DC Comics

Guy Ritchie and Joel Silver... they've got a love thang goin' on.

Little surprise.  When I was on-set for "Sherlock Holmes" last year, Guy seemed absolutely delighted by the process and the experience, and Susan Downey, who was there for Silver Films, seemed quite pleased with Guy in return.  Early word on "Sherlock Holmes" is strong, and I suspect the film's going to be huge this Christmas.

So this puts Ritchie in the enviable position of having bounced back.  Not every filmmaker who suffers through a "Swept Away" or a "Revolver" or, god forbid, both in a row, ever gets the opportunity to jump back into the studio game.  Ritchie's earned himself a second chance here, and he appears to be serious about making it work.

When we spoke in December, "Sgt. Rock" was still very much a possibility for Ritchie and Silver to make together, and if I was a betting man, I'd say there's still a chance we'll see that happen at some point.  It just appears that it's going to be after they make "Lobo" together for Warner Bros., adapting one of the craziest characters in all of DC Comics history into a PG-13 action movie that the studio hopes will kickstart a new franchise.

Good luck with that.

[more after the jump]

I'm not negative towards the idea of doing Lobo as a movie, per se.  I mean, since the early days of Ain't It Cool, Warner Bros. has been talking about doing this.  We ran a story about a "Lobo" script in June of 1998.  In the year 2000, Harry was the one who broke the story about "Lobo Vs. Superman," developed for the studio by Keith Giffen himself, and for at least a moment, it looked like that might really happen.  Earlier this year, Latino Review ran a script review for the latest attempt at bringing "Lobo" to the screen, which was the first moment I realized they were still plugging away, still trying to figure him out as an adaptation.

Why all this effort for a character that not many people know in the first place?  I mean, sure, comic book fans might know him, but Lobo is pretty much a non-entity to the general public, and they're the ones who have to buy the tickets here, right?

And why would you hire the writer of "My Super Ex-Girlfriend" to ever touch another superhero film, especially one that's supposed to be funny?  I mean, no offense to Don Payne, who may be a really nice guy, but his script for "My Super Ex-Girlfriend" had a tin ear for genre, no new ideas to speak of, and there's a weird sort of mysogyny to the entire execution of the thing.  Not the most auspicious of efforts in terms of superheroes on film so far.

And "Lobo" is a tough property, tone-wise.  He was essentially invented as a way of roasting Wolverine and other berserker characters, the super-super strong guys with the foul tempers.  Lobo is what would happen if none of those characters (and none of the writers working on them) had a moral compass.  And that's the appeal.  So hearing that the first goal of the studio is a PG-13... well, right away, that doesn't really sound like Lobo.

I'm sure it can be done.  Somehow.  It just seems surprising that you'd buy a character as outrageous as this one, and then immediately try to fit it into a box.  I hope they're not going to play Lobo too seriously... and I really hope no one tries to redeem him or make him into a "good guy."

It looks like Warner Bros. is starting to get serious about developing and greenlighting their lesser known DC characters these days.  "The Losers" and "Jonah Hex" are both in production now, and "The Green Lantern" has been greenlit with a monster budget.  I think there's certainly potential for "Lobo" to stand out, even in a field already crowded with superhero movies, so I'm curious to see how this one moves forward.  Rest assured, we'll have news on it for you here at HitFix if the film does get the go-ahead.

It's too interesting to ignore, no matter how it turns out.

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Dante01

    warblecroaker

    Lobo should be just perfect for a maniac like Ritchie. I just wish Vaughn was guiding and producing with him instead of those Hollywood sharks. But i think if anyone can pull the Czarnian off, Ritchie can. I expect he will doctor the script, that writer does not inspire a lot of confidence. Lobo is a hell of a character[!], the possibilities for intergalactic mayhem and deep black humor are awesome, even if it doesnt get an R rating.
    So you are saying it is not quite greenlit yet?

    September 3, 2009 at 10:07AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Snarf

    Lobo has gotton the PG treatment before. The Charecter appeared in Superman:The Animated Series in the two parter "The Main Man" and later in Justice League "Hereafter". While watered down, it was still fun to watch.

    September 3, 2009 at 5:05PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Warren Peace

    You know what I bet brought this on? Hancock. I think that's what they're aiming for, an asshole the whole family can enjoy. I think that can work if they give him something Hancock didn't have -- a goody-two-shoes foil (which is amazing since Charlize Theron could've EASILY been that). I'd love an NC-17 Lobo but I do think they can stay true to the character if they play their cards right. Hell, a lot of the most subtlely transgressive films out there are G/PG...

    September 3, 2009 at 6:14PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    TallBoy66

    I don't get why Lobo has to be R-rated. All of his appearances have, basically, been PG-13 affairs in the comics.

    September 3, 2009 at 8:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JoeK

    This character was invented as a one-note goof. A single joke and for a very finite audience at that. When I think of major resources being put into this I just shake my head.

    September 5, 2009 at 6:45PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Dante01

    warblecroaker

    JoeK, I shake my head at your narrow mind. Lobo is one of the most outrageous characters ever created in any medium. Some of the comics have been repetitive and cheap, but in between there are some fantastic truly great tales. His meetup with The Mask for instance was a brutal comical masterpiece. It all depends on the writer and the artist handling him, and with Guy Ritchie he couldn't be in better hands. It could be a madcap sci- fi action film like we never seen before.

    September 6, 2009 at 8:59AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web