Fox condemns early review of leaked 'Wolverine'
Will Fox take further action against Fox News employee Roger Friedman?
Hugh Jackman in 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine'
The following statement just arrived in our mailbox direct from 20th Century Fox:
"We've just been made aware that Roger Friedman, a freelance columnist who writes Fox 411 on Foxnews.com - an entirely separate company from 20th Century Fox -- watched on the internet and reviewed a stolen and unfinished version of X-Men Orgins: Wolverine. This behavior is reprehensible and we condemn this act categorically -- whether the review is good or bad."
Okay. That's a start. The big question that I've been discussing with other webmasters all afternoon is just how far Fox is going to follow this. I know that Fox News and 20th Century Fox are technically separate companies, but they're both under the News Corp. banner, meaning everyone eventually answers to Rupert Murdoch.
It is my sincere belief that there is only one course of action for Fox News and 20th Century Fox to take here. It's clear. It's simple. And it puts the matter to bed.
Fire Roger Friedman.
[more after the jump]
Don't punish him. Don't sanction him. Fire him. Cut all corporate ties to him. Permanently. He may have taken the article down, but you can still easily read it via Google caching.
I believe that if any webmaster at any fansite had reviewed it, the results would have involved legal action. I think Fox was very clear about that, and they've certainly been litigious about their materials in the past in much less extreme circumstances. But since we not only refused to review it but also to publish any reactions to it from anyone else, and since the same thing happened at Ain't It Cool and CHUD and at most of the other major geek sites, Fox is in an awkward position here. We all respected the law. We all chose to do the right thing.
And your own employee screwed you. And more than that... he practically cackled about doing it. He not only talked about downloading "Wolverine," he went on to advise people how to download the top ten films at the box-office this week, and mentioned that he planned to watch "I Love You, Man" at home tonight to avoid the rain.
This is criminal. It's blatantly criminal, and it's the sort of behavior that would be punished if it was anyone else.
Fire Roger Friedman.
Fox's statement suggests that they had no part in Friedman's decision to publish, which refutes the theory that this was spin control. And you know what? I believe that. I think if Fox really had wanted to use Friedman for spin control, they would have flown him to LA and shown him the finished film with all the reshoots in place and the FX finished. And that would have been fine. It's their film. They can show it to whoever they want. No one could have said a word.
But Friedman crossed a line, a LEGAL line, and he bragged about doing it after Fox had said earlier this week that they will prosecute anyone who downloads or distributes the movie.
Prove it.
Fire Roger Friedman.
We'll be watching.
UPDATE - 10:00 PM PST:
NewsCorp has also issued a statement now.
Statement regarding Roger Friedman's column on FoxNews.com promoting a pirated version of X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Los Angeles, Calif., April 3, 2009 -- "Roger Friedman's views in no way reflect the views of News Corporation. We, along with 20th Century Fox Film Corporation, have been a consistent leader in the fight against piracy and have zero tolerance for any action that encourages and promotes piracy. Once we learned of Roger Friedman's post we asked Fox News to remove it, which they did immediately."
We will continue to follow this story as it develops.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
News From Our Partners
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
Supernatural Season 8 Finale Review: It's Raining Angels
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
-
'Pacific Rim' Trailer Surfaces: Watch Now!
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
-
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition
Video Interviews with Katie Aselton & Lake Bell of Black Rock
-
'The Office' Series Finale Review: "Finale"
'Anger Management' Review: "Charlie and the Break-Up Coach"
'Hannibal' Review: "Fromage"
-
Mariah Carey Medleys, Jennifer Lopez Lives It Up With Pitbull on 'American Idol' Finale [Videos]
Candice Glover Wins 'American Idol' Season 12
Beyonce Gets Emotional Onstage in Belgium [Video]
-
Crosstalk: A fan and a newbie catch up on the first season of The Venture Bros.
AVQ&A: What are your favorite and least favorite cultural baits and switches?
Podmass: The Dice Man infiltrates podcasting, Casey Wilson chokes up on The JV Club, and Kumail vs. Maron
-
Who Won 'American Idol' 2013?
'The Office' Finale: Michael Scott's Surprise Appearance
And Your New 'American Idol' Is ...
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupcabri
April 3, 2009 at 11:30PM EST Reply to CommentYour caching link didn't work for me but googling it worked.
And I completely agree with you.
Waynegrow
April 3, 2009 at 11:40PM EST Reply to CommentWaynegrow
April 3, 2009 at 11:46PM EST Reply to CommentDrew,
Your former site, AICN, rose to fame by reviewing early cuts of films and then reviewing them online. Every major studio often complained that you guys would sneak into test screenings and then review the movies. Studios complained that the films you were reviewing were works in progress and not ready to be reviewed. A pretty honest complaint.
What about Friedman upsets you? That he downloaded a movie online, or that he reviewed a version of the film that was not complete?
iwasakabukiman
April 4, 2009 at 12:15AM EST Reply to Comment@Waynegrow Yeah, but they didn't illegally download the films off the internet and review them, they got into early screenings that were held by the studios.
Either way, Drew is right, they need to fire him.
washington
April 4, 2009 at 12:24AM EST Reply to CommentJeeze, do Roger Friedman columns read like Jackie Harvey at The Onion or what? His stuff makes my brain hurt,
Waynegrow
April 4, 2009 at 12:32AM EST Reply to Commentiwasakabukiman....my point is that, Friedman wrote a negative review of a movie that was not completed and posted it online. Would Fox fire him if the review was great? Would Fox fire him if he saw the movie and did not review it? Seems to me that the issue is that he wrote a negative review of a movie that was not complete and that the studio was not ready to show to critics. l
washington
April 4, 2009 at 12:38AM EST Reply to CommentWaynegrow, part of Drew's point is how Fox are complete hypocrites if they don't fire him, based on their past dealings with internet writers.
drew
April 4, 2009 at 1:27AM EST Reply to CommentWaynegrow, it's a fair question. The short answer is that I never stole anything or committed an illegal act. I may not have made the studios happy, but I didn't work for them, and I still don't. Roger Friedman, working for News Corp, not only broke the law, but then crowed about it in public. What he did would have gotten anyone else online immediately prosecuted, and if Fox expects to ever deal with any of us again on anything like a professional level, they have one choice: fire Friedman. It's the only right thing to do.
drew
April 4, 2009 at 1:30AM EST Reply to CommentAnd to be clear, Waynegrow... it was a glowingly positive review, to the point that people were accusing him of being ordered to write it by Fox, which was not the case.
iwasakabukiman
April 4, 2009 at 1:47AM EST Reply to Comment@Waynegrow Like Drew said, the review WAS positive. The point is that he did something illegal and he should have to pay for it, be it with his job or some other way.
Waynegrow
April 4, 2009 at 2:48AM EST Reply to CommentI guess my question is not one of what is legal and what is not legal then. I guess the question is one for Drew, that is, what bothers you about Friedman? Drew, you are a writer, what would bother you more, somebody downloading an episode that you wrote of MASTERS OF HORROR illegally or somebody writing a review of your episode of PROLIFE (which I loved) before it was done.
I guess my question is not one of legality...but what is fair to the artist....downloading or writing a review of a film that is not complete....and what is a more offensive to the creators of said work.
drew
April 4, 2009 at 2:59AM EST Reply to CommentWaynegrow, I think I explained what bothers me. If any other webmaster had written a piece about how they downloaded "Wolverine" illegally and then reviewed the movie, Fox would go after them with every lawyer they employ. They cannot allow Friedman to do the same. They just can't. If they do, they can never go after anyone else again, because we can just point at Friedman, employed by Fox, as a precedent. My episodes of "Masters" were both illegally downloaded and traded to a remarkable degree. I'm sure I lost many many many dollars in residuals as a result. I don't spend a lot of time bitching about it because it won't change anything. This is NOT about the larger issue of piracy or copyright. This is about Friedman's actions and Fox's reaction... whatever it ends up being.
Waynegrow
April 4, 2009 at 3:25AM EST Reply to Commentso your issue is not that the movie was viewed illegaly, that a review was posted off of illegal viewing, and reviewed off an early cut.......but that since it is a fox movie and a fox employee did this he should be fired. Your issue is not with the illegal downloading, or the reviewing of a work in progress....but that that fox wont eat one of their own.....I guess I ask you this, as a writer/journalist, what is more important to protest, illegal downloads, reviews of incompleted work.....or new corp double standards?
daq
April 4, 2009 at 8:57AM EST Reply to Commentive got no doubt fox would crucify sites like hitfix, AICN, /film etc, if they even hinted at posting a Wolverine workprint review, but studio double standards in these matters are hardly surprising. personally i don't think this guy deserves to lose his job over it anyways. sure - he showed very bad judgment in running it, but calling for his head seems a tad over the top IMO. (that said - if i was that Fantastic Four projectionist who lost his job a few years back, id be pretty damn pissed if this guy gets away with just a slap on the wrist)
studioplant
April 4, 2009 at 1:10PM EST Reply to CommentI think it is funny how this has your panties all tied up in a knot, but you cannot understand why people would go bug poop insane over a picture of the Looney Tune Characters displayed in an image depicting the last supper. It is all relative man.
jen
April 4, 2009 at 1:17PM EST Reply to CommentDrew, I completely agree with you on this one. Fox needs to fire him.
googoogaa
April 4, 2009 at 3:10PM EST Reply to CommentIs everyone taking crazy pills or something? Fox news and 20th century might be under the same huge corporate umbrella, but it still might take a 72 hours to fire the guy... and if for some strange reason 20th century isn't able to get him fired, im sure they'll be pissed.... the "hypocrite" argument is just absurd.
I mean, here's there statement once again: “We’ve just been made aware that Roger Friedman, a freelance columnist who writes Fox 411 on Foxnews.com – an entirely separate company from 20th Century Fox — watched on the internet and reviewed a stolen and unfinished version of X-Men Origins: Wolverine. This behavior is reprehensible and we condemn this act categorically — whether the review is good or bad.â€
treatybum
April 4, 2009 at 3:56PM EST Reply to Commenti agree with googoogaa --- there is NO way 20th century fox had anything to do with this and to be honest in a corporation as big as fox, there is no way they have the control to fire a freelance writer that works for fox news. YES he should be fired but even if he isnt, i A) will still see the movie in the theaters and B) will still hate fox news
JayEssTee
April 4, 2009 at 10:02PM EST Reply to CommentFriedman has been fired:
http://tinyurl.com/d749hv
JoeK
April 4, 2009 at 10:06PM EST Reply to CommentCall me crazy but the level of hysteria this has engendered is mind numbing. I'm not saying Drew doesn't have a point of a kind but this all comes across like some kind of Taliban style bloodlust.
I do believe the statement about Friedman's freelance contributions being outside of the corporate auspices but for all the accusations tossed at the guy there is precious little acknowledgement of the gray area that online movie journos are trafficking here when it comes to early coverage of "unfinished work" - something that many writers built their reputations doing. The semantics of how one acquired their knowledge/experience of the movie in question seems kind of week given the evolution of technology since this all started.
I don't advocate what Friedman did for a second and I'm pretty sure that professional sanctions alone would have crippled any regular access for Friedman to continue to do his job - regardless if he's allowed to keep it. This is some incredibly insular hand wringing though and the drumbeat from a few sources against Friedman is a bit disconcerting from my point of view as it feel precisely like the same kind of heat applied to the people plying their trade 10 years now that the internet has established its legitimacy.
I'm not sure what the right thing is here but the thunderous way this is being portrayed in black and white terms feels disproportionate. Ironic though that the way this turned out is creating enough trade for the outlets in question without actual reviews from the principals. There is too much parsing going on relative to past behavior in my opinion though - regardless of how this turns out.
JoeK
April 4, 2009 at 10:09PM EST Reply to CommentW-E-A-K
Sheesh.
I also forgot to say that I bet Friedman would have been pilloried for not covering the situation at least in the way it has on the other sites for some of the same reasons he got hit here.
I'm really not defending the guy. I mostly agree with the reasons he's been put under fire but the hogpile seems too out of control and not 100% motivated by truth and justice and all that.
mjones2347
April 4, 2009 at 11:46PM EST Reply to CommentSorry Drew, you are just way off base here. While you get a lifetime pass from me due to having John Carpenter direct 2 of your screenplays, I just don't see why you think Roger should get fired. All he did was point out how "easy" it was to find this stuff online. So you say - what if Harry Knowles did the same thing - well there's not much Fox could do except ban him from a few screenings - it's not like they would shut down AICN. The true culprits are the people who leaked it, not the ones who found it. I'm sure that in your Morning Read, you link to a lot of youtube files that may be of copyrighted works where the writer is not getting paid. Roger's a good writer, I don't always agree with his tastes in movies, but he comes up with scoops now and then. But to have him fired? Way over the top. What online journalist HASN'T downloaded a movie illegally before (except for maybe Roger Ebert). I think you are taking out your frustration on all things "Fox". It's OK if you don't like Fox News - but this isn't the best way to get revenge.....
treatybum
April 5, 2009 at 1:04AM EST Reply to Commenthttp://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-fox-news-fires-showbiz-columnist-for-encouraging-piracy/
looks like they did it. good for them
treatybum
April 5, 2009 at 1:04AM EST Reply to Commenthttp://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-fox-news-fires-showbiz-columnist-for-encouraging-piracy/
looks like they did it. good for them
treatybum
April 5, 2009 at 1:16AM EST Reply to Commenthttp://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-fox-news-fires-showbiz-columnist-for-encouraging-piracy/
they fired him. thank god. good call on their part.
impossiblefunky
April 5, 2009 at 11:26AM EST Reply to CommentSounds like sour grapes to me.
http://digg.com/d1nyJ2