Cannes Film Festival 2013

Darren Aronofsky confirms a new title for 'Wolverine 2'

The director asserts this is a new approach to the character

<p>Adam Kubert is just one of the artists who has sent Wolverine to Japan over the years, and now Darren Aronofsky is set to do the same in his new film 'The Wolverine'</p>

Adam Kubert is just one of the artists who has sent Wolverine to Japan over the years, and now Darren Aronofsky is set to do the same in his new film 'The Wolverine'

Credit: Marvel Comics

Earlier today, I sat down at the W Hotel in Hollywood to talk with Darren Aronofsky and Natalie Portman about their new film, "Black Swan," and we'll have those conversations here for you in the week before the film opens.

For now, though, there's one tidbit worth passing along from our conversation.  When Aronofsky was settling in for the interview, I mentioned to him that I had run into Matty Libatique the other night, and Aronofsky smiled.  "I saw that."  He offered up one correction to the information that we've run on the film so far, though, and as far as I can tell, this is the first time I've heard this.

The film that he's directing is officially called "The Wolverine," and there won't be a number attached to it.  In our interview, he referred to the movie as a "one-off," and he emphasized that the film isn't a sequel in any conventional sense.

It's an interesting move, and it certainly separates this from Gavin Hood's movie, and from the larger "X-Men" franchise in general.  Between this film and Matthew Vaughn's "X-Men: First Class," it sounds like any rules we've got in mind about these films and what to expect based on the first four films in the franchise are out the window.

Frankly, I like that.  Comics have always made room for different artists and writers to take these icons and bend and twist them and try different things with them, so why shouldn't the films be the same way?

We'll have more on "The Wolverine" and "Black Swan" for you soon here on HitFix.

Get Instant Alerts - Motion Captured
By subscribing to this e-alert, you agree to HitFix Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and to occasionally receive promotional emails from HitFix.

Follow Drew McWeeny and Motion Captured on

RSS Facebook Twitter
 

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Kevin

    I don't want these movies to tie into the previous X-Men movies (Wolverine not included) because those seriously ruined the X-Men stories. if they do these different, maybe they can reboot the series entirely and NOT kill almost EVERYBODY and take away some powers. I love X-Men, but The Last Stand seriously ticked me off

    November 13, 2010 at 11:12PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Michael Of course, in the tail end of Last Stand they revealed that the mutants can get their powers back and at least one of the dead characters is actually alive. I always thought that was funny -- "In case everybody realizes this movie sucks, we'll give the team on the next movie just enough ammunition to reverse everything we did."

      November 14, 2010 at 3:37PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Bickerbrack

    Seriously this is great news, the Xman films have just been falling into an abyss, the only strong element this one had to offer was Hugh Jackman, so if it's a completely new Wolverine film, keeping Jackman, then thats just the best case scenario.

    November 13, 2010 at 11:29PM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_monty_talkback_profile

    Monterey Jack

    THE Wolverine is every bit of a dumb sequel title as Rambo and THE Final Destination. Just add a number or a subtitle (just as long as it doesn't contain the words "rise" or "rising").

    November 13, 2010 at 11:32PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Unknown It's not a sequel dumba**. Learn to read. The film is a "one-off" meaning it's a seperate entity & not associated with any other film prior.

      November 14, 2010 at 1:03AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mike P. Putting a number after a films sequel is unimaginitive and lazy.

      November 15, 2010 at 9:18PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    RobertSmithe

    Title seems a little self important but I am excited to see what Aronofsky does with this.

    November 13, 2010 at 11:54PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ian

    Aronofsky is a qualitative film auteur. What the fck is he doing directing Wolverine, part 2?



    At least the Robocop thing had substance.


    "I have an idea, how about we make a reboot within a reboot. And elaborate even further on the backstory leading up to the one that's already in that other movie." - The Exec.

    November 14, 2010 at 1:09AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Brian "At least the Robocop thing had substance" is a funny sentence lol.

      Wolverine (the character) at his best can make for some good drama. The movies aren't representative of the best it has to offer.

      November 14, 2010 at 12:32PM EST
    • Killer_kadoogan_talkback_profile

      kadoogan Brian, have you actually seen the original Robocop? That is definitely a movie with substance and I'm pretty sure Aronofsky's version would have been one, too.

      November 14, 2010 at 8:24PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mark Please read the article before commenting. It explicitly states that it's NOT "Wolverine, Part 2," - it is not a sequel to "Wolverine" and has nothing to do with it.

      November 16, 2010 at 12:23AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Theaterman

    So does this mean that X1,X2,X3 and Origins are mot connected with this movie. If this movie is not a sequel or a prequel then why not go all out and get a new actor to play Wolverine.

    Hugh Jackman is too TALL to be Wolverine. His legs looks thin because he's a freaking 6 footer, he should be Cyclops or Superman NOT Wolverine.

    November 14, 2010 at 5:53AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Ella He is too tall. So what ?!...geez, he has been Wolverine for over 10 years, get over it finally. At least he can act.

      November 14, 2010 at 6:40AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Theaterman @Ella

      I don't hate Hugh Jackman and I agree that he's a great actor.

      But seeing him as a six footer Wolverine kinda destroys Wolverine's image. Wolverine is supposed to be a small hairy guy, he's the underdog. He is the opposite of Cyclops.

      Like I said if they are ignoring 10 years of X-Men Movie History then why not change the entire cast.

      November 14, 2010 at 10:36AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Hector Except that working with Hugh Jackman again is probably the only reason Aronofsky accepted the project. Also, no one who regularly leaves their mom's basement cares that Wolverine is a few inches too tall.

      November 14, 2010 at 5:38PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Theaterman @Hector

      Posting insult doesn't make you look cool, it makes YOU look stupid.

      And the mom's basement insult is getting boring, care to try something else Hector?

      November 15, 2010 at 3:04AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Teager Wolverine was 6 foot tall or similar during the Ultimate X-Men run. Comic book writers aren't big on continuity and are pretty flexible (hence all the retcons to suit how they write) so why should you be?

      Besides, what actor are you going to find that can play a five foot three tall yet intimidating Wolverine? Put Danny DeVito on a protein shake diet?

      November 16, 2010 at 2:01AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Theaterman @Teager

      I'm aware of how tall Wolverine is in Ultimate X-Men. But I'm pretty sure the general audience knows that Wolverine is small because every incarnation of Wolverine from cartoons, games, toys and even the majority of comic guest appearances he's portrayed as a small man.

      And since the new director say's that he's ignoring all previous X-Men movies(10 Years). If he wants it to be more believable that this is a one-off and not a sequel/prequel then he should cast another actor that is "IF" he really wanted people to believe that this is not a sequel.

      November 16, 2010 at 2:33AM EST
    • Pretty sure the general audience doesn't give a hoot what height Wolverine is, cuz all the movies featuring him have been blockbusters, and Hugh Jackman is pretty universally hailed as the best thing about the franchise.

      November 16, 2010 at 9:08PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Movie Critics Corner

    I didn't think i would like the first film but end up loving it so i am excited to see this film. For all your movie news and reviews visit Movie Critics Corner

    November 14, 2010 at 10:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Eyeicon_talkback_profile

    Jade

    i can't believe after a whole decade, there's some comic book purist still complaining that jackman is too tall to be the character. come on....

    November 15, 2010 at 9:04AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Speaking Geek

    As I say in my blog, I'm still worried about this because of how crappy the last couple X-Men movies have been. But Aranofsky is great and there's plenty of room for something great. Plus I've always wanted to see how Aranofsky would handle a comic book movie since he was attached to the Batman reboot way back when.

    November 15, 2010 at 11:18AM EST Reply to Comment


  • Write a comment...

    November 15, 2010 at 1:14PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ojob

    I'm more excited about this upcoming film than FIRST CLASS. I understand that films should stand alone from the books but my friends and I could not stop talking about all of the plot holes and bad characterization of ORGINS(back to back fight scenes?). Chris McQuarie's script is exactly the type of gritty talent that is needed in this franchise.

    November 15, 2010 at 6:39PM EST Reply to Comment


  • The liberties that the Fox people took with Worverine are what thew it off.

    Here's to hoping that Aranofsky is a fan of Barry Windsor-Smith's 'Weapon X'.

    November 15, 2010 at 7:42PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Dresh

    I love the concept of this project and hope Aronofsky takes it in a unique direction. It's interesting that considering how many super-hero films have come out, how few of them felt individualistic and original as opposed to 'committee think'. I'd love to see a real auteur do an idiosyncratic super-hero film; and the 'Logan in Japan' plot-line is a perfect opportunity to do just that. Go Darren!

    November 16, 2010 at 12:30PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    j zimmerman

    aronofsky is awesome. he strips every hot chick actress that normally wouldn't be naked into his movies for art. jennifer conally, marisa tomei, and now natalie portman. keep em comin!

    November 22, 2010 at 12:31PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web