Bryan Singer reveals 'X-Men First Class' details: some big surprises, some big gambles
Xavier and Magneto put McAvoy and Fassbender center stage
James McAvoy, seen here in the new Robert Redford film 'The Conspirator,' appears as a young Professor X in 'X-Men: First Class'
Holy cow, some days it pays to pick up the phone at Harry Knowles' house.
Original "X-Men" Director and "X-Men: First Class" producer Bryan Singer and Harry have a relationship that goes waaaaaaaaay back to the start of both the site and Bryan's career as a filmmaker. And it's as simple as Harry feels a great affection for Bryan's work, start to finish, and Bryan seems to like talking to Harry.
And when they talk, it usually results in Bryan spilling the beans in a major way, and that's what happened again. Harry just wrote it up, and it is a vintage Ain't It Cool special. Harry lays out a lot of the film's big ideas, pretty much exactly as Bryan voiced them to him. It's not a critical piece... it's pure pitch, and as a pitch, it's a pretty radical shift for the series.
I'm a fairly on-the-record fan of Matthew Vaughn as a director, and I know he was disappointed on a creative and a personal level when "X-Men 3" didn't happen. So far, it appears he's been able to bring his entire creative team with him to the project, and that's very good news. I've long considered his partnership with screenwriter Jane Goldman to be one of the "secrets" of why Matthew Vaughn's done so well with his three films so far. And the same is true of his producer Tarquin Pack. And the same is true of his cinematographer, his sound guy, his costume and make-up people... Matthew's from that British tradition of the rep company, the people you keep employed and fed and working and prosperous, and who work their asses off for you in return. He gets better and better as a director because they work together better and better as a team each time. I'm really pleased to see they're shooting this in London and not in Vancouver or in Los Angeles, and not because I have an issue with those cities... it's just that a London shoot would indicate that this is Matthew's movie.
So what movie is it, exactly? Well, according to Harry, it's set in the '60s, in the era of the initials... MLK and JFK and RFK and Malcolm X... and James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender are playing young Xavier and young Erik, the men who will become Professor X and Magneto. They're not there... not yet... but they're getting radicalized. The times, they are a-changin', evidently.
We'll see Xavier walking. We'll see what puts him in a wheelchair. And we'll meet the Hellfire Club, the film's villains, which is a pretty big move. That's where Kevin Bacon comes in as Sebastian Shaw. Which opens up a ton of supporting cast on both sides of the equation.
This isn't the Singer franchise. It's not a reboot, either. It sounds like they're reserving the right to make their minds up later. And I know that sort of thing freaks out fans, but honestly... I don't see an issue with it. And I sort of mean that as a pun. My relationship to comics was always a flirtation, with occasional bouts of heavy consumption. I'd get hooked on a storyline after sampling different books on and off based on cover art or someone's recommendation, and I'd buy a book for a year or two years, and then drop it. Other books, I'd just buy annuals. Special occasions. I liked oversized comics. Giant ones. And one of the reasons I never got manic about many books (with one major exception I'll mention in a moment) was because of the way Marvel would introduce alternative titles. Like you had three or four Spider-Man series, and a couple of Fantastic Four series and the Avengers and the Defenders and Iron Man and Thor and Marvel Team-Up and What If? and continuity across all of that was... well, what's the polite way to put this? Totally f'ing nonexistent.
Comic characters are archetypes. Heightened so you can project meaning and personality onto them. They can be rewritten and reordered and reintroduced and retconned and reimagined and recast and reworked and still come up fresh if you capture something honest with them. They don't have to match what came before as long as there's something interesting done with them.
This is not based on the comic that's been published as "X-Men: First Class." Instead, this is a Bond-era movie, with Bond-era technology, and with mutants struggling to find their place in America for the very first time. Here are some of the points Harry confirms in his piece:
* * Alex "Havoc" Summers, the brother of Cyclops, will be played by Lucas Till.
* * January Jones is Emma Frost and Kevin Bacon is Sebastian Shaw, and they're definitely '60s swingers in this version.
* * Nicholas Hoult is available to play Hank "The Beast" McCoy because of a delay in production on 'Fury Road."
* * This will be a sprawling international adventure movie.
* * Costumes. Vintage comic book style costumes.
* * And we will see those costumes. Soon. Within a month or so.
All in all, it's a provocative framework, but we still don't really know what the movie is. There are some big choices here, and Singer's obviously onboard and excited and enthusiastic.
The question now, one Vaughn has faced a few times already in his short time as a director, is what will the fans think of what he does to the material?
We'll know soon. "X-Men: First Class" starts production August 31, and hits theaters Friday, June 3, 2011.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
Become a fan of HitFix on Facebook.
You can e-mail me at drew@hitfix.com or follow me on Twitter, where I'm DrewAtHitFix.
News From Our Partners
-
Weekly Ketchup: Fox and Marvel Both Courting Quicksilver for Comic Blockbusters
Critics Consensus: Fast & Furious 6 is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Photos with Vin Diesel, Michelle Rodriguez, Gina Carano and More
-
Will Smith Raps 'Fresh Prince' Theme with Jaden, Dances "Carlton" and "Apache" with Alfonso Ribiero
'Sons of Anarchy' Season 6: Kurt Sutter to Launch 'Talking Dead'-Style Companion Piece?
The CW's 'Cult' Returns from Cancellation June 28
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Does Someone Have to Go?: Work Sucks.... If You Are On This Show
The Telefile - Save Me: Lightning Strikes NBC
-
What Netflix Really Wants Out Of 'Arrested Development'
What To Watch This Memorial Day Weekend
Is The New 'Bachelorette' Engaged?
-
Would You Rather… Hang Backstage with One Direction or the Jonas Brothers?
Watch Kesha Perform 'Machine Gun Love' Live
See Pictures of Your Favorite Celebrity Couples Now + Then
-
What to Watch This Weekend: Orphan Black, Behind the Candelabra, and Arrested Development's Netflix Debut
Do These Four New Arrested Development Clips Get You Excited for the Show's Return? (VIDEO)
Arrested Development Q&A: Alia Shawkat on Maeby, the Return of the Show, and the Canonization of Mitch Hurwitz
-
Baz Luhrmann Passed on Directing 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'
Someone Just Paid $1.5 Million to Sit Next to Leonardo DiCaprio in Space
Tim Curry Is Fine After Suffering a Massive Stroke: Report
-
'Fast & Furious 6': The Reviews Are In!
'Return Of The Jedi' Turns 30: Secrets Of Ewok Language Revealed!
'Fast & Furious 6' Expected To Lap 'Hangover III' At Box Office
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
How long until they discuss another film in this series?Friday, May 24, 2013
-
They can both use the same character, but will it be worth it?Thursday, May 23, 2013
-
Our conversation was an afternoon delightThursday, May 23, 2013
-
One of the emotional lynchpins of the series discusses the newest filmWednesday, May 22, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupcosmicdust
August 21, 2010 at 8:14AM EST Reply to CommentDrew...what was the one major exemption you'll "mention in a moment"?
drew Ha. That'll teach me to write and post at 3:00 AM. The exception was "The New Mutants," and for some reason, that series rang my bell like no other X series. I got crazy about it. I still have the run of the first 100 or so episodes here, having survived move after movie. A lot of it is that Sienkiewicz art and Warlock as a character, but I think it was also the idea that I was jumping on with new characters and didn't have to wrestle with continuity in quite the same way. I liked that it was a series about young people just starting to learn how to deal with the mutant powers rather than an established X-team with the marquee names.
August 21, 2010 at 4:07PM ESTI hope whatever "X-Men: First Class" turns out to be, it can capture some of that sort of energy, the raw feeling of the new for these characters, especially if they're setting it during the oh-so-turbulent '60s.
jcal
August 21, 2010 at 10:03AM EST Reply to CommentWhat about the part where Singer revealed Cyclops and Jean Grey aren't going to be in this movie?
Brendan
August 21, 2010 at 2:22PM EST Reply to CommentThat's a fairly short time between the beginning of production and the release date, especially if they're trying to make a period movie with a large sense of scope. Here's hoping they pull it off.
nick_r
August 21, 2010 at 10:15PM EST Reply to CommentJane Goldman didn't have anything to do with Layer Cake though, right? Or was she uncredited?
Drew Melbourne
August 21, 2010 at 11:56PM EST Reply to CommentI don't understand the fan outcry over Cyclops and Marvel Girl not being in the movie. This is a prequel. It's the story of Young Xavier and Young Magneto. And it's set against the days when Xavier was first reaching out to other Mutants. It doesn't fit the comic history, but it fits the movie history fine, where Beast was noticeably older than Jean and Scott, who were in turn noticeably older than Warren and Bobby.
And it's not like the comics haven't done stuff like this before. Darwin, one of the characters in the film, was from a "secret era" of the X-Men that was retroactively revealed decades later. The idea of Xavier first experimenting with teaching other Mutants about their powers in the 60's is a great idea, and if they can make a comic book movie that feels grounded in a particular time and place and feels like it has relevance to the real world in some way? Heck, that's all the better.
OhScotty
August 22, 2010 at 8:13AM EST Reply to CommentI still can't believe the timeline of this movie! They haven't started shooting yet and it comes out in June? I hope it doesn't end up getting rushed.
Bill Plant
August 22, 2010 at 1:36PM EST Reply to CommentIt's an insult to comic fans. Another example of Singer/Fox doing what they like and messing with continuity.
warblecroaker
August 22, 2010 at 8:27PM EST Reply to CommentOne of the best things about The Incredibles was the way they made the Bond in the sixties combine with the superhero concept. I have high hopes that Vaughn and his crew, and with Singer, can make something amazingly cool with that same combination. If Fox keeps their dirty interference to an absolute minimum. I see a lot of Xfanatics are crying to high heaven. I can understand their fear after all the stupid decisions made in the making of specially the last two Xfilms, but I don't get all the complaints about having too many mutants or not the right mutants. Haven't the story and team-members of the Xmen been changed around countless times in the comics anyway? And weren't there a Xteam previous to the one with Cyclops and Jean Grey? I think with the talent involved this thing is going to be amazing, and I hope the same team continues to make more than one film.
AJ
August 23, 2010 at 3:53AM EST Reply to CommentX-men in the 1960s is cool.
Fantastic Four in the 1960s is VERY cool.
I hope Fox follows the "period setting" in the long-threatened Fantastic Four reboot.
JoeK
August 23, 2010 at 9:45AM EST Reply to CommentAny long time comics fan/reader turning their nose up at the news coming out of this production is the very essence of what's wrong with fandom. A silver age X-Men movie made by people that have already demonstrated their affinity for the source? Seriously The Simpsons Comic Book guy is less a parody than an outright tragic portrait at this point.
The only thing that concerns me is the timeline, which I imagine is somehow tied to rights issues for Fox?
Brad
August 25, 2010 at 1:14AM EST Reply to CommentSo, in the original X-men movies Cyclops is a throwaway character, to the point of being egregiously killed offscreen in the third movie (for the record, I love X1 and 2, and think they are a fine, sobering Sci-Fi take on the material), then was NEEDLESSLY shoe-horned into the Wolverine movie, just to be slapped around by Sabertooth, and now that they are making a movie called X-men, First Class (the title coming from a very fun comic that had Scott back as a very primary focus for the story), and he isn't gonna be in it at all. Great. Jesus.
Also, just make it a fucking reboot already. Why in the blue hell would you even attempt to make this tie-in. It makes no sense. When Wolverine encounters the X-Men in the first movie, he has no idea who they are, but if they've been running around in bright costumes since the 60's, don't you think he'd be generally aware of who they are.
I'm all for a crazy/pulpy 60's X-men, but man is this news disappointing for me. It seems like they (fox) want to have their cake and eat it too.