Your email was sent. Thanks for sharing HitFix!

Close

Cannes Film Festival 2013

EXCLUSIVE: Bryan Singer boarding 'Battlestar Galactica' for Universal?

UPDATED: Universal confirms Singer's involvment. Will he direct? And which version will it be?

<p><span class="smallest">Is this the direction Bryan Singer's "Battlestar Gallactica" will go?  Concept art from his original pilot way back in 2001.</span></p>

Is this the direction Bryan Singer's "Battlestar Gallactica" will go?  Concept art from his original pilot way back in 2001.

I really didn't see this one coming.

One of the many casualties of Sept. 11, 2001 was the Tom De Santo/Bryan Singer version of "Battlestar Galactica," designed as a sequel to the '70s show, which was less than three months from shooting when the attacks on America happened.  Since the Cylon sneak attack was a big part of the $14 million backdoor pilot they were about to shoot, Sci-Fi got very nervous about the film, and everything fell apart.

In the time since, obviously, Ron Moore and David Eick and the entire amazing creative team who did bring "Battlestar Galactica" back to television managed to not only get a new show on the air, but they've completed their run and they're gearing up on a spinoff series, "Caprica."  Despite the amount of critical love that was displayed for the show during its run, I wouldn't call Moore's "Galactica" a phenomenon.  It was more like a very enthusiastic and vocal cult audience.  As a result, Universal seems to feel that there's more life in the property, and that there is room for another interpretation.

That's why they're nearing a deal with Bryan Singer to produce and possibly direct a brand-new "Battlestar Galactica" feature film.

[more after the jump]

The question this raises, of course, is how close will this be to the plans that Singer had for the material before Ron Moore's show aired?  Right now, my sources indicate that the big decisions haven't been made yet.  Singer is the first major creative element to be approached, so once they sign him, they'll go find a writer and they'll figure out exactly which story they're telling.  It seems like he'd want to get back to the ideas he originally loved about the piece, but since that was developed with another studio, I'm not sure that would work.

And I'm not sure I buy that Singer's going to come in just to direct a big-screen version of the show that just finished its run.  The series wrapped up pretty conclusively, with "The Plan" and "Caprica" already in motion as extensions of that story in different directions.

So is this going to be yet another all-new take on the premise?  In February of this year, the announcement was made that Glen Larson had signed a deal with Universal to develop a "Galactica" film that was not tied to any previous version.  This has got to be that same project, right?  So I guess that means Singer and Larson are going to be sitting down to figure out what take they want to pursue.

Tell me... does Singer's attachment mean you're interested?  Should Larson revisit this material already?  Do you think Universal's going to be able to get lightning to strike again in the same spot?

You can see more on the De Santo/Singer version here.

You can read how Richard Hatch originally wanted to reboot the show.

And you can even read an interview where Ron Moore says he has no problem with someone trying a totally different take on the show if you click here.

So far, I haven't heard definitively that Tom De Santo is part of this particular version of the project, but I'm assumng that his long-term association with Singer and his obvious undying love for the material would lead to him reteaming with his long-time friend in some capacity.

I'd love to hear your reaction to this news, and as more details fall into place, we'll do our best to bring them to you first, right here at HitFix.

UPDATED (8.13) - Variety has confirmed, through Universal, that Singer has come onboard the project.  We had sourced it completely enough that we were confident, but now we have independent verification, so I'm'a get all Nikki Finke up in here.  TOLDJA!

Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.

Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.

Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • 1
  • 2
Next 75 Comments
  • Default-avatar

    tgilders

    Too soon?

    August 12, 2009 at 5:55PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      John_G Honestly, I just don't see this moving ahead yet. Universal has a good product in the TV show of BSG and they continue to produce new movies, such as The Plan coming up later this year. I think Universal will wait until interest in the TV show peters out. Putting two completely takes on the same franchise out in such a short time is sure to cannibalize one market or the other.

      I have no grudge against Singer, but it would be nice to see him tackle more original material instead of these homage films. Haven't we seen enough 70's and 80's remakes yet?

      August 12, 2009 at 7:48PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    nick_r

    Obviously I have a certain amount of built-in interest in anything Bryan Singer does, and BSG is one of the best television shows ever made. However, I'm curious about where this leads us. Rather than wanting a sufficient gap before exploiting the property again, Universal clearly wants the show and its success to be fresh in everyone's mind -- even though Singer's version will likely have nothing to do with the Ron Moore series. The film could be ready by 2011 or even late 2010 if it gears up quickly enough. So really, what's next? Will we see two entirely different takes on a single property released the same year, or even the same season? Is Summer 2015 going to be a box-office battle between the Jon Favreau version of "Pirates of the Caribbean" and the Neill Blokamp version, both released by Disney? I'm not necessarily saying this is a terrible thing to imagine; but it's certainly a strange one, and the way things are going I feel like it's not all that far-fetched.

    August 12, 2009 at 6:03PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    vyperstryke

    The show's proverbial body is hardly even cold to start talking about taking the movie in a direction that has nothing to do with the show.

    I don't mind having a movie going in a different direction at all. I'm game either way. BSG was by far the best show on TV. It had it all and I would love to revisit those characters again. As long as it's fresh. If that can't be done and it means they have to go with something else, so be it...but it may be a tad too soon.

    August 12, 2009 at 6:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    MediaFiend

    Unless they hire Ron Moore to actually write it, I don't see the point. I'm a 40 yr. old who loathed the original as a kid, so the last thing I want to hear after Moore and cos. triumph is that Glen "Hack/Thief" Larson is involved. If Singer is working with him they should try Knight Rider or The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries. They WILL NOT improve on Moore. Then again, what the hell do I know.

    August 12, 2009 at 6:22PM EST Reply to Comment


  • Didn't Brian Singer already proved he was too much in love with old materials to properly adapt it for today's audience ?
    I'm looking at you Superman "I won't throw a single punch in the whole movie" Returns.

    August 12, 2009 at 6:34PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    John

    Ron Moore's version was such an amazing and compelling story. I have no idea why Glen Larson hates it so much. If he were smart, he'd realize he has a built in audience AND critical acclaim from the current version and try to bring that version to the big screen. I've been fortunate enough to see a few episodes on the big screen and this series is perfect for a feature film.
    Wake up Universal!!!!

    August 12, 2009 at 6:47PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    soloyoda

    Singer's attachment does make me more interested. I was one of the people that actually really liked what he did with the Superman franchise, so I have confidence that he can take old material and make it fresh. Of course, this enthusiasm that I have for the news is met with an equal amount of fear, so I'm hoping that Singer can pull it off.

    August 12, 2009 at 7:13PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Photo_15_talkback_profile

    Jordo

    My thinking is that this will never see the light of day. That's the ideal situation.

    August 12, 2009 at 8:38PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mal

    With Singer aboard, this bods well for the film version! I would not be surprised if DeSanto would also end up on the project. -- As for the comments that it is too soon after the Moore version, I hate to bring people have to reality, but that show was anything but a hit. 1.8 mil viewers on a backwoods channel for the majority of its run during its second half is hardly dollar signs in movie studio eyes and there are quite a few people who would like to see a more faithful update to the original, much like Abrahms managed to do with Star Trek. As for Larson being a hack compared to Moore's supposed brilliant writing... by Moore's own admission, he borrowed from everything under the sink to tell his "original" stories. Now there is a hack if there ever was one. This will be made and it will blow away the forgetful last several years!

    August 12, 2009 at 9:11PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Snarf

    Meh. Unless thy're planning on picking up where the original series left off, some 30 years later, I'd say let it rest and do something original.

    August 12, 2009 at 9:45PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Eric

    what a horrible idea

    August 12, 2009 at 10:37PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    The Bandsaw Vigilante

    "As for Larson being a hack compared to Moore's supposed brilliant writing... by Moore's own admission, he borrowed from everything under the sink to tell his "original" stories. Now there is a hack if there ever was one. This will be made and it will blow away the forgetful last several years!"

    Er...sure, whatever, re: the last five years of the RDM-version being "forgetful." One of the most critically-acclaimed series of the past decade?

    Takes all kinds, I guess.

    As for Glen Larson, he was once dubbed "Glen Larceny" by writer Harlan Ellison, due to his frequent, well-known-in-the-TV-industry liberal "haircuts" of other writers' previous concepts and scripts.

    Ronald Moore is Paddy-frigging-Chayefsky compared to Larson. Then again, so is most everyone else in the industry.

    August 13, 2009 at 12:56AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mal Fine, well of course if Ellison said so, it must be the case. Also, since when did the critics count? Anyone can have an opinion, and again the majority of TV watching folks ignored Moore's self-indulgent and dark soapy snorefest. You can try and spin it anyway you want, but the numbers don't lie. And since we know Hollywood is run by bean-counters (in this case a blessing), they will not be touching Moore's version!

      August 14, 2009 at 2:21AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mal Fine, well of course if Ellison said so, it must be the case. Also, since when did the critics count? Anyone can have an opinion, and again the majority of TV watching folks ignored Moore's self-indulgent and dark soapy snorefest. You can try and spin it anyway you want, but the numbers don't lie. And since we know Hollywood is run by bean-counters (in this case a blessing), they will not be touching Moore's version! --Oh yeah, and most of Moore's ideas for stories came from the DeSanto version! Real original! ;)

      August 14, 2009 at 2:23AM EST


  • Brian Singer and Tom DeSanto are definitely the right choice to make this film! Bring it on!!!

    August 13, 2009 at 3:46AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Pchlaszachraika

    Frak NO!

    August 13, 2009 at 4:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Warren Peace

    Pretty insane... fandom for the 70's show is even more "cultish" than that of the modern incarnation, so what studio would think this is a good idea?

    They'll just embarass themselves and keep even MORE people from discovering the magnificent Moore version if they go through with this. The likelihood of this ending well is very, very slim.

    Between this and a Superman sequel, does Singer deal only in horrible pipedreams these says?

    August 13, 2009 at 4:45AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mal Not really. If they try for a Star Trek like remake it can be quite good!

      August 14, 2009 at 2:25AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    civa

    It will only work if they stick to the Ron Moore BSG version/ storyline. What would be really cool is if they tell the story from the first cylon war about William Adama or Saul Tye! If they try to make it like the 70's BSG it will be a bigger bomb than the American remake of Godzilla!

    August 13, 2009 at 10:50AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    para

    Singer for BSG...if RDM would not have happened, his talent probably would have been enough to add something to the idea. Now however his version, however compelling visually, would appear no less shallow than his X-Men-movies were. Though visually the 2001 concept art really looks that creative to me. Whats that, a centurion on steroids?!

    And please, lets face it...after all the heat and controversy BSG-RDM faced initially, it clearly is no less than a phenomenon. They pulled something off, that really does not happen very often, showing that a re-launch really can vastly improve over the original, and I am saying that being a fan of Benedict and Greene as well.

    August 13, 2009 at 11:20AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mal 1.8 mil viewers do not make a phenomenon. Nor do those numbers translate well to the big screen. A Star trek like treatment might be good though.

      August 14, 2009 at 2:27AM EST


  • singer on battlestar? hasn't he ruined enough things? after superman, i'm surprised someone would let him try something new.

    August 13, 2009 at 11:44AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Rob

    As a huge fan of the RDM version of Battlestar (it was pretty much my favorite show of all-time), I am hesitant about another version coming down the pike so soon after the series' conclusion. I think Bryan Singer's a fine director, and I liked what he did with X-Men and Superman. Had he made BSG before Moore, it might have had more of a chance to stand on its own and flourish. But now I feel that whatever gets put in front of us will be compared harshly to the RDM series, just as that one was compared to the original. And if Singer decides to go off on a completely different storyline with different characters, or go back to the original, I think it'll be met with hostility. Will I watch it? Sure, but I really don't see how he'll be able to match what Moore and his team accomplished. We've still got "The Plan" coming out soon, and "Caprica" after that. Past that, I think it's best just to let the old girl die in peace, or at least leave the franchise be for a few years...

    August 13, 2009 at 12:47PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Spectreavatar-lrg_talkback_profile

    Banshee

    This is fantastic news. I really liked the RDM version of Galactica, but it really lacked in the design dept. and visually it was boring. It looked just like Wing Commander or Space:Above and Beyond.

    It also wasn't any FUN. I think it would be great to re-boot it based on the original show, updating the costume designs a little but basically keeping the same look and tone.

    August 13, 2009 at 1:26PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Brian Orlando

    I am thrilled that we may actually get a real Battlestar Galactica movie after what I personally felt was a piece of crap Ron Moore production that had little to no relation to the original concept. Ron Moore is a hack that has no respect for original source material. And please, human cylons (can we say Terminator?)? modern terminology like "bullets", neck ties? I could go on and on. Thank Goodness Bryan Singer is back to what he and Tom DeSanto originally set out to do until Bonnie Hammer and Sci-Fi screwed it up. Like J.J. Abrams, Bryan Singer is a true fan of the original and will make a proper repectful sequel like he did with Superman Returns. I do know alot of people that have been waiting for this. Thirty years is a long time to wait but will be worth it.

    August 13, 2009 at 1:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      The Bandsaw Vigilante Also, it's been explained by RDM that the language spoken 150,000 years ago on the series was, in fact, English, with all related idioms and terminology -- Moore said that the universe occasionally brings back cultural elements from the past on a cyclical basis, whenever it's needed (a la "All Along The Watchtower"), and this is the case with our own culture, descended from the Colonials.

      August 13, 2009 at 2:06PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Rooster

    The recent Battlestar TV series was exceptional. It was popular enough to give the SCI-FI network its biggest ratings ever and good enough to win a Hugo Award, a Peabody and a handful of Emmys and Saturns. Several magazines, including Time, Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly praised it as one of the best shows on television. And, if you care, Stephen King wrote, "This is a beautifully written show... And there's not a better acting troupe at work on television." SO, considering such a story-defining series JUST ENDED this year, do we really need a reboot? No. Reboots are for dead franchises, not recently retired successes. I think a smart Battlestar movie would take place in the recent TV series' universe... building on or giving background to existing stories (even if it focuses on new characters). Just my two cents.

    August 13, 2009 at 1:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      The Bandsaw Vigilante "I am thrilled that we may actually get a real Battlestar Galactica movie after what I personally felt was a piece of crap Ron Moore production that had little to no relation to the original concept. Ron Moore is a hack that has no respect for original source material. And please, human cylons (can we say Terminator?)? modern terminology like "bullets", neck ties? I could go on and on."
      Spoken by someone who evidently has no conception of how properly-done SF functions, either in print or on film. I personally could name a few big-name hard SF authors who'd gladly take apart what you just said from a hard science perspective, point by point. To give just one example to save time: When we finally venture out into space, we'll be using bullets and rail-weaponry like on the RDM show, *NOT* the laser zap-guns of the Glen Larson version.

      August 13, 2009 at 2:02PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mal Except the show Battlestar Galactica is NOT about WE, but about a completely different group of humans who grew up in a totally different part of the universe with completely different cultural and historical timelines. Putting that aside, you really believe we will be using bullets in space? LOL!!! Anyway, your entire commercial for RDMs mess, missed the most important fact. Numbers. As in, it did not have any. 1.8 mil viewers do not make a lot of money for studios. Much, much better shows have been cancelled with more viewership then RDMs mess could find on a tiny channel. So it may have had all the critics drooling, but the majority of the audience said, "no thank you!"

      August 14, 2009 at 2:34AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Brittany

    Could we give my DVDs time to even collect dust on the shelf? Honestly, why do we need this show to come back again? Anyone doing it now will seem petulent - "WELL HERE'S MY IDEA AND IT'S BETTER!" I think that Eick and Moore did a great job of convincing people to watch their re-imagining and it was fantastic. I would not be one to follow any other Galactica story line. For all of my intents and purposes, the show is over and can't be topped.

    I understand there are no fresh ideas out there for anything in Hollywood, but this is moving amazingly fast. It's if someone approached the crew on LOST nad said "Well, we know your show isn't over yet, but in 2015, we're doing it again!"

    WHY IS THIS NECESSARY??

    August 13, 2009 at 3:24PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Cakes

    Really? So you know, that whole trip to the United Nations, getting them to change their charter...not a phenomenon at all, huh?

    August 13, 2009 at 3:35PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mikey M

    Worse idea since a Buffy reboot was announced. Don't alienate the fans. How about the Logan's Run remake Bryan??

    August 13, 2009 at 6:40PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    This entire article is meant to stir up an old feud while dodging the fact that there are a lot of us who have been supportive of this since well before Ron Moore's show ever hit the map.

    "Only if Starbuck is rightfully a man again..." Come on. The whole thing is leading. There is no way to legitimately vote for a continuation that doesn't insult the new series. That is not what most of us want to do. They had their show, it was successful and was given a proper send off by its creators!

    Stop trying to play us against each other people. The shows are completely different and attract completely different fans.

    August 13, 2009 at 11:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ari

    Ron Moore's BSG's audience described as a "cult following." Gee, I guess you could say that, as long as you're willing to include the United Nations and the Peabody Awards judges as cult-ish folk. I'd take a guess that the author never bothered to watch the series, yet is willing to criticize without seeing. Good luck to Mr. Singer, but, hopefully, he will refrain from biting the hand that feeds him; Ron Moore's successful reimagining of a campy late 1970s short-lived series made the upcoming movie possible.

    August 14, 2009 at 12:26AM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew Wow. Overreact much? The show struggled with ratings its entire run. It was never a cross-over monster hit. Yes... some very smart folks in high places loved it, MYSELF INCLUDED, but that doesn't change the fact that for a show that was praised as highly as this one is, that never translated into a mainstream mass acceptance. That's not a slam on the show, just a statement of fact. Calm down.

      August 14, 2009 at 12:42AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JT It was a crappy soap opera that turned into a Terminator clone... Get over it.

      March 19, 2011 at 3:17PM EST
  • Uga_vii_talkback_profile

    BugKiller

    Drew,

    Come on, man. Enough with the lame back-handed compliments. Your so-called "low-rated" yet critically beloved series was in fact the highest-rated series in the history of the channel that broadcasted it.

    I would call that an unqualified success. In the age of DVRs, instant-internet viewing on Hulu and Scifi.com, pulling in between 2.5 and 4 million viewers a show, on a second-tier cable channel is an AMAZING feat.

    And to the morons who just don't get it: I'm glad you don't get it. Makes me feel a hell of a lot smarter that I do.

    You're the same idiots who bitch and moan about Lucas and Brannon and Braga giving us low-rent sci fi, and then refuse to acknowledge the absolute genius of RDM.

    You're just miserable human beings.

    Guess what? Larson's Galatica? It SUCKS.

    Transformers and Voltron the cartoons? SUCKS.

    It's amazing how much money I've spent on DVDs from my childhood that are absolute crap. Just the most purile of trash.

    There are very few things we cherish from our childhood that have held-up over time and that we could actually watch now without wanting to bash our heads in.

    The Secret of NIMH. Robotech. The NeverEnding Story. That's about it.

    Everything else from the 80's, outside of the music (and even some of that), is crap.

    Spider-Man and his Amazing Friends? CRAP.

    The Master of the Universe (movie AND cartoons)? CRAP.

    Small Wonder? The most evil CRAP in the history of history.

    See what I mean?

    The Golden Girls holds up. The Cosby Show.

    Stop holding up the original, and sucky Galactica to this rosy-glassed view. It's terrible sci fi.

    And Drew, Starbuck was MADE for Katee Sackhoff.

    Benedict is a poseur a-hole hack.

    August 14, 2009 at 1:17AM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew When did I say anything about Dirk Benedict? Anywhere? Is this what fandom is now? Just randomly insulting people over every perceived misstep? I'm not a fan of the original "Galactica." Never have been. Never said a word to that effect anywhere. I am, however, a fan of the new show, and I've written about it extensively at AICN, my old DVD blog, and even here when I reviewed "Caprica," which I quite liked. Ease off the anger, dude. You're yelling at the wrong person.

      August 14, 2009 at 2:00AM EST
    • Uga_vii_talkback_profile

      BugKiller Drew,

      LOL.Okay, so I'm guessing you had nothing to do with the intentionally one-sided poll questions on the side of your article? Look, I KNOW you liked the show. I followed you in AICN. I'm just saying, your article was lacking in context. Yes, BSG was low-rated. If compared to 30 Rock or Lost. But not if compared to Monk or Burn Notice or the Stargate drivel that's been on SciFi the last decade.And the rest of my rant wasn't aimed at you, but at the people shouting "GINO" when their precious Larson-BSG was one of the most putrid shows on television, and the RDM-BSG is quite possibly (arguably) the greatest science fiction show in television history (yes, I know, Twilight Zone, original Star Trek, etc, etc).I'm just sick of people shouting about Bayformers (at least with the first movie which was actually good) when the cartoon Transformers is terrible when viewed 25 years later as an adult.I'm sick of purported sci fi "fans" whining about Brannon and Braga and Lucas (rightfully, though) and then turn around and call the genius Ron Moore a hack, when he is the Geoff Johns of television. Yeah. He is. Deal with it haters.I'm on your side, man, and I know you're on mine. But re-read your article. It does lack a bit for context with some stuff.

      August 14, 2009 at 9:45AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Emily

    I am unbelievably insulted by this article. This person should NEVER have written it. Please next time pick someone with a brain and knowledge about their subject matter and whom they are writing it for. I thought knowing your audience was a writing BASIC. Go back to school, asshole.

    August 14, 2009 at 9:55AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    MO

    I was never a fan of the original series but I think the reimagined BSG is probably the best science show to hit the TV screens.

    Since little is known at this point about the new feature film, I can only wish that it will not be a reboot on top of Ron Moore's BSG, but instead an elaboration of the story: How bout a focusing on the War on "Earth" that lead the final five to flee on the 12 colonies? Or even about Kobol and the exodus?

    August 14, 2009 at 10:00AM EST Reply to Comment
  • 1
  • 2
Next 75 Comments

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

HitFix Poll

Are you ready for a new 'Battlestar Galactica' movie?

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web