Blake Lively passes on 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies,' so will it ever happen?
We look at the troubled history of the film so far
Blake Lively, seen here at the CinemaCon Awards in March, has passed on 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies,' raising serious questions about the film's fate
Serious question. By a quick show of hands, how many of you are seriously excited about or interested in a film version of "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies"?
I ask because I'm a little confused by the way this one's coming together. Or not coming together, as the case may be. According to Variety's Justin Kroll and Jeff Sneider, Blake Lively has now officially passed on playing Elizabeth Bennett in the film adaptation of Seth Grahame-Smith's novel. I actually had to go look up who the current director of the film is, and I'm wondering if Craig Gillespie is going to stay on the film for much longer. This thing's been through a lot of hands in the last few years, and it's no closer to making it to the screen now than it was at the start of the process.
As a book, I guess I can acknowledge the joke, but I made it through about four chapters of the novel when it came out before I set it aside. I'm all for post-modernism and mash-up culture, but it has to add something beyond a gimmick, and I'm still not convinced that "P&P&Z" does.
When you're aiming high in the initial stages of casting, of course you face some disappointments. Natalie Portman may have been connected to the project as a producer, but I still think it was a long shot for them to ever expect her to star in a film as potentially silly as this one.
And let's face it… there is a huge potential for this film to be a disaster. I'm guessing the producers of the film look at this summer's disappointing results of "Cowboys and Aliens," a project that had so many big names involved and which just couldn't seem to get past the perception from audiences that it was an inherently silly mash-up concept, and they wonder if they're going to fare any better in the marketplace. This is going to be an exercise in getting tone exactly right, and I don't think there's anything easy about the challenge.
So while they've been playing round-robin on directors (so far David O. Russell, Mike White, and Gillespie have all been attached), they've also been struggling to find an actress wiling to risk the ridiculous. Portman was first up, and they've also made very public bids for Anne Hathaway, Mia Wasikowska, Scarlett Johansson, and Emma Stone. None of them were up for it, and word broke last week that Blake Lively was the newest choice for Gillespie, and that he had offered her the role officially.
At what point do you accept that your material might be uncastable? I'd say they've worked their way completely off the A-list at this point and they're dealing with the low end of the B-list. I saw "Green Lantern" this summer, and I'm not sure I buy the hype around Lively in general after that. Yes, the film was a mess in many regards, but she was flat-out awful in it. There are certain actors who simply don't work in period films because of how completely modern they are, and Blake Lively onscreen feels like someone who is absolutely a product of 21st-Century pop culture. If she's the name that the producers were chasing at this point, then maybe it's time for them to give up the chase.
I might be wrong. Craig Gillespie might find the exact right cast and he might be the exact right guy and they may have figured out the script and they might, somehow, someday make a great version of the film. But the odds of that seem to be getting increasingly thin, and there has to be a point where people finally just decide they can't push the rock up the hill any longer. If I were a betting man, I don't think I'd put money down on the notion of eventually sitting in a dark theater and seeing this come to life. I guess we'll see how some of the other Grahame-Smith projects do, like next year's "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter," and if one of them becomes a huge hit, then I would expect this heats back up. But if that tanks, it might be the excuse the producers need to pack up, dignity intact, and quit chasing the impossible.
News From Our Partners
-
Total Recall: Star Trek Movies
Parental Guidance: Star Trek Into Darkness
In Pictures: The Stars of Star Trek Into Darkness
-
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
'Star Trek' And Klingon: Learn The Language Of The Aliens!
-
One Direction Announce Where We Are Stadium Tour for 2014
Miley Cyrus Wants Everyone to Know She's Still Engaged by Posting This New Pic
Most Anticipated Album Release for June 2013 – Readers Poll
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
-
Weekend Movies: 'Star Trek Into Darkness,' 'Black Rock,' and More
Bruce Willis Set for 'Expiration': Actor Will Play Hitman in Next Movie
Emma Watson Says She is in No Rush 'To Be Seen as a Woman'
-
Hulu.com: Is The Office the Definitive TV Show of the '00s?
Craziest 'Simpsons' Couch Gag Yet?
Denied By PBS?
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day One: Sofia Coppola offers the first misfire of the festival
Hear This: A song with a long title succinctly encapsulates ’90s power-pop
Watch This: Laura Palmer lives—however briefly—in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
The CW's 2013-2014 Schedule: Supernatural Switches Nights Again, The Vampire Diaries Pairs With Reign
Watch the Trailers for The CW's New Series, Including The 100, Star-Crossed, and Reign (VIDEO)
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013
-
David Twohy's latest looks lean and meanWednesday, May 15, 2013
-
Can this series really survive the loss of Justin Lin?Wednesday, May 15, 2013
-
Plus how devoted do you have to be to be called a 'Trekkkie'?Tuesday, May 14, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupbriguyx
October 4, 2011 at 2:24AM EST Reply to CommentI've always thought this movie would never be a hit because there's no crossover between the two audiences. Horror fans want a straight exciting horror movie and romance fans have no interest in gore.
And check out Blake Lively in "The Private Lives Of Pippa Lee." Terrible movie, but she was pretty great in it.
Matthew
October 4, 2011 at 2:42AM EST Reply to CommentI could not finish the book. It felt like they copied and pasted from to different books and just hoped it would somehow connect.
Matthew
October 4, 2011 at 2:46AM EST Reply to CommentI couldn't get through the book. felt like they just copied and pasted from two different books and hoped to would make since. Then again, most people in Hollywood don't know how to write a story, I'm sure it made since to them.
Lorraine Carlson
October 4, 2011 at 6:29AM EST Reply to CommentThey will probably cast one of the below rising young actresses as Elizabeth Bennet:
Mischa Barton, Rachel Bilson, Sophia Bush, Miley Cyrus, Kat Dennings, Hilary Duff, Leighton Meester, Ellen Page, Emma Roberts, Jessica Szohr, Evan Rachel Wood
jcpdiesel21 Mischa Barton, rising young actress? You're being generous with that label. She's pretty much dropped off the scene since The O.C. wrapped.
October 4, 2011 at 12:38PM ESTformamswaterfly
October 4, 2011 at 8:05AM EST Reply to CommentI've never been at all interested in this one. I bought the book as a joke for someone because of how ridiculous it looked but never had any expectation that they would read it.
jcpdiesel21
October 4, 2011 at 12:37PM EST Reply to CommentThe book was a huge disappointment for me. There were a few humorous moments and touches here and there, but it was largely the exact same story with zombies added. Nothing really that merits all of the hype or a movie version.
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter by the same author is a much better book and a pleasant surprise, and I think the material should make for a fun albeit very gory movie.
Absolutely agree! AL:VK is a terrific thriller with a fascinating take on American history.
October 5, 2011 at 4:31PM ESTdustin
October 4, 2011 at 2:01PM EST Reply to CommentWe have the book on our shelf, but it's window dressing. Neither me or my wife have read it. I'm not interested. Lively is a sexy little minx... but she's not a a real presence on screen, and she can be downright awful.
If I can be frank, I don't give a flying fuck about P&P&Z as a film. The novel caught on for 15 minutes because of the gimmick, and the moment for that gimmick has passed.