Analysis: First 'Skyfall' trailer is gorgeous and brutal
007 looks like he's going to be an unstoppable force this time around
- Critic's Rating A
- Readers' Rating C+
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Yes, even though I'm at a film festival, I still feel compelled to weigh in on the first trailer for "Skyfall," the new James Bond film.
As a lifelong fan of the series, one of the things I find most interesting is watching the way the aesthetics of Bond have shifted over the years to reflect wherever mainstream film has gone. You can look at a Bond film and get a sense of what was going on culturally at the time it was made. They are reflections of their moments, time capsules with a body count.
Hiring Sam Mendes for this 50th anniversary edition of the series was an interesting choice because of how different James Bond is than anything he's shot before, but just based on this teaser trailer, I'd say it looks like that gamble has paid off handsomely. This is a gorgeous introduction to the new film, and I love the word association opening. Daniel Craig's Bond is wound tighter than any previous incarnation, and that's one of the reasons I love him in the role. HIs Bond takes full advantage of that license to kill, and not just so he can make a pithy joke and move on. He is a cultured ape, a brute who just happens to look good in a tux, and he is dangerous.
I'm amazed there are people who are still grumbling about the casting. I guess they got so used to one particular type of Bond that they can't accept this more lethal version. I'm not sure where the idea took root that Bond had to be funny and sort of silly, but many of those fans grew up in the Roger Moore era. Whatever else you want to say about Moore, he was never scary. There was never a sense that he was a ticking time bomb about to go off. We'll get into it more as I reach the Moore era in my "James Bond Declassified" series, which resumes after the festival, but it's safe to say that my definition of Bond starts with Fleming's novels, not with any particular film incarnation.
Roger Deakins, one of the greatest working photographers, looks to be a key collaborator this time out, and I honestly can't think of any Bond film that has offered up such a hallucinatory first glimpse. There are some truly breathtaking visuals here, and I hope the whole film looks like that. Also, did you catch Javier Bardem there at the end, just a silhouette against the flames engulfing Bond's ancestral home? Nice. Really nice.
I still don't really know what "Skyfall" is about, and that's fine by me. We've got months to go still, and this barrage of beautiful images and sudden violence is enough to convince me that we're in for a treat this November.
"Skyfall" opens in the UK October 26 and in the US November 9, 2012.
Trending Now on HitFix Boards
| Topic | Started By | Latest Post | Replies |
|---|---|---|---|
| sandylewis90 |
11 days ago
|
2
|
|
| sandylewis90 |
about 1 month ago
|
1
|
|
| Discuss In Theaters and Coming Soon on HitFix Message Boards » | |||
News From Our Partners
-
Beyonce Pregnant Again? Sources Confirm 'Epic' Star Is Carrying Baby No. 2
'Hangover 3' Red Band Trailer: Take a Walk Down a NSFW Memory Lane (VIDEO)
Why 'Man of Steel' Didn't Use 'Superman' in the Title
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Three: Cheers for the young stars of The Selfish Giant, jeers for the new films by Hirokazu Kore-eda and Arnaud Desplechin
Hear This: Destroy This Place shows how press releases can get it right
Watch This: With Beavis And Butt-head Do America, Mike Judge skewered the idiocy of cinematic adventures
-
Kendall Schmidt of Big Time Rush Loses $7,000 Worth of Gifts for Fans [Video]
Kanye West to Drop New Album 'Yeezus' on June 18
Justin Bieber + Selena Gomez Will Sit Together at 2013 Billboard Music Awards
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
The Office Series Finale Review: That'll Do, Show. That'll Do.
Syfy Renews Warehouse 13 for a Fifth and Final Season
-
Fiery 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Scene Hurt The Most: Ouch!
How Far Will 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Boldly Go At Box Office?
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Secret Behind The Mystery Villain
-
The 'Doctors' Unite
'We Are Men' In 4 Words
MTV Legend Recalls Heavy Metal Frontman's Anti-Gay T-Shirt Controversy
-
Weekly Ketchup: Will Smith to Star in Wild Bunch Remake?
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Hollywood's busiest alien spends a little more time with StarfleetThursday, May 16, 2013



Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupHan
May 21, 2012 at 11:47AM EST Reply to CommentReally hoping this will be a return to form. They've had a couple years to plan this one, and they've assembled a really interesting and unexpected group of people. Fingers crossed that I won't be disappointed again.
Rev. Slappy
May 21, 2012 at 12:01PM EST Reply to CommentI'm embarrassed to say I've never read one of Fleming's novels. Any recommendations on where to start? Casino Royale is the first in the series, right?
Cleave Read them in order, yes Casino Royale is the first. I got the whole series in a box set for £9 and read them all in 2 months.
May 21, 2012 at 4:27PM EST
If you've got an e-reader there are some great deals on the collections online.
May 21, 2012 at 5:26PM ESTIntellectual Ninja
May 21, 2012 at 12:16PM EST Reply to CommentOne of the nicer aftereffects of Craig's darker, more violent version of Bond is that many people seem to have revisited their notion of disliking Dalton's similarly (well, for the 80's at least) "dark & violent" version of the character.
Dalton was actually a very good Bond. He was a cold-blooded assassin, much as a real spy would have to be. He was the anti-thesis of Moore's jokey, hokey Bond.
And I loathe Moore, and to a slightly lesser extent, Brosnan. Much like Moore, Brosnan's only good film was his first. The other three Brosnan films became more and more ridiculous, with the exception of the beginning of Die Another Day, which appeared it was going to take Bond into a "darker" place only to abandon its boldness and retreated back into the even more rote and ridiculous pattern.
But while Brosnan batted .250 with his Bonds, Moore has only one "good" film in 7. Yes, while The Spy Who Loved Me was also a good film, because of Moore's interpretation, I like to pretend it's not a Bond film. It just works better that way for me. It's actually a great film if I pretend the guy's name isn't Bond.
Of course, Connery's work (besides Diamonds are Forever) is above reproach, even in a lesser film like You Only Live Twice. And Lazenby is good in what may be the best Bond film of them all (though Craig's Casino Royale might be able to vie for that title).
But I dare y'all to go back and watch The Living Daylights and License to Kill and pay attention to Dalton's performance. While they are not very well written or produced (seriously, they're so poorly shot and lit that they look like TV movies of the week), Dalton's Bond is a pretty serious badass. He tough, gritty, and you believe he's capable of killing someone with no remorse.
velocityknown That was one of the reasons Dalton was such a misunderstood Bond. The prodcuers/directors wanted to make Bond and quippy action hero, but Dalton wanted to basically be a Craig type Bond. Dalton was ahead of his time unfortunately, wish he would've been blessed with better creative around him.
May 21, 2012 at 12:23PM ESTlevrock Yeah, Dalton was playing a Craig-type Bond, but they were sticking him with Moore-era scripts. (Although I do love the Moore period for its over the topness.)
May 21, 2012 at 3:01PM EST
I've always enjoyed Dalton. I know this sounds odd, but Brosnan is the only bond I just don't like. He's too much of a fancy boy. IMO, Goldeneye's success had more to do with the ensemble cast and creative team than Pierce.
May 21, 2012 at 5:38PM ESTCraig is my 2nd favorite Bond behind Connery of course. This idea that he's too ugly only comes from men. Every woman I know thinks he's just about the sexiest thing ever. In today's effeminate culture it's a breath of fresh air to see a manly man. Not only that, but you look at Craig and you think "that guy could probably kick my arse." Whereas Brosnan looks like he might drop the gun right after firing it lol. Killing people is brutal and messy, people don't just fall over dead because you're a spy :p
Mike Agree wholeheartedly with everything you wrote, except I have a soft spot for Moore only because he was the first Bond I "followed". But having gone back and watched those movies, they really are just... cheesy.
May 21, 2012 at 10:09PM ESTI was one of the few that I knew that at the time loved Dalton's Bond, for the reasons you mention. I'm actually of the opinion that "License to Kill" is the best Bond movie, period, because of him (and also Robert Davi's stone cold villain). It was the only one until Craig's "Casino Royale" where it felt like Bond had something to lose, as well as real feelings.
I didn't care much for the last Bond movie though, it just felt like a mishmash of story ideas that never worked as a whole movie. I'm hoping Mendes' involvement will bring Bond back to what it should be.
EJ Cohen
May 21, 2012 at 1:51PM EST Reply to CommentDo we know for a fact that Bond's ancestral home actually plays a role in this? Thought that was just a rumor. As for the teaser: very pleasantly surprised. There was the skeptic in me upon first hearing the casting news, etc, that EON were going to strive for an "Oscar" worthy picture. Not that Bond films shouldn't aspire to be "art" but it seemed kind of a simple minded bid for respect. But that teaser is so well shot and executed. Looking forward to this.
goodhorse
May 21, 2012 at 6:52PM EST Reply to CommentIs it me or have we been missing a good, intelligent thriller for quite some time now (MI4 kinda fitted the bill I guess, but was more adrenaline-pumping than thought-provoking).
In any case, this latest Bond looks like it is going to fix that!
Chris
May 21, 2012 at 8:49PM EST Reply to CommentI think hiring Sam Mendes has as much to do with Daniel Craig as it does EON. If you recall, Roger Michell (Enduring Love) was originally supposed to direct Quantum of Solace, but had to drop out due to scheduling conflicts. I think Craig likes to work with directors he's worked with before.
Elliot
May 22, 2012 at 3:21AM EST Reply to CommentMOST IMPORTANTLY THOUGH, I DIDN'T NOTICE A SECOND OF "SHAKY CAM"! YAAAAAY!!
elliot
May 22, 2012 at 3:23AM EST Reply to CommentThe best thing about that preview was there was not a second of "shaky cam" during it :)