The Motion/Captured Review: 'Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince'
David Yates returns with the best of the series so far
Life will never be the same for Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) or, indeed, anyone else after these climactic moments from 'Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince'
Seems fitting that I should publish this review on the day before I'm going to go see the new Chris Columbus film. I know people love to beat up on Chris for the first few films in the series, and the second one in particular, but I'm going to point out that Columbus was the one who found these kids in the first place, and based on the work they do in this new movie, he's looking more and more like a genius for the decisions he made almost a decade ago.
I'm going to write this review as if there's little of substance that I'd be able to spoil for you, since this is a book that's been out there for a while. If you're one of those people who has only been watching the films, then I'll warn you before I drop any big plot points. Because I'd read the books, I realized from the moment the film began that director David Yates is working from a whole new level of confidence this time out. The movie begins with the Warner Bros shield, and then we find ourselves in the Ministry of Magic at the end of the last movie. Harry's still got blood on him, and as people push in to ask questions and the Daily Prophet starts snapping photos, everything slows down. Harry looks lost. Upset. And just before he's overwhelmed by it all, Dumbledore steps close to him, puts one arm around him, and pulls him close to protect him. That one gesture says everything you need to know thematically about this film, and from there, we cut to the main title, and I knew... just knew... that Yates was going to nail this film.
And he did. This is absolutely the best of the "Harry Potter" films so far.
That may sound like faint praise, but it's not. Even removed from the sliding scale of this particular series, "Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince" is a remarkable fantasy adventure, dense and serious and adult, and it serves as a fascinating benchmark for just how far this series has come since 2001. I've always liked the ambition more than the execution, but now, finally, it feels to me like we're seeing the full potential of the series realized, and the result is somewhat breathtaking.
[more after the jump]
What Yates brings to the series is an affinity with the actors that allows them to all do the best work they've done so far, and in particular, he manages to elicit work from the young cast that suggests they all have careers after these films are finished if they want. Daniel Radcliffe is, to put it kindly, somewhat limited in range, but Yates creates such a great comfortable environment for Radcliffe that the young actor loosens up here and delivers his loosest, most natural work ever. The same is true of Rupert Grint, who has always served as comic relief among the key "Potter" characters, and who comes very close to walking away as MVP of this film. He's grown into a very confident young comic performer, and in scene after scene, he finds the exact right pitch at which to play Ron Weasley. The third part of the main trio is, of course, Emma Watson as Hermione Granger, and she's quite affecting here. There's one scene in particular where I unexpectedly found myself moved nearly to tears by Watson's work, and I think it's because the vulnerability she shows in the scene reminded me that these young people are in that shadowy zone between children and adults, where everything's cranked up and more important and oh-so-deeply felt, and she made that seem real. Bonnie Wright has grown into her role as Ginny Weasley nicely, and there's a lovely adult grace about her now that makes her budding relationship with Harry make sense. She may be younger, but these kids have lived through extraordinary circumstances, and they wear those scars with dignity. Tom Felton's had a tough path in the series, playing Draco Malfoy, who started as a sort of stock creep, a baby-faced Jimmy Stewart with a haughty sneer. At this point, though, Malfoy's grown up twisted, and he embraces a terrible assignment here, convinced he's finally found a way to prove himself to be a better magician than Harry Potter, and possibly even better than his own father. Felton reveals real layers to Malfoy's malice, though, and he and Radcliffe share a number of scenes that illuminate how far they've come as performers. In a strange way, these films have become the giant blockbuster equivalent of Michael Apted's "7 Up" series in England, a chance to watch a wide range of English schoolkids move from childhood to adulthood as we watch, checking in every so often to see how much they've changed as well as how much they've stayed the same. It's a somewhat remarkable accomplishment for a giant corporate franchise, and what's happened as a result is this product, this calculated commercial material, has ended up with a soul that is uncommon in films of this size, and it actually seems to be growing as the series nears the end instead of fizzling out.
The adult cast is equally impressive, and you've got to be dazzled on some level by any film franchise that can attract a who's who of English stage and TV actors as impressive as the roster that "Harry Potter" can boast. The main new addition this time is Jim Broadbent, and he's absolutely amazing. I've said for years that everything's better with Broadbent. I've always loved this sad-eyed rubber-faced actor, and in the role of Horace Slughorn, he's found a perfect use of his particular talents. There are moments in the film where he's uproariously funny, including his introduction disguised as an armchair, but Slughorn's got some dark secrets tucked away, and when Broadbent turns those big watery eyes on Harry, ashamed of himself, it's shattering. If this were any movie but part six of a series, I'd say Broadbent does "Best Supporting Actor" level work here. It's a master class in how to make the most of every moment onscreen without ever once overpowering the film around him. The same could be said for Alan Rickman, whose Snape has always been one of the consistent treats of the series, and here, as always, he seems to savor each pause in each line of dialogue like ice cubes in a desert. He can say more with a stone-faced look than some actors can say with whole pages of dialogue. Maggie Smith and Julie Walters and David Thewlis all show up for a few scenes, and they all ground the world in a somber reality, reminding us that the stakes have gotten higher and higher over the course of the series so far.
If there is someone who walks away with the film, though, it's not Broadbent as I thought immediately after the screening. No... it's Michael Gambon. I know when the switch was made after Richard Harris passed away, many people thought Gambon was a poor trade. Balderdash. Gambon has absolutely become Dumbledore at this point, and I can't picture anyone else playing the scenes he has with Radcliffe in this film. If you know the ending of the movie, you'll feel it building to that point. Gambon is constantly testing these kids, especially Harry, seeing if he really is as strong as he believes, and when the moments come where Harry has to show real strength, Dumbledore is confident he'll deliver. There's a scene near the end of the film, where Dumbledore and Harry are chasing an artifact relating to Voldemort, and Dumbledore asks Harry to do something horrible. In the book, it seemed like a tough choice, but seeing it come to life, seeing Harry have to follow through, it's positively wrenching. This isn't a choice Harry could have made one film ago or two films ago. The real quiet genius of what Jo Rowling wrote is that each book represents a different step on the path to growing up, and this is the moment where you have to let authority fall away as you step up and make your own way in the world. Harry has leaned on Dumbledore for so much over the years, even when he didn't know he was doing it, that the idea of a world without his mentor is unthinkable. Facing that, his greatest fear, is a test that defines who Harry is and who he will be, and the movie clearly externalizes that internal dilemma.
I love how Yates has grown so confident with the effects work this time that it's almost invisible. You know someone's comfortable with it when they no longer feel the need to rub your nose in it. There are tons and tons of special effects in the film, but they're used to simply flesh out the world or to punctuate dramatic beats. Even moments like the Quidditch match, which felt like they always stopped the films cold in earlier movies, are played here as character beats. Hogwarts is less showy overall, but that means that when magic is invoked, it actually feels like magic again. The opening attack on the Millenium Bridge in England is shocking because we're not used to seeing the mundane world rub up against the magic of the Potter series quite so blatantly. In general, Yates seems good at suggesting that all of this is happening right under our noses, that we're not looking at a different world, but rather at our own with different eyes. Even more than Cuaron with "Azkaban," Yates has managed to combine the real and the unreal in a way that feels absolutely grounded.
I have full confidence now that Yates, working with screenwriter Steve Kloves, who was profoundly missed on the last movie, is going to stick the landing with the next two films, and we may be looking at a singular accomplishment in fantasy filmmaking by the time all is said and done. I don't think this is a beat-for-beat translation of the book... it's been a while since I've read it, so I can't tell you what minutiae did or didn't make the cut... but in spirit, this is the first time I've felt like I can wholeheartedly recommend this to anyone as a great film, not just a great entry in this particular series. That's surprising considering how far down the road we are, and I sincerely look forward to seeing this one again as soon as possible.
Don't forget to check out our new gallery with tons of images to tide you over until the film opens on July 15th.
Can't get enough of Motion/Captured? Don't miss a post with daily HitFix Blog Alerts. Sign up now.
Don't miss out. Add Motion/Captured to your iGoogle, My Yahoo or My MSN experience by clicking here.
Not part of the HitFix Nation yet? Take 90 seconds and sign up today.
News From Our Partners
-
Demi Lovato Is Thrilled That Her Voice Is Finally Being Heard on Radio [Video]
One Direction's Niall Horan Spends the Night With UK TV Star Louise Thompson
Kelly Clarkson Denies 'American Idol' Judging Gig
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Ten: The big wrap-up, including Jim Jarmusch's fantastic vampire film
Hear This: “Second Best” reflects a pivotal moment all serious bands face
Watch This: The wages and the fear remain high in William Friedkin’s Sorcerer
-
'Star Wars: Episode VI': What's Its Legacy... And Its Future?
'Arrested Development' Season Four: Eight Things To Remember
'Fast & Furious 6': The Reviews Are In!
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Does Someone Have to Go?: Work Sucks.... If You Are On This Show
The Telefile - Save Me: Lightning Strikes NBC
-
What to Watch This Weekend: Orphan Black, Behind the Candelabra, and Arrested Development's Netflix Debut
Do These Four New Arrested Development Clips Get You Excited for the Show's Return? (VIDEO)
Arrested Development Q&A: Alia Shawkat on Maeby, the Return of the Show, and the Canonization of Mitch Hurwitz
-
Babble.com: 8 Parenting Lessons To Learn From 'Arrested Development'
WATCH: New 'Arrested' Clip You Probably Haven't Seen
What Is Up With Rob Lowe's Face? The Actor On His Crazy 'Candelabra' Role
-
Baz Luhrmann Passed on Directing 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'
Someone Just Paid $1.5 Million to Sit Next to Leonardo DiCaprio in Space
Tim Curry Is Fine After Suffering a Massive Stroke: Report
-
Mega Man X Trailer: The Blue Bomber Busts His Way to Wii U Next Week
The Wrap Up: Charlie Sheen Gets a New Name For 'Machete Kills'
New 'Man of Steel' TV Spot: "Why Did You Send Me Here?"
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
And if so, what does his character name suggest for the future?Saturday, May 25, 2013
-
How long until they discuss another film in this series?Friday, May 24, 2013
-
They can both use the same character, but will it be worth it?Thursday, May 23, 2013
-
Our conversation was an afternoon delightThursday, May 23, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupStormshadow4life
July 6, 2009 at 10:13PM EST Reply to CommentNice! Thanks for the super early review. I remember reading one on AICN back in November, and it had me really worried....but now I'm just way too excited!
David D.
July 6, 2009 at 11:28PM EST Reply to CommentI remember those AICN reviews too, and they both were angered by the omission of a significant, emotional scene from the end of the book. I gather it's here now?
I do hope it's as good as you say. I was truly disappointed by Yates' work in "Phoenix," especially the lack of an emotional kick when Sirius Black's fate was revealed, and was sorry to hear he'd been hired for "Deathly Hallows." But I did love "Girl in the Cafe," and I am hoping for the best.
Oh, one more thing you didn't mention -- was this really a "PG" film?
drew
July 7, 2009 at 12:30AM EST Reply to CommentKeep in mind... I'm not a raving Potter fanboy. I like the books, and I like some of the films. However, Devin Faraci could absolutely be called a Potter freak, and he loved the film as much as I did. I'm not so much worried about every line of the book being there as long as the films work as films, and this one does and then some.
lazygarfield
July 7, 2009 at 5:38AM EST Reply to CommentDREWWWWWW!!!! You made my day.. and you ruined it too! Now I know that this film will be awesome and I am all excited it.... But I also know that i wont get to see it for another 10 days.. which is equivalent to torture for me. Damn.
David D.
July 7, 2009 at 8:37AM EST Reply to CommentPlease don't misunderstand, Drew... I wasn't suggesting that "every line in the book [had to] be there." I was trying to avoid spoilers by referring to a major scene at the climax of the book (let's call it "D_________'s F______") that apparently was not included in the version screened last year, and the AICN commenters were (understandably) angered by its omission. Then last December I read a quote (from Radcliffe, I believe, in EW) that remarked how emotional everyone had been during the shooting of that scene, which led me to believe that they had quickly gone back and shot it. That's all I wondered about. Thanks.
drew
July 7, 2009 at 8:41AM EST Reply to CommentIt's not "D____'s F____," per se, but there is a scene that stands in for it, emotionally, that I think works on a visual level much better. It's simple. It's sad. And at that point in the film, it's all that needs to be said.
JoeK
July 7, 2009 at 9:23AM EST Reply to CommentI think it's too easily dismissed just how good for genre fans this series as a whole has been, including Columbus' installments, which established standards for casting, production design and more that the whole series owes almost all its lifeblood to. I was movie only until the last installment and then had to get through the books and did in a matter of days. This is a fantastic series and considering how these movies might have looked had they been made in a different era I think they are treasures. People will be watching and enjoying each film in this series for many many years to come. Really looking forward to seeing this.
darwinmayflower
July 8, 2009 at 7:42PM EST Reply to CommentMori,
please get rid of the netflix pop-ups, or I will have to stop visiting your site.
they are very annoying.
drew
July 8, 2009 at 10:50PM EST Reply to CommentNot sure what Netflix pop-ups you're referring to, as I don't have anything to do with the ad side of things, but I'll mention it.
D.Vader
July 10, 2009 at 9:37AM EST Reply to CommentMeh, I dunno 'bout this. I was extremely disappointed in the last one, and that's shattered my faith in Yates. This review basically tells us the same things that could be said about the last 5 movies: the acting is great, the tone is getting darker, the kids are growing, the effects are good, yadda yadda yadda.
But I've heard way too much about the things Yates has dropped or changed, and these rewrites are putting the producers into a corner. I just haven no faith in the next 3 movies being as good as they could be. They are falling so far short of their potential.
Joan Greenwood I fully agree.
August 19, 2009 at 8:09AM ESTwhiterok
July 11, 2009 at 12:23AM EST Reply to CommentGreat review. That is EXACTLY how I felt about the last one. It finally became a REAL film for me. Very happy that Yates is the director for the last two. Can't wait to see this.
shazz
July 13, 2009 at 6:31PM EST Reply to CommentI was lucky enough to see a prescreening over the weekend and this is EXACTLY how I felt about it. Like you, it's been a little while since I've read the book, but I felt it was a very emotional adaptation and worked very well as a film. No longer did special effects or certain scenes (quidditch) feel like "hey! look what we put on the movie screen!" but it all worked together to make a cohesive story. Not everyone will be satisfied, but I can't wait to go back on Wednesday and catch all the things I missed the first go round.