Russell of 'Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains'
Credit: CBS
Pre-credit sequence. After a lengthy pre-credit sequence, we return to Yin Yang for Night 36. Parvati and Russell are debating whether or not Sandra's decision to play her Idol that night was stupid. Russell thinks it was pointless and proved that Sandra is a liar and Sandra doesn't understand what sort of etiquette she was supposed to observe. Sandra, who refuses to back down, makes it clear that Russell wasn't exactly forthcoming with all of his Idols. Russell doesn't just think Sandra's lying. He's also convinced that Parvati knew about the Idol, which makes her sneaky in his eyes. Parvati compares Russell to a two-year-old child who had his toy taken away, but Russell's pouting has had its desired effect. Jerri's talking about how she'd been wanting Parvati out since the first day, while Colby is just smiling and nodding politely. As Colby puts it, "Any time this dysfunctional family of Villains is not getting along, it takes the attention off me.
[Full recap of all two-plus hours of this "
Survivor"
finale, leading up to the climactic vote, after the break...]
Contingencies. The tree-mail clue hints about shattered dishes and steady hands. Russell says that it's all on Colby. If Colby doesn't win Individual Immunity, Russell says he's going home. But if Colby wins, Russell thinks he has a choice to make. He says his ideal Finals group would be Sandra and Jerri, figuring if he goes to the jury with those two, the jury wouldn't have a choice but to give him the million bucks. Silly Russell still thinks he won a million dollars in Samoa.
Irritable Bowl Syndrome. Immunity finds the contestants stacking and balancing plates and bowls and dishes, a challenge that was part of the China season. Sandra's steady hand fails her first. Jerri's dishes wobble and crash next. Russell's out next, meaning that we're down to Parvati and Colby. A large bowl causes shaking for each contestant, as they reach 17 dishes and the wind isn't helping. Colby seems under control, but his dishes fall. Parvati wins another Immunity. Jerri sounds confident that Colby is doomed, but she correctly notes, "It *is* 'Survivor.'"
Colby doesn't know how to quit, previous 37 days notwithstanding. "Winning today is a huge deal," Parvati knows. Colby's gracious, saying he had his opportunity to win Immunity and that he's proud to be the Last Hero Standing, vowing not to hustle for votes. He finishes his "surrender speech" and hugs everybody. He's hoping for an "Aw shucks, he's so pathetic" vote. However, it's a lie. Or he tries to tell the camera it's a lie. Colby votes, "I don't know how to quit. It's just not in me." Well that's fine. But what *can* do? He has one more play. He goes to Russell and asks if the plan is to get rid of him tonight and get rid of Parvati tomorrow. Russell agrees that it is and Colby argues that Russell's best hope is to get rid of Sandra instead, making it more likely to beat Parvati the next day. Russell briefly makes it sound like he's considering Colby's point and vows to make his decision on-the-spot at Tribal Council.
Tribal Council I. Colby calls this his toughest "Survivor" experience yet. He clearly makes his argument again that voting Sandra out would be right, because nobody wants to sit next to Parvati at the jury and everybody wants to sit next to Sandra. Parvati is amused to hear Colby talk about the target on her back and says she doesn't believe anybody. Everybody wants to trust people, but nobody trusts anybody. Blah blah. I can't see any way this vote doesn't go against Colby.
The Vote, I. Sandra writes Colby's name down. Colby writes Sandra's name down. Jeff reads the votes: Colby. Sandra. Colby. Colby. Game over. Well that was dull. Colby's done, ending a rather pathetic season for both Colby personally and for the Heroes. Jeff tells everybody to get a good night's sleep. "I guess I'm just an old, dusty veteran," says Colby, who admits he's just not destined to win this game.
I'm the only one left who likes Parvati. The Final Four returns to camp, Villains all. For some reason, they're only talking about how much of a lunatic Rupert is. Parvati, though, is newly wary. Her eyes were opened at Tribal Council by the talk of her being a jury threat. Jerri and Russell both agree that if they don't win Immunity, Parvati's going to win. "They all think she's some big strategic player, which she isn't," Russell tells Jerri, grumbling all the way. A map arrives and sends them to go off to celebrate the Rites of Passage.
A great chance to take a shower, bake a cake or having a conversation with friends and family. At least with an All-Star season, you remember all of the contestants vividly, rather than stopping and going, "Who the heck was that?" The Rites of Passage begins with a tribute to Sugar's pixelated breasts. And it's downhill from there. I like the wise words of Randy, who observes, "My lack of ability to communicate with 26-year-old girls is what got me booted." My stomach flips a little with Russell's mockery of Boston Rob and with Jerry referring to Coach as "Benji." By the end, it's one person after another with Russell saying, "You shouldn't have messed with me." Yawn. They end at a massive, creepy Wicker Man/Burning Man stature and set it aflame.
Four blind rats. See how they run. It's time for their final Immunity challenge. It's a "Survivor" maze. They're blindfolded, but have to make their way to four stations to collect four necklaces with the help of guideposts they can only read with their fingers. In the beginning, the contestants are all bunched, but then Russell opens up a lead. He's the first to two necklaces, followed closely by Jerri and by Parvati, who keeps bumping into things. Jerri is the first to get to three necklaces, with Parvati close behind. Russell and Parvati both find their fourth necklace at the same time and the start slapping and elbowing each other trying to get out of the maze. Who will escape the maze first? It's amazingly tense, as Russell, Jerry and Parvati get within inches of the finish, but the final Immunity goes to... Russell. "I've gotta talk to Russell, make sure I'm still his girl," Parvati says. It's probably too late for that, Parv.
"Survivor" finales are really long, aren't they? Jerri is giddy that Parvati is going home. The only person who's safe is Sandra. Russell says he's keeping her because he can beat her, which he tells her as well. Sandra makes a big show of saying she's perfectly happy with the $100,000. Parvati, however, takes Russell aside and says that Sandra would get Danielle, Candice and several other votes. Russell's trying to think of which woman he could sent home, while still getting their vote. It's yet another Tribal Council where I can't see any chance of the vote not going the most predictable direction. Parvati is going home.
Tribal Council II. The ladies each discuss their approach to currying favor with Russell and keeping him around. Sandra jokes that Russell keeps telling her she can't win and therefore she could be kept around. "Alliances are going to get broke tonight," Russell warns. Parvati admits that she's a threat and that she played a good strategic game and Jerri jumps in to agree. Parvati's only argument is that Russell should keep her if he wants to redeem himself, that she's had his back the whole time. She says that she's been protecting him. Oy. PARVATI. Russell doesn't like anybody else getting credit for anything and he wants no part of Parvati claiming that she helped him in any way. Bye, Parvati.
The Vote, II. Parvati writes Jerri's name down. Jerri writes Parvati's name and actually acknowledges having "mad respect" for Parvati. That's gracious. Jeff reads the votes: Parvati. Jerri. Jerri. Jerri. Huh. Well that was some interesting editing. "I can't wait to hear this story later," Jerri tells Russell, before telling the camera she's probably going to vote for him.
A brief pause: Do you think an All-Star jury will respect Russell's gameplay in a way that his regular season jury didn't? It's an interesting question. Also, when all is said and done, Parvati and Sandra have orchestrated nearly as many clear and big moves as Russell has, provided they're willing to take credit for it.
Fear of the dirty, gray hat. So our Final Three is Parvati, Sandra and Russell. Sandra is so close to winning another million, but she's also homesick and wondering how her husband in Afghanistan is doing, comparing his fight with hers. She says this is how she hustles, this is how she makes her money. They all celebrate the next morning with their drinks and their food. This is Parvati's 114th day. Russell is playing that game where he tries psyching his rivals out on jury morning. "He don't know what it's like to be up against two chicks!" Sandra laughs and then, in a classic moment, she goes and tosses Russell's signature hat into the fire. "I don't care," She says. "I should burn his sneakers." She calls it payback for everything Russell did to her. Russell returns and looks for his hate and the two gals play dumb. "If I don't get my hat, I ain't leaving," Russell pouts. Sandra smartly points out that the Heroes were all responsible for their own self-destruction. In this segment, the only person making a good case is Sandra. Is that foreshadowing? Jury time!
Opening statements. "I've been sole-surviving since my alliance was wiped out," Sandra leads. Her point is that she's been on her own and that she did what she had to do to keep her torch lit. Russell says "Survivor" isn't a game of luck. "I tried to play hard. That's what I did," Russell says, actually apologizing if anybody was offended. Parvati leads by saying that she was a threat from the beginning and that she worked to keep a wall of defense. She says that Russell was her dragon and "I kept him as my pet." It's a great line. It may even be a million dollar line.
The Jury. Colby leads off by asking if Russell thinks he made it here without luck. Russell says yes, and Colby calls him delusional. Colby then asks Parvati to defend her strategy, which she does by pointing to her double-Idol night. Coach calls Parvati "The Charmer," Russell "The Manipulator" and Sandra "The Coattail Rider." Coach tells Russell he should have been more penitent, tells Sandra that she played with weakness, but he tells Parvati that she was a warrior in challenges. Coach says he's taking his responsibility seriously. Amanda asks Sandra to defend her strategy, but Sandra gives the smart answer that if her strategy had been better, Russell would have been gone long ago. Sandra laments that Heroes wouldn't join her in voting Russell out. Courtney likes Sandra and praises Sandra's loyalty and gives her friend the chance to defend her loyalty. Well played Courtney, who sets 'em up and Sandra knocks 'em down. JT starts by telling Russell you can't win the game if you can't get the jury to vote. Russell thinks this jury will respect him. JT emphasizes he isn't out for vengeance. Danielle pops up and starts talking in a funny voice. Is she drunk? She points out Russell's lack of skill in his jury management and asks him if he'd change anything. Russell says no and says he refuses to tell them what they want to hear. He says that he doesn't regret anything he did and Danielle says, "That's too bad." Jerri wants an apology from Russell. Russell makes up some lie about how he couldn't beat her. Parvati, however, says that Russell told her that he was certain he'd get Jerri's vote. Russell doesn't even protest. Candice tells Russell that he told "dirty lies," tells Parvati that she was under Russell's thumb, like a spouse in a bad relationship. Candice says she's basing her vote on how people treated people. Rupert tells Russell that being honest in "Survivor" is hard and that to be manipulative and deceiving is easy. Rupert apologizes to Sandra and says he was swayed by "a disgusting human being," thanking her for helping. Rupert respects Parvati's effort, but has reservations about who she aligned with.
Post-Jury Read: It sure feels like Sandra has this one in the bag and that Parvati might get a couple random votes. It turns out that All-Stars might actually respect Russell's game play even less, because all of them have played the game before and they all understand what he never learned, the lesson of playing your game, but also knowing that there's going to be a jury at the end. I'm not sure which of those jury members could possibly vote for Russell. I can see Amanda and Danielle still voting for Parvati. Maybe one or two others? Sandra still wins, I'm assuming.
The Final Vote. Jerri decides to vote for Parvati, but at the last second. Candice votes for Sandra, saying she works hard and puts family first. Danielle votes for Parvati, because hot chicks have to stick together. Courtney gives Sandra a fist-bump and a vote. After long deliberation, Coach writes Parvati's name down, because she's a warrior adding "King Arthur's journey has officially ended." Rupert votes Sandra, of course. This could be a bit closer than I thought. But Russell getting shut out is gonna be awesome. Jeff exits Tribal Council and walks all the way to New York City.
And your winner... Jeff makes a speech about what a good season this has been and goes to read the votes: Parvati. Sandra. Parvati. Sandra. Parvati. Sandra. [Russell's gonna kill somebody.] Sandra. SANDRA IS THE WINNER. For the overall season, this was a more deserved win than Sandra's first win. It was, in fact, a totally deserved win, even if I was rooting for Parvati. Sandra Diaz-Twine is your first-ever two-time "Survivor" winner.
Bottom Line: This is a good result. Sandra was much more active in her second time through. She made several key moves, including getting Coach voted out. She also tried to swing the game in an entirely different strategic direction and when she couldn't sway the Heroes, she hung around and stayed in the game by doing it her way. That was a good season and a worthy winner.
What'd you think of the finale? And of Sandra as a winner?
A long-time member of the TCA Board and a longer-time blogger of "American Idol," Dan Fienberg writes about TV, except for when he writes about movies or sometimes writes about the Red Sox. But never music. He would sound stupid talking about music.
Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupbhietanen
May 16, 2010 at 11:02PM EST Reply to CommentI actually felt kinda bad for Russell. For how much Probst gloated for him last year he was torn apart in the finale. Russell played a great game two straight seasons, but again didn't show any respect for the jury members (especially this season) and therefore didn't deserve to win.
The more and more I think about it Sandra was very worthy of this win. I still think Parvati deserved to win more, but Sandra played the jury very well. Her bringing up that she tried to get the Hero's to turn on Russell and them not listening was a great one and I'm almost positive it swung her some votes.
When making the decision for best player ever Sandra and Parvati really are the only two you can consider. Parvati made three deep runs and perhaps would have won her first season if it wasn't for a double elimination challenge that swung Exile Island. Both proved how great they were this season and either would have been a worthy champion playing against the toughest cast in the history of the show.
Can't wait for next season, this one certainly is up there with the 1st and Fans vs Favorites as the best.
andythesaint
May 17, 2010 at 12:01AM EST Reply to CommentI think the underrated thing about Sandra's game (which often went unnoticed in discussions about Pearl Islands) is that she always has her finger on the pulse of what's happening in the game. You rarely see her voting the opposite way of how the game is going (other than the Rupert vote in PI, then the Tyson/Rob/Danielle votes here, where things should've been going the other way... she even voted for Courtney this season). It's an incredibly important skill for an under the radar player, and one that few seem to possess. She may not overly control the game (which isn't an option available to her anyway), but she's never lost in it either. I think tonight's win helps validate her win several years ago (although I always felt she was a worthy victor then as well).
Part of me was hoping she'd take credit for Coach's ouster, which is the biggest reason she made it to the end (without it, she would've been voted out pre-merge), but that would have cost her Coach's potential vote (which she didn't get anyway), and ruined her narrative of a misplaced Hero stuck with Villains, which was the perfect argument for this jury. Russell will never understand that at certain point in the game, he becomes a useful idiot, and Sandra correctly understood that positioning herself as the anti-Russell was her key to victory.
Adam B. Part of the reason why Sandra got minimal credit the first time around was that you had the alpha males in there -- Fairplay, Rupert and Savage -- and so she really did fly under the radar until Burton and Fairplay foolishly left the three remaining women together while the two of them went off for a reward. And then Sandra struck.
May 17, 2010 at 9:10AM ESTAnd even then, Sandra didn't win final immunity; Lill did on that great raft ("I do yoga") challenge, and I think that if Lill had been able to own (and not be ashamed of) her strategic play, she might've won.
andythesaint The only way Lill could've won is if she took Fairplay to the end, and even then, she probably would've lost. Everyone on the jury (except Burton, obviously) HATED the outcast twist, and were determined to not vote for one of them. Lill even sensed as much, which was one of the reasons she took Sandra to the end (she was basically decided who she wanted to win more, since she wasn't going to).
May 17, 2010 at 1:07PM ESTRich
May 17, 2010 at 3:05AM EST Reply to CommentDan - I think you may have missed a small but vital piece of information: at one point during this episode, Russell discussed his strategy in picking the finalists. During this little talk, he admitted that what he did last season did not work. I think he knew he had lost.
Sandra, by way of winning twice, is the best 'Survivor' player ever. Scoreboard. No other argument beats scoreboard.
semicolwin yes, thank you for pointing this out. I thought it was very telling that it appeared he believed he had lost his first season. A lot of people (myself included) had said he was playing as though he thought he'd won the first time around, but I remember at the reunion for Samoa, he talked about during the jury and in the subsequent weeks afterward, he could tell he wasn't going to win by how the jury acted toward him. Yet, his gameplay this season made it look like he thought he'd won.
May 17, 2010 at 9:59AM ESTflashman
May 17, 2010 at 5:14AM EST Reply to CommentSeeing Russell get to this point a second time explains why he was crying at the end of last season when he lost. Had he been slightly less obnoxious that time he could have won, whereas this time he kept playing hard long after he needed to and burned every single bridge. I'm actually a big fan of his take no prisoners strategy since it tends to punch up the middle parts of the season that can drag a bit, but he's definitely a fool for failing to realize that people responded negatively to him well before the jury vote. Had he had some time off after his first loss before returning he might have had a better shot at the jury part of the game, but then no one would give him the opportunity to ever get there.
Next time they do a season with returning players I want them to bring back all the people who were the first to get knocked out, and give them all a chance to actually show what they could have done. It would be interesting to see whether their teams were right or wrong to knock them out the first time around, and might actually change early game strategy in future if anything surprising comes about. Every single person would have something to prove, and especially in trying not to be the first out two times. I just wish they'd stop trying to pretend there's anything interesting in picking another tropical/semi-tropical location every damn time, and then withholding whatever the twist will be - people watching till the end of the reunion show will likely be tuning in next season, so saving a twist for promos in the fall is kind of pointless with that audience.
semicolwin the idea of bringing back the first one out of each season is a GREAT idea. I'm not sure how many of them they would/could get, since at least early on in the game's history, it was the norm to vote out the oldest person first. Those people would now be even older and possibly unwilling to play again, but I think in theory, this is an awesome idea.
May 17, 2010 at 10:39AM ESTbhietanen I thought of the same idea, but people who go first are usually weak and old and at this point they will be... weaker and older. How about a season where people who never made the jury are on instead?
May 17, 2010 at 12:11PM ESTJonathan
May 17, 2010 at 10:29AM EST Reply to Commentthe "move" that sandra made by swaying russel to vote out coach was not her doing! russel knew that the heroes thought there was a female alliance, so coach had to go. russel was playing to have all the heroes on his side when they merged, and it even got jt to give him the idol! sandra's main goal throughout the game (she even said it), was to get russel out! russel not only made it to the end, but he chose the 2 people he wanted to get there with. he got robbed once again.
semicolwin I'm in the camp that says Russell got robbed the first time around. However, this time, and especially at the reunion hearing him say that he doesn't care about pleasing the jury, I'd have to say he was not robbed. He learned nothing from his first time around (and technically was at a disadvantage because, even though he sensed it, he couldn't be sure he had won or lost) about the social side of the game. Jeff made a great point when Russell said America should have a portion of the vote, in saying that isn't the game of Survivor. Russell knew what he was signing up for. He knew that you have to be cut-throat enough to get to the end, but then you have to get the people you eliminated to like you enough to give you the money.
May 17, 2010 at 10:33AM ESTsemicolwin *oops, hit return too soon*
May 17, 2010 at 10:38AM ESTThe first time around, Russell kept his alliance of four intact, whereas this time, he got rid of Danielle, one of his original alliance-mates. The first time around, many of the cocky, sometimes mean comments he made about other players were made during the solo interview ("talking head") with the camera, whereas this time, he said many of those things directly to the person's face.
I definitely think playing back-to-back hurt him in the long run, because he lost whatever little bit of subtlety his game had the first time around. Like Rob said, he plays to get to the end, but not to win, because he makes too many enemies and not enough friends, and doesn't even seem to care until it bites him in the ass.
Jonathan it seems to me that there are only a few ways to get to the end of survivor. you either have to back stab people and be the leader of an alliance, you have to be that leader's right hand person, or you just have to do nothing a float through. i personally think that the leader who is in charge of getting every single person out should win. i thought that the all stars would respect the person who voted every single one of them out, but they didn't, and that's why i'm disappointed. i guess it's a flaw of the survivor game that you just have to be a quiet girl who gets lucky and gets in the right alliance to win in the end. sandra could have been any other girl on the show, but russel chose to keep her. no one else could have done what russel did throughout the entire game. he got rid of danielle because he saw that her and parv were close and he wanted 3 girls who didn't really like each other with him in the final 4 just in case he didn't get immunity. i think if he could have scripted out the game before he went into the season, he would have chosen the exact same people to leave every week. no one else could say the same.
May 17, 2010 at 10:56AM ESTJonathan and i know that there is a social component of the game, but shouldn't it be said that they guy who was able to control so many people played a good social game? i kind of view russel in the same pantheon of reality players as dr will from big brother. there really was no difference in their game (they both had alliances with everyone, and back-stabbed them all), but the only difference between them is that will is a good-looking, funny, young guy and he was easier to vote for because the jury is fine to lose to someone like him. no one wants to think that they got out witted by a redneck, bald, old man.
May 17, 2010 at 11:06AM ESTbhietanen There is a difference between being a great player who has a hand in eliminating all the players while saying not being a total ass to the jury members (Todd in China) and being a total ass and rubbing it in. Russell flat out rubbed it in to people and acted like an ass at tribal council in front of the jury. You simply can't win if you act that mean to people (and you shouldn't) even if you play a great strategic game.
May 17, 2010 at 12:19PM ESTI felt he got robbed last season (even though he did come off as an ass to people, just not as bad), but this year he didn't deserve to win. If you eliminate the extremely important social feature from you're gameplay (which he admitted) its impossible to win.
Jonathan but we've got to the point that the social aspect is worth 99% and strategy is worth 1%. if we go back to the beginning of survivor when the criteria was "outwit, outplay, outlast", then russel would've won hands down. with this new scoring system of the social was 33%, physical 33%, and strategy 33%, we would've had sandra with a little more than parv with social, russel with almost all of the strategy points (with 1% going to parv for when she played to idols), and physical being split between russel and parv. I would give sandra 29%, parv 31%, and russel 40%. no matter how you break it down, sandra shouldn't have more than 33%, and should never have won.
May 17, 2010 at 12:50PM ESTsemicolwin Russell being able to control people does not equate to him playing a good social game. A social game means that even though you may have backstabbed them, they still 'like' you enough to vote for you. Russell's game is based on fear and intimidation (as well as being one step ahead strategically), which makes the game less fun for everyone else to play, as they constantly feel like they have to tip-toe around Russell to not set off his paranoia.
May 17, 2010 at 1:06PM ESTAs far as your percentages, I think Parv gets more than 1% of the strategizing. The double idol may have been her signature strategy moment, but like she said at final tribal, she was one of, if not the biggest threat in many people's minds coming into the game. She found an alliance almost out of desperation (as no one else wanted to align with her), and when she realized Russell was willing to make many of the bigger moves, regardless of if it pissed people off (and especially because they also benefited her), she was smart enough to stay on his good side. Then, even though she was scheming with him the whole time, all the animosity from the blindsides and backstabbing was projected onto Russell, and not her.
semicolwin *of course I hit return too soon again*
May 17, 2010 at 1:19PM ESTHonestly, in this season, the smartest place to be was on Russell's good side, and for the most part, only she and Jerri realized that. That is a good strategy. She also was Russell's main confidant, meaning she was at least getting to have some influence on who would be voted out.
I also think Parvati gets more of the physical percentage than Russell. Twice she won immunity when it would have been her going home, and as Jeff said, she's tied for second in most challenges won. She is constantly near the top of any of the stamina challenges.
And I personally think Parvati's social game was the best, but only because I think her gameplay style made it so she had to work harder to stay on people's good sides. Sandra didn't really play a game that would piss people off (except Russell), whereas Parvati aligned with the #1 villain and had a hand in many of the big votes, yet she was fairly well liked, and Russell was not. However, seeing how the vote went, Sandra in reality obviously does edge her out socially.
I think if Russell played Heroes vs. Villains with some more subtlety (and I only mean as much as he had in his first season), for example saving his harsher comments for the solo interviews with the cameras, and kept his WITS about him better, then he had a good chance to win. But when everyone on the jury thinks he crossed a line (and especially when he wouldn't cop to this fact) and wouldn't vote for him, then he failed at the social (I guess essentially the OUTWIT portion) part of the game.
semicolwin Oh, and if it wasn't obvious, I thought Parvati should have won.
May 17, 2010 at 1:23PM ESTJonathan I am more fine with Parvati winning than Sandra. The only reason I can't completely agree with her winning over Russell is that if Russell picked a different sidekick (say, Danielle) it wouldve been him, danielle, and Sandra in the final. However, if Parvati latched onto a different guy, she wouldn't have been there. I also think that survivor needs to go back to the 2 person final. In this 3 person format it is too easy to get to the en without making any strategic moves and just being nice to everyone.
May 17, 2010 at 2:39PM ESTHobart The flaw in Russell's game is his ego. He is unwilling to admit that luck and the play of others have an impact on the game. Tom, Colby and Boston Rob all of whom DOMINATED a season have all talked about how important luck was in their game and Russell only made it to the end of this season due to Tyson and JT's boneheaded moves (which Russell had little more than a minor hand in) and the obvious desire of everyone by the end to keep him in the game because he couldn't win.
May 17, 2010 at 3:24PM ESTJury members like to have their egos stroked and Russell refused to admit that anyone else in the game was even playing.
Alex
December 14, 2012 at 11:11PM EST Reply to CommentRussell should have won. He played the most dominating game. Sandra was an awful winner. She didn't do anything. As for the Coach elimination, he was going home anyway, to maintain the illusion of an all female alliance.
Rick
December 14, 2012 at 11:16PM EST Reply to CommentWhat a terrible winner Sandra was. Russell was robbed both times. The jury should put aside likeability, and vote solely based on who played the best game which was HANDS DOWN RUSSELL!!
Nate
December 14, 2012 at 11:18PM EST Reply to CommentI can't believe it. The jury is given 2 great players they can vote for (Parvati and Russell) and one uselss player, and they vote for the useless player. I would have voted for Russell, but Parvati would also have made a great winner. The jury was a bunch of bitter babies.