Cannes Film Festival 2013

Recap: 'Fringe' - 'The Firefly'

A visit to a musician sparks new fears in Walter about the fate of Peter.

<p>John Noble and Michael Cerveris of 'Fringe'</p>

John Noble and Michael Cerveris of 'Fringe'

Credit: FOX

Let’s get the obvious out of the way up front: dubbing the return episode of “Fringe” as “The Firefly” is a pretty good joke. It keys in nicely with FOX’s marketing strategy to make Fridays not simply another victim in the so-called “death slot.” (Incidentally? “Death slot” is a phrase I am so loath to use I feel like I just consumed some of Walter Bishop’s special milk that so does NOT make a body feel good.) But we’re not here as leaves on the wind, findin’ trouble in the ‘verse. We’re here to talk about “Fringe,” and the slam-bang return that was tonight’s episode.

[Full recap of said episode after the break…]

Lots of talk during the start of the fifth season of “Lost” centered around the popular meme that the show was finally letting its freak flag fly. In some ways, I get what people meant, but never understood how THEN was the point that people decided that stuff on “Lost” was truly weird. I imagine a lot of words will be spent on how the Friday slot will allow “Fringe” to hoist a similar flag, but what the Friday slot is really going to do is enforce what’s been working all along for the better part of a year now on the show. Some programs thrive on procedural storytelling. “Fringe” absolutely does not. By forgoing typical “monster of the week” eps and making each individual episode set against the backdrop of a multiverse war, “Fringe” found its voice, a voice that will only grow stronger in this new slot.

That means tons of continuity that would lead casual observers slack-jawed trying to pick up the various threads at play in “The Firefly.” Tonight’s episode introduced new aspects to familiar faces, but didn’t try and really bring newbies up to real speed. Characters reference events of the past, but not in overly dumbed-down monologues designed to recapitulate the plot. Events stretching as far back as the first handful of episodes through “Marionette” were sprinkled in to tonight’s story. “Fringe” has never truly held audiences’ hands since going headlong into the multiverse saga, even with better time slots and stronger lead-ins to earn larger sets of eyeballs. There sure as hell isn’t a reason to start now.

Most hours of “Fringe,” or dramas, for that matter, feature an antagonist that sets events in motion over which the protagonist must triumph. “The Firefly” asks this question: What if the protagonist and antagonist are the same? There’s no external threat during the hour, merely a host of broken people that need to move past their current psychological states in order to complete the work ahead. After the drama/trauma of the Over Here/Over There episodes, Olivia and Company seek to return to their “normal” lives, but find themselves hopelessly out of sync. They need to find a better frequency. Or, perhaps, a better tune.

Want More...

Fringe?
  • Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

Enter Roscoe Joyce, aka Christopher Lloyd, aka Doc Brown. Who better to tell a time-travel tell of woe than good ol’ Doc himself? Joyce looks like the undernourished love child of Graham Nash and Lukas Haas, and is used by The Observer to set up a type of Rube Goldberg machine involving the Bishop Boys. What the game truly is defines the central mystery of the show, a game that helps illuminate several key things about The Observer that I’m not sure we fully knew until tonight. To wit: 1) he sees all possible futures at once, but doesn’t know which one is THE future, because 2) he himself has limited ability to see the future on a micro level, which 3) gives him a heretofore unseen emotive reaction to the damage he unwittingly caused by saving Walter and Peter after they crossed over in 1985 from the other universe. (See what I mean about lack of hand holding?)

What ensues is a combination of past episodes “White Tulip” and “The Plateau.” The latter is represented by the insanely complex set of machinations put in place by The Observer to ensure that Anton Chekov’s milkshake only brings Peter Bishop to the yard. (And he’s like, it’s better than “UHHHH!”) The former is represented by the touching, and oddly heartbreaking, connection between Walter and Roscoe. Walter has of course seen the devastation that his interference has cost, but just like The Observer, he has only see it in grand examples such as ambered city blocks and zeppelins over Manhattan. He has never conceived of the individual, atomic ways in which his paternal love/possessiveness/hubris affected individuals. (In some ways, this episode could have easily been called “The Butterfly,” though that probably would have tipped the show’s narrative hand straight off.)

While The Observer’s plan ultimately spared Walter’s life, it also in some ways potentially renewed it as well. Walter’s prime directive stands to prevent loss: it’s a continually possessive stance that seeks to stop the loss of Peter. It’s not a way to live so much as a way to prevent death. Which isn’t much of a life at all. Similarly, both Peter and Olivia are also in in-between states, neither of them sure what their places are either in either world or each other’s lives. “If You Meet The Buddha on the Road, Kill Him!” is about self-discovery, but both are past in the point in which their do-it-alone ethos isn’t going to cut it anymore. Seeing the elderly couple s happy in Roscoe’s hospital only enforced the current gulf between them.

“The Firefly” wasn’t about moving the pieces forward so much as prepping those pieces for the game that’s about to start. When done poorly, episodes such as this feel like placeholders, unnecessary pauses, a way for a show to drag out an episode requirement that exceeds their storytelling capacity. But “The Firefly” is in many ways a resetting of the “Fringe” universe, not only in terms of the timeslot itself but the luxuries that the slot could potentially afford. To bring up “Lost” one more time, it’s time for the show to make its own kind of music. Why not have a musician help them along the way?

 

Other stray thoughts about tonight’s episode:

*** Piero Umiliani’s “"Mah Nà Mah Nà" playing while Walter creates Super Brain Serum? Faaantastic. I want an episode where he does acid, puts on those funky glasses from tonight, and performs with The Muppets.

*** According to Amazon, “If You Meet The Buddha on the Road, Kill Him!” is, “A synthesis of myth, philosophy and literature that illuminates the true nature of psychotherapy and the journey toward self-discovery.” You know how to charm the ladies with your sexy gifts, Peter.

*** I originally heard “Violet Sedan Chair” as “Violent Sedan Chair,” which gave me horrifying visions of Christopher Lloyd as Iggy Pop, shirtless and bleeding onstage.

*** Speaking of Lloyd, dude just KILLED tonight. Almost every line reading elicited either a smile or a tear. Some favorites: “Tuesday…Tuesday is chicken dinner!” “Brain mapping? Sounds like a good name for an album.” And my favorite: “But I played again! It felt good! It felt right! Maybe that’s why Bobby came back again.”

*** Walter called Astrid “Ashram” tonight, which is pretty accurate when compared to Roscoe’s guess of “Kelly.”

*** My least appropriate reaction of the night? Hearing Peter Bishop ask, “Ever feel like every time we get close to getting the answers, somebody changes the question?” and immediately shouting at the screen, “Oh my God, Rowdy Roddy Piper is behind this whole thing?”(The former WWE star once interviewed a jobber Frankie Williams on “Piper’s Pit,” and after beating him up, shouted at the camera, “Just when they think they've got the answers, I change the questions." I feel like you need to know these things.)

What did you think of tonight’s return of “Fringe”? How many of you stayed in to watch? How worried are you about the show’s future on Fridays? Leave your thoughts below!

 

 

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    aby

    No mention of the Twin Peaks shout out with the two different colored glasses and naming Dr. Jacoby. It was my favorite moment of episode.

    January 22, 2011 at 12:28AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Chrissy Aw, you beat me. Very cool little bit.

      January 22, 2011 at 12:50AM EST
    • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

      Mulderism I was wondering about that too.

      January 23, 2011 at 2:25AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    OldDarth

    Hey Ryan - great write up!

    No thoughts on the Observer's 'Tough to be a father,' statement to Peter?

    January 22, 2011 at 12:36AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Darren Yeah, I wondered the same!!! No reaction to that Ryan?

      January 22, 2011 at 2:12AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ed W It seemed like a fairly straightforward comment about what he thought Walter was about to go through losing a son.

      January 22, 2011 at 7:22AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      MattC For a moment I thought I that might be reference to Peter being a father, but I agree that it was probably directed at walter's plight.

      January 22, 2011 at 4:29PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    geoff

    I loved the "Twin Peaks" reference to a Dr. Jacoby at the University of Washington by Walter as he wore the 3D polarized lens glasses. Great stuff.

    January 22, 2011 at 12:42AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    trebornedies

    No kidding... as soon as I saw those glasses, I thought Dr. Jacoby. Then they mention him by name and say he's from the state of Washington (from a little town--called Twin Peaks!) I immediately shouted at the TV -- Hah! I love this show.

    January 22, 2011 at 12:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Chrissy

    Lots of neat stuff in tonight's episode. I found myself wondering what Peter would be like had he been raised by Walternate, and how that world is different for the lack of him (besides the obvous ways). It's interesting that, rather than focus on the big macro changes that Walter's actions caused, The Observer was able to find a smaller, more personal ripple that would resonate with Walter specifically (the loss of a son, but also the loss of music and the will to make it). That Observer is a fine judge of people, weirdly

    January 22, 2011 at 12:54AM EST Reply to Comment


  • Unfortunately the premise of your entire review - that the title and story of the episode is a shout out to the show Firefly, and that the story is a representation of how the show prepares to adjust itself in its' new timeslot - is completely wrong. The story of the Firefly as described by the observer was first put out to the public on November 16th on hulu, entitled Fringe Graphic Novel. It was five chapters that concluded on december 10th. I guess, "nice...try...though...?"

    January 22, 2011 at 1:21AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Hwat And your text is supposed to prove what?

      January 22, 2011 at 8:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kyle Even though the story of the little girl chasing the firefly was already established, it's still possible that the producers had another title in mind, and only changed it upon learning of the switch to Friday nights.

      January 23, 2011 at 2:00PM EST
    • The premise of the review is based around his belief that "Fringe” found its voice, a voice that will only grow stronger in this new slot." The implication being that this awesome episode can be used as an example of the storytellers now have new direction. But that is flat out wrong. When he states, "this episode could have easily been called 'The Butterfly,' though that probably would have tipped the show’s narrative hand straight off," he is directly implying that this episode exists as constructed because of the time shift, leading the reader to think, "maybe the time shift WILL be good for the show." Whether or not changes in narrative end up occuring have NOTHING to do with this episode. Simple. He had his story made and used the show to fit the story rather than the other way around. It is simply laziness.

      January 24, 2011 at 6:07PM EST


  • Unfortunately the premise of your entire review - that the title and story of the episode is a shout out to the show Firefly, and that the story is a representation of how the show prepares to adjust itself in its' new timeslot - is completely wrong. The story of the Firefly as described by the observer was first put out to the public on November 16th on hulu, entitled Fringe Graphic Novel. It was five chapters that concluded on december 10th. I guess, "nice...try...though...?".

    January 22, 2011 at 1:22AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Matt

    The Observers have to be the First People, right? Ones who survived? The people before the dinosaurs who built the ancient technology about to destroy or save the universes?

    It's the only thing that makes sense.

    January 22, 2011 at 1:23AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Now imagine just blurting that out to a large gathering

      January 22, 2011 at 2:25AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jenfullmoon I agree.

      January 22, 2011 at 2:47AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tausif Khan They could also be "The Powers that Be" or the people who manage the divide between the (at least) two universes.

      January 22, 2011 at 4:48AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      MattC I think Sam Weiss is going to be one of the first people ...

      January 22, 2011 at 4:31PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ed W They came across as robots to me. Catching the bullets in mid-air was more like some type of android than what I'd imagine the first people to be like. Not that I have much evidence to back it up. :)

      January 22, 2011 at 5:47PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    I haven't watched Fringe on television before but I am hooked now.

    Two things that got me ready for tonight's episode:

    1)Fox replayed Fringe @ 11 pm after it's local news.

    2) Hulu helped tremendously. It's clip features of "Just the Facts" helped me understand the mythos so I would not be lost. The show clips/motion comic helped as well and definitely having the last few episodes to watch as well.

    I am a sci fi fan. However, sometimes I avoid sci fi shows I haven't seen before because the mythos gets so complicated later on in a series. These simple features helped me catch up on and get into a show that I was not already watching. It made me find something great.

    Because of this I now think it is a great show.

    January 22, 2011 at 4:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ed W

    'What ensues is a combination of past episodes “White Tulip” and “The Plateau.” '

    Yep. Good point.

    I wasn't as moved as I was supposed to be by Walter realizing he had inadvertently caused the death of the man's son when the show had already established that what Walter did in saving Peter had wreaked havoc and caused untold damage and death in the other universe. The show had already been there, done that emotionally on a greater scale.

    I'd call the episode good, not great. I don't think we're going to get back to great ones till later in the season. After seeing how well she can act in another variation on the role, I have less patience for boring and wooden Olivia.

    January 22, 2011 at 7:32AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    rhys1882

    What's interesting about the Observer's little plan was that if Walter didn't give Peter the keys (i.e., show that he was willing to let Peter risk death) Walter would have drank the milk and died. So there was basically a failsafe built into the plan. Either Walter shows he is willing to sacrifice Peter (the failing that led Walter to damage Earth-2 by crossing over) or he dies - removing him from the equation regarding whatever is going to happen between the two universes in the future. My question is, would Walter would have died regardless of whether the Observer got involved? I guess Walter's death really would've been the ultimate result of all of the events put into motion by the Observer in the first place.

    January 22, 2011 at 6:58PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Elisângela

    I liked of this episode 10,Firefly, there was mistery, feelings,conflict, love and father and son, love and Peter and Olive, both understanding each other. Walter fighting for Peter. And observers with very much mistery. In this episode there was too action,good. Very good episode s03e10 Firefly. Very good.And there was poetry, beauty and mistery lines . Only hope Peter and Walter don't die.

    January 22, 2011 at 11:10PM EST Reply to Comment
  • S602160292_2076173_4167_talkback_profile

    studioplant

    My wife sat down and watched the episode with me. It was her first episode. She knew what was going on through the whole episode, and got caught up in the moment when Walter realized he killed Doc Brown's son. She is looking forward to next week's episode.

    January 23, 2011 at 6:04PM EST Reply to Comment


  • I found the "it's tough to be a father comment" interesting because it seems like the Observers don't seem to have that sort of relationship. That's a highly speculative guess, but we've seen no females, all the observers seem adult, and based on the episode "August" it seems they rarely die, plus the whole non-linear relationship to time thing.

    January 23, 2011 at 9:19PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Reid Don't forget the child from the S1 episode Inner Child. We still haven't learned any more about who that kid could be, but we are certainly led to believe he was a baby Observer.

      January 26, 2011 at 7:36PM EST

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web