Cannes Film Festival 2013

Recap: 'Battlestar Galactica' goes for camp with 'The Oath'

Gaeta may be the show's worst villain ever as the show ends on a cliffhanger spoiled in next episode's preview

Laura Roslin before cancer forced her to wear an unfortunately fake looking wig.

Laura Roslin before cancer forced her to wear an unfortunately fake looking wig.

Credit: Sci-Fi Channel


Yeesh.

Anyone getting that sinking feeling that perhaps "BSG" has gone on one half a season too long? 

As with any serialized series, there is always the chance that the storyline gets so immense and complicated that it veers off track as the writers try to steer their way to a satisfactory resolution.  That hasn't been a problem for "Galactica" so far, but the last few episodes are showing serious strains in the direction of the series.  A coup attempt drawn out over three episodes?  Really?  It just feels like filler at this point.

The weakest link in this whole scenario has been making Gaeta the series' latest villain.  It would be one thing if the one-legged Colonial officer had some true motivation, but his reasoning sounds like a spoiled teenager than anything else.  Making things more frustrating (and we haven't talked about how the show's first gay, er, bi male character is a freakin' bad guy) is that Alessandro Juliani is not a strong enough actor to pull this off.  Perhaps that's why Moore and Eick resisted bringing Gaeta to the forefront for so long?  It's as if Sulu finally became captain of the Excelsior, but sucked (which obviously wasn't the case). 

This episode's "revolution" also featured way too many scenes that bordered on pure camp.  The show started off strong with Tigh's private shock, wonderfully understated by Michael Hogan, at Roslin's breakfast appearance in Adama's cell after some obvious hanky panky.

Besides Juliani's unconvincing evil turn, how about Saul and Adama acting like two action heroes out of a Bruckheimer flick?  Gutsy, unexpected, and fun for sure, but such an easy out plot wise.

More campy fun? How about the witty tête-à-tête between Baltar and Roslin where they both admit that they might be frauds? And while any longtime viewer truly doubts Roslin thinks that, it's one of the episodes more inspired exchanges.  Plus, it was a nice to see Baltar hasn't changed his spots and is relieved to get our of his cult at any opportunity, as dangerous as the current circumstances are.  And his call to Gaeta towards the end of the episode seemed like an oddly placed bit of foreshadowing, but of what is unclear.  You just know he's somehow going to be involved in Gaeta's eventual fate.

And can we even talk about Katee Sackhoff forgetting she isn't shooting "Bionic Woman" anymore?  She hasn't shown any depth to her character (whatever Starbuck currently is) since her "resurrection" last season.  We love the Sackhoff, but it's clear she was counting the days while they shot this.

(Also, what was with Jamie Bamber this episode?  Was he sick during shooting or something?  He sounds stuffed up half the time.)

So, like a great space opera the episode ends on a big cliffhanger which really isn't one once you watch the next chapter's preview. Still..

[Spoilers ahead]

Can Adama and Tigh survive alone vs. a whole squadron?  Will they die in an explosion? (Again, it appears so).

And what does Roslin's "I'm coming for all of you!" mean? Besides the fact she sounds like she was just possessed by the devil? And would it not be a fitting end to Gaeta to have his death at the greatest traitor of all, Baltar?

On to next week's "Blood on the Scales." Ominous indeed.

Greg-ellwood-sm
Gregory Ellwood
Editor-in-Chief, Co-Founder
With over a decade of experience in the movie industry, Ellwood survived working for two major studios and has written for Variety, MSN and the LA Times. A co-founder of HitFix, Ellwood spends his time relaxing hitting 3’s on the basketball court and following his beloved Clippers.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    rdh381act

    Um, you are completely wrong! One of the best eps. ever. Never coming back to this sight.

    January 31, 2009 at 11:34AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    AceHoly

    I have rarely seen a review so totally off track. This episode was riveting... clearly you either haven't watched much BSG or simply don't get it.

    January 31, 2009 at 4:31PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    AceHoly

    And if you HONESTLY THINK that the coming attractions REALLY tell the story about what happens in next week's episode, you really aren't fit to critique TV. It's called a "tease."

    January 31, 2009 at 4:32PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Hanks_talkback_profile

    Fletcher Hanks

    Like most television in America, this show has been on too long. Of course, fans are programmed to never let go of their beloved shows (and the producers' accountants have them programmed to never give up on easy money). I mean, after about season 3 of SEINFELD, the show basically just remade previous episodes with all the same types of situations that happened before, complete with remanufactured jokes. That kind of thing is only interesting if you have a short attention span.

    February 1, 2009 at 6:41AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    AceHoly

    Fletcher Hanks has no idea what he's talking about. Three years? Guess he's not seen the brilliant television coming out of the LOST camp this season (and last). This has NOTHING to do with Fans being "programmed" (and what an idiotic thing to say). If any television shows go past their prime, you can blame the networks for trying to milk the last dime out of a franchise... and yet, those same networks fall down totally when it comes to recognizing brilliant and/or unique shows (Pushing Daisies, Journeyman among others) that don't catch an audience in the first week.

    Fletcher, simply because YOU have a short attention span don't presume that others who enjoy a quality TV show that can run many seasons (The Simpsons certainly was good past 3 seasons... in fact, probably didn't hit its stride until after three) have to share your ADHD.

    February 1, 2009 at 11:56AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Photo_15_talkback_profile

    Jordo

    Uh, were we watching the same show? The review and the episode don't seem to match up!

    February 1, 2009 at 2:22PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Hanks_talkback_profile

    Fletcher Hanks

    My comment on "three years" applied to sitcoms and episodic drama, and even then it is a generalization (welcome to the Internet, generalizations happen). You have mentioned several shows that are exceptions to my remarks: THE SIMPSONS broke new ground because it was a primetime animated show...obviously that would take sometime for the writers to "get" the formula that has developed. LOST is another exception because they are telling an unfolding story. LOST is just a very long mini-series. And by the way, NONE of my comments really applied to your spaceships-on-the-run show. But, you see, television has been around along time, and the majority of "hits" stay on way too long. The fact that fans still want to see "Jack Bauer" running around doing essentially the same thing he did in year one and two proves my point. Perhaps you are an exception, sir, but quite a few fans out there "love" the characters on these shows (which, if you were to study this problem further, is exactly WHY sitcoms stay on as long as they do...the whole "Jumping The Shark" issue is the direct result of idiots still watching a show because they are used to spending Thursday night with their "friends". SEX & THE CITY is another example...so are all soap operas). In fact, fans love their precious characters so much that even after a show DOES go off the air...they start demanding MOVIES featuring the characters. This is the "programming" part I mentioned. After you read a novel, do you immediately want another one with the same characters? Of course this is done...to sell books. The prime example of all I have said concerning this network fatigue syndrome is LAW & ORDER. Finally, my point, which was just a reply to the review for a particular episode (and commenting on how a show may be on television too long), is that producers don't know when to pull the plug and viewers don't know when to move on. It's not a matter of ADD, it's a matter of recognizing that a current episode is simply mimicking a previous episode.

    February 1, 2009 at 7:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    AceHoly

    Fletcher, sir, again you whip open your intellectual raincoat and reveal the embarrassingly meager equipment concealed beneath. You blame the "idiot" fans for loving characters and that's why television shows stay on longer than three years. Yet, those SAME fans are the ones that COINED the phrase "Jump the Shark" (and others like it) to describe when their favorite TV shows drop significantly in quality. And quality, sir, is what drives viewership, not idiocy of viewers or their being "programmed" to watch whether a show is good or not. Caught "Heroes" lately? For a show that was gangbusters in its debut season, it's now teetering on cancellation because the show's quality is swirling the bowl. A result of viewer "idiocy?" HARDLY. So your postulations here simply don't hold water. As to this week's riveting episode of Battlestar Galactica "mimicking" a previous episode? Odd, I don't recall a previous episode where full scale mutiny occurs. The military has always had a tenuous relationship with the civilian government on BSG throughout the run because it requires a military solution to simply stay alive. Do pay attention, Fletcher.

    February 2, 2009 at 8:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    tommyc

    February 2, 2009 at 6:12PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web