Trey Parker and Matt Stone tripped acid at the Oscars in 2000

Imagine if they won and had to accept in those dresses?

<p>Trey Parker (far left) and Matt Stone (far right) make J-Lo and Paltrow proud with their 2000 homage...with a little Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds for added effect.</p>

Trey Parker (far left) and Matt Stone (far right) make J-Lo and Paltrow proud with their 2000 homage...with a little Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds for added effect.

Are you a fan of Academy Awards?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

One of the cooler Oscar nominations of recent memory was the Best Original Song recognition Trey Parker and Marc Shaiman received for the ditty "Blame Canada" from 1999's "South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut." And one of the more eye-popping moments of an Oscar telecast was when Parker and Matt Stone showed up to the ceremony in March of 2000 decked out in dresses similar to those worn by Jennifer Lopez and Gwyneth Paltrow at previous Oscar ceremonies.

While visiting David Letterman back in March, the duo copped to "Sheening" at the Oscars that year, in reference to bad boy Charlie Sheen, who was very much in the news for his shenanigans at the time of their Late Night appearance. "We were just Sheening our heads off," Parker said at the time. No explanation of the drug of choice, though given the association, many thought they were coked out of their minds. Well, they wanted to set the record straight when they appeared on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" last night.

Settle down, everyone. They weren't using cocaine that night. They were just flying high on a little acid, okay? Click through to see the section of the interview where they discuss the trippy night.

 

 

Kristopher-tapley-sm
Kristopher Tapley
Editor-at-Large
Kristopher Tapley has covered the film awards landscape for over a decade. He founded In Contention in 2005. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, The Times of London and Variety. He begs you not to take any of this too seriously.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Yucca

    Oh look at me, I'm hip and cool because I tripped on acid during the Oscars. This is making headlines because?

    September 30, 2011 at 2:18PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Because I thought it was funny. It needed your comment because? I mean, after all, it's SUCH a pointless post.

      September 30, 2011 at 5:26PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jh You read it. It must be important to you. I think it's hilarious.

      October 18, 2011 at 8:26AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tyler It's making headlines because you're not a famous person who thought of doing it.

      January 8, 2012 at 6:16AM EST
  • Guypic_talkback_profile

    Guy Lodge

    If I were nominated, I don't think I'd be able to get through the Oscars entirely sober -- I'd probably draw the line at acid, but hey, whatever works for them.

    Thanks for reminding us what a fantastic nomination this was. That they (and Aimee Mann) lost out to a phoned-in Phil Collins ballad from a below-par Disney movie is really regrettable, and a reminder of how much more eccentric the Best Original Song category has grown in recent years -- I'm pretty sure they'd win today.

    September 30, 2011 at 3:45PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Tye-Grr I agree, Guy. I think they'd have a much better chance of winning now. In fact, I'm surprised (pleasantly) that they were even nominated then.

      September 30, 2011 at 4:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JLPatt Nah, the Collins tune is good and "Tarzan" was one of Disney's better latter 90s offerings. But I agree that Mann should have won.

      September 30, 2011 at 5:19PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    wisconsinkel

    Great bit of retrospective news...other than the fact that Matt Stone was not nominated. Trey Parker was nominated for his collaboration with Marc Shaiman on this song

    September 30, 2011 at 5:14PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Ah. Very true.

      September 30, 2011 at 5:27PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JLPatt

    Ugh, these guys are so annoying. Go away!

    September 30, 2011 at 5:15PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Joe W How are they annoying? I find this duo to be one of the most refreshing, level-headed, and hilarious pair in Hollywood.

      September 30, 2011 at 7:38PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JLPatt Questionable political standings and arrogant, too-cool-for-school demeanor. Also their show hasn't been good in years yet they still act like they're the stuff. They just rub me the wrong way I guess.

      September 30, 2011 at 8:44PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Frank Lee Would people who find annoying the "questionable political standings" of liberal celebrities be justified in having a similar childish reaction? By the way, you make it sound like Stone and Parker are getting by on fumes these days. In fact, they have the most popular and acclaimed musical on Broadway right now.

      September 30, 2011 at 11:46PM EST
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Yeah, they kind of are "the stuff" if you hang around the Eugene O'Neill Theatre.

      October 1, 2011 at 1:01PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Fitz

    I'm really curious where this next season of South Park will go. Especially after the downer of last season.

    September 30, 2011 at 6:14PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      DB I also feel like the last season was a let down but I have a feeling they have been busy with their musical. I have higher hopes for next season.

      October 1, 2011 at 1:11PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DB I also feel like the last season was a let down but I have a feeling they have been busy with their musical. I have higher hopes for next season.

      October 1, 2011 at 1:11PM EST
  • Dsc00002_talkback_profile

    loyal_mehnert

    Trey Parker would be one step closer to his EGOT if it weren't for Phil Collins.

    September 30, 2011 at 6:17PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      MN What? EGOT? Do you mean his ego? If you did, I still wouldn't understand what you're saying.

      October 18, 2011 at 8:30AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      S MN EGOT = E mmy G olden globe O scar T ony :-)

      January 13, 2012 at 7:09AM EST
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
UPDATED: FEB 25, 2013

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

News From Our Partners