Cannes Film Festival 2013

Streep defends subjective politics of 'Iron Lady'

Fresh off her NYFCC win, star insists her film is 'not a biopic'

<p>Meryl Streep plays Margaret Thatcher in "The Iron Lady."</p>

Meryl Streep plays Margaret Thatcher in "The Iron Lady."

Credit: The Weinstein Company

Are you a fan of In Contention?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

Unlike my esteemed colleague, I must admit I was pretty thrilled with the outcome of yesterday's New York Film Critics' Circle Awards -- within the bracket of likely Oscar contenders, they picked the most formally adventurous and openly lovable option for their top prize, recognizing that it's principally its director's achievement to boot. Awards for supporting performances, foreign language film and cinematography were all as well-deserved as they were predictable, and if Brad Pitt's Best Actor prize came as a surprise, it's good see a major star rewarded for raising his game in worthy projects.

The one major award I was less than pleased with, you probably won't be surprised to hear, was Meryl Streep's Best Actress prize for "The Iron Lady" -- her fifth win with the Gotham crowd. The performance, I suppose, is accomplished enough (though far from the most inspired or affecting work in the category this year), but it's surrounded by a film so muddled and misguided as to steer even its expert star into the wrong tonal territory on occasion.

I'll save my full thoughts on "The Iron Lady" for a review later this week -- my Twitter followers already have some idea of how little I like it -- but my problems with it are split fairly evenly between its structural and technical ineptitude and its ludicrously myopic politics. Not only highly selective with Thatcher's laundry-list of socially destructive policies and decisions, the film's take on the ones it does cop to is still, shall we say, pretty creative.

Related

Want More...

Academy Awards?
  • Oscar-statues-outside-the-82nd-academy-awards-at-the-kodak-theater-in-hollywood-ca
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

That's a subjective view, of course, so it's prudent of Streep herself to remind us that the film is entitled to its own. USA Today reports that while in Washington to accept her Kennedy Center honor this weekend -- it sure is a good week for the actress -- Streep presented "The Iron Lady" to an audience of political types, former state senators and governors among them. Perhaps anticipating a more politically concerned response to the film, she had a clever semi-defence ready:

"This is not a biopic," the actress warned the packed audience before the feature directed by her Mamma Mia! maestro Phyllida Lloyd began. Instead, The Iron Lady presents an older Thatcher as she flashes back to the highs and lows of her career while staving off dementia. "It's a subjective look back," Streep explained. "As close to the truth as fiction will allow."

Hard to argue with that: "The Iron Lady" is as free to interpret its subject however it wishes as I am to find that interpretation dramatically and/or ideologically ill-considered. As it stands, for a film that was pitched all along as a mere performance showcase, I'm increasingly interested in tracking the critical response to it as a whole.

For more views on movies, awards season and other pursuits, follow @GuyLodge on Twitter.

Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!

Guy-lodge-sm
Guy Lodge
Critic
Guy Lodge is a South African-born critic and sometime screenwriter. In addition to his work at In Contention, he is a freelance contributor to Variety, Time Out, Empire and The Guardian. He lives well beyond his means in London.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Trex

    Guy this is important and has nothing to do with The Iron Lady- when will be able to hear your insightful thoughts on Young Adult. Your tweet was such a tease... come on man!

    November 30, 2011 at 6:49PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Frank Lee

    I'm guessing that film critics in the UK are ignoring the coincidence of the Euro crumbling and the most un-Thatcherite economies in Europe (Greece, Spain, Portugal) going belly-up at the very moment "The Iron Lady" is being released.

    November 30, 2011 at 7:40PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ivan

    Guy, don't you think that Meryl has a point? She says "It's a subjective look back", the key word being 'subjective'. I don't know much about her "reign" as a prime minister, since I'm not from UK, and I can't judge, but the truth is always somewhere in between. It would be ridiculous for the movie to critisize her very much since it is told from her perspective (well sort of...). I am interested in your opinion about the movie without your political subjectivity, if it is possible. Is it good filmaking (which I doubt, considering who is the director) and did Meryl nailed it again? Thanks!

    November 30, 2011 at 8:53PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Did you read my last paragraph? I acknowledge her point.

      November 30, 2011 at 8:57PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    utahprime

    Oh how I wish you would fixate on berating some other actress for just a little while. I won't bother reading your review. In fact, I never do. All the reviews I have read are in the "amazing" performance category.

    November 30, 2011 at 10:42PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Why did you bother reading this, then? Just curious.

      November 30, 2011 at 11:00PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Deena Jones' wig I'm with you UTAHPRIME. Clearly some critics lack subjectivity and I have In Contention as proof.

      November 30, 2011 at 11:09PM EST
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge "Clearly some critics lack subjectivity"

      Huh? Criticism is built on subjectivity -- I don't think it's possible for a critic to lack it. (Perhaps you mean objectivity?)

      December 1, 2011 at 8:20AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    utahprime

    By the way, it is Streep's fifth NYFCC award not her fifth award with the Gotham crowd.

    November 30, 2011 at 10:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge I meant 'Gotham' in the geographical sense, not as a reference to the Gotham Awards, which I am quite aware are different from the NYFCC Awards.

      November 30, 2011 at 11:02PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JLPatt Should've picked a different set of words. I was confused as well.

      November 30, 2011 at 11:50PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Deena Jones' wig

    Another overly sensitive liberal Brit bashing the movie because it did not portray Thatcher as a blood-sucking monster. Here we go again.

    November 30, 2011 at 11:08PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Frank Lee Bingo.

      November 30, 2011 at 11:30PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SJG I have to say that's my impression as well, but I've been trying to give Guy the benefit of the doubt. It's too bad that this movie seems to be genuinely bad, but then instead of criticizing the actual film the bemoan that it doesn't toe the politically orthodox liberal line.

      December 1, 2011 at 12:33AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Robert A. Boy, the Streep fanatics are out in full force! At least the overly sensitive conservative Brit-bashing ones.

      December 1, 2011 at 1:35AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SJG I truly don't have a problem with people bashing Thatcher's politics in the proper forum because I don't have a dog in that fight, but it seems that a lot of the reviews I've read focus on her politics and not on the movie. I genuinely just want to know what people think of the movie and its craft and not reviewers' political reactions. I'm giving Guy the benefit of the doubt because we haven't seen his actual review yet.

      And, fwiw, this season I'm a Viola Davis fanatic for sure and I'm about the furthest thing from a Brit basher imaginable. If anything I tend to think of the USA as about the worst country in the Anglosphere.

      I just get sick of political orthodoxy, on either side of the spectrum. I find it just as annoying that a lot of rightwingers I know claim The Motorcycle Diaries sucks primarily because they hate Che Guevara. It's a stupid reason to dislike a movie. I want to know about plot, character, etc., and I haven't been reading as much about that as I have been reading a bunch of handwringing over the failure to acknowledge Thatcher's "socially destructive policies and decisions" or whatever.

      Politics is relative; filmmaking is a craft. The one relies on what people's values are, how their consciences are formed, what idea of justice they have, and people from Plato to Confucius to Thomas Moore to Voltaire have reached wildly different conclusions on the subject. The other relies on more objective measures like "The pacing is bad" or "The dialogue is clunky", and most critics circles and awards bodies have a pretty standard set of criteria they judge things by. I don't think it's ludicrous to expect the primary focus of film criticism to be on those things, though I fully understand the criticism may touch on the political issues.

      December 1, 2011 at 3:55AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SJG Also, just to ramble on a bit longer, it's my understanding that the movie really does suck so it's not like there's any lack of things for critics to point out that they dislike and sublimate their political frustrations that way.

      December 1, 2011 at 3:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Glenn UK Oh please unless you ARE Brit then don't make such ridiculous comments about us being overly sensitive about the blood sucking monster that Thatcher WAS! Its political fact. It's more about the glamourised or should I say Hollywood-ised portrayal of Thatcher that pisses people off! If you are going to film something then do it proper in the first place or not at all!!! A waste of Streep's talents to be associated with such shite! However, her performance is no where near as good as the majestic and towering performance of Dame Helen Mirren in The Queen. Cue Streep fanatics .......... LOL!!!

      December 1, 2011 at 10:41AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SJG I really hope it's clear to anyone reading this exchange objectively that I'm not the fanatical one. One of us wants just wants to read a straightforward critique of the film... one of us wants a cellophane hit job portraying a "blood sucking monster", who, by the way, was still a human being with faults and basic human dignity like any of the rest of us.

      December 1, 2011 at 12:51PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Joe7827 Not that Guy always rubs me the right way, but... isn't it a bit ironic that he is being taken to task for bashing the movie's politics, when the whole point of the post in the first place is to offer the movie's side of the story? This article seemed pretty even-handed to me.

      December 1, 2011 at 4:26PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SJG My absolute last comment on the subject, because I think this horse has been flogged long past death:

      Naturally I meant "celluloid" not "cellophane" above.

      December 1, 2011 at 7:54PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    HoustonRufus

    I'm very eager to read your review, Guy. Being from the US and not having seen the film yet, I'm hesitant to comment. I'm also curious how a film critic goes about considering a film like this or J Edgar for that matter. Such films would seem to pose particular challenges for any viewer, but I would think that would be especially true for a film critic.

    November 30, 2011 at 11:14PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    utahprime

    Actually, Guy, I only read a few lines before realizing it was written by you rather than Kris. Like I said, I never read you biased commentaries.

    November 30, 2011 at 11:20PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Then why do you even waste your - and our - time with your comments?

      December 1, 2011 at 12:17AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      GlennAU Here's a helpful tip: The author's name is written under the headline of every article. There's even a photo. I just don't want you reading something of Guy's that may stretch your mind about a topic.

      December 1, 2011 at 8:30AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    GlennAU

    Whether you agree with Thatcher's politics - or the film's stance of them - the film itself a complete and utter trainwreck from start to finish. Streep comes off best, but that's the faintest of praise since everything else about it could very well be described as "whack". At least Jim Broadbent isn't in the awards discussion... now there's a performance that's outright bad. Yeesh. He's giving a "Moulin Rouge!" performance in an "Iris" film.

    December 1, 2011 at 3:49AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Dalurae

    Hm, I find it a bit weird to see conservatives condemning this film for depicting their Maggie as a demented old lady and liberals doing that for whitewashing Thatcher's politics. It seems politics in film is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. :S
    But anyway, films dealing with political figures as (in)famous as Thatcher are almost always subject to some sort of controversy as to their treatment of real-life person(s), and I'm sure the filmmakers behind The Iron Lady knew all along that they'd be called out by a certain group of viewers, conservative or liberal, for the creative decisions they made with the film. There's no way in hell they thought they'd be able to avoid such altercations. I just think it's idealistic for anyone to expect critics to judge a biopic like this (or a subjective look whatever) solely based on its technical aspects.
    If you don't agree with what Guy Lodge has to say about the creative decisions made in this film to include or leave out certain parts of Thatcher's legacy, then just take it as his own opinion or raise constructive counter-arguments, instead of calling him overly sensitive and mistaking it for his personal attack on Meryl Streep.
    I'm getting sick of seeing the Meryl brigade spamming the comments section.

    December 1, 2011 at 7:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    daveylo

    Since there haven't been too many feature films about Thatcher at least being shown internationally it does sound like Iron Lady is a missed opportunity. Maybe another film will be made that dares to show more of Thatcher's darker side.

    December 1, 2011 at 9:48AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    JJ1

    It's always interesting to hear bloggers/prognosticators opinions before the reviews come out for certain films. Some early reactions can be meh to certain movies, then the reviews come out and ... bam ... the critics love it. On the flip side, I've heard raves from bloggers, only then to see that critics loathed the film.

    Genuinely intrigued to see what the critics (on both sides of the pond) do with The Iron Lady.

    December 1, 2011 at 10:16AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS

oscarside.jpg

Best Picture

Best Director

Best Actor

Best Actress

Best Supporting Actor

Best Supporting Actress

Best Adapted Screenplay

Best Original Screenplay

Best Cinematography

Best Costume Design

Best Film Editing

Best Makeup And Hairstyling

Best Original Score

Best Original Song

Best Production Design

Best Sound Editing

Best Sound Mixing

Best Visual Effects

Best Animated Feature Film

Best Documentary Feature

Best Foreign Language Film

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook