Review: 'Rust and Bone' and 'After the Battle'
Audiard's latest an aggressively moving study of broken hearts and bodies
Marion Cotillard and Matthias Schoenaerts in "Rust and Bone."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
CANNES - As a general rule, it should be a bit further into Cannes, when the combination of punishing onscreen themes and depleted reserves of sleep have battered down all defences, that I have my first involuntary cry of the festival. And as a general rule, it should be several lifetimes before the instigator of such a reaction is Katy Perry's plastic empowerment anthem "Firework," with a wheelchair-bound young woman playing conductor to its ersatz emotional swell.
"Rust and Bone" (B+) a remarkable exercise in brute sentimentality and unwashed romance from French genre artisan Jacques Audiard, is not a film with much use for general rules: awash with aesthetic and narrative decisions that scratch at the boundaries of human empathy and simple good taste, it's the rare Croisette provocation that invites polarized responses by flirting with convention, even cliché, rather than transgression. In no other context could the Wonderbread pop stylings of Ms. Perry sound more subversive.
It's apt that one of "Rust and Bone"'s most electric scenes should seek to dignify disposable Top 40 fodder, since the film as a whole seems exactingly crafted to redeem an entire cinematic subgenre that has too long been submerged by its own least distinguished projects. The words "disability drama" are enough to prompt an unmasked groan from many a wary film fan, conjuring as they do drippy recollections of triumph-of-the-will awards bait, much of it unawarded, or soft-lit, true-life TV movies starring Lindsay Wagner as somebody's mother. But they rarely promise a film engaging with the ugly, dramatically seething actualities of human damage, an awareness that hisses from Audiard's film with alternating fury and euphoria.
Everybody, and indeed every body, is broken in Audiard's chosen working-class corner of the Cote d'Azur, where Marion Cotillard's disaffected Sea World animal trainer and Matthias Schoenaert's shiftless, lowering security worker meet following an altercation at the nightclub where he works -- her bloodied nose and his swollen knuckles mordant omens of a relationship that they can't yet know will be founded on rolling physical setbacks and recoveries. By their second encounter, she will have lost both legs, perhaps to an Orca whale, in a freak work accident; he'll have turned to bare-knuckle fighting as a means of supporting his motherless young son, himself no stranger to the sting of his father's palm.
Related
-
Cannes Check: Jacques Audiard's 'Rust and Bone'
Continuing our preview series on the Cannes competition
-
Cannes Check: Yousry Nasrallah's 'After the Battle'
Continuing our preview series on the Cannes competition
She's the medically disabled one, but neither is a fully functioning human being; as she gradually rebuilds her body, he finds repeated new ways to break down his. In Hollywood script-manual logic, that pat irony would invite mutual completion between one and the other. In Audiard's more hardened human universe, their sex-led partnership destroys as much connective tissue as it forges; few films trading in equivalent subject matter have mapped out the enervating back-and-forth of the recovery process with quite such sensory candor. (The actors, it hardly needs saying, are superb -- particularly Schoenaerts, hungrier and more reactive than he was in his impressive breakthrough in 2011 Oscar nominee "Bullhead.") Physical sensation is a driving storytelling aid here, magnified by the tactile floridity of Audiard's filmmaking: cinematographer Stephane Fontaine's blunt, shoal-hued compositions are wired with glittering natural light and warm flashes of skin and blood, as the film's song-heavy sound mix seemingly checks in and out of an echoing headspace.
Few filmmakers are quite as adept at conveying not just a character's sense of self, but their immediate experience of their environment. It's this kind of grandly wrought specificity that keeps "Rust and Bone" from tipping into familiar sentiment even as scene after scene lends itself to visual and verbal platitude -- and as the script's occasionally ungainly subplots reveal all too obviously its adaptation from a collection of short stories. As the narrative reaches its emotional crescendos, capped by a staggering scene at a frozen lake than inspired gasps, sobs and eye-rolls in seemingly equal measure at this morning's screening, the unfinished details of its construction matter very little indeed. Some will inevitably cry manipulation, as if eliciting such strength of feeling in a viewer could or should be anything but.
Would that anyone could accuse "After the Battle" (D+) the lone African or Middle Eastern film in an internationally spottier-than-usual Competition lineup, of successfully harvesting sentiment. Instead, Yousry Nasrallah's shouty, inert, indefatigably earnest drama of class, gender and societal conflicts in the wake of last year's Arab Spring conflicts in Egypt has justifiably little faith in its routinely ill-placed digital camera's ability to capture political subtext. Instead, it resorts to the trusty alternative of having characters spout helpful paragraphs of text out loud -- an awful lot of it, given that the film feigns to see both sides of the fallout that followed the fatality-stained Battle of the Camels in February 2011. There, a group of working-class horsemen charged into a crowd of protestors in Cairo's Tahrir Square, setting in motion a chain of conversations that led to the dissolution of the Mubarak regime.
With the topicality of the events in question representing catnip to most festival programmers, one rather hoped "After the Battle" would demonstrate other, less cynical reasons for its presence here. But with the level of its visual storytelling and rhetorical content hovering perilously around the daytime-TV level, Cannes selectors clearly had their diplomat hats on when admitting this one into Competition. Whether or not it's too soon to tackle these events head-on is a moot point; Nasrallah clearly thinks it is, which is why he laces his vague, boiled-down observations thereof through an insipid, scarcely credible will-they-won't-they romance between one of the socially reviled horsemen and an educated female NGO worker distributing handouts to him and his peers -- a dynamic that could yield rich insights about shifting moral and social hierarchies in Egypt if they could only stop talking about that very thing.
"You're always finding political solutions to personal problems," one character chides another at one point. The same could be said for Nasrallah and Omar Shama's didactic, thuddingly literal script, though when the personal talk begins ("You look like someone with a weight you can't carry or unload, like a donkey"), it becomes clear that political solutions may be the way forward for these characters. Nasrallah's most cinematic flourish is the insertion of cantering dressage horses into every other frame, an uncertain visual metaphor that does, at least, reassuringly suggest he's as bored of his colorless human mouthpieces as we are. Bring on the empty horses, indeed.
For more views on movies, awards season and other pursuits, follow @GuyLodge on Twitter.
Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Zal Batmanglij's latest hits theaters May 31Tuesday, May 21, 2013
-
Michael Douglas and Matt Damon excel in Soderbergh's witty Liberace biopicTuesday, May 21, 2013
-
The actor-director gets all the best close-ups in his Faulkner adaptationMonday, May 20, 2013
-
'Traumatized critics exhale.'Monday, May 20, 2013







Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupalex_leonardis
May 17, 2012 at 10:30PM EST Reply to CommentIf you had to grade them both?
MaxC Really? A grade, that's your first reaction? Utterly inane.
May 17, 2012 at 11:19PM ESTJLPatt Really? Talk about a rude and uncalled for reaction. I second Alex's question.
May 17, 2012 at 11:23PM ESTMaxC Why? You have a well written and thoughtful review, what's the point of a grade? Would it matter if it was a "B" or an "A"? You have Guy's take already (and one that tells you much more than any letter or number)
May 17, 2012 at 11:29PM ESTJLPatt Some of us like grades. Helps cement and represent a review for us. If you don't mind, that's fine, but there are others who like such signposts.
May 17, 2012 at 11:45PM EST
I merely was asking of one for a scale of quality. I don't like reading reviews or seeing trailers before movies I want to see so as to keep myself the freshest I could be before seeing them. That's one of the main reasons why Shame, Drive, and We Need To Talk About Kevin are my three favorites from last year.
May 17, 2012 at 11:48PM ESTAnd honestly, I'm not asking much. I'll come back and read the review when I've seen the movie so as to refine my opinion but for now I just want an indicator.
Mykill On Twitter, Guy gave "Rust and Bone" a B+ and "After the Battle" a D+. His reviews for both films are excellent and much more thorough than the tweet reviews (I'm glad to read both.)
May 17, 2012 at 11:50PM ESTMatthew Starr Yeah I'm with Alex. I follow Guy on Twitter because I like the grades and short tweet reactions but I don't like to read full reviews before I have seen a film.
May 18, 2012 at 3:15PM ESTGuy Lodge Grades have been added, as per Twitter. A mere oversight to have left them off in the first place -- apologies.
May 18, 2012 at 6:26PM ESTJLPatt
May 17, 2012 at 11:23PM EST Reply to CommentInteresting, another positive review of "Rust and Bone." So do you sense it's getting more good word than bad? Curious because the first thing I read about it was Gleiberman's review, which called the film "dismal."
Steven Flores I wouldn't trust Owen Glieberman if my life depended on it. The guy is a hack.
May 17, 2012 at 11:29PM ESTJLPatt He seems like a pretty good critic to me.
May 17, 2012 at 11:45PM ESTMykill Most of the trades have given Rust and Bone high marks, along with lots of other critics I read (Indiewire for example.) I wouldn't go as far to say that Owen Gleiberman is a hack, per se, but I do think his tastes in films tend to be a tad unadventurous.
May 17, 2012 at 11:53PM ESTMaxC
May 17, 2012 at 11:23PM EST Reply to CommentMan, though, I'm excited for Rust & Bone. Sorta surprised that Audiard went for Katy Perry, however. Must be going hard of hearing in his old age...
Lars
May 17, 2012 at 11:31PM EST Reply to CommentYeah, "disability drama" is usually a movie disguised for Oscar or awards glory, but when I saw Lee Chang-Dong's Oasis, I was completely blown away (yes, it's a bit too melodramatic). So I'm hoping that Rust and Bone would do the same! Looking forward...
Steven Flores
May 18, 2012 at 1:27AM EST Reply to Comment@JLPlatt-Compared to idiots like Pete Hammond, Shawn Edwards, Cole Smithey, and Ben Lyons.
JFK
May 18, 2012 at 9:32AM EST Reply to CommentExcellent review of R&B, Guy! Would you count both Schoenaerts and Cotillard in for the actor recognition at Cannes at this point? Any chance of translating over to the Oscar race? I'm going to guess that you're wild run-ons in the second review are a product of Cannes fatigue.
Guy Lodge Yes, and then some! It's never a good idea to write, much less post, at 4am. Thanks for politely noting the error.
May 18, 2012 at 6:27PM ESTjames t
May 19, 2012 at 4:16AM EST Reply to CommentWell, if someone cries "manipulation", they probably didn't feel moved so I'm not sure the closing argument applies :)