Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: '21 Jump Street' is a sly, silly celebration of immaturity

Channing Tatum an unexpected delight in irreverent TV show reboot

  • Critic's Rating B
  • Readers' Rating B
<p>Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum in "21 Jump Street."</p>

Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum in "21 Jump Street."

Credit: Columbia Pictures

Are you a fan of In Contention?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

"Fuck 'Glee,'" Channing Tatum's hulking undercover cop mutters early on in "21 Jump Street," having disguised himself as a teenager for a high-school drugs bust, only to discover that his letterman-jacketed jockishness no longer carries the social cachet it did in his youth. It's a throwaway line that nonetheless unlocks several suspended levels of socio-cultural awareness in Phil Lord and Chris Miller's enthusiastically goofy spin on the long-buried youth TV series of the same name -- a blithe barrage of wildly variable gags that would no more admit to such awareness than have Tatum and his partner in bromance, Jonah Hill, kiss on screen.

"Glee" would, of course, and therein lies the point. Perhaps the most conceptually playful and self-sustaining entry in the recent mini-genre of 1980s TV reboots, "21 Jump Street" employs its dodgy cultural lineage less as nostalgia kick than as conversation starter: amusing (and genuinely flummoxing) Johnny Depp cameo aside, the film is only incidentally interested in its source material, and far more preoccupied with the tension between between past and present adolescent generations.

Tatum's offhand "Glee" diss may amount to a clever-clever instance of pop eating itself -- do contemporary TV shows exist in the postmodern world of period TV spinoffs? -- but it also speaks to a less arch, more affecting form of social insecurity: the terrible moment every 20-something faces when he realizes that he just doesn't get kids anymore.

With Hill and co-writer Michael Bacall's script swiftly reaching the conclusion that the demographic has done a lot of unwarranted growing up in the last couple of decades, the defiantly R-rated "21 Jump Street" is determined to prove that adults can do reckless immaturity rather better than kids these days. The teenagers here, led by the slippery, tidily groomed Dave Franco, are big on tolerance, eccentricity, environmental issues, insipid pop-folk music and sophisticated designer drugs -- all, save the last one or two, ostensibly positive developments that the Generation X-ers behind this weirdly inverted teen movie see as far juicier satirical targets than the floppy haircuts and ill-cut denim of a TV show scarcely anyone has watched or thought about for 20 years. 

Want More...

Academy Awards?
  • Oscar-statues-outside-the-82nd-academy-awards-at-the-kodak-theater-in-hollywood-ca
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

All of which, I admit, makes this cheerfully crass, stylistically slipshod and very, very funny film sounds a lot more calculated and self-admiring than it is. Borrowing little more than a logline from the original series -- baby-faced cops enrol as high-school students to crack down on youth crime from within -- the film asserts its own gently ironic comic tone from the get-go, taking full advantage of the fact that few viewers younger than Hill will know the difference, and few viewers older will care.

Hill and Tatum play Schmidt and Jenko, high-school foes turned policy-academy buddies: equally dunderheaded as patrol cops, they're shifted to Jump Street duty, masquerading as decidedly overgrown teen brothers to bring down Franco's smoothly run drug ring. By their own buffoonery, geeky Schmidt is forced into the role designated for Jenko, that of the athletic would-be prom king; Jenko, in turn, has to join the science-fair squad instead. The jokes, from here on out, pretty much write themselves: bald reversals fuel the lean storytelling, with comic beats determined as much by audience expectation and star personae than any writerly manipulation.

The surprise comes when neither fish-out-of-water figure is as awkwardly received as teen-movie lore would dictate: as Hill has little trouble landing the faintly boho blonde (Brie Larson) his Eminem-worshipping 16-year-old self could only dream of, Tatum finds an unexpected kinship with the four-eyed lab geeks, whose minimal social currency has stayed constant since 1999, as his has plummeted to their level. "21 Jump Street" isn't the first commercial film to observe the 21st-century realignment of adolescent cliques -- indeed, the 21st-century realignment of cool -- but it's the first I've seen to question it quite so brazenly. 

That the film skirts smugness and condescension (though not some regrettable missteps into incongruous and dissonantly nasty gross-out humor) is partly attributable to the light directorial touch of Lord and Miller, whose last effort was the scrappy animated feature "Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs." Treating proceedings as scarcely more credible or gravity-bound than a picture-book fantasy, they set up and shoot down the gags with necessary pace if not too much finesse, coming only temporarily unstuck in the choppy action sequences that dominate the film's latter half.

It's the star duo, however, that turn this iffy proposition into something first serviceable and finally a little bit special. Hill, a few pounds lighter but affably roly-poly as ever, is more subdued than his apprentice work in less specialized teen films than "Superbad" might have led us to expect, but is sparked into life by his buoyant and sincerely sweet chemistry with Tatum -- who unexpectedly emerges as the comic sensation of this entire dippy enterprise.

After a long spell of quite literal grunt work that required him to act mainly from the abdomen outwards, Tatum seems finally to be waking up to the witty properties of his cartoonishly lantern-jawed hotness, as he wryly deadpans his way through a character that, for a change, isn't any smarter than he looks, but is winningly comfortable with that. ("Fuck science!" he yells elatedly at the climax of the film's single most riotous set piece.) With his spacily precise verbal timing and surprisingly animated physique, Tatum proves that off-the-wall comedy may yet be the best place for a lunk like him -- which is one feat of reverse-type engineering on which this delightfully silly diversion couldn't quite have counted.    

For more views on movies, awards season and other pursuits, follow @GuyLodge on Twitter. 

Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!  

Guy-lodge-sm
Guy Lodge
Critic
Guy Lodge is a South African-born critic and sometime screenwriter. In addition to his work at In Contention, he is a freelance contributor to Variety, Time Out, Empire and The Guardian. He lives well beyond his means in London.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Zoidberg_talkback_profile

    mrbilliam

    Dave Franco is playing a high school student? If the premise of the movie is that two adults are pretending to be teenagers, aren't you undermining that by casting other adults as the "actual" teenagers? (IMDB says Franco is was born in 1985 while Hill and Tatum were born in 1983 and 1980 respectively).

    March 15, 2012 at 2:58PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Verisimilitude is not a high priority here.

      March 15, 2012 at 4:28PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      /3rt Franco looks younger than both of them.

      March 15, 2012 at 4:36PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Brock Landers

    Saw this at a pre-screening. I haven't laughed that hard since... In Bruges? It's been a while. It just seemed as if joke after joke was connecting. Even jokes that were a bit iffy were funny because of the way Hill and especially Tatum delivered them.

    It honestly wouldn't surprise me if this turned up in my top 10-20 of 2012. It's incredibly funny and really intelligent. I can't wait to see it again.

    "I didn't punch him because he's gay, I punched him... and then he happened to turn out to be gay afterward."

    Tatum has a bright future in comedy if he chooses to do more.

    March 15, 2012 at 4:44PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    DefRef

    Way to blow a surprise cameo, Guy. Are you hoping to get a gig with Entertainment Weekly and wish to show your mad spoiling skillz? Also, Drew reviewed this last week. Why the second review, other than to get some spoilers out there for your EW job application?

    March 15, 2012 at 5:13PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Sincere apologies for the spoiler -- it's been so widely publicised, and included in so many other reviews, I assumed everyone knew. My mistake.

      As for Drew's review, while we're all under the HitFix umbrella, we're two separate blogs with separate audiences (albeit with some common readers). Even for those who read both of us, I'd think we're sufficiently different in tone and perspective to allow some room for overlap. No need to be unpleasant about it. (And no, I wouldn't turn down an EW gig -- though I'm fine as I am, thanks for asking.)

      March 15, 2012 at 8:07PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    BJT

    Surely it comes as no surprise that Tatum can do comedy. His superp "You killed my fish" reactions and slapstick physicality was the only god thing in last yearas diabolical "Dilemma".

    March 16, 2012 at 9:36AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Guypic_talkback_profile

    Guy Lodge

    Apologies for the initial errors in this review -- I accidentally wound up publishing the unproofed version. Corrected now.

    March 16, 2012 at 9:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Megan

    Thanks for the review - I look forward to seeing this.

    March 16, 2012 at 2:32PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Anita

    Finally saw it last night and I was happy that the hype and great reviews were justified. And I completely agree about Tatum being best in show and having a bright future in comedy, which I hope will be the direction he will go. His confusion at the hipsters in the beginning was priceless.

    March 22, 2012 at 11:25AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    PhilippinesPhil

    Wow, you used the F word right off the bat. So edgy. (sarcasm)

    May 15, 2012 at 1:07AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS

oscarside.jpg

Best Picture

Best Director

Best Actor

Best Actress

Best Supporting Actor

Best Supporting Actress

Best Adapted Screenplay

Best Original Screenplay

Best Cinematography

Best Costume Design

Best Film Editing

Best Makeup And Hairstyling

Best Original Score

Best Original Song

Best Production Design

Best Sound Editing

Best Sound Mixing

Best Visual Effects

Best Animated Feature Film

Best Documentary Feature

Best Foreign Language Film

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook