Oscar Talk: Ep. 63 -- Digging into the supporting categories, from George Clooney to Melissa McCarthy
Also: Urging you to see '50/50' and 'Take Shelter' and discussing the box office of films like 'Drive,' 'Warrior' and 'Moneyball'
Are you a fan of Academy Awards?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Welcome to Oscar Talk.
In case you're new to the site and/or the podcast, Oscar Talk is a weekly kudocast, your one-stop awards chat shop between yours truly and Anne Thompson of Thompson on Hollywood. The podcast is weekly, every Friday throughout the season, charting the ups and downs of contenders along the way. Plenty of things change en route to Oscar's stage and we're here to address it all as it unfolds.
With the early fall tests behind us, we stand on the precipice of October. The New York film fest is just around the corner with London fest not far behind. We're very much off to the races, but also very much in our bubble right now, seeing a number of films that Academy members and even industry sorts haven't gotten around to yet. So that's the echo chamber for you. A few more weeks of that and finally the few voices will turn into a more rousing chorus. Now, let's see what's on the docket today...
Opening today are "50/50" and "Take Shelter," two films we heartily endorse and have talked about at length before. We give both another once over before urging you to go check them out this weekend.
It's about time we start diving into some Oscar categories on the podcast. So we start today by first chewing on the Best Supporting Actor category...
…before moving on to the supporting ladies.
We touch on the box office performance of films like "Drive," "Warrior" and "Moneyball."
Finally, reader questions, which we've been skimping on a bit lately. We address a few of them through the podcast and a few more at the end.
Have a listen to the new podcast below with a little of Chris Cornell's "The Keeper," from "Machine Gun Preacher" (expanding wider this weekend) leading the way. If the file cuts off for you at any time, try the back-up download link at the bottom of this post. And as always, remember to subscribe to Oscar Talk via iTunes here.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Un Certain Regard opener is worthy of a Competition slotThursday, May 16, 2013
-
Sleek shock value but little substance in another take on the Mexican drug warThursday, May 16, 2013
-
She'll join 'Walk the Line' co-star Joaquin Phoenix in the filmWednesday, May 15, 2013
-
It's not a world premiere, but Luhrmann's latest lends the Croisette some glitterWednesday, May 15, 2013





Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupMaxim
September 30, 2011 at 12:38PM EST Reply to CommentOne quick correction: Clooney didn't win Best Supporting Actor for "Good Night and Good Luck", he won for "Syrianna". I'm sure Anne knows that though.
Kristopher Tapley I somehow glossed past that, too. But indeed, we're aware. ;)
September 30, 2011 at 1:03PM ESTMaxim
September 30, 2011 at 12:44PM EST Reply to CommentOMG, Anne is favor of hazing. HAZ-ING.
/3rt
September 30, 2011 at 12:47PM EST Reply to CommentThe music at the end of the podcast-- where's it from?
Kristopher Tapley Mychael Danna's beautiful, underrated score from Moneyball.
September 30, 2011 at 1:02PM ESTrustyreub I second that question? Where's it from?? "Ides of March"?
September 30, 2011 at 5:31PM ESTrustyreub Nevermind.
September 30, 2011 at 5:31PM ESTCoffeysr
September 30, 2011 at 2:05PM EST Reply to CommentWow, I totally disagree with Anne in her thinking the Supporting Actress race is more stacked than Lead. A race with Meryl Streep and Clenn Close in it is nothing to scoff at. By the sounds of it, you guys aren't rating Nobbs as an Oscar win for Close?
Will
September 30, 2011 at 2:33PM EST Reply to CommentI won't step back into the supporting actor debate you guys have, because I don't think either of you will ever change your mind. Haha. But I'm on Kris' side in this.
I also agree that it's silly to use the 'they haven't even seen these movies' argument. That's why it's a prediction. It's not THAT serious. It's just an educated guess based on previous outcomes with an understanding that nothing is ever 100%.
Matt
September 30, 2011 at 2:38PM EST Reply to CommentHey Kris - Love the OT. Just a note that Anne comes in much louder and clearer (literally) than you each time. Just letting you know.
Mark Matt, what does OT mean?
September 30, 2011 at 4:02PM ESTKristopher Tapley Well aware. It's because she uses a different mic than me. I generally try to adjust in editing. I do my best.
September 30, 2011 at 5:31PM ESTjohn Stark
September 30, 2011 at 2:51PM EST Reply to CommentUsing Anne's ideas about who is deserving of a lead and supporting nod, how do you explain Precious. I would explain it as for once the Academy got it right. They overlook the fact that Gabourey Sidibe has never acted in a film before and gave her the nom she deserves, which is Lead Actress. True Grit was Hailee's story, Tree of Life is Hunter's story, but the problem for the Academy is they have stars in their eyes. They have trouble seeing past the bigger names in the film, which Precious didn't have.
/3rt Age. No one wants to nominate children in the lead acting categories. Sidibe is in her 20s, the ripe age for Best Actress.
September 30, 2011 at 5:39PM ESTGuy Lodge The obvious name to bring up here is Keisha Castle-Hughes, an inarguable lead performance from a 13 year-old actress that was nonetheless campaigned in supporting by the studio.
October 1, 2011 at 6:05AM ESTThe Screen Actors' Guild fell for the campaign. The Academy didn't, and nominated her in Best Actress, where she belonged. Would be interested to know if Anne thinks the studio did the right thing there.
JJ1 YES, to Guy.
October 1, 2011 at 7:34AM ESTDanny Same analogy applies to EL&IC. After seeing the movie, I doubt even Anne could argue Thomas Horn's is a supporting performance. He is in 99% of the movie, and all the other (famous) actors are in 40% at most (Sydow) or much much less. Unfortunately, the way Oscar politics works, Horn's chances would be better if he were considered in Supporting. Keisha rightly was considered in lead and got through in a year where there was relatively less competition in lead actress. This year the Best Actor line-up is so strong already with several more high profile candidates in the pipeline; unless EC&IL and Horn make a HUGE impact, I don't see a nom happening for him. He's quite good though. Unless the movie flops and disappears with a whimper (doubtful) the kids is about to be shot out of a cannon, metaphorically speaking.
October 1, 2011 at 9:26AM ESTMatt
September 30, 2011 at 2:52PM EST Reply to CommentMaggie Smith won not ERW.
john Stark
September 30, 2011 at 3:06PM EST Reply to CommentAlso, Marlee Matlin had never acted in a film when she stole Sigourney Weaver's Aliens Oscar, for A Children of a Lesser God.
john Stark
September 30, 2011 at 3:33PM EST Reply to CommentA few more from recent years: Keisha Castle-Hughes and Catalina Sandino Moreno are two more example of the Academy having no other big stars to get in the way of giving the films true lead her due. They both had never acted before and both were children.
john Stark
September 30, 2011 at 3:44PM EST Reply to CommentAnd Lastly... Here are two performances that Won the Oscar, but for the wrong category. 2006's "The Last King of Scotland" Forest Whitaker should have won for Best Supporting not Best Lead. The films story belongs to James McAvoy, who was also deserving of a nod, but ultimately I would have given the Best Actor award to Peter O'Toole for "Venus"
Also in 2006's "Dreamgirls" Jennifer Hudson could be considered a Lead Performance, but because she was new to the film biz, she was relegated to a Supporting Nod. Had the Academy put her in the Lead Actress race she would have lost to Helen Mirren, so I guess that worked in her favor.
Just my two cents.
/3rt Hudson's performance isn't strong enough to find support outside of supporting.
September 30, 2011 at 5:42PM ESTLaura Stewart
September 30, 2011 at 4:02PM EST Reply to CommentJustice for JGL!! Preach it Anne!
JJ1
September 30, 2011 at 4:48PM EST Reply to CommentI know it's easy to make lists like these, but I don't think Lead is particularly weak:
Meryl Streep, Glenn Close, Charlize Theron, Viola Davis, Michelle Williams, Tilda Swinton, Elizabeth Olsen, Felicity Jones, Rachel Weisz, Michelle Yeoh, Emily Watson, Rooney Mara, Jodie Foster, Kirsten Dunst, Juliette Binoche, etc.
That's a good 15 that I think could seriously factor into the 5 with solid campaigns.
Kristopher Tapley It's weak for actual viable contenders.
September 30, 2011 at 5:33PM ESTJJ1 gotcha
September 30, 2011 at 5:46PM ESTHoustonRufus Yeah, of those listed, all wonderful actresses, by the way, I can really only say Streep, Close and Davis are almost certainly in. But the Actor category makes my head hurt. No matter who is nominated for Best Actor this year, I'll be using all sort of profanity because I know several performances I cherish won't make the cut.
September 30, 2011 at 8:24PM ESTDanny I would add Vera Farmiga in Higher Ground to that list, with Kris's comment as the obligatory caveat.
October 1, 2011 at 9:34AM ESTLaura Stewart
September 30, 2011 at 5:10PM EST Reply to CommentRegarding the whole January-January journey, Michelle Williams did it for Blue Valentine. I get she has more credibility and exposure than the cast of MMMM, but it's worth mentioning. Anne didn't mention her.
Fitz
September 30, 2011 at 5:36PM EST Reply to CommentThanks for getting my question in there, Kris. I know I put it up two weeks in a row.
Leagues better than Winter's Bone? That's heartening.
Kristopher Tapley But I wasn't a Winter's Bone fan, so...
September 30, 2011 at 8:10PM ESTm1 Unless you REALLY hated Winter's Bone, I think that you should try watching it again. It holds up so well, and it's not a film most people would think of revisiting in the first place.
October 2, 2011 at 4:18PM ESTJJ1 I was not high on Winter's Bone after the first viewing. And I still think it's very overrated. BUT, I must agree with M1 that on a re-watch (because I wanted to see if I was losing my mind - based on the amazing reviews), the film did improve quite a bit, for me. I still don't think it's overly special.
October 2, 2011 at 4:33PM ESTGraysmith
September 30, 2011 at 5:50PM EST Reply to CommentAt this point in the race, predictions are based on what’s most likely to be nominated. So when you’ve got Meryl Streep, the most Oscar-nominated actress of all time, playing a famous person the odds of her being nominated are pretty high. Doesn’t mean it’ll happen, doesn’t mean you think she’s going to win it’s just that you’re foolish to bet against it until you know more. Same thing with War Horse. It’s Spielberg, a war movie, a period drama. You’re a fool to not think this is a huge contender until the cards are on the table.
loyal_mehnert
September 30, 2011 at 6:02PM EST Reply to CommentAny news on Pariah Kris? I've had it on my Best Actress list since Sundance. A story of a lesbian black teenager, with a proper push from Focus Adepero Oduye could be this year's Gabourey Sidibe. But I haven't heard anything lately about the film.
Kristopher Tapley I keep missing screenings. I hear it's good but I don't know about awards. Maybe Indie Spirits.
September 30, 2011 at 8:10PM ESTHoustonRufus
September 30, 2011 at 8:21PM EST Reply to CommentVery much enjoyed the discussion.
JJ1 Ditto. And Anne's continuing to back her Lead/Supporting theory is showing some cracks.
September 30, 2011 at 9:33PM ESTShe couldn't differentiate between the ideology that Pitt being Lead makes sense in AMPAS world, and what her actual "opinion" would be. Right?
The hushed chuckles, the pauses, the hesitations. I don't get it. Does her theory and her opinion match?
Evan
September 30, 2011 at 11:52PM EST Reply to CommentI love JGL. However-- in semi-defense of his critics, don't you think that the marketing for his next film Premium Rush certainly raises questions about his acting/film choices? It's like the Eddie Murphy Dreamgirls/Norbit transition, except that the trailer for the second film has come out before the release of the first, highly-acclaimed film.
Ross Jones
October 1, 2011 at 1:40AM EST Reply to CommentI think it's totally fine to handicap a movie you haven't seen. You still know something about it - the director, the cast, the screenplay. It's not nothing. It bugs me when people say that Kris is opening himself up to look a fool if War Horse doesn't deliver. This is nonsense. Even if War Horse is terribly, that doesn't necessarily make invalidate Kris's analysis of the available information at the time.
Guy Lodge
October 1, 2011 at 6:28AM EST Reply to CommentCan't help thinking Anne is letting her more reserved personal opinion of 'Martha Marcy May Marlene' (countered with her adoration of 'Winter's Bone') get in the way of this discussion -- I'm not saying it's an easy Oscar get by any means, but to fall back on the fact that it's a debut feature as a reason why she doesn't think people will connect with it doesn't really fly. (And come on, 'Down to the Bone' may have been quite well-received on a tiny scale, but how many Academy members were really familiar with Debra Granik's work when they put 'Winter's Bone' on their ballots? When it comes to modest indies like this, it's the movie that has to sell itself, not the director.)
In one sense, 'Martha''s genre trappings make it more appealing to a certain audience than 'Winter's Bone' -- again, not saying that audience is the Academy, but I think it's risky to take people's reactions to a film this widely acclaimed so for granted. I feel comparatively bullish about Olsen's chances.
Also, I'm curious to know why Berenice Bejo is so swiftly dismissed -- she's a gorgeous ingenue doing expressive work in what is pretty much a lead role, and we know Harvey Weinstein is going for a big haul of nominations for 'The Artist'. Why would she not get swept along?
Anyway, great listen, as always.
JJ1 I completely agree with both things you said, Guy.
October 1, 2011 at 7:40AM EST1) I don't quite know why Anne had this fascination with Granik last year, but it really was something. As you said, before 'Down to the Bone', why would most people AMPAS-related know or care who she was when 'Winter's Bone' burst out?
Her 1-2 punch of Granik/Cholodenko praise (while not unwarranted) drove me nuts last year. I swore she was getting paid for every name drop of 'Granik' or 'Cholodenko', haha.
2) I haven't even seen The Artist yet, but from all reports I've read, Bejo is great. And it's an Oscary film being dangled by Weinstein. I also think she's a strong possibility.
Anne thompson Arguably winter's bone was also genre film, guy. I remain fascinated by how many people stick their necks out with confident positivity on films they have not yet seen! Meryl Streep has appeared in films that she did not get nominated for and phyllida Lloyd is a theater director who knows how to do stage musicals, and I am not confident about The Iron Lady.
October 1, 2011 at 5:59PM ESTGlenn close and Gary old man both give very small, precise, calibrated, quiet performances that are by definition not loud and noisy. Thus the strength of their competitors will determine whether they make the cut. Tilda swinton, Kirsten dunst, and Elizabeth Olsen are in movies that may not be beloved by the academy. We have to see if critics push them into must- see status. I somehow doubt it. But if there's nothing else to vote for, they will!
As for newcomer in lead vs. Supporting, this is case of age, scene time, who's better known, agreed. I feel strongly brad Pitt is lead for tree of life-- I object when distrib makes these calls on basis of what will win over what is. I will hold off on extremely loud until I see it! It's a case by case basis. I felt strongly that young hailee steinfeld belonged in supporting, jennifer Hudson too.
Forgive typos.
Kristopher Tapley "what will win over what is."
October 1, 2011 at 11:20PM ESTWhat "is," in The Tree of Life, is McCracken is lead, Pitt is supporting. :)
Casey Fiore Anne it seems as though you are saying the distinction between lead and supporting is purely about the status of the performer, and the role in the film itself is ultimately insignificant. This makes no sense for an award that is at least purportedly an honor for the best work in film over the past year, and not a statement about the career. By your standards, the award would need to be called "Best Star." The awards have very specific and meaningful titles: "Best Actor in a Leading Role" and "Best Actor in a Supporting Role". Your definition demeans the work in favor of the political standing of the star in Hollywood. If Hunter McCracken could not be a lead because his star isn't as big as Brad Pitt's then to maintain consistency in your argument an actor should be measured by his star status, not the strength of his performance. Count every foreign actor out.
October 2, 2011 at 9:40AM ESTAugusta
October 3, 2011 at 12:39PM EST Reply to CommentIt seems in the spirit of the game to predict when a movie will be good (when it has high probabilities of success, like Spielberg's Warhorse). But when there is a high probability of a movie being terrible, to predict it as a failure is unfair, unprofessional, ungenerous of spirit, and annoys the powerful people connected to the film.
There is a high probability that The Iron Lady will be just as awful a film as Mama Mia. Anne says she saw Mama Mia, Kris states he didn't. Mama Mia was a congealed mess. It had great actors in it: all of them looked bad, candidates for Razzies. If you watch Mama Mia, thinking of that same hand guiding a political drama/biography, you envision a shallow, incoherent, caricatured piece of flotsam.
The tactful and tactical thing to do when the probabilities are high that a movie will be an artistic and commercial failure, is to reserve judgment.
JJ1 Firstly, do I think 'Mamma Mia!' is garbage? Yes. But do I love it in spite of itself? Yes. {haha}
October 3, 2011 at 2:17PM ESTBut I do second most everything you just said, Augusta. Especially the last paragraph.