Off the Carpet: Wide open supporting actor race could be headlined by vets
Chrisopher Plummer, Albert Brooks, Max Von Sydow and Nick Nolte lead early talk
Corey Stoll's performance as Ernest Hemingway in the well-liked "Midnight in Paris" is the kind of thing that could find traction in a wide open field.
Are you a fan of Academy Awards?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Last week -- out of pure laziness because there frankly isn't much about the season worth discussing without assigning dubious meaning to this and that -- I shined a light on the lead actor category in this space. Today, for the same reasons, let's move on to Best Supporting Actor.
Anne and I took a stab at the supporting categories in Friday's Oscar Talk, but digging in a bit on the fellows, it's exciting how wide open the field appears to be. When your best bet is a player in a fringe indie hopeful that isn't likely to stir much discussion in other arenas, you know it's a fluid line-up. Still, Christopher Plummer is a delight and makes it look so easy in "Beginners," so, fittingly, he's already having flags planted on his behalf by early kudo committees. But after that, it's anyone's game.
I placed a bet on Max Von Sydow last week after hearing multiple accounts of his work in "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" being something special and the most viable option from the cast. But it's still a largely unseen film, as is "My Week with Marilyn" and Kenneth Branagh's supporting turn as Laurence Olivier. But those who have caught a look are quick to mention the two.
Of the films that have been widely screened, Albert Brooks sticks out as a real possibility in "Drive." That is, of course, assuming the Academy can warm up to the chilly film. Certainly if Brooks maintains a presence throughout the season, he'll be an easy vote for many. And it's the kind of recognition that would open even more doors for the long-time comedy actor.
One question is whether Nick Nolte can hold on to a spot in the wake of box office woes for "Warrior." That will be a tough hurdle to clear, and it'll require a bit of a presence, much like Brooks. Sustaining anything from September on is difficult, but especially so when you face inherent uphill climbs.
It's interesting, then, that so many veteran actors are leading the discussion in the category this year. But the fun doesn't stop there.
Fox Searchlight is planning a supporting actor push for Brad Pitt's career-best performance in "The Tree of Life," a nice complement to his leading work in "Moneyball." He could find traction in both categories easily. It'll be interesting to watch how or if the focus shifts between the films.
George Clooney's "The Ides of March" contains a pair of performances that could find room. Philip Seymour Hoffman nails the part of a jaded but loyal campaign strategist, however, I think Clooney's sparsely utilized politician makes a more compelling case for recognition, especially given a knock-out delivery late in the film.
Jim Broadbent and David Thewlis have similar roles in "The Iron Lady" and "The Lady," respectively. The latter has received good notices out of Toronto while the former is still to be revealed.
Another mostly unseen possibility is Patton Oswalt in "Young Adult," who is said to be a very sympathetic element of the film. Meanwhile, Jonah Hill already has a healthy number of fans of his work in "Moneyball."
There are a pair of brief but memorable portrayals in "The Descendants" (Robert Forster) and "Rampart" (Ben Foster). The former has the most potential for finding champions but neither are likely to gain considerable traction.
Finally, if enough people see their films, John Hawkes ("Martha Marcy May Marlene") and Ezra Miller ("We Need to Talk About Kevin") could easily find passionate supporters. And who knows what the supporting casts of "J. Edgar" and "War Horse" bring to the table?
But since things are so up in the air, I'd like to throw my vote into the ether. Corey Stoll in "Midnight in Paris" remains one of the true delights for me this year. His riff on Ernest Hemingway through the author's trademark prose style was perfectly executed. I keep saying I just had a big smile on my face whenever he was on screen, and that kind of presence deserves to be recognized. Here's hoping he can find some traction this season.
QUICK NOTE: The Contenders section still isn't up and running yet, but for now, I've done a small bit of updating in the sidebar predictions. The full list of predictions will soon be available there, but for now, it was easier to move the top eight categories there while we work on other elements.
What are some other supporting performances from the year that you think deserve a look in this wide open race? Rattle off your favorites in the comments section below.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
The actor-director gets all the best close-ups in his Faulkner adaptationMonday, May 20, 2013
-
'Traumatized critics exhale.'Monday, May 20, 2013
-
The prestige distributor also handled Asghar Farhadi's 'A Separation'Monday, May 20, 2013
-
Oscar Isaac is a revelation in melancholy study of arrested artistrySunday, May 19, 2013






Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 59 CommentsDaniel N.
October 3, 2011 at 2:04PM EST Reply to CommentI was quite fond of John C. Reilly in "Terri". For that matter, Jacob Wysocki was terrific too. And I'm surprised that Jude Law isn't really in the conversation for "Contagion".
Daniel N.
October 3, 2011 at 2:05PM EST Reply to CommentJohn C. Reilly in "Terri" was pretty terrific. Same goes for Jacob Wysocki, but that's lead. And I'm kind of surprised that Jude Law isn't in the conversation for "Contagion" - I figure if there's one thing that the studio could push for in that ensemble it would be him.
Blake
October 3, 2011 at 2:41PM EST Reply to CommentAre the tech categories going to be added back to the sidebar predictions? It was sad to see them go after the move to HitFix.
Kristopher Tapley Please read the "Quick Note" where that question is answered.
October 3, 2011 at 2:49PM ESTDanny
October 3, 2011 at 2:58PM EST Reply to CommentAlan Rickman in HPDH2.
GL
October 3, 2011 at 3:05PM EST Reply to CommentYou pretty much nailed the conversation when it comes to this category. It's possibly the widest race after Supporting Actress. I would love to see a push for Watlz and Reilly in "Carnage". A film that seems to have been resurrected at the NYFF. And also it would be awesome to see some of the supporting players from "Midnight in Paris" make the talk as well. As for "Contagion" and Jude Law, the film has pretty much settled in the sci-fi bit of the race, and once that happens, it's a very hard hole to climb out of.
Kristopher Tapley RE: Waltz and Reilly, they'll both go lead, so, don't expect to see them pop up here.
October 3, 2011 at 3:53PM ESTLaura Stewart
October 3, 2011 at 3:10PM EST Reply to CommentThis probably won't happen, but John Hawkes in MMMM. I thought he was great in Winter's Bone (not a fan of the movie though- sorry Anne!), but he was delightfully terrifying in MMMM.
Lev Lewis
October 3, 2011 at 3:33PM EST Reply to CommentCurious as to why nobody mentions Hugh Dancy in Martha Marcy. His parts not as showy as Hawkes', but it's certainly more substantial. Paulson & Dancy were terrific, and should really be in the conversation.
AnnaZed
October 3, 2011 at 3:33PM EST Reply to CommentAre all of the Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy guys considered not in this conversation, already?
Kristopher Tapley They're in the conversation, sure. But the more I reflect on them the more it becomes obvious none of them will stand out from the pack.
October 3, 2011 at 3:54PM ESTJames
October 3, 2011 at 3:39PM EST Reply to CommentI just wish Stoll had more screen time. He's so good in the film. Its not often you see actors that you aren't too familiar with that work with high prolific filmmakers and you wonder "Where did he come across this guy? I like this actor. I'd like to see more of him or her." Of course Stoll's been working for quite some time now.
Linus
October 3, 2011 at 3:48PM EST Reply to CommentWould love to see a nomination for Mark Strong in Tinker, Tailor.
AnnaZed I haven't seen the film yet, but Mark Strong has had just such a wonderful couple of years since RockNRolla maybe they should nominate him just so the general public can get straight that he's not Stanley Tucci.
October 3, 2011 at 4:16PM ESTLinus Most people I know actually get Strong confused with Andy Garcia. Heh.
October 3, 2011 at 4:22PM ESTglenn c
October 3, 2011 at 3:54PM EST Reply to CommentBrian Cox and Gerard Butler in Ralph Fienne's directorial debut, Coriolanus. Cox is brilliant as always but Butler surprised a lot of people by being more than able to hold a screen with the inimitable Mr. Fiennes.
DylanS
October 3, 2011 at 4:03PM EST Reply to CommentI feel like Hawkes would really need Elizabeth Olsen to gain traction and get nominated for him to get a nod himself, as was the case with "Winter's Bone". I just worry that the category, and competition from Felicity Jones in another breakout indie role, is going to make that difficult for her.
DylanS
October 3, 2011 at 4:10PM EST Reply to CommentI think the only person who really has a chance amongst the Supporting males from "Tinker, Tailor" is Hardy. The problem is that all of the performances are very very good, but the critics seem to be singling him out (if anyone). A smart campaign and end of year critical recognition for the performance could make that nomination possible.
JJ1
October 3, 2011 at 4:10PM EST Reply to CommentBad buzz be damned, I still think Armie Hammer could have a shot based on his star potential and what we saw in the trailer of what could be a very Oscar-friendly film (even with the overall quality up in the air).
And I agree with those who say that this field feels WIDE open. Though, I'm guessing that Kenneth Branagh has a shot - good buzz, and goodwill from directing the successful Thor.
Ibad
October 3, 2011 at 4:37PM EST Reply to CommentThis would be my ballot as of right now:
1. Shahab Hosseini, A Separation
2. Ezra Miller, We Need To Talk About Kevin
3. Bruce Greenwood, Meek's Cutoff
4. Eddie Marsan, Tyrannosaur
5. Zachary Quinto, Margin Call
Stanford
October 3, 2011 at 4:42PM EST Reply to CommentPretty much agree with your assessment. I think Brooks is a lock for Drive because Drive should be getting more buzz for director and cinematography but hasn't. Brooks acting here would be a standout in any movie this year, by far, but is also enhanced because something must be given to such a well reviewed and well made film as this. Didn't Refn win Cannes?
Guy Lodge Refn did indeed win Best Director at Cannes, but that makes no difference to the Oscar conversation, I'm afraid. Different worlds.
October 3, 2011 at 6:18PM ESTTye-Grr
October 3, 2011 at 5:09PM EST Reply to CommentAs of right now, my personal choices out of the performances I've seen would be:
Christoph Waltz, 'Water For Elephants'
Alan Rickman, 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2'
Ryan Gosling, 'Crazy, Stupid, Love'
Albert Brooks, 'Drive'
Kiefer Sutherland, 'Melancholia'
DylanS really like the choice of Sutherland in "Melancholia". After I saw that he was in it, I had this weird feeling that he wasn't going to gell with Von Triers sensibility. But after seeing the film, he was my favorite performance and I was really intrigued by his characters arc in the second half.
October 3, 2011 at 6:14PM ESTLinus I agree with that. Sutherland is a good shout. Saw the movie for the first time today and thought he was great.
October 3, 2011 at 6:16PM ESTRashad Loved Waltz too
October 3, 2011 at 6:34PM ESTTye-Grr @Dylan- Those were my thoughts too before going in. I was pleasantly surprised.
October 4, 2011 at 12:05AM EST@Rashad- Waltz was flat-out fantastic. It's just too bad that 'Elephants' came out so early in the year and with such a negative reaction. It's a mediocre film, but Waltz is seriously Oscar-worthy.
Laura Stewart Hmmm.. this is interesting. I don't see see any of those happening besides Brooks and that's still iffy. None of the men stood out for me in Melancholia... to be honest, none of the performances were inspiring.
October 4, 2011 at 4:13AM ESTsharkman
October 3, 2011 at 5:37PM EST Reply to CommentI thought The Guard was pretty funny, but not a great film, but, while those who have seen it are raving Gleeson's performance, Don Cheadle has sadly been given short shrift. To some extent, he plays the straight man to Gleeson, but people shouldn't let that get in the way of realizing how Cheadle is one of the great actors of our time. I'm so irked at how he's misused by Hollywood. :(
SJG
October 3, 2011 at 5:42PM EST Reply to CommentI've seen really few movies that had supporting male performances that particularly stand out, but I concur with you Kris that Corey Stoll would be a great unexpected addition to the nominees. And while we're on the subject of Midnight in Paris, I really can't fathom why Rachel McAdams isn't being considered more seriously in Supporting Actress. I realize that Cotillard has more star power and she had the more enviable role, but McAdams totally kicked ass in what was my hands-down favorite female performance of the year thus far, excluding possibly Jessica Chastain in The Help.
But back on the subject of Supporting Actor, I weirdly would love to see Tom Hiddleston get recognition, not for Midnight in Paris, but--dare I say it?--Thor. I know that there is literally no chance of that ever happening, and maybe his performance just seemed really good because of how much the movie itself kind of sucked, but it has been one of my favorite supporting performances from a man this year. Which is kind of sad.
Finally, I'm glad that it's looking more and more like Brooks is a lock. I didn't care for Drive much at all--more respect for what it tried to do than actually caring for what it did--but Brooks really is beginning to stand out as a real highlight of 2011 for me.
Guy Lodge I'm stunned anybody loves McAdams that much in Midnight in Paris. I just felt sorry for the actress -- she seemed utterly hamstrung by one of the narrowest, most needlessly ungenerous female roles Allen has ever written.
October 3, 2011 at 6:21PM ESTDylanS I agree with you for the most part, Guy. But I do think it was smart of Allen to cast the always likable McAdams as a character who's written to be so unlikeable. It sort of balances it out enough to work in the end.
October 3, 2011 at 7:53PM ESTSJG You don't understand, Guy. I live in one of the wealthiest per capita counties in the United States. The entire population is yuppie, big business, Republican, etc., etc. Rachel McAdams is PERFECT. I interact with women just like her character all of the time.
October 3, 2011 at 11:05PM ESTYou can say it's needlessly ungenerous, but I have the feeling you've not been blessed with the constant presence of people who are exactly like her. I wanted to die laughing. I loved everything about her performance. The way she moved her head was even spot on.
Laura Stewart Oh man SJG, you need to move. Now!!
October 4, 2011 at 4:14AM ESTPaul Outlaw If you've seen Mean Girls, you know that likeability is not what put McAdams on the map. And that was a better part (and performance) than this one.
October 5, 2011 at 12:18PM ESTSJG
October 3, 2011 at 5:45PM EST Reply to CommentOh, and this is unrelated to the topic Kris, but do you really not do predictions for the full slate of categories anymore? I miss that... unless I'm just not finding some link to the full slate somewhere.
Kristopher Tapley I've answered this in this thread once already! Wowsers. Check the note listed at the bottom of the article.
October 3, 2011 at 6:09PM ESTJJ1
October 3, 2011 at 6:06PM EST Reply to CommentTo echo the last podcast, perhaps Philip Seymour Hoffman 'does' have more of a shot fur 'Ides'. I sense a slight changing of the winds towards that film after it's initial 'okay' response. One of my favorite critics (James Berardinelli) just raved the film and all the performances. And as mentioned, this is a Clooney writing, directing, acting vehicle. AMPAS likes him and - usually - the prestige films he is tied to.
AndrewM679
October 3, 2011 at 6:15PM EST Reply to CommentNot that I want to see a movie with Leo and Hammer in it, I'm a little happy that J.Edgar may not live up to the hype. Opens up the BP field, and makes best actor more exciting.
Dalurae
October 3, 2011 at 6:20PM EST Reply to CommentI wonder if Midnight in Paris will still be talked about till year end. Loved the movie and Corey Stoll's portrayal of Hemingway, but don't think the odds are in Stoll's favor.
Same goes for Christopher Plummer. Again I liked Beginners very much, but it's quite forgotten at this point IMO. But I wonder if he'd have chances for his role in Girl with Dragon Tattoo.
Hm, provided J.Edgar turns out good enough (though I am very doubtful...) how about Armie Hammer? He looks great in the trailer.
Don't think MMMM will get the same buzz as Winter's Bone, but haven't seen the film so I guess I'm in no position to pass judgment. Of course I'd be happy to see Hawkes lands a nom again.:)
Bryce
October 3, 2011 at 6:28PM EST Reply to CommentMy predictions (Realistic wishlist):
Kenneth Branagh - My Week with Marilyn
Albert Brooks - Drive
John Hawkes - Martha Marcy May Marlene
Brad Pitt - The Tree of Life
Christopher Plummer - Beginners
I've had a pretty good personal streak for the past couple of years at guessing what Oscar players won't meet expectations (I guessed what the reception would be for The Ides of March earlier), and my instinct is telling me that EL&IC will join the likes of The Lovely Bones, Nine and recent Eastwood films.
JJ1
October 3, 2011 at 6:32PM EST Reply to CommentSomeone mentioned Tom Hiddleston before. Good call. He has obvious huge stumbling blocks (relative unknown, genre of the film - superhero comic).
BUT, Hiddleston was able to convey vulnerability, attract sympathy, and then ... turn monstrous and powerful in several of those heated scenes with Hopkins and Hemsworth. It's what I'd call a 'great performance' by an actor in a Supporting Role.
Rashad Agreed. I'd nominate him and Hemsworth. And Fassbender.
October 3, 2011 at 6:35PM ESTSJG I'm glad to hear I wasn't the only one who harbors some seriously unrealistic hopes for his Thor performance. You've perfectly summed up why his performance was so great.
October 3, 2011 at 11:07PM ESTTye-Grr Count me in as someone who walked away from 'Thor' feeling that Hiddleston gave the film's best performance. I thought he was great. I enjoyed pretty much all involved, but Hiddleston stole the film.
October 4, 2011 at 12:08AM ESTBen
October 3, 2011 at 6:45PM EST Reply to CommentPhillip Seymour Hoffman is certainly a wonderful actor but no performance in Ides stood out for me. All of those actors have done MUCH better work.
ryy
October 3, 2011 at 8:02PM EST Reply to CommentMark Strong for “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy”
He's the best supporting actor in the film.
Guy Lodge That some of you are singling out Strong provides a handy illustration of why none of the 'Tinker, Tailor' supporting actors are going to break through -- there are too many of them, and the quality of their performances is too uniformly high, for one to get singled out. A lot of people favour Hardy; others think Cumberbatch is the standout. You see the problem? It's an 'L.A. Confidential' situation.
October 4, 2011 at 3:14AM ESTRichardA
October 3, 2011 at 8:04PM EST Reply to CommentThe way things are going, Midnight in Paris will be the summer movie that will be remembered. I'm pretty much sure that Eric Stoller will be singled out (over Marion Cotillard) for the acting catergories. It WILL get BP, screenplay, acting for Stoller, and maybe director. I'm sure the surge will start off from the NY Critics and the corresponding Top 10 lists.
Reply i don't think any of the supporting performances in the movie were strong enough. Only Owen Wilson got initial buzz.
October 3, 2011 at 8:18PM ESTKristopher Tapley Eric who?
October 4, 2011 at 2:22AM ESTGuy Lodge There was no initial buzz for Wilson, good though he is in the film.
October 4, 2011 at 3:10AM ESTLaura Stewart
October 4, 2011 at 4:15AM EST Reply to CommentTom Hardy because he has the most beautiful lips in the industry.
Anita
October 4, 2011 at 10:19AM EST Reply to CommentI really hope Young Adult delivers, because I'd love to see Patton Oswalt get some attention this season. He was so fantastic in United States of Tara and Big Fan. It would be really nice to see him receive some well-deserved praise. Max Von Sydow's role looks to be something I'm going to be a total sucker for, and since this category is unofficially the lifetime achievement category, he absolutely should be in the mix. Would be great to see Pitt, Forster and Foster, but I cannot understand the praise for Miller. I found him almost unwatchable.
- 1
- 2
Next 59 Comments