John Orloff talks his new exciting gig: writing Bryan Singer's 'Battlestar Galactica' reboot
The 'Anonymous' screenwriter on his chance to finally write in the genre he loves
"Anonymous" screenwriter John Orloff is a big fan of the series and has always wanted to write sci-fi.
Are you a fan of Academy Awards?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
So the news just dropped that "Anonymous" screenwriter John Orloff has been tapped to write Bryan Singer's reboot of "Battlestar Galactica" for the big screen. I was aware of this imminent announcement when I sat down with Orloff last week to discuss his work on "Anonymous" (that interview will pop up in this space in the coming days), so I wanted to get his perspective on transitioning to a project of that scale.
Orloff got the gig because Singer happened to see "Anonymous" and really liked it. Singer had talked to the writer about "Battlestar Galactica" being a sort of Shakespearean story, fathers and sons painted against a big interstellar canvas. After that, it was all about Orloff's take on the material, which he calls "pretty ballsy."
Naturally he was reticent to go into too many details. But it sounded to me like a project he wants to fit inside the pre-existing framework that came before. I was reminded of how the filmmakers behind 2009's "Star Trek" were careful about that kind of thing, not to draw any real definitive parallel here.
Here is the bulk of what Orloff told me:
"I'm a huge fan of the original series and of the second show, too. But I always thought the first show was a little too heavily reliant on 'Star Wars,' you know? Whereas I think the second show was really original and really cool. And I think I've come up with a way to write this movie that won't fuck any of that up. I'm not sure how much they want me to talk about it. Let's just say it's not what you expect. It will all work in the universe that exists. It will not conflict with anything Ron Moore has done. I don't think you can compete with what he's done.
"I'm actually a science fiction geek more than anything. I just sort of got type cast as sort of a non-fiction screenwriter. That's because the first thing I ever wrote was 'Anonymous' and then my first job was 'Band of Brothers,' and that led to 'A Mighty Heart.' But I'm a total 'Star Wars' geek. I was a huge 'Star Trek' nut. '2001' is probably my favorite film. Stanley Kubrick is my favorite director; every movie is like a novel in the sense of the metaphoric depths of his thinking. And so my whole life I've always wanted to write a space epic. So to finally get a chance to write in the genre that I wanted to write basically forever is really cool."
I have to come clean and admit that I've never really dug in on either series, though I did see the new mini-series when it came along. Regardless, I think Orloff is careful to maintain a lot of what built a new fanbase for the material, and clearly he's excited about diving into a world he's dreamed about writing for years.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
The actor-director gets all the best close-ups in his Faulkner adaptationMonday, May 20, 2013
-
'Traumatized critics exhale.'Monday, May 20, 2013
-
The prestige distributor also handled Asghar Farhadi's 'A Separation'Monday, May 20, 2013
-
Oscar Isaac is a revelation in melancholy study of arrested artistrySunday, May 19, 2013






Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupNecron2.0
October 21, 2011 at 11:54AM EST Reply to Comment"It will not conflict with anything Ron Moore has done."
Ron Moore's show wasn't a success. It got a bunch of critical hype, but viewership was in the toilet. If this is a reboot of the original, better BSG, then it MUST conflict with what Ron Moore did.
Chris By your logic American Idol is a better show than Mad Men because it gets way better ratings.
October 21, 2011 at 11:31PM ESTj
October 22, 2011 at 1:28PM EST Reply to CommentChris, shows are made for audiences, not for critics.
Not only must it conflict with Moore's great big nothing, it must ignore Moore's tripe altogether.
Iain Parkes
October 22, 2011 at 2:11PM EST Reply to CommentAre you people still pissed off that Starbuck was a girl in Ron's show? Get a grip!
J No. We're pissed of that Ron Moore's Lifetime drama had nothing to do with Battlestar Galactica.
October 22, 2011 at 2:27PM ESTSo get your own grip.
Logan
October 24, 2011 at 2:53PM EST Reply to CommentI love the people who can't get past their nostalgia to realize how truly awful the original BSG was.
J You know you GINO was a Lifetime drama, right?
October 24, 2011 at 4:33PM ESTAnthony Pero
October 26, 2011 at 9:21AM EST Reply to CommentI'm sorry, I have to LOL at the notion that the original BSG is in any way, shape or form even in the same discussion as RM's reboot, which is one of the top five tv shows of all time. Comparing viewership between these shows is like comparing Brett Favre's stats with Norm Van Brocklin. It's a pointless exercise. The original BSG was only competing with three other shows when it aired. You had three options to watch TV with during it's time slot. You have 300 now. EVERY show has worse numbers nowadays than in 1979.
Anthony Pero
October 26, 2011 at 9:26AM EST Reply to CommentThere's plenty of room to expand on what Ron Moore's show has already done.
***Spoiler warning***
The cylons could return to a modern day (or near future) Earth.
You could look at the original Cylon war that ended 40 years before the show
You could take it from the "other" Earth's civilation, and what happened there.
***End Spoiler Warning***
I'm excited about this project now. I was dreading it before.