Cannes Film Festival 2013

If 'Nine' is out of the Best Picture race, who is in?

'District 9,' 'The Blind Side' and 'This Is It' could sneak in

Penelope Cruz, Fergie and Nicole Kidman at the Los Angeles premiere of Nine

Penelope Cruz is the only actress who has remain unscathed from critics for her work in "Nine."  Reviews have not been as kind to co-stars Nicole Kidman or Fergie.

Credit: AP Photo/Matt Sayles

The box office gods were not kind to Rob Marshall's "Nine" over the weekend. 

After expanding from four to 1,412 theaters, the movie musical grossed only $5.4 million with an incredibly disappointing $3,862 average.  If The Weinstein Company and Relativity Media production had been a low budget indie along the lines of "The Hurt Locker," "A Single Man" or "Crazy Heart" this wouldn't be that big a concern. However, "Nine" cost $65 million after tax credits (or so both companies say, other reports have it anywhere from $80-85 million) and a road to profitability for the high profile movie seems incredibly difficult at this point.  And if Oscar avoids anything, it's high-profile, Oscar bait bombs.  This is not about celebrating red ink people.

Like most movie musicals, "Nine's" biggest day was Friday ($2 million) and it dropped every day following (that's not a good sign).  The Weinstein Company is well aware that "Nine" didn't expand as hoped and told the LA Times the film will be pulled from smaller cities in the midwest where it performed poorly.  Instead, they will take their chances on the big cities and hope further awards recognition will help fuel the box office. That's akin to making a big hell mary pass in the fourth quarter with your receiver on the other side of the field.  "Nine" was savaged by critics including two damning reviews from the papers of record, the New York and Los Angeles Times, and overall national response hasn't been any kinder.  If Oscar was still operating under its old five-picture system "Nine" would have already gotten the Heidi Klum "You're out" speech.  Instead, it stands perilously on the edge of not making the inaugural ten nominees.  That's a big fall from being the frontrunner way back in September and August.  Well, except for those of us who'd heard the horror stories of bad test screenings and continuous re-edits.

In any event, with Academy members ranking their top ten nominees the question becomes what film could get enough support to knock it out?  It's not enough for "Nine" to be kicked out, support has to go somewhere else.  To figure out how that scenario could play out, let's take a quick look at the overall field.

Locks:

"Avatar"
"The Hurt Locker"
"Up in the AIr"
"Precious"
"Inglourious Basterds"

Should get in:
"Up"
"Invictus"

To be fair, there really are three slots in play after "Nine" has faltered as a true contender. 

Your candidates:
"An Education"
It should get in based on the SAG ensemble nomination, but negative campaigning hasn't helped.  It's gonna be close.

"Nine"
Would be more of a shock if it made the ten than didn't at this point.  And if the box office really falters over the next few weeks, its pretty much over.

"The Blind Side"
A monster hit, but is it too schmaltzy for the Academy (and yes, I did just type that)? Beyond Bullock's charismatic performance the membership might not think there's that much there.

"The Last Station"
Could be the screener surprise #1.  Something suggests the humor in the drama will play better on the small screen for members.

"District 9"
Critically acclaimed blockbuster, but has Sony Pictures campaigned it correctly?  Their ads are not inspired and it all feels a bit half-hearted, like even they don't believe.  They should.

"Michael Jackson's This Is It"
Prognosticators like Pete Hammond believe and the fact it's is the highest grossing concert documentary of all time will help, but hearing it listed among the top ten would still be a shocker.

"Crazy Heart"
Could be screener surprise #2.  It's not doing OK in theaters in limited release, but it's the sort of title the membership will definitely catch over the holidays.  Will that help or hurt?

"The Messenger"
Enough actors saw it for Woody Harrelson to get a SAG nod, have enough of the general Academy members popped the screener in too?  Could be screener surprise #3.

"It's Complicated"
Had a strong opening at the box office for a Nancy Myers film and could defeat "Nine" for the Golden Globe for Best Picture Comedy or Musical.  With ten slots at play, the older-skewing comedy could really benefit from a last minute push.

"A Serious Man"
Long thought of as a shoo-in and the limited box office hasn't helped, but the critic's darling still has its fans.

Looking at the rest of the contenders, it's starting to seem implausible for "Nine" to still make it.  Sure, it's going to make more money than other semi-wide releases "An Education," "The Hurt Locker" and "A Serious Man," but perception is everything.  Those films have a lot more going for them than "Nine"...at the moment. 

Then again, last year Harvey Weinstein pulled a rabbit out of his hat by landing a Best Picture nod for "The Reader" when everyone thought that film's chances were dead and gone.  Can he do the same for "Nine" this time around?  Or, does he focus his energy on driving "Basterds" to an upset to win it all?  We'd recommend the latter, but something tells us Harvey ain't playing that card...yet.

Did "Nine" hit your hometown?  If you saw it, what did you think? And if you didn't go, what made you skip it?  Share your thoughts below.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Cam

    Hurt Locker all the way. I still have to see A Single Man and An Education, but I don't believe they will sway me. Katherine Hardwicke deserves her Best Director nom, and that fantastic little movie deserves to be a Best Picture winner. More people will actually be forced to go watch it and feel for our troops.

    December 29, 2009 at 11:26AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      MLeigh I presume you mean Kathryn Bigelow...

      December 29, 2009 at 1:24PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Michael

    I'm thinking that there might be 4 spots open if Invictus keeps faltering at the box office. Also, I have to comment on the exclusion of The White Ribbon as a possibility in the minds of these "experts." First, the Academy has had a love affair with directors of foreign films (Almodavar, Merilles, Schabel), even when they haven't nominated the film. I see Haneke as a spoiler to take Eastwood's slot (with Invictus faltering) in order to join Bigelow, Cameron, Tarantino, and Reitman in the Director field and with 10 nominees, The White Ribbon is a strong candidate to sneak in. As the frontrunner in the foreign film race, The White Ribbon is on the Academy members' radar more than people think.

    December 29, 2009 at 11:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Leo

    I think you forgot A Single Man.

    December 29, 2009 at 1:31PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Anonymous Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if Harvey diverts some of his Nine campaign bucks to A Single Man and sneaks it in.

      I also wouldn't count out Star Trek just yet. I didn't like it as much as District 9 but I think it has a better chance at this point judging by the Golden Globes love.

      And if a documentary was going to make the top 10, I think The Cove has a much better shot than This Is It.

      December 29, 2009 at 3:13PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Alex

    I am shocked by all this negative response of both critics, and the lack of public viewing, 'Nine' is a rare film, that has true craft and care put into every second, is it becaise its dark or inspiried byt a great film?
    I mean seriously what is it people, I would like an actual, reasonable response, why is this a bad movie, these are the people that celebrate 'Transformenrs' and 'G.I. Joe', tell me why they were better films, please.

    'Nine' is gorgeous, the performances are fantastic, and numbers are so well done, I mean really what is it?

    December 29, 2009 at 1:53PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Courtney I agree. I loved "Nine" and thought it was absolutely fantastic. As a Broadway lover, I was a little scared at first about seeing this film, as many movies based off of Broadway shows fail - in quality and in ratings. However, this film is unlike any movie musical I have ever seen before. I loved the artistry that so obviously went in to making this film. I recommend it to eveyone.

      December 29, 2009 at 2:01PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      L.S Alex, the problem with Nine is it strives to be an arthouse masterpiece and it falls short of that lofty goal. When you a make a film like Transformers of G.I Joe you are catering to the general masses and make no illusions of pretense of artistic granduer. Thus it's much easier for audiences to like these films. When you make a remake of a Fellini art film, you have to be on the ball. You cannot strive to make half assed art and expect success. Half assed commerce on other hand is just commerce. That's why people like Transformers better than Nine, cause one is a honest commercial film, the other a half hearted arthouse masterpiece.
      You cannot go halfway with art, it is or it isn't.

      December 29, 2009 at 3:05PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    craig

    ok you really dropped the ball on this one!!...(500) Days Of Summer has a better shot then most of the films you listed!

    December 29, 2009 at 1:55PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Anthony

    Yo writer--

    1. It's a "hail Mary" pass, not a "hell mary" pass.

    2. As far as the caption on the picture goes, Marion Cotillard also received wonderful reviews.

    December 29, 2009 at 1:55PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mark

    I WANT to see one independent film on the list and I know that film called "SERBIAN SCARS" was one of the top contenders for 67th Golden Globes and now is going for the Oscars so I want to se that film on the list. To many big studios with a bad films we need something new and fresh GO SERBIAN SCARS BIG FAN HERE!!!!!!!!

    December 29, 2009 at 2:09PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      tony Mark I saw the film and you are right great film lets see this film on the list.......

      December 29, 2009 at 2:10PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    jak

    December 29, 2009 at 2:50PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      jak Sorry, I hit enter too fast. Anyway, here's my call for ten best pictures nominations. The Hurt Locker, Avatar, Precious, Up in the Air, Inglourious Basterds, An Education, A Single man, District 9, a serious man and my no guts no glory pick for the tenth nom is...In the Loop.

      December 29, 2009 at 3:00PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Morgan

    I always thought Sony's marketing campaign for District 9 was weird anyway. The trailers were so unlike what the film actually offered that most people walked out either elated or deeply disappointed that the movie wasn't what they thought it was. Even the marketing for the DVD is the same. You'd think after months of glowing reviews and audience response they would have gotten a handle on what they actually have here - hard sci fi with a great central performance. Instead they keep playing up the "alien invasion" angle. Weird.

    December 29, 2009 at 3:00PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    monkey

    moon was one of the best pictures i've seen all year. sam rockwell did an amazing job in that but i guess no one bothered to watch it.

    December 29, 2009 at 3:31PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jeff

    You know what is sad? That a film the quality of "Star Trek". One of the best reviewed movies of the year. Can't even rate a mention of possible nominees when they open the ranks to 10. It's the Hollywood bias against TV. But the movie really transcended it's roots and became a true cinematic experience. Pretty close to a cinematic miracle, given the odds of success. Oh well, it can't take anything away from that amazing experience. Just would be nice to have some academy love.

    December 29, 2009 at 3:38PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dax

    District 9 deserves the spot. And I do agree with the weird angle that Sony is taking with their advertising of the movie. It really is more than just an 'alien invasion' movie. Actually, it's not even about an invasion at all. And after watching Avatar, the only thing Avatar has going for it is the graphics. The script and acting was just dull. So having it get a Best Picture nom just because it made millions at the box office and it's nice to look at, doesn't mean it deserves Best Picture.

    December 29, 2009 at 3:48PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    OscarWatcher

    Avatar nominated for best picture? You serious? Anyway, The Blind Side deserves to be up there too. And UP, of course.

    December 29, 2009 at 3:55PM EST Reply to Comment


  • I don't get Moon not getting any attention either. I don't expect it to win but it was a great movie and Sam Rockwell was lights out.

    December 29, 2009 at 4:37PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Kyle Boynton

    (500) Days of Summer or Moon. Fantastic flicks from this year that deserve a shot at the top stop.

    December 29, 2009 at 4:38PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    phloppydong

    Up In the Air, for worst movie of the year. How this is getting any award attention shows how out of touch with reality and good movies Award voters are.

    December 29, 2009 at 4:55PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Adam Ouriel

    listen, in my opinion, this is why the move to 10 movies for best picture was very much unnecessary - there are five "locks" listed for a reason: there were five nominations before, and that's the perfect number. there's so much discrepancy beyond that because those pictures don't deserve the nominations.

    December 29, 2009 at 5:01PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Rob Wills I absolutely agree with Adam's assessment. I'm not positive those would have been my five choices, as I still have a couple to see, but 5 is definitely the right number. The problem for me is the critics have become so powerful that if you don't go along with their 5 choices, you are laughed out the door. I wish people could feel OK voting with their hearts, rather than parroting the critics. Critics have let me down a lot of times.

      December 29, 2009 at 8:11PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ralph

    Nine wasn't worth the time I spent anticipating the film and probably wasn't worth the time I spent watching it. A fan of the show on which it is based, I was appalled by the cuts and so angry with the additions that I nearly got up and left the theatre. The heart of the story was stolen from it at every point. Characters were added which were un-needed. Lillian was subjugated to a castrated role. It was a mess. It looked beautiful...but there was nothing holding it together except the hope that a womanizer can succeed. He doesn't... but by the time you get there you're already so mad at the film for glorifying male objectification of women... There was no real feeling of hurt or damage in Guido, which is necessary in making him human. This film robbed the musical of everything that made it great and powerful and gave us huge dance numbers instead. Total fluff and undeserving of the money and time I spent on it.

    December 29, 2009 at 5:04PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mc

    What about THE ROAD? Any possibility that could sneak in? If anything, Viggo certainly deserves a nom for his intense performance- maybe the best I've seen all year, to be honest.

    December 29, 2009 at 5:52PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    taber

    goodbye solo was the best film i saw this year.

    December 29, 2009 at 6:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    Is NINE out of the running because no one is seeing it -- or because it is a bad movie? It has been universally panned by the critics, so why does its box-office matter?

    This has been a bad year for movies. The only movie that I've seen that is worthy of being the Best Picture is 500 DAYS OF SUMMER. Unfortunately, it is a movie that a lot of people missed. Too bad that quality counts for so little.

    December 29, 2009 at 6:41PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Matt

    Star Trek should be on that list

    December 29, 2009 at 6:42PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bro I agree with the sentiment. I thought the expansion to 10 films was in part so that more blockbusters that would usual be ignored (a la Spiderman or the Dark Knight) would have some chance. Star Trek was a boffo box office hit and one of the best review movies of the year. Doesn't it at least deserve a mention?

      December 29, 2009 at 11:28PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ryan Hoffman

    Yea I have to echo what other readers have said, 500 Days of Summer has an outside shot at the 10, but it is certainly better possibility than "This Is It". Pete Hammond really is looking for something that isn't there and I will literally eat crow if it makes it.
    In my opinion the order of likelihood right now of nomination (not in winning order necessarily)
    1. The Hurt Locker
    2. Up In The Air
    3. Avatar
    4. Inglorious Basterds
    5. Precious
    6. Invictus
    7. Up
    8. An Education

    Those 8 are in.

    9. A Serious Man
    10. Crazy Heart
    11. The Blind Side
    12. The Messenger
    13. District 9
    14. The Last Station
    15. The Lovely Bones
    16. Julie and Julia
    17. 500 Days of Summer
    18. It's Complicated
    19. Star Trek
    20. A Single Man

    If I had to pick 2 just based on gut I'll say A Serious Man and The Messenger getting in with The Blind Side being able to bounce if possible.

    December 29, 2009 at 6:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Ryan Hoffman lol I forgot Nine, I would say its behind the blind side.

      December 29, 2009 at 6:54PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Robert Rostad

    I walked out of NINE with bad feelings for the film, then realized that I was still thinking about it days later. It's interesting, and has some striking moments. I think it'll be something that people revisit for a couple years. It may age well.

    December 30, 2009 at 3:33PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Awards Campaign

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web