Cannes Film Festival 2013

Damon Lindelof and Ridley Scott say they took the 'Alien' prequel out of 'Prometheus'

Plus: Michael Fassbender on bringing life to an android

<p>David (Michael Fassbender) makes a startling discovery in a scene from Ridley Scott's "Prometheus."</p>

David (Michael Fassbender) makes a startling discovery in a scene from Ridley Scott's "Prometheus."

Credit: 20th Century Fox

Are you a fan of Breaking News?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

ANAHEIM - You'd think after a 25 minute panel in front of approximately 3,700 WonderCon attendees, a few scattered interviews and a 20 minute press conference Saturday we'd finally know whether Ridley Scott's "Prometheus" was actually a prequel to his 1979 classic "Alien."  It turns out the true answer may just depend on your definition of prequel.

After impressing the WonderCon crowd with the film's new trailer, Scott appeared with screenwriter and executive producer Damon Lindelof and star Michael Fassbender for a quick, but informative press conference.  Lindeloff admits that when he first met with Scott to discuss the project the p-word was the big "elephant in the room and needed to be addressed."

Lindelof recalls, "When I first heard Ridley was going to direct an 'Alien' prequel and six months later my phone rang and the voice on the other end said, 'Are you able to talk to Ridley Scott?' And I crashed into a telephone pole. (Laughs.) I came back and [they told me they were going to send me a script that night].  I read this thing and we went in and had a meeting and he was already clearly saying, 'I want to come back to the genre.  I want to do Sci-Fi again, but I think this movie is too close to 'Alien.' I've done this stuff before, but there are big ideas in that are unique in and of itself.'  And I said, 'Well, I think that's what we have to do because if there was a sequel to this movie we are working on, which eventually became 'Prometheus,' it would not be 'Alien.'  Normally that's a definition of a prequel is it precedes the other movie."

After making a dig at George Lucas' "Star Wars" franchise, Lindelof continues, "Often there is an inevitability to watching a prequel.  So, If the ending of this movie is just going to be the room that John Hurt walks into that has eggs there is nothing interesting in that. We know how it's going to end. So, this movie will hopefully contextualize the original 'Alien' so maybe you know a bit  more, but you don't [expletive] around with that movie.  If were successful enough to even do a sequel to 'Prometheus it will tangentialize even further away from the original 'Alien.'"

"Prometheus" features Fassbender, Charlize Theron, Noomi Rapace, Idris Elba, Logan Marshall-Green ("Dark Blue"), Rafe Spall and Sean Harris as explorers hoping to find out more about an ancient alien connection to Earth.  When they arrive at the origin planet dictated in the archeological "invitation" it's soon apparent all isn't what it seems.  And for anyone who has seen the original "Alien," it just happens to be the planet where Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) first encountered those pesky chestbursters that haunted her across the big screen for decades.  Therein lies a connection that isn't a direct prequel, but could be argued either way in a court of law.

Fassbender, who is coming off his critically acclaimed turns in "Shame" and "X-Men: First Class," has the unenviable job of playing David, the crew's lifelike android.  On one hand, the 34-year-old actor appears to have put a lot of thought into his portrayal of a being that is almost human noting, "I think you want to play with as much of those human traits as possible. What if you program something and you you try and build a computer that essentially has a physicality to it and it's programed to be able to incorporate itself into a human environment? You have to have certain personalities that will get on in space. He has to be flexible. What happens when the program makes its own connections?  Forming its own sort of ego, insecurity, envy, jealousy?"

Fassbender also notes, "You have this guy who is on his own for two years while everyone else is in cryostasis. So, what does he do?  He amuses himself. There was the idea there that he was a little boy and he has to rely on his imagination to keep himself occupied.  He's curious and how far will that curiosity go?  In the way Damon wrote it, people treat him like a robot. There's a bit of contempt for David. He has all the answers or at least a lot of them. So, he's hyper-intelligent and more advanced than a regular human being so people don't really embrace him in. He's sort of used and abused. And so how does that make him feel? If robots can feel? You're always playing with the ambiguity if this robot is starting to form a real personality."

Lindeloff recalls it was a conversation with Scott early on which helped him find the character in the context of the screenplay.

"David is mass produced so there are 20,000 other David units out there that look exactly like Michael Fassbender. What a wonderful world that would be, huh? (Laughs).  But the idea is that we all have our iPhones, but we put different cases on them and different apps on them. This David, once you take him out of the wrapping, he would begin to customize himself. He could change his hairstyle. He could change the way he speaks. He could take on different applications based on what this unit is meant to do.  Once we cast Michael that was the killer app there. "

So, whether David is as corrupt and evil as Ash in "Alien" (played by Ian Holm) or as helpful and goodhearted as Bishop in "Aliens" (played by Lance Henricksen) remains to be seen.  Especially after the robot delivers a very dramatic line reading ("Big things have small beginnings") at the end of the film's latest trailer.

Scott was mostly quiet during the conference just chiming to talk about how hard it is to make an original movie and using the examples of the original "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and "The Exorcist" as the forerunners of all modern horror movies.  He also detoured around a pointed question about the differences in technology seen in "Prometheus" and in "Alien" (filmed 30 years earlier) by going off on a long tangent about how Steve Jobs' love of guerrilla glass inspired his idea to give the crew fishbowl like helmets.  But, he's Ridley Scott.  He's a legend and he's allowed to allow for a little creative license now and then.

The 20th Century Fox tentpole was actually something of a vacation for Lindeloff who segued relatively quickly from wrapping up the groundbreaking TV series "Lost" to collaborating with Scott on "Prometheus."  While that might be daunting for some screenwriters, Lindeloff called it "a huge relief."

"I think obviously with 'Lost' it was six years of my life. Between Carlton and I we were at the wheel of the car and the idea of telling a story over 120 hours of time just felt so unwieldy," LIndelof says. "I went away for a month after 'Lost' ended and then the first project I did an committed the next year of my life exclusively to was 'Prometheus.' So, the idea of saying 'yes' it's going to fit in the confines of 120 pages, but you keep going over that same story again.  And whatever story is out there about me saying, 'This is what you should do Ridley.' It's in fact the opposite. I came in and I think he had a clear conversation about the movie he wanted to make. He was enormously patient with me and then I wrote that movie. It was nice to be in the passenger seat saying, 'Maybe we should just make a left up here?' As opposed to driving the car.  And if you are going to let someone drive [it's Ridley]."

"Prometheus" opens nationwide in IMAX and 3D on June 8. 

Greg-ellwood-sm
Gregory Ellwood
Editor-in-Chief, Co-Founder
With over a decade of experience in the movie industry, Ellwood survived working for two major studios and has written for Variety, MSN and the LA Times. A co-founder of HitFix, Ellwood spends his time relaxing hitting 3’s on the basketball court and following his beloved Clippers.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    moribundman

    Who edited this article? For Pete's sake, those mistakes are totally amateur!

    March 18, 2012 at 4:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Joe Gerardi

    Umm... "Crashed into a telephone *poll*"??? Has journalism completely gone to the dogs? Are there no such things as editors any more?

    March 18, 2012 at 5:34AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      DefRef Yeah, and it's "Gorilla glass" used for rugged smartphone screens. None of these trivial rules of basic grammar apply when you're a Major Hollywood Big Shot and co-founder of the site like Ellwood is. Proofreading is for mortals.

      March 18, 2012 at 8:34PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    stewart

    good 1

    March 18, 2012 at 8:00AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Steven Ball

    You went on and on re Michael Fassbender but forgot to mention 2 other actors in the movie who are just as sexy and talented: Guy Pearce and Patrick Wilson.

    March 18, 2012 at 8:02AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Cordy Who were not at the panel he is reporting on...

      March 18, 2012 at 8:27PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    guest

    It's not a prequel it's a reboot. I'm not sure why they're not saying it outright.

    March 18, 2012 at 10:22AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      DougMac I think it's more shared universe than direct prequel. At least if they are not bluffing. But this gives them the chance to make more sequels that take place before Alien while existing in the same universe.

      March 18, 2012 at 11:56AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Robert Yeah, I agree with Doug, you're misunderstanding the difference between 'shared universe' and 'reboot.' 'Halloween' directed by Rob Zombie was a reboot, the Kurt Russell movie 'Soldier' is set in the same universe as 'Blade Runner' (they run almost concurrently). Some people call this a 'side-quel.' It's not the same story, it's different characters, they just happen to be in the same shared space.

      March 18, 2012 at 4:30PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Nowhereman @Robert: Rob Zombie's Halloween is a remake, not a reboot. 'The Amazing Spiderman' that is coming out this year would be a reboot...

      March 19, 2012 at 1:48AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Gray

    Say what you want it may not be a direct prequel but it is in a prequel to the alien world, so yeah I consider it a prequel. You can spin it off in any direction you like, but it has Lv426, the Horseshoe ship and the space Jockey, I can't look at this any other way than a form of prequel.

    March 18, 2012 at 1:59PM EST Reply to Comment
  • 3_talkback_profile

    Intellectual Ninja

    So basically, Lindelof and Ridley don't want to call this movie a prequel (when it so obviously IS a prequel) because of the negative connotation to the word prequel because of Lucas' shitty Star Wars prequels?

    That's actually pretty smart. And they're right. Lucas pretty much napalmed people's idea of what prequels are or can be. People hear that word and they automatically think to themselves, "Prequels? Ugh, like those shitty Star Wars films?"

    But, like Drew has been saying the last month, it is kind of insulting to our intelligence to so vehemently deny these films ARE prequels, because what they're essentially saying by saying that is that there's no connection, or a very tenuous connection, when we can tell that there's a very BIG connection to Alien and Aliens.

    So it's an issue of semantics, and the emotional attachments we as an audience attribute to the word "prequel" that has Lindelof and Ridley Scott running from it like their hair is on fire.

    March 18, 2012 at 3:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Arrow I don't see how one franchise could ruin a word, no matter how bad it is. There's been plenty of shitty sequels and no one seems to care about making them.

      Personnally, I'm not sure Lindelof and Scott understand what "prequel" means. If it's in the same universe and the same and the same timeline, it's a prequel. You don't have to make reference to the other films if you don't want to.

      March 18, 2012 at 5:20PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Prettok Is Predator a prequel to Alien then. Same universe and all thanks to those AvP flicks.
      Are all Thomas Hardy and William Faulkner novels sequels of each other since they take place in the same fictional county?

      March 19, 2012 at 2:27AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Deborah

    I understand why they're not saying it's a prequel. Just the word alone, implies choicelessness. But it IS related to Alien.

    And thank god for that.

    This looks like a winner and I will be rocking up on June 8 -- just like everybody else with any sense.

    March 18, 2012 at 5:39PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Grifter

    What they are saying is that Prometheus will not lead to a direct continuation of the Alien story.

    It deals with the Space Jockey and Xenomorph elements yet the story itself will lead elsewhere.

    Pararell to the Alien story or not? Who knows. Wait and find out.

    March 19, 2012 at 2:42AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

    Mulderism

    I'm confused. Isn't this a movie that explains how the alien ship crashed on LV-426 with the alien eggs onboard? And how the 'Company' eventually learned about it and send Ripley's ship to investigate? That's the movie I want to see.

    Damon Lindelof's involvement has me quite worried.

    March 19, 2012 at 1:08PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mike Love

    Wong about the planet that they landed on , it was not the same as the one Ripley and the Nostromo landed on. In prometheus it was LV-223, in Alien it was LV-426 also dubbed acheron in Aliens.

    June 14, 2012 at 11:12PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Awards Campaign

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web