Cannes Film Festival 2013

An 'Awards-worthy look at the top 25 films of the decade

From 'Let the Right One In' to 'The Dark Knight' and everything in-between

Christian Bale is Batman in Christopher Nolan's "The Dark Knight"

An iconic image from Christopher Nolan's masterpiece "The Dark Knight."

Credit: Warner Bros.


It's a daunting task to come up with a list of best films for a year let alone a decade.  And strangely, unlike the 90's, the past 10 years has just whizzed by with so many movies that were good, but not great that many years seem like a blur.  You try to think of movies that stand out only to discover they came out in 1999 or within the past two years.  That can't be an accurate look at the decade, can it?

The first part of the 21st Century in film is marked by two events: 9/11 and the Writer's Strike of 2008.  Obviously, one has truer historical importance, but both deeply affected the movie industry both creatively and economically.  I'll leave it to cinema historians to reflect on the deluge of war documentaries and features in the middle of the decade that were a direct reflection of the tragic events in New York, but there is some irony that the best of those films, "The Hurt Locker," was one of the last and as good as it is, didn't make this list.  

As any major work stoppage is apt to do, a significant writer's or actor's strike has traditionally affected the next 18 months following it which means this year's crop of films.  No matter what anyone says on either side of these cyclical disputes, the work always suffers.  Studios rush scripts to get finished for production before an expected strike and then rush scripts out when the stoppage is over and that's never good.  Looking over this list and those of my peers, very few films from 2009 crop into their top ten, if any.  In fact, only one made my top 25, "Precious."  But that's another discussion for another page view.

If you were compare decades, this one feels uneven to the 90s which seemed like one breakthrough after another.  That could be because the 80s were a tepid and bloated time following the much lauded 70s era of filmmaking.  Sure, Indie film reached it's peak economically in the 00's, but certainly not artistically.  And with the current dearth of legitimate distributors and the fading DVD market, it's unclear what will happen to independent cinema in the future.  We're guessing it will thrive again in another few years, but perhaps that's wishful thinking.  

In any event, if you're looking for big blockbuster like "Casino Royale," "Pirates of the Caribbean," "Star Trek," "The Bourne Ultimatum" or "Avatar" on this list you'll be sadly disappointed.  All great films, but not best of a decade worthy.  At least not yet, because when it comes down to it a "best of" list is really combining your artistic sensibility with an educated guess on what films will survive the test of time.  When people look back, what films will they watch the most?  What will have the most meaning or relevancy to them?  What will be their "Godfather," "Terms of Endearment" or "Silence of the Lambs" ten or twenty years down the road?  Just something to keep in mind when reviewing the following selections.

25. "Let the Right One In" (2008)
A remarkable and imaginative thriller that could have been made by Polanski or Scorsese in the 70s, by Demme in the early 90s or released 5 years from now and still seem fresh and contemporary.

24. "No Country For Old Men" (2007)

The best Coen film of the decade and yes, sorry Paul Thomas Anderson fans, it's still a more significant accomplishment than "There Will Be Blood."

23. "Finding Nemo" (2003)

Besides another Pixar film further down the list, one of the company's few efforts that overcomes the cutesy formula that is becoming more and more evident with each release.  A truly moving and entertaining piece of animation.

22. "Maria Full of Grace" (2004)
A stunning debut from a filmmaker -- Joshua Marston -- who hasn't released another feature since.  A cousin of the "Y Tu Mama" realism that will be remarked upon later in this list.

21. "Murderball" (2005)

Quite possibly one of the best sports documentaries ever.  

20. "Los Angeles Plays Itself" (2003)

This documentary chronicling how LA has been depicted in the cinema over the past 100 years is a jaw-dropping masterpiece and should be required watching for any true Los Angeleno or, more importantly, student of American history.

19. "Precious" (2009)
One of the more powerful and moving films of the decade lead by a gut-wrenching performance by Mo'Nique that will be referenced for years.

18. "Kill Bill Vol. 1" (2003)
Quentin Tarantino may have made his best dramatic work with "Inglourious Basterds," but he hit an aesthetic high with the first half of his epic action flick.  Other commercial, TV and movie directors have been ripping it off ever since.

17. "The Squid and the Whale" (2005)
Along with "Kramer vs. Kramer" stands as one of the signature films on how divorce affects families in America.  Oh, and it's damn funny and honest too.

16. "Y Tu Mama Tambien" (2001)
A landmark film in which director Alfonso Cuaron brings a new energetic sense of realism to independent film.  The picture was also one of the first to refreshingly depict the middle class in Mexico outside of the stereotypical drug cartel or criminal world stereotypes.

15. "Children of Men" (2006)

Cuaron shows his versatility in this harrowing near-future thriller that features some of these most amazing one-shot sequences ever put to film.  Only a muddled third act keeps it from being higher.

14. "Fahrenheit 9/11" (2004)
No one will argue that a lot of the shine has come off Michael Moore's 2004 documentary depicting the events of 9/11 and the decisions made by the Bush administration thereafter.  However, that might have more to do with Moore than the film itself. In hindsight, it's still one of the most striking cinematic indictments against an American President still in power (at the time of release) ever.

13. "The Lives of Others" (2006)
A pretty powerful film centering on a member of the East German Secret Police and how his views are changed after spying on a suspected writer and his lover.
 
12. "Hero" (2002)

Acclaimed filmmaker Zhang Yimou has been living in the shadow of this gorgeous, intoxicating and heartbreaking martial arts epic ever since its release.  Sadly, he may never top it.

11. "The Incredibles" (2004)
Still Pixar's best movie ever precisely because it has such an identity of its own.  if any of the company's animated features deserved to be nominated for the big Best Picture Oscar it was this one.

10. "Dreamgirls" (2006)
Besides featuring one of the most powerful performances of the decade by Jennifer Hudson, this is the one musical that has more unforgettably staged and moving numbers than any of its peers. Watch "Dreamgirls," "And I'm Telling You...," "Steppin' To The Bad Side," "Fake Your Way To The Top" and "Hard to Say Goodbye" and you'll realize that "Chicago" and "Moulin Rouge" are all one step behind.

9. "28 Days Later" (2002)
The magic of "Slumdog Millionaire" has faded fast (very fast actually), but Danny Boyle's impressive and gutsy reinvention of the zombie thriller has completely changed action movies in the years since.  It's still his best film and the one he'll be remembered for most (at this moment at least).

8. "Atonement" (2007)
Strangely considered overrated, Joe Wright's adaptation of Ian McEwan's acclaimed novel is an intricately and beautifully structured epic that reveals more and more to the viewer during each subsequent screening.

7. "The Hours" (2002)
Another film strangely considered overrated, Stephen Daldry's masterpiece balances three heartbreaking stories and may feature the best set of performances by an ensemble cast in decades.  It features one of Meryl Streep's best turns ever and she wasn't even nominated for it (and we know she gets nominated for almost everything).  Moreover, it's still Julianne Moore's best work to date even though critics ignored it favoring her mannered performance in "Far From Heaven" instead.  At the least, it's worth watching again just for the amazing Philip Glass score.

6. "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" (2007)

Another of the decade's masterpieces that hasn't gotten the love it deserves.  From Brad Pitt's striking turn as James to Casey Affleck's harrowing performance as Ford, this exquisite drama will be remembered long after some of the other more "acclaimed" films the year it debuted.

5. "Sexy Beast" (2000)

Jonathan Glazer's heart-stopping thriller is a stylistic tour-de-force with Ben Kingsley at his absolute best (the idea he lost to Jim Broadbent for Best Supporting Actor that year is a joke).  There is a long laundry list of actors and filmmakers who have been ripping off both Kingsley's performance and the aesthetic of the picture ever since it's release.

4. "Lost in Translation" (2003)

If Cuaron brought a new realism to cinema than Sophia Coppola raised the bar with her artful and subtle drama about two lonely American souls finding each other in the almost alien world of cosmopolitan Tokyo.  Breathtaking to say the least.

3. "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" (2000)

Ang Lee's martial arts epic beat Zhang Yimou's "Hero" to the world stage, but that's not why it's higher on the list.  Lee introduced every element of this fantastical world with a deliberate and lyrical turn that expertly draws the viewer into the story.  He's aided by stunning imagery (which looks more realistic than "Hero") an amazing score and a heartbreaking performance by Michelle Yeow that never got the recognition it deserved (are we detecting a theme here?).

2. "Brokeback Mountain" (2005)

An even bigger achievement for Lee than "Crouching," "Brokeback" is one of the quintessential American love stories of our time.  Every performance and moment is spot on.  A true classic in every sense of the word.

1. "The Dark Knight" (2008)
It isn't in vogue to put Christopher Nolan's blockbuster -- a sequel no less -- on the top of a best of the decade list, but my god is it a masterpiece.  And we have HBO, at least in this pundit's case, to thank for it.  Every time "Dark Knight" is on you can't turn away from the screen.  Whether it's Ledger's career defining performance (which will still be lauded when we're all dead and gone), the groundbreaking score (by two composers of polar opposite styles mind you), the screenplay's subtle allegories to panic in a post-9/11 world or one strikingly powerful and original action sequence after another, Nolan has turned a "superhero movie" into art.  And that, ladies and gentleman, is very, very, very hard thing to do.

Agree or disagree with this list?  Share your thoughts below.

 As the season heats up, look for breaking awards season news and commentary daily on Awards Campaign.  For the latest, follow @HitFixGregory on Twitter.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    BugKiller

    Ummm...

    WHERE THE FRAK IS THE LORD OF THE RINGS???

    The Lord of the Rings (taken as a whole, or as possibly, The Fellowship of the Ring) is better than every single film you have on this list.

    And you're a film critic?

    THIS LIST IS A FAIL OF EPIC PROPORTIONS!

    December 23, 2009 at 8:06AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    BugKiller

    And if you want to talk about culturally significant films, that will last and be beloved in 70 years, as The Wizard of Oz is now...

    ... then The Lord of the Rings would STILL be number one.

    You really need to re-do this list.

    December 23, 2009 at 8:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    fairportfan

    "when a young rock star dies
    to our shock and surprise
    in plane crash or flashy sports car
    he becomes quite well known
    and the kindness he's shown
    has made more than one post-mortem star..."

    "Dark Knight" ain't all that great, and Ledger's Joker was one of the bigger mistakes since Jim Carrey as the Riddler. (Not Ledger's fault - he did real good by a truly stupid re-imaging of the character.)

    It doesn't belong on any Top 20 lists, and even if it did, nowhere near the Number 1 spot.

    Secondly, as usual among the innumerate or historically-challenged, you're ending the decade a year early.

    OTOH, that's as deeply ingrained in the public mindset as the daily misuse of "hopefully" or express checkout lanes that say "Ten items or less", so i doubt it's ever going to be set right.

    December 23, 2009 at 8:16AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      NoSmellNoTell fairportfan,

      First of all, please explain yourself. You say that Ledger's joker was a huge mistake but you fail to give any reasons why. Some very valid arguments for Heath Ledger as the Joker NOT being a mistake though are the fact that The Dark Knight is the second highest grossing film of all time, Ledger won the best supporting actor Oscar, and the 94% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

      As for your comment about the decade, you fail to realize the definition of a decade. A decade is defined as ANY period of 10 years. Therefore 2000-2009 is 10 years, thus a decade. 1458-1467 is 10 years thus a decade. It doesn't matter when it starts and when it ends as long as the movies being reviewed are within that 10 years. That is why 1990 is not considered part of the '80s. So the argument that you don't start counting with 0 is invalid because by saying the best of the decade they are starting with the year 2000 not the year 0. Not to mention that the year 1 itself is arbitrary considering there were years before.

      But good luck getting people to ready your best of the decade articles next year. And I would like to see if your Best Films of the '80s list includes Goodfellas since that came out in 1990.

      December 23, 2009 at 9:54AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Larry

    Some very confusing inclusions/exlusions on this list...

    December 23, 2009 at 8:33AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bob some that should have made the cut:

      a prophet
      adaptation
      the assassination of jesse james
      avatar
      the diving bell and the butterfly
      frost/nixon
      inglourious basterds
      the lord of the rings
      the pianist
      up in the air
      wall-e

      among others!

      December 23, 2009 at 8:46AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Petio Tzvetkov

    It's just absurd not to include movies like LOTR, Sin City, Inglourious Basterds, The Departed, Into The Wild, There Will Be Blood...

    December 23, 2009 at 9:13AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ryan Welshans

    I'm getting pretty tired of seeing critics not putting Avatar on their list, do you honestly think that people will be talking about and analyzing DREAMGIRLS over AVATAR for years to come? If so, I then i'll keep my mouth shut, but I seriously doubt that will be the case. You can do a much better list my friend.

    December 23, 2009 at 9:14AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Cush Agree with your last 3.

      This list is not a list. He's just trying to please every ethnic group. Y Tu Mama Tambien was shite and if you can't admit that, God help you.

      City of God anyone?

      December 23, 2009 at 9:46AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Cush

    See Angels of the Universe (2000). Icelandic film. Ought to be in your top 10. Hard to find, but it's out there.

    Dreamgirls is nonsense. With that PC outlook, you should have included Crash (possibly worst film of the decade).

    December 23, 2009 at 9:43AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Terry Crash is one of the best of the decade.

      December 23, 2009 at 10:36AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Cam

    At least someone has the guts to put TDK where it belongs on their Decade list instead of copping out and not even putting it on the list because too many "anti-mainsteam" people say its overrated crap because everyone else loves it. Good on you for not being a chump like everyone on AICN. And yea Terry, Crash is one of the best of the decade...or the absolute worst. Whichever.

    December 23, 2009 at 11:03AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Cush Crash is white elephant porn

      December 23, 2009 at 11:24AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Cam

    And The Lives of Others was 2007..not 1986. Weird typo.

    December 23, 2009 at 11:05AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Yes, thanks for the heads up. I think I was thinking the year it took place...thought it actually takes place in 84 I believe. And it came out in LA in 2006...

      December 23, 2009 at 3:00PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    keyshock

    I really thought City of God would be on the list.

    December 23, 2009 at 11:19AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    stormshadow4life

    No LOTR = Instant FAIL. No Gladiator, Moulin Rouge, or Pan's Labyrinth just add to the FAILURE of this list. I'll stick to listening to Drew when it comes to movies.

    December 23, 2009 at 11:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Xavier_s_talkback_profile

    lazygarfield

    Two times in your list, you acknowledge a respective film for the effect it had on its genre after its release and how people have been ripping it off since... in that aspect, LOTR de facto becomes the top film in your list.

    The effect it had on the fantasy / medieval / sword n sandals / novel adaptation genres is so MASSIVE that it just cannot be ignored.. And in terms of movies referencing / ripping it off??? I bring to your notice Narnia, The Golden Compass, Eragon etc.

    Also, you mention in the start that one of the major criteria for this list was "what films will survive the test of time.".. In that aspect too, LOTR needs to be (atleast) near the top of your list. Its been 9 years since the first one but still, the very mention of a BluRay release gets people worked up and then the news of "only theatricals" drives them mad with rage. Gollum and Aragron are still featuring in "characters of the decade" lists at outlets like Empire. If that doesn't indicate people remembering the film, then I don't know what does...

    If you are so clearly outlining the criteria for a list, then you should stick to it.

    December 23, 2009 at 11:27AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      BugKiller EXACTLY!!!

      This guy can't name ONE film from the aughts that will be more beloved and remembered 50 years from now like The Lord of the Rings will be.

      This has to be one of the worst lists I've seen in a list crazy end of year.

      Horrible, horrible, horrible job.

      December 23, 2009 at 3:41PM EST
  • Photo_15_talkback_profile

    Jordo

    I like most of these picks, but Gregory obviously has some homophobic tendencies for only including one film about a romance between two men on his list. What about LOTR?!

    December 23, 2009 at 5:15PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Xavier_s_talkback_profile

      lazygarfield Lol, good one Jordo..

      December 23, 2009 at 7:00PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ted

    It's telling that only one of your picks (No Country For Old Men, at the bottom of your list) was a Best Picture winner, and only six of your picks were even BP nominees. Being a nominee isn't a requirement for a 'Best Of' list, but most of those films were great works that deserved more consideration.

    Your comments on the other films closely resemble the hype machines that were attached to them at the time, and shows your interest in satisfying your reader base instead of creating something worth reading.

    Master and Commander, Munich, The Departed, Letters From Iwo Jima, Michael Clayton; you could have picked any one, if not all, of those films and shored up that sieve you call a list.

    LOTR, while I'm not a fan, should have been credited somewhere for at minimum its technical achievements. Nice work.

    December 23, 2009 at 5:40PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    lucius

    Some interesting and unusual choices, and some dumbfounding ones (Dreamgirls...Dreamgirls?). And I'm sorry, films like Lost In Translation and Hours really do not hold up.

    Why double up on Ang Lee? He's an uneven filmmaker and a single mention would be more than generous. And as great as some parts of Children of Men were, the overall film is not a contender here.

    You were obviously trying to make a statement by excluding Peter Jackson. I'd also put him in the 'uneven' bin, but his achievements are undeniable, just man up and admit it.

    Probably Juno should be included in any top of the decade list...

    December 23, 2009 at 6:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • I'm not denying Peter Jackson's achievements, but that doesn't mean the films make a top 25 of a decade list. And certainly not Juno...

      December 23, 2009 at 8:44PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Chris M

    Love your selection of the Dark Knight at #1, but disagree with almost everything else.

    I actually don't really like LOTR that much, I think it's highly overrated (the Two Towers is the only one I've been able to watch straight through for a second time, the first one bogs down in the middle and the third one is a pile of dog poo). That said, it absolutely HAS to be in a Top 25 for the decade list, just like even the most ardent Star Wars haters would have to admit that Star Wars belongs on a "best of 70's list" - Aside from Dark Knight, no films will be remembered more from this decade than the LOTR films. And while I find them tedious, I am still amazed at their technical brilliance almost a decade later.

    Also, how anyone could say The Incredibles is better than Wall-E is just beyond me.

    December 23, 2009 at 10:46PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Josh

    Dark Knight being number one i think is a bit of a joke
    I'm not saying it wasn't an amazing picture, it just wasn't the masterpiece i think you say it is
    However i love your placing of Sexy Beast and Lost in Translation, right on the mark
    As well as The Hours, Jesse James and Crouching Tiger
    Infact, i think all three of those films t
    I think you've included one too many pixar films, they're great films but don't really deserve to be on the list let alone where they are placed (you've put both of them infront of No Country For Old Men...)
    Dreamgirls should deffinately not be on that list, i have no idea why Jennifer Garner won an oscar for her role and there's not much of a story to the film, to me it's just a bunch of montages
    Great music though!
    AND, to top my comments off, here's some movies i think should've made the list:
    Old Boy
    The Matrix
    O Brother, Where Art Thou?
    The Lord of the Rings
    Eyes Wide Shut
    Departures
    Adaptation
    House of Sand and Fog
    I know it's hard to choose, but yeah...my 2 cents

    December 24, 2009 at 10:06AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Petio Tzvetkov

    I forgot The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button, a movie that touched me deeply

    December 25, 2009 at 5:44AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    sonicballer8888

    You dare not put Avatar on the list? THOU SHALL BE DAMMED to eternal suffering in the depths of the fire of doom!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Okay, the story may not have been original, but STORY ISNT THE ONLY THING IN A MOVIE!!!

    THERE ARE:
    Visual Effects
    Cinematography
    Acting
    Script
    Score

    and more. Anyone who has seen Avatar should know that Avatar was great in those sections except for a few bits of dialogue. Avatar is a freakin' masterpiece. For some reason, the Dark Knight just feels like a Michael Bay movie... except darker and um... less epic music.

    December 27, 2009 at 7:00PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Awards Campaign

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web