What superheroes does Disney jump on after acquiring Marvel this week?
TV could be the next big boon for Marvel Characters
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Moviegoers have shown a willingness to be entangled by Spider-Man's web over and over again. Now, as Disney prepares to buy the comic-book powerhouse Marvel, it faces the question of whether fans will also get attached to characters as obscure as Ant-Man and Iron Fist.
The Walt Disney Co. is making a $4.2 billion bet that they will as it nears completion of its acquisition of Marvel Entertainment Inc. this week. The cash-and-stock deal brings those characters and thousands of others to an entertainment empire that already includes Mickey Mouse, Kermit the Frog and Hannah Montana.
Disney's biggest challenge will be to get enough people enthused about second-string superheroes to justify the price — about $1.2 billion, or 40 percent, more than what Marvel's stock was worth when the deal was announced Aug. 31.
The high price means Disney will have to find new ways to earn revenue from Marvel — perhaps by bringing Marvel-licensed toys to more store shelves around the world, and by digging deep into its comic vault for potential new blockbusters.
Although Disney is constrained by the fact that big-name Marvel superheroes such as Spider-Man are already locked up in long-term deals with rival movie studios, Disney has had a history of successfully turning unknown talent such as Miley Cyrus, the actress behind "Hannah Montana," into multibillion-dollar enterprises.
"With Marvel, it's not just about 'Iron Man' and 'Hulk,'" Caris & Co. analyst David Miller said. "It's all about the other 5,000 characters that you and I don't even know about yet."
Disney shares are already being helped, having risen more than 20 percent since the deal was announced, partly on the hope for new character development and better use of Marvel heroes in movies, stores and theme parks.
Marvel shareholders are expected to give final approval to the offer on Thursday, with the closing of the deal to follow immediately.
The deal has already spawned a bout of speculation in the comic book world about who will be the next big Thing.
Possibilities include classics such as Ant-Man, the alter-ego of mad scientist Dr. Henry Pym, and Dr. Strange, the mystical go-to guy whenever there's an extradimensional threat. Both are connected to The Avengers line of characters that Marvel had started developing for the big screen long before Disney made the deal; Iron Man and the Hulk are among the Avengers that Marvel already has tapped.
There are about 5,000 more characters, including obscure ones such as martial arts master Iron Fist from the 1970s and up-and-coming ones such as the Runaways, a street-savvy pack of teenagers that have become a recent Marvel comic-book hit.
Whoever is the next comic book movie star, Marvel has a track record of success: its "Iron Man" movie took in $572 million at box offices worldwide despite the character once being a B-lister in the pantheon of superheroes.
"They picked the right one and they did it the right way," said Gareb Shamus, whose company Wizard Entertainment Group runs several of the Comic-Con fan conventions around the nation. "When you do that you've got a franchise that could last forever."
Through the deal, Marvel gains the ability to quickly reach more markets worldwide. Disney is by far the world's top licenser of its character brands, with $30 billion in retail sales in fiscal 2008, compared with fourth-place Marvel at $5.7 billion, according to License! Global magazine.
"It gives Marvel the opportunity to expand internationally and leverage the Disney retail relationships as well as their licensee relationships," said Tony Lisanti, the magazine's global editorial director.
Marvel Chief Executive Isaac "Ike" Perlmutter, who owns 37 percent of Marvel stock, also secured himself the top job overseeing the Marvel business after the acquisition. That includes decisions on which characters are developed into movie stars.
Disney, which is based in Burbank, Calif., and plans to keep Marvel's operations in New York, hasn't tipped its hand on what lesser-known characters it believes have the potential to leap off the printed page.
And there are some characters Disney says it is happy to let other movie studios keep developing, including Spider-Man at Sony Pictures and the X-Men and Fantastic Four at 20th Century Fox. Marvel earns royalties and a piece of the merchandising sales from those movies, and Disney soon will, too.
Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said the company may initially develop new characters on television rather than in movies. Its boy-focused cable channel, Disney XD, already airs 25 hours of Marvel cartoons every week and recently launched in Japan, as well as in several European and Latin American countries.
Television is where Disney incubated such hits as "Hannah Montana" and "High School Musical." Since their debut on cable TV's Disney Channel, the franchises have spawned movies, concerts and a cascade of related merchandise.
"Instead of making a $200 million movie and kind of betting the farm on one character, you can develop a television pilot, a television series," Iger told analysts this month.
Disney would benefit the most from new characters that Disney and Marvel develop together because the company would own the franchises outright instead of simply receiving licensing fees from the movies that Sony Corp. and News Corp.'s Fox produce on their own. Those deals last until Sony and Fox stop making the movies.
New characters could also be a boon for fans who are tiring of sequels.
Analysts note that when Disney does land a hit, it is quick to spread the success around to its other businesses.
That's why "Hannah Montana" and "High School Musical" have combined to sell billions of dollars in merchandise, and why "Cars" — a product of Disney's purchase of Pixar — is getting its own section at Disney's California Adventure theme park. Conversely, Pirates of the Caribbean was a theme park ride decades before it became a huge movie franchise.
"What Disney does better than anyone else is they leverage content across multiple platforms," Miller said. "When Disney has a hit film property, it uplifts and enhances all the other businesses."
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
News From Our Partners
-
Recap: First you get the sugar, then you get the power: The A.V. Club visits the 2012 Sweets & Snacks Expo
Random Roles: Common Law star Jack McGee on working with everyone from Vanilla Ice to Ron Howard
AVQ&A: Happiest sad songs
-
Box Office Guru Wrapup: The Avengers' Reign Continues
Weekly Ketchup: Rise of the Planet of the Apes Sequel Gets A Writer
Critics Consensus: Battleship Is All Wet
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Friday, May 18, 2012
The Telefile - USA Network Upfront 2012: Characters, Extremely Defined Jawlines Still Welcome
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
-
Adrian Grenier Explores His Latin Heritage
Soyon An: American Idol: What They Wore, 5/9/12 (Top 4)
Mick Jagger, Arcade Fire & More Perform On 'SNL' Finale, Plus Mick's Dig At Mitt
-
Dance Music Vocalist Susana Releasing New Album
Lisa Marie Presley Talks About Finding Self With New Album
Lana Del Rey Releasing New Single Titled "National Anthem"
-
'Avengers' Sinks 'Battleship' To Remain No. 1
'Battleship' And The Worst Toy Commercials Disguised As Movies (PHOTOS)
'Hyde Park On Hudson' Trailer: Bill Murray As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
-
Daniel Radcliffe And Jon Hamm Join British Miniseries
Kanye West To Debut 'Cruel Summer' Short Film At Cannes
Cameron Diaz, Chace Crawford Know 'What To Expect When You're Expecting'
-
Brandi Glanville Claims She Hooked Up With Gerard Butler
Charlie Sheen Talks Ladies – Onscreen & Off
Jonah Hill ‘Overwhelmed’ By ‘Moneyball’ Supporting Actor Nomination
Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupTrekscribbler
December 28, 2009 at 7:14PM EST Reply to CommentOh, yeah. People are demanded an ANT-MAN film. Sheesh.
Drew Melbourne You're thinking about this the wrong way. If you were basing decisions on properties that comics fans were stoked to see, they probably wouldn't have even made Iron Man.
December 29, 2009 at 12:28AM ESTWhat you need to think about are the kinds of movies that can be made from these properties, and Ant-Man is great fodder for a potentially lighter movie with some cool size-changing effects. Especially in the hands of an Edgar Wright, this could be something special.
Of course, as has already been proven, the wrong script and the wrong director can sink even the most awesome characters...
Trekscribbler You may be overestimating the potential of these secondary characters. My point is that no one is clamoring for an ANT-MAN movie, but the article indicates it as a "possibility." Sure, great shape changing effects could be great, but we've already had INNERSPACE and HONEY I SHRUNK THE KIDS, so unless an ANT-MAN feature can bring something new to the table, what's the rush? Also, I'd agree that in the hands of Edgar Wright, it might be a thing of beauty, but what if the only hands at the table belong to Joel Schumacher? Or what if Christopher Nolan wants to make ol' Ants all dark and urban? Again, I think you're pre-supposing that Disney may think beyond the 'merchandisability' of a comics film ... and they've got such a great track record there.
December 29, 2009 at 12:42AM ESTJohn W
December 28, 2009 at 8:09PM EST Reply to CommentThe problem isn't going to be finding characters that are interesting, it's doing them right.
Already we've seen five interesting Marvel titles that have been badly handled: Hulk, Daredevil, Electra, Fantastic Four and Punisher.
What continues to boggle my mind is why there is this need on the part of the producers of these films, to deviate from the comics, instead of following the blueprint that's been laid out for them.
The two that really irk me is FF and Punisher. FF because it is one of Marvel's defining titles. Lee & Kirby at their best. It should have been treated with the same reverence as Spiderman, Superman, and Batman. Instead they fumbled on the 1 yard line.
The second is Punisher because it requires no CG effects to pull off. Just a good story and staying true to the character.
Trekscribbler Major agreement. I mean how do you screw up a character as primal as The Punisher three times in a row? To me it's only a clear indication that the studios aren't really interested in the possible artistic expression of bringing comics characters to the screen as they are with bringing a bankable commodity to the screen. I tend to be hard on films, and I'd always say that I see more comics-to-films failures than I do victories (keep in mind that I've found all of the Spidey flicks boring, so I'm the odd man out in the debate here, I know that going in).
December 29, 2009 at 12:45AM EST