Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: “Gulliver’s Travels” will have you reaching for the Dramamine

Another holiday release falls flat


Big-studio kids movies have become, for the most part, so aggressively shrill and unfunny and loaded with soon-to-be-dated references and cookie-cutter scripted and patronizing and tedious, that “Gulliver’s Travels” hardly registers as an affront to good taste or good humor. Even its mediocrity is mediocre.

Jack Black – the most pasteurized, castrated, and utterly bland version of Jack Black yet presented to a wide audience – stars as Lemuel Gulliver, a slacker who’s spent years in the mailroom of a New York City newspaper because he’s lacked the gumption to try for something better or even to ask travel editor Darcy Silverman (Amanda Peet) out on a date. (Side note: Black and Peet previously starred together in “Saving Silverman,” and if her character name was a conscious homage, it’s worth noting that no movie should make its viewers wish they were watching something else instead. And if the audience would rather be watching something as wretched as “Saving Silverman,” all is lost.)

Armed with some plagiarized articles, Gulliver applies for and gets a full-time travel-writing gig. (Pause while anyone who has worked for a newspaper over the last two decades rolls his or her eyes.) His first assignment takes him to the Bermuda triangle, where his boat gets sucked up into a giant water column.

Gulliver awakes on the beach of Lilliput, whose army of tiny soldiers attempt to stake him down to the ground. The relatively giant Gulliver fights back but is eventually subdued by General Edward (Chris O’Dowd) and thrown into the dungeon alongside Horatio (Jason Segel, looking puffy and bored out of his skull); Gulliver’s fellow prisoner was incarcerated for pitching woo at the princess (Emily Blunt), who’s promised to the general.

When a neighboring kingdom sets Lilliput’s castle on fire, Gulliver puts it out in a manner that you can probably guess but would have expected to be too cheap and tasteless a gag for a film aimed at children. You would be wrong. Now that Gulliver’s a hero, he lies and tells the Lilliputians that he’s the president of the United States, and he restages sequences from “Star Wars,” “Titanic,” and “Avatar” as though they were chapters from his own life. (Viewers of “Gulliver’s Travels” who get bored – and many will – can entertain themselves by guessing what movies would have been referenced had this film not been produced by Fox.)

You can pretty much guess what happens from here – Gulliver is exposed as a phony, the bad guy takes over, the manchild must prove himself, tons of CG gags about tiny people – but you probably didn’t guess that a giant robot would play a key role in the film. Yes, a giant robot. In “Gulliver’s Travels.” Because – like the carriage chase that Robert Zemeckis plopped into last year’s “A Christmas Carol” – these centuries-old classic tales cry out for loud and obnoxious 21st century special effects.

Black has pretty much long since established that he’ll do anything for a buck, but “Gulliver’s Travels” wastes the talents of Segel, Peet (thanks to “Please Give,” she has the honor of being in one of the year’s best films as well as one of the worst), Blunt, and the exceedingly funny British TV star Catherine Tate, who gets Brobdingnagian servings of nothing to do here. Since he’s playing the villain and spared much of what the script (by Joe Stillman and Nicholas Stoller) considers to be comedy, O’Dowd winds up as the film’s MVP by default.

2010 began with the desecration of Lewis Carroll’s “Alice in Wonderland” and it ends with Jack Black (who also executive-produced) blowing his nose into Jonathan Swift’s “Gulliver’s Travels.” The only upside to this movie becoming a hit would be the green-lighting of a movie version of Swift’s “A Modest Proposal,” wherein the cast of the “Baby Geniuses” movies gets eaten. And then we could flambé the studio exec that green-lit this snoozer.

"Gulliver's Travels" opens nationwide on Dec. 25.

Duralde is the author of “Have Yourself a Movie Little Christmas" available on Amazon.com and the DVD Editor of Movieline.  He's also written for MSNBC and the Rotten Tomatoes Show.
 
 

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    LemuelG

    I'm far from wanting to defend a film that insults one of my favorite books (in its entirety one of the sharpest works of satire imaginable) - but Gulliver putting the fire out in that very special way is actually in the original book (although quite probably much less crudely than in this film).

    December 23, 2010 at 6:12AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Gus Actually crude bodily function humor is all throughout Gulliver's Travels. Swift was obsessed with it.

      December 23, 2010 at 11:38AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Gretchen

    The best thing about this movie had nothing to do with watching the movie -- it watching Jeff Probst on "Survivor Nicaragua" trying to sell it as a "reward" to the survivors and the survivors pretending to like it, and seeing an otherwise worthless Survivor Dan sitting out the "reward" challenge in the ginormous chair.

    December 23, 2010 at 11:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Gretchen

    Oops....meant to say "it WAS watching Jeff Probst....."

    December 23, 2010 at 11:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Bananaman

    "the exceedingly funny British TV star Catherine Tate".....that proves you know pretty much nothing about anything.

    December 23, 2010 at 12:30PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Capt. Metropolis Perhaps you are unaware that she had her own comedy show pre-"Doctor Who." Or maybe you're just a tool.

      December 23, 2010 at 11:34PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bananaman or perhaps I know exactly who she is, and therefore know anyone who describes her as exceedingly funny is clearly not right in the head.
      I'm not trying to start anything here, just commenting after reading this review, that, based on that quote alone, my sensibilities differ diametrically with the reviewer.

      December 24, 2010 at 4:15AM EST

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web